Not one of Vaccarini’s most successful works, read The Family aloud to me after we’d walked around the vast interior of the cathedral of Catania. We’d walked around the interior and stopped to look at the remnants of classical pillars, and learnt later that they were once part of the Achillean Baths, built between the 3rd and 5th centuries CE. The first cathedral on the site was completed in 1093, built at the direction of Roger the Conqueror (why should that title belong only to the Norman conqueror of England?) by destroying the Roman structure. This was almost brought down by an earhtquake within a century, further weakened by a fire, and eventually levelled by the Sicilian earthquake of 1693, leaving a place for Vaccarini to come and underperform, as we are now told.


I’m not sure I entirely subscribed to this theory. I’d been pretty impressed by the doors. The press of crowds was so much that if I moved back to get the whole door, no one noticed me trying to take a photo. My only chance was to come close, and for The Family to strategically block the entrance for the microseconds it took me to fumble with the phone. Sorry, you’ll just have to imagine the rest of the door, or buy a ticket to Sicily.
The floor was also covered in nice mosaics. I’m sure you’ve seen some which are far superior, but they belong to other cultures. For the 18th century in Europe, this elaborate a geometry was the very cutting edge of what artists knew. Of course, the fact that the stone is not polychrome marble could be one reason why some art historians turn their noses up at it.




I liked also the furniture: the baptismal font, the frog lion (hadn’t Sicilians seen lions? Africa is so close!) tethered to something that looked like an ark, the lovely church organ (I would have loved to hear it), and the overwhelmingly baroque pulpit. All these things were richly decorated and beautiful to look at. Of course, the effect of Baroque is much more overwhelming in a small church. The cavernous height of this structure left it all seeming too small.
No, The Family clarified, reading further. It is the facade that is considered disappointing. That may be. I realized that I must have agreed with this assessment, because I had no photo of the facade. My attention was on this statue outside the entrance doors. It was probably of Moses. The sun had moved around to highlight his hand, so beautifully carved. But even more impressive was the beard in stone. It looked like cotton wool. This was not a minor work by any means, but I haven’t found who the sculptor is.



















