close

Just Books Crowdfunder: The Conquest of Violence

Just Books in Belfast are fundraising to publish The Conquest of Violence: Bart de Ligt and the anarchist anti-militarism of the deed. You can support the publication on their CrowdFunder page.

Help get this new book on anarchist anti-militarism edited by Jeroen JJ Van and published by Just Books Publishing into print. Including Bart de Ligt’s Conquest of Violence (first published in English in 1937) along with new translations of previously unpublished texts.

At this critical time in history, as the push to war engulfs us this work seems essential. Bart de Ligt (1883-1938) was a leading Dutch anarcho-syndicalist and anti-militarist, who was imprisoned in his own country for his anti-militaristic activities both during and after the First World War.   

The Conquest of Violence presents a strategy for the transformation of society, linking Mahatma Gandhiโ€™s principled non-violence with the total non-cooperation advocated by anarcho-syndicalists through the general strike. De Ligt was both an admirer and critic of Gandhi.

The quest for non-violent methods of waging conflict and struggling against militarism is even more urgent today. This is a voice which still deserves to be heard.

At @ 500 pages this is the first in a series of titles dealing with anarchist anti-militarism.

ILA Podcast #63: Gearรณid ร“ Faoleรกn: The Provisional IRA in the Republic of Ireland

BERJAYA

Gearรณid ร“ Faoleรกn: The Provisional IRA in the Republic of Ireland Irish Left Archive Podcast

In this episode we talk to Gearรณid ร“ Faoleรกn about his research into support for the Provisional IRA in the Republic of Ireland during the Troubles. Gearรณid is the author of A Broad Church: The Provisional IRA in the Republic of Ireland, 1969โ€“1980 and A Broad Church Vol. 2: The Provisional IRA in the Republic of Ireland, 1980-1989, published by Merrion Press in 2019 and 2023, respectively. He is currently working on a history of traditional music in west Clare with support from a bursary from the Irish Association of Professional Historians.

We discuss the extent of support and sympathy for the IRA in the South and its role in the armed campaign; how public support manifested in training, arms, and the legal system; and the wide, cross-party political spread of IRA sympathy, discrete from the political wing of the Provisional movement.

Both volumes of A Broad Church are available from Merrion Press.


The Irish Left Archive Podcast website is at podcast.leftarchive.ie. You can follow us on the Fediverse (Mastodon, Pixelfed, Peertube etc.) at @ila@leftarchive.ie.

When you’re ‘laid off’

Funny, the very phrase ‘laid off’ is such a light sounding one, but being made redundant or fired or whatever is anything but. I’ve had that experience a few times in my life. Once it was at a time when I had another plan, so it was anything but traumatic. Another time myself and a couple of others were let go on foot of union organising, and there was no plan. That was difficult, not because the job was any good but because it was, well, the source of income and suddenly cut adrift from that and trying to find work, and then trying to find permanent work, was difficult in the extreme. The level of instability was beyond stressful. But this piece on Slate.com was of particular interest because while the article itself is just okay, the comments under it are well worth a read for accounts of people who were in a similar position. Ostensibly the piece is about revenge, but the actual course of action taken by the author doesn’t seem to be particularly exaggerated in that respect. On the other hand, I’m deeply sympathetic to anyone in that position, so if it provided some satisfaction fair dues.

The account of the company is striking. A publishing outfit that was outsourcing. Astoundingly:

…that wasnโ€™t the end. I would have to work there for another month, doing my usual job while my manager trained my replacement in India. After all, these werenโ€™t the sort of layoffs where jobs were cut and reabsorbed by other staff. No, these were the sort of layoffs where your company builds an office overseas for the sole purpose of sending work offshore. This change was called an โ€œefficiencyโ€ in the email we received that afternoon, as if sending a job to another country would somehow make things run more smoothly.

Bad enough the working for a month to train up the replacement, but then:

The following Friday, we had a company-wide meeting with the CEO, who Iโ€™ll call โ€œDaniel.โ€ He implied that we should be excited about the amount of money we were saving, and that we had far surpassed our original goal. His voice was smooth and enthusiastic: โ€œThink about all the customers weโ€™ll be able to help!โ€

Sometimes, Daniel reminded me of a love bomber, only corporate. In meetings, he would go on and on about our company credo, our company values, how he cared about the โ€œemployee experience.โ€

โ€œAs it states in our credo,โ€ Daniel said, invoking one of his favorite words. โ€œWe are accountable to and for each other.โ€

His other favorite word was โ€œfamily,โ€ as in โ€œthis company is a family,โ€ and he continued to use it in the meeting about layoffs. I donโ€™t know how Danielโ€™s family works, but I have never kicked out one of my siblings so I could exchange them for a cheaper model.

No. It’s not an effing family. In the place I was ‘laid off’ the boss once pulled aside a new management hire who had made the mistake of addressing him by his first name at a meeting, saying ‘I’m your boss, not your buddy’. Say what one likes, for all the crap there was a certain honesty in the way the power relationships were made manifest in that.ย 

Anyhow the author got onto Glassdoor, which is some sort of anonymous review site of workplaces, and left an account of the processes involved. Which got likes. And moved on with their life.ย 

But it’s under-reflected, this whole area. Work consumes so much of life, but the dynamics that it brings into play, hiring, being made redundant, are often absent from consideration. And it’s not that infrequent that people experience those.ย 

I didn’t bother with revenge. I got another couple of jobs. The company tried to hire me back on a part time basis when ran into trouble because they couldn’t under labour law just replace me (as might be the case under ‘at will’ in parts of the US as I understand it). They had to wait a year. In a way that was hilarious, I already had hours elsewhere, and I went in a couple of days and then ‘resigned’, which I guess evened out the score a little. But they didn’t care. And why would they? There’s nothing worse than people thinking they’re indispensable to something – a company, any organisation, will move on. There is no loyalty (perhaps in more paternalistic settings there might be, but that’s long gone and have to wonder what the pluses and minuses of that were). More satisfying was the fact they screwed up redundancy payments and they had to provide compensation, and more satisfying again was a year later when they were able to hire a replacement and the General Manger of the group rang me to ask would I come in to get the new person up to speed. No fireworks, just a firm no to that. He knew he was chancing his arm. Perhaps the difference was that by then I was settled into a new position and was more secure.ย 

In truth there is no revenge. The key remains to understand the actual power relationships at work and not be swayed by the froth. And a few comments stand out:

Thereโ€™s value in publishing your experience as a worker, but it canโ€™t be an act of โ€œrevenge.โ€ It has to be an act of labor solidarity. Workers should write and speak about their experiences so that others will know and be able to organize, and to make better informed choices. The writer should not expect any emotional gratification or to see any real effects. The writer should expect only that theyโ€™re putting it out there to help others.

And this:

I don’t expect my employer to care about me. I do expect my employer to understand that the lack of emotional connection is mutual.
ย 
I love my work, but I am indifferent as to the organization that pays me to do it. Mostly I just want it to give me the proper tools and working environment and then stay out of my way.

But the lack of mention of unions whether in the text or comments is notable.

Perhaps this comment comes close to addressing why that is:

How employers have managed to make workers accept their interpretation of fundamentalist capitalism as the only way is what’s insane.
ย 
The company exists only to maximize profits for its investors. Period.
ย 
And you can see the utter blindness this leads to in the article. Making laid-off employees attend meetings where you brag about the company culture. Talking up outsourcing jobs to cheaper labor and how it will help the bottom line, directly to the people whose jobs are being outsourced.
ย 
On an individual level, almost all of us know how deranged this is, and why the most common reaction to all the corporate Orwellian gobbledygook, at least internally, is “STFU you jackasses”. Yet somehow, on a societal level, it’s accepted as a necessary norm.
ย 
As is the lack of unions, the lack of a sense of collective power. I’ve been on the hard end of that, many of us have. But many of us have also seen what can happen when workers work together to improve wages, conditions. It’s difficult, sure, but it’s not impossible.ย 

A higher form of trolling on neutrality

Surely, surely, the Government could do better than this?

The Department of Defence has confirmed that a Pentagon-based US company has been appointed to oversee a redesign of the Defence Forces.

It said the Institute for Security Governance (ISG) was identified as the “most suitable and appropriate” by the Defence Forces to carry out a force design which was recommended by the Commission on the Defence Forces.

In a statement to RTร‰ News, the department said ISG has “significant expertise and experience in force design and development” and has worked with over 80 nations.

Perhaps, for example, it could go and engage with neutral states about how they organised such matters. One doesn’t have to support participation in military alliances to see value in reconsidering our Defence Forces in various contexts, but to do this.ย 

The cynical interpretation, and perhaps the correct one, is that this is a signal to the new and very specific sort of administration in Washington D.C. A further cynical interpretation is that at this point with a comfortable majority of the right of centre and, perhaps, almost echoing developments elsewhere, the Government doesn’t much care about what it does or how it does it – as evidenced by the speaking rights row.

A new political dynamic?

Is this to be the shape of democratic politics in Europe for the next while, ‘centrists’ and so-called ‘centrists’ banding together to fend off far-right parties attempting to enter government?

Five months after the far-right Freedom party (FPร–) finished first in parliamentary elections, Austriaโ€™s three leading centrist parties have reached agreement to form a new government without it.

The centre-right Peopleโ€™s party (ร–VP), the Social Democrats (SPร–) and the liberal Neos, whose first attempt at forming a coalition failed in January, unveiled a 200-page programme aimed mainly at reviving the countryโ€™s ailing economy and cutting its budget deficit.

Christian Stocker, the ร–VP leader and likely next chancellor, said on Thursday a โ€œcommon programmeโ€ had been agreed with the SPร– and liberals, adding that the three parties had been working โ€œaround the clockโ€ to finalise an accord.

The agreement ends months of uncertainty after the FPร–โ€™s historic election victory, when it gained almost 29% of the vote. After the mainstream partiesโ€™ unsuccessful effort, the ร–VP entered talks with the FPร–, which also broke down this month.

But if politics reduces down to just keeping the hard and far right, with coalitions between, at least, nominally quite different parties that too is a trap. Then again the OVP and the FPO did go into negotiations which broke down.ย 

The negotiations foundered, however, over various disagreements including on EU and asylum policy, as well as the FPร–โ€™s insistence that it wanted control of both the interior and finance ministries, a demand the ร–VP rejected out of hand.

One has to applaud the OVP its good sense in not wanting the FPO control of those ministries.ย 

And then there’s another issue:

The coalition deal calls for strict new asylum rules, โ€œreturn centresโ€ to house rejected asylum seekers and the suspension of family reunification. Stocker said: โ€œIf the number of asylum applications increases, we reserve the right to impose a freeze.โ€

The partiesโ€™ programme also promises they will work out a โ€œconstitutional legal ban on headscarvesโ€. It emphasises, however, that Austriaโ€™s new government remains โ€œcommitted to a strong and better European Unionโ€.

If ‘centrists’ merely emulate the hard and far right then at some point it seems likely that voters may go that way anyhow, after all, such approaches merely normalise what hitherto was abnormal.ย 

None of this is news to any of us, but it’s no harm keeping in mind just what the dynamics are and where they may lead.ย 

Speaking of which.


Just looking at Italy, where the hard right leads the coalition, interesting to see that Brothers of Italy has increased its vote by 3% since the 2022 election, up from 26% to 28.8% in the latest poll. So has the Democratic Party, up from 19.1% to 23.5%. M5S conversely is down 15.4% to 11.4%. The Lega is static on 8.8%, while Forza Italia is up 1% to 9.1%. So the current government remains ahead of its rivals.

The optimistic view is that in Italy the Brothers of Italy have themselves been deradicalised to some degree by government. And certainly the government there has received a number of rebuffs on matters close to its heart. But then one wonders what of a second term in office and how would that function, say if its partners lost support and it gained it and they felt that voters legitimised a much harder approach?

An end to paramilitarism?

This seems optimistic:

The Irish and British governments are to appoint an independent expert to assess the merits of engaging directly with paramilitary groups still operating in Northern Ireland as part of a process to encourage them to cease to exist.

More than 26 years after the signing of the Good Friday Agreement a report published today makes clear that paramilitaries continue to operate and wield influence in many areas.

The report by the Independent Reporting Commission said coercive control and threats linked to paramilitary groups “persist and remain a real concern”.

And the question comes to mind reading the following, what is in this for paramilitary groups?

[Northern Ireland Secretary of State Hilary Benn.] Mr Benn said he wanted to make clear that the appointment was not the start of a formal process of engagement.

“This scoping exercise is also not a part of, or alternative to, the existing law enforcement and criminal justice measures,” he added.

“I also want to be clear that no financial offer will be made to paramilitary groups or to individuals involved in them in exchange for an end to violence and ongoing harms.”

No disagreement there. The list is extensive:

The IRC report said the activities of paramilitaries include intimidation, financial extortion, sexual exploitation, creating communities where people are afraid to speak out, and stifling alternative voices and leadership.

It said some use membership of paramilitary organisations for overt criminality like drug dealing, and that there is an increasing interaction with organised crime groups.

The attempted murder of a man in west Belfast at the weekend illustrated the continuing threat posed by paramilitaries.

Apparently, according to the Belfast Telegraph podcast this very week, there’s a feud within ONH, where there are two factions vying for the name – in part according to the podcast because one group is attempting to join the New IRA. The numbers are small, according to the Belfast Telegraph (NIRA has perhaps 250 members, ONH would be smaller by quite some margin) but there it is. That’s all it takes. How this aids the cause of Ireland is a different question.

It is thought he was targeted as part of a feud.

A number of dissident republican paramilitary groups, including the New IRA, remain active and continue to target police officers in Northern Ireland.

Members of another, the Irish National Liberation Army, are heavily involved in a range of criminal activity including drug dealing.

The main loyalist groups, the UVF and UDA, continue to recruit and have thousands of members across Northern Ireland.

Many of their members are also involved in a range of criminality including drugs.

And note the absence of PIRA there, the one group which moved if not quite effortlessly to politics, certainly with sufficient efficiency to move entirely away from paramilitarism.

None of this is a bad idea. But difficult to see just why any group would call it a day when either goals or other motivations are not met, or even aren’t required other than continued organisational existence.ย 

‘Stop behaving like a child, Taoiseach’

This has to hurt.

The Taoiseach has been told to โ€œstop behaving like a childโ€ by the Ceann Comhairle, following a series of interruptions in the Dรกil.

Proceedings in the chamber on Wednesday afternoon were marked with a series of interjections from both Government and Opposition benches. Some of the interruptions related to a row on speaking rights which has hung over the business of the Dรกil since the formation of the Fianna Fรกil and Fine Gael Government, supported by independent TDs.

During questions on policy and legislation, Labour TD Alan Kelly and Taoiseach Micheรกl Martin were engaged in a back-and-forth exchange on vetting applicants to the Garda College, despite the Ceann Comhairle indicating it was Social Democrats TD Sinead Gibneyโ€™s time to speak.

Ceann Comhairle Verona Murphy told Mr Kelly to respect Ms Gibneyโ€™s time and as Mr Martin continued to speak, she added: โ€œTaoiseach, please stop behaving like a child.โ€

There were numerous objections to the comment from the Government benches, as the Taoiseach insisted he had not been interrupting. Ms Murphy said: โ€œWhat we seem to have this morning is a playground, so Iโ€™d ask everybody to conform and have respect for the members whose time youโ€™re taking up.โ€

Cillian Sherlock, PA

But it’s funny. The Business Post in its coverage, as distinct from its analysis from commentators, of the first few weeks of the Government has pointed to some basic realities, aired on this site by many of us from the off:

Like a man traduced M. Martin pulled the condemnation card against the opposition in the Dรกil last week after daring to dream up ways of ramping up housing supply…

The taoiseach may rightly point out that the country needs close to โ‚ฌ20 billion in private investment to have anychance of reaching 50,000 new homes a year. But with no clear plan from the government benches about how to get there the new coalition ends it first month in a state of anxiety and FF with a drop in support.

Another point made in the BP by Richard Colwell was that there was no real honeymoon period for the government but given it was largely the same as the previous one why would there be one?

But all this testiness. All this complaining. All this palaver in the Dรกil. Presumably someone in FF thinks this works – but for who?