close
Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘subsidies’

December 11, 20025
By Data Centers AI ChatGPT with facts provided by Kimberly Mann

 

Northern Indiana is experiencing a utility crisis fueled by rising electricity costs, inaccessible decision-making, and a pipeline of policy decisions that elevate corporate and utility interests above public welfare. A close review of regulatory filings, legislative texts, grid operator classifications, and utility statements reveals a pattern: NIPSCO and its parent company, NiSource, have positioned themselves at the center of an incentive-driven system that profits while Hoosiers pay more.

Utilities Paid to Generate—and NOT Generate—Electricity

 

NIPSCO receives compensation both for producing electricity and for not producing it under certain market conditions (PJM and MidContinent Independent System Operator (MISO) market rules, demand response programs). These financial structures allow utilities to profit regardless of customer relief or grid stability.

The same utility actively markets the region to heavy energy users—particularly data centers and other large loads—offering substantial rate reductions through Economic Development Riders (EDRs). Source: NIPSCO Economic Development Rider description quoted in GreatNews.Life (Admave, C., Great News Life, n.d.). https://greatnews.life/article/nipsco-helps-region-develop-with-reliable-energy-job-creation-and-money-saving-opportunities/

At the same time, NIPSCO can sell excess electricity—produced with customer-funded infrastructure—to foreign markets for higher profit. Source: NIPSCO public claims on “excess power sales” (NIPSCO.com).

Electricity as a Life-Sustaining Commodity in Indiana

 

Northern Indiana’s winter climate makes electricity and gas critical to survival. Many residents choose between utilities and food on a monthly basis (Source: Indiana Community Action Poverty Data, 2023)

Despite this, utilities continue raising rates, citing increasing industrial loads—loads they themselves invited.

 

1.    Closed-Door Development Networks Influence Land Use and Energy Demand

NIPSCO sits on local and regional economic development boards that help determine land use, industrial siting, and incentive allocation. These boards often conduct negotiations behind closed doors, outside public oversight.

A major structural shift occurred when a federal judge ruled the Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC) was not a public agency but a private corporation that is funded with hardworking citizen’s tax dollars ranging in the billions of dollars. Source: Federal District Court ruling, widely reported (2024).

This means billions in taxpayer-funded incentives are administered by a private entity acting without public transparency.

 

2.    Industrial Energy Guzzlers Subsidized by Taxpayers

 

Large commercial operations are placed on Indiana farmland with monetary support from:

 

  1. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts
  2. State and federal subsidies
  3. Local tax abatements
  4. Economic development incentive packages
  5. Utility-backed discount programs (EDRs)

These incentives shift costs downward onto residential customers.

Meanwhile, utilities use the arrival of energy-intensive facilities to justify new generation construction—costs that also fall on ratepayers.

 

3.    Renewable Energy Projects Classified as Unreliable by Grid Operators

 

MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator), the grid operator for Northern Indiana, designated solar, wind, and battery storage as “unreliable/intermittent” resources on the 2024 reliability curve. Source: MISO Reliability-Based Demand Curve (RBDC) briefings, 2024–2025; MISO Resource Adequacy Subcommittee (RASC) update 7/10/2024.

Because of this classification, these renewable projects contribute little to the capacity obligation that determines customer rates—even though they receive enormous subsidies.

Impact: They raise, not lower, long-term cost obligations.

 

4.    House Bill 1007: Guaranteed Utility Profits and Nuclear Development Subsidies

 

Indiana House Bill 1007 (May 2025), authored by Rep. Ed Soliday, allows utilities to:

 

  1. Recover 80% of small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) development costs upfront
  2. Recover the remaining 20% even if the reactor is never completed
  3. Charge residential customers for new power plants while also receiving economic development subsidies
  4. Collect ongoing operational costs if the IURC blocks retirement of any generation resource

Sources: Indiana House Bill 1007, 2025 session (legislative text) Public reporting on SMR project failures nationwide (DOE, NRC status updates)

No Small Modular nuclear Reactor facility in the U.S. has been completed.

 

NIPSCO spent $141,100 on lobbying legislation in topics Energy, Environment, Licensure, Taxation, Utilities in 2024. Source: Indiana Lobby Registration Commission (ILRC) annual filings. Rep. Soliday represents the area where NIPSCO is headquartered (Merrillville) and serves on the Committee on Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications.  All 5 of the 5 bills authored by Rep. Ed Soliday involved Energy generation, carbon sequestration, Quantum research (data centers)  tax incentives, Expedited approval of electric transmission and generation projects.  Others Co Sponsored and Sponsored included but not limited to  Water, Wastewater, IURC matters, Nuclear reactor development costs, energy production zones, water utilities, and construction of data centers. Source: https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2025/legislators/legislator_edmond_soliday_864

 

5.    Capacity Cost Explosion: $30 → $666.50

 

MISO’s first-ever application of the Reliability-Based Demand Curve (RBDC) that qualifies Solar/Wind as unreliable triggered a record capacity price spike:

2024: $30/MW/day

2025: $666.50/MW/day

Source:MISO 2025/2026 Planning Resource Auction results (MISO.org). MISO RASC Status Update – 7/10/2024.

This represents a 2,122% increase, the highest in regional history.

Despite billions in renewable investments, capacity costs still rose because MISO classified renewables as unreliable.

 

6.    NIPSCO’s Internal Economic Development Network

 

NIPSCO divides Northern Indiana into mapped territories, each managed by an in-house economic development representative. These NIPSCO employees sit on the following boards among other local Economic Development boards listed at the bottom of this report:

 

  1. Indiana Economic Development Corporation
  2. Northwest Indiana Forum
  3. Michiana Regional Economic Development Corporation
  4. Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership
  5. North Central Economic Development Partnership

Source: NIPSCO Economic Development webpage https://www.nipsco.com/partner-with-us/economic-development

Their mission: recruit large commercial energy consumers into NIPSCO’s territory.

 

7.    Renewable Projects Owned or Contracted by NIPSCO

 

NIPSCO’s renewable portfolio includes:

  1. Dunns Bridge I
  2. Dunns Bridge II
  3. Cavalry Solar Energy Center
  4. Indiana Crossroads
  5. Fairbanks Solar
  6. Crossroads II Wind
  7. Green River Solar- upcoming
  8. Gibson Solar Gibson County- upcoming
  9. Fairbanks Solar Sullivan County- upcoming
  10. Appleseed Solar Cass County-upcoming

Source: NIPSCO Generation Transition portfolio.

These projects require heavy subsidies but do not reduce capacity costs under MISO’s rules.

NIPSCO claims customers received $60 million in Renewable Energy Credit (REC) returns since 2021.Source: NIPSCO public statements (2024–2025).Yet residential electric and gas bills rose about 30% in 2025 when including the loophole titled: Delivery charge.  Just a $28 use of gas charges resulted in a $75 delivery fee plus a kwh raise.

8.    Financial Markets Praise the Profit Model

While Hoosiers struggle with rate hikes, financial analysts celebrate NiSource’s rising margins: Source: Yahoo Finance, “A Closer Look at NiSource’s Valuation” https://finance.yahoo.com/news/closer-look-nisource-ni-valuation-120726409.html

Key praise includes:

­+“Robust infrastructure upgrades”
+“Expanding margins”
+“Digital efficiencies”
+“Constructive regulatory relationships”
+“Growth supported by economic development”

These assessments confirm what the data shows: the system is working extremely well for utilities and investors—and failing residents.

 

Conclusion: A System Designed Against Consumers

This investigation shows a circular, self-reinforcing structure:

  1. Utilities recruit large industrial energy users.
  2. Industries receive taxpayer-funded incentives and discounted electricity.
  3. Utilities claim new generation must be built to serve them.
  4. Utilites lobby Representatives to force IURC to raise rates and payments for uncompleted/forced-open projects
  5. Utilities build unreliable renewable facilities that raise capacity costs.
  6. Utilities cite capacity shortfalls to raise residential rates.
  7. Excess reliable power is sold to foreign markets for profit.

Financial markets reward utilities for “margin expansion.”

Meanwhile, Indiana families—facing record costs and limited oversight—are left to shoulder the burden.

Unless regulatory conditions change and public transparency improves, Indiana’s energy landscape will continue prioritizing private profit over public necessity.

 

Short List of NIPSCO employees on the boards of Economic Development programs in Indiana:

 

**The Association of Indiana Counties (AIC)– Board of Directors-Cindy Admave NIPSCO. AIC’s purposes and goals are to seek the betterment of county government through: representation of counties at the Indiana General Assembly; research and dissemination of information; communications through publications and seminars; professional training and educational programs; liaison between counties, state and federal agencies; and technical and managerial assistance.  While there are a number of agencies and groups offering assistance to county government, AIC is the only entity that represents the legislative needs of Indiana counties.” https://web.indianacounties.org/Associate/NIPSCO-206

 

**Indiana Economic Development Association: NIPSCO Corporate member- Cindy Admave https://ieda.org/Sys/PublicProfile/41903983

**Portage Economic Development Corp Board of Directors NIPSCO Cindy Admave Board Secretary https://www.portagein.org/staff

**Starke County Economic Development Foundation – SCEDF Sponsors: Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) Cindy Admave, Economic Development Department. 

**NWI Forum : introduces 2025 board members Rick Calinski, NIPSCO director of public affairs and economic development and Bert Cook https://nwindianabusiness.com/community/business-news/nwi-forum-introduces-2025-board-members/72729/ NWI forum is comprised of local economic development commission reps and other large businesses

**Unity Foundation board of directors: Katie Eaton is the Public Affairs & Economic Development Manager at NIPSCO…Eaton most recently served as the President of the Michigan City Chamber of Commerce.

*”LaPorte Economic Advancement Partnership Board of directors: Cindy Admave,  Bert Cook, Mayor Thomas Dermody, Michael Riehle, Assessor Mike Schultz

** Urban Enterprise Association of LaPorte (UEA) Board of Directors : Cindy Admave NIPSCO Economic Development Manager, Bert Cook, Mayor Thomas Dermody, Michael Riehle, Assessor Mike Schultz

**Greater LaPorte Economic Development BOARD OF DIRECTORS: NIPSCO Cindy Admave, Mayor Thomas Dermody, Michael Riehle, Assessor Mike Schultz

**Valparaiso Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors :. Katie Eaton is the Public Affairs & Economic Development Manager at NIPSCO.

**South Bend Regional Chamber of Commerce: South Bend Regional Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors :

**Lake County IN Economic Alliance Board of Directors: Alexius Barber NIPSCO

**Questa Education Foundation Board of Directors : Dana Berkes is Manager of Public Affairs for NIPSCO, overseeing public affairs, economic development, and community relations in 11 Northeast Indiana counties. She serves as Vice President of the Purdue Fort Wayne Foundation board and holds leadership roles with Greater Fort Wayne, Inc., Junior Achievement, and others. https://www.questafoundation.org/news/2025/8/19/questa-welcomes-three-new-board-members

 

** Michigan City Economic Development Corp : Board of Directors :  Robert J. Schaefer’s involvement in economic development began during his time working At NIPSCO. He was assigned by NIPSCO to work with economic development agencies Throughout the region to assist them in their efforts to attract and retain businesses. Each of These agencies felt that NIPSCO’s Presence at the table was valuable and Necessary for them to be successful.  When Mayor Sheila Brillson took office, Among her highest priorities was job Creation and economic development. She Wanted Michigan City to be in the forefront In this arena. In order to realize her vision, She put together a small group of experts To assist and advise her. One of those Experts was Bob.  Bob called upon his economic Development experience with NIPSCO. He Knew what attributes an organization Needed to make economic development Efforts effective. Based largely on Bob’s advice, an existing non-profit organization Was repurposed to become MCEDC with a Board of directors consisting of members Appointed by the Mayor and the Chamber Of Commerce. Bob’s involvement did not end with the formation of MCEDC https://edcmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Bob-Schaefer-Bio.pdf

 

** Northwest Indiana Forum : Northern Indiana Public Service Company, LLC (NIPSCO) welcomes Spencer Summers to the role of Economic Development Manager. In this role, Summers will position Northwest Indiana’s strategic assets to decision-makers nationwide while cultivating relationships with site selectors, investors and industry leaders to advance sustainable economic growth, enhance regional competitiveness and expand business opportunities throughout the area….Before joining NIPSCO, Summers served as the Economic Development Director at the Northwest Indiana Forum and as Facility and League Director at The Courts of Northwest Indiana in Valparaiso. He obtained a Master of Business Administration with a concentration in Information Systems from Purdue University Northwest in 2023, following a double major in Business Management and Human Resources from PNW in 2022 https://greatnews.life/article/nipsco-welcomes-spencer-summers-as-new-economic-development-manager/

 

Other NIPSCO Affiliations/Information Concerning Economic Development organizations in Northwest Indiana:

 

**Indiana University Northwest launches inaugural Economic Development Academy. Regional economic development professionals will serve as program leaders, imparting their expertise and experience with program participants. Those leaders include:

 

  • Anthony Sindone and Micah Pollak, IU Northwest, economists specializing in regional economic development
  • Rick Calinski, NIPSCO, Director of Public Affairs and Economic Development
  • Heather Ennis, Northwest Indiana Forum, President & CEO
  • Seth Spencer, Sera Group, CEO

 

***Dec 3, 2025:Donald Babcock said he was officially “retired” for about four months after a 43-year stint at NIPSCO. He now works for PNW as director of economic development and community relations. https://nwindianabusiness.com/article/next-acts-2025-12/

**Gov. Mike Braun hired Washington-based FTI Consulting Inc. to conduct a forensic audit of the Indiana Economic Development Corp. after Indiana Legislative Insight reported allegations of self-dealing among the agency and its affiliates….The big picture: The audit reported no criminal findings but dozens of instances of “gaps in governance and inadequate policies and procedures.” Forty-six donors, including Rolls-Royce, NIPSCO, AES and Pure Development, which is heavily involved in the IEDC-led LEAP development in Boone County, received either payments or tax credits from the IEDC. https://www.axios.com/local/indianapolis/2025/10/06/what-to-know-about-the-iedc-investigation

 

BERJAYA

 

 

Read Full Post »

© The Rooster Crows March 12 2023

While families struggle with keeping food on the table and maintaining their 11 year old vehicle, our President’s plan is to give more and more of our hard earned tax dollars to foreigners and huge corporations through regulation and legislation.

According to Notebook, “representatives of VW and other potential EV battery makers met with European Commission officials last week in Brussels, and laid out their argumentation why they would be putting their Europe-based projects on hold in favor of the US. VW, in particular, calculated that it will receive up to US$10 billion from the US government over the IRA’s 10-year subsidy span.” The Financial Times and Marketwatch also reporting the $10 Billion subsidy.

The article goes on to say “The incentives include US$0.35/kWh of produced battery capacity, as well as a similar assembly subsidy. Analysts recently calculated that Tesla will be getting up to $3.5 billion annually… “

Unfortunately, this means an increase of Chinese imports for materials and further degradation of the people in Africa who have been reported to mine cobalt for EV batteries with their hands. China struck a $6. 5 Billion deal with the African government for mining rights. These deals between Africa and the Chinese were reportedly initiated by the investment firm of Hunter Biden.

Spending billions of tax dollars on new technology while USA citizens are struggling to meet basics needs and our national deficit grows is irresponsible. “Let them eat cake! “

BERJAYA

Read Full Post »

© The Rooster Crows March 11 2023

Billions handed out to foreign EV companies while Americans Suffer. This time a German company planting its feet in South Carolina.


Scout Motors is a subsidiary of the German multinational automotive manufacturer headquartered in Wolfsburg, Lower Saxony, Germany who had a net income of $15.4 Billion in 2021. The brand Scout will be produced in South Carolina at the cost of all citizens but especially those living in the State and County giving Scout a $1.3 Billion package plus added benefits.


In order to attract a foreign owned $2 billion electric vehicle plant to Blythewood, South Carolina agreed spend $1.3 billion. The Scout Motors also will be given $400 million for site construction as a part of the $1.3 billion package. The deal even includes $16 Million in property acquisition (eminent domain) to connect to the railroad.


The state incentives come on top of:

  1. property tax break and other incentives offered by Richland County. (The company’s property would be assessed at a tax rate of 4%. Per the state Department of Revenue, manufacturing property in South Carolina is typically assessed at rates up to 10.5%. )
  2. The county incentives also include stipends for employees’ child care,
  3. The company also will be able get a further 50% tax break through making investments in infrastructure, a setup known as an infrastructure tax credit.
  4. Receive job development credits, which are awarded for the amount of investment the company will carry out and number of jobs it creates.

During the Obama administration, federal subsidies were being launched to promote electric vehicle expansion. Today, grant and loan programs are in place to promote manufacturing from state and federal programs to expand the availability of charging stations. Individuals can also get a $7,500 tax credit for purchasing a new electric vehicle or a $4,000 credit for a used one with more than $12, 000 credit for EVs made with Union workers.

Federal subsidies for electric vehicles increased to more than $750 Million in 2014. The Obama administration alone pledged $2.4 billion dollars in grants to support the manufacturing and development of electric cars and batteries. In 2021, government approved about US$2 billion in incentives. Michigan passed a US$1.5 billion bill in December 2021 that expanded state incentives, including for EV production.


Since 2002 the EV pioneer Tesla has received the most subsidies at US$2.5 billion. As of Feb 2022:

  1. Ford was next highest at US$1.5 billion, followed by
  2. GM at $1.1 billion.
  3. Fourth on the list is the start-up electric truck company Rivian, which is now set to received more than US$400 million from Georgia to build a new plant in the southern state…. As of Feb 2022.

As the top business owners such as Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Ken Griffin warn of a coming recession in 2023 and layoffs become noticable by Tesla, General Motors, Walmart, and Goldman Sachs, our government Spends our money on the luxury ride of the rich.

BERJAYA

Read Full Post »

August 3 2022. By Kimberly Mann

Planting corn on farmland has been a farmer’s money crop for many years. Only in recent times have we begun to fight for the use of corn and farmland in energy production instead of food production, one of the three basic necessities of human life.

“It takes approximately 8 acres of land per megawatt of installed solar capacity and an average of 106 acres per megawatt of wind energy.” Congressman Tom Tiffany Farmers are being enticed with rental payments for solar nearing 5X that of crop production. We have not found any restrictions that prevent farmland owners from claiming conservation subsidies and rental payments from solar farm owners leasing the same land.

Taxpayers spent $9 Billion in corn subsidies in 2020 which included “conservation”: forgoing planting corn for environmental purposes and biomass: corn fuel which is another environmental program. Solar federal subsidies (taxpayer dollars) totaled more than $6 million in 2020 not including loans, state subsidies, local subsidies, and rebates. Economic Development dollars are also at work especially in the large commercial solar farms like the new 13,000 acre solar farm in Northwest Indiana. In December 2020, Congress passed an extension of the ITC, which provides a 26% tax credit for systems installed in 2020-2022, and 22% for systems installed in 2023.

“In the real world, compared to their contribution, wind and solar get 25 times the subsidies that nuclear gets and 50 times the subsidies that fossil fuels get.” according to Jeff Wallther. Solar only contributes 3% of USA Energy. Comparing land use of crop vs solar panels, most conservatives learn toward food production while liberals believe “renewable energy” panels are more important regardless of food shortages and high prices.

Using farmland for more “global warming ” projects at a time when global food supplies are tight does not make economical common sense. Corn exports have exceeded previous record highs in the past couple of years. Corn prices in the USA have climbed due to China paying high prices for corn imports from USA. China owns 80% of Solar panel production and has hoarded over 69% of the world’s corn. Corn prices also increase due to conservation, solar farming, and Biomass production.

Between 2010 and 2015, we subsidized wind and solar to the tune $39 Billion per year and extra Congressional appropriations such as $59 Billion in 2015 not including state and local subsidies to quiet the scream of climate alarmist who insist, without proof, that Solar is a better energy source even though it is produced by oil, causes significant wildlife habitat disturbances, toxic waste produced at end of cycle, mass of black panels trapping heat, alteration of earth sun exposure and moisture, acute runoff, migratory bird loss effect, and depends upon Chinese Rare Earth Metals to be manufactured.

Solar is only “cheap” while taxpayer dollars subsidizes the extravagant cost. When subsidies are removed, Solar power becomes a mountain too high to climb. Those who are taking advantage of all the rebates, tax credits, state refunds for solar installation only worsen the poverty problem in the USA in a moral superiority role of environmental Protection forcing others to pay for their energy phobias.

BERJAYA

Read Full Post »

The wonderful idea behind facts is that they can be corrected if information becomes available which is important in the highly “propagandized”, political news we are subjected to daily.

For instances, the $440 Billion in oil subsidies that are being used as a weapon against US oil companies in this Tweet. A subsidy is “a sum of money granted by the government or a public body to assist an industry or business so that the price of a commodity or service may remain low or competitive:”

BERJAYA

The issue with this statement is that the $440 Billion in subsidies did not go to US oil companies according to International Energy Agency IEA.org. The $440 Billion is a total of subsidies by many different countries to their own country. (See chart) The information appears to have been extrapolated from the iea.org webpage.

BERJAYA
IEA.org

An interesting point in the chart, the green areas represent subsidies for electricity.

The approximate subsidies for oil companies in 2015-16 was $10.5 Billion which includes tax deductions for certain intangible drilling, regulation relief subsidies, and relief for shipping in US waters. In relation to other expenditures, we just appropriated $13 Billion for a war in another country.

Read Full Post »

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started