Some of the spelling may be off. A petition to the Chancery Court of England, from the late 1400s:
To the right reverend fadre in god and my goode and gracious lorde the Bysshop of Lincoln and chancellor of England
Mekely besecheth youre goode and gracious lordeship youre poro and contynuell Oratrice Elizabeth Broun wyf onto John Broun now being beyond the see with the Duc of Burgoyne that where oon Thomas Brighton of London ffuller surmysyng certoyn money to be due to hym by the said John diverse tymes sythen the departyng of the said John oute of England hath taken pleyntes of dette agenste your said Oratrice in London and hath had her arrested into the countey and in somuche as she att that tyme was and yette is covert baron [illegible] the said Thomas in his pleyntes and now of late the said Thomas intendyng furthermore to trouble and vexe her hath take a new pleynte of dette of xxxiiii S and iiii d agenst the said John and your said Oratrice as soole marchante where in trouth your said Oratrice was never soole marchante and never bought ne sold with the same Thomas nor knoweth any suche money due to hym by her said husbond and now of late hath caused a queste to be summoned upon the same and thereby intending to [???] your said Oratrice in the said some of xxxiiii S and iiii d with the costes and damagez whiche is like to be to the grete hurte and utterly undoyng of your said Oratrice and also agenst all reason and goode constence in lesse than your goode and gracious lordeships to her beschsed in this behalf wherefore please it your goode and gracious lordeship to the [illegible] matur afore your said lordship unto the kyngs chancery and there to doo as consciuonce will require in the behalf and this atte the reverence of god and in the way of charitee

no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 03:55 (UTC)She's just a smol bean! She never heard of this ffuller until he started maykynge pleynts!
no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 13:48 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 04:25 (UTC)She's never seen him before in her life!
no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 04:27 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 04:31 (UTC)Shucks!
no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 05:31 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 13:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 08:53 (UTC)> intendying furthermore to trouble and vexe her
> hath caused a queste!! to be summoned!!!
> intending to [???] your said Oratrice
> with the costes and damagez whiche is like to be to the grete hurte and utterly undoying of your said Oratrice
she's innocent your honour, I believe it with my hwoole harte
no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 13:47 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 19:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 19:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 20:23 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 June 2026 21:41 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 June 2026 05:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 June 2026 09:32 (UTC)Glad the historical research is going well! It is fun coming across this kind of thing.
no subject
Date: 20 June 2026 15:36 (UTC)At least it was in English. The royal and eclisiastical counts were still in Latin.
no subject
Date: 20 June 2026 18:02 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 June 2026 20:06 (UTC)It looks like these: http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/ChP/C1no64/C1no64%20pt%201/index3.htm
Though for some reason I couldn't find this actual one there.
no subject
Date: 21 June 2026 09:55 (UTC)no subject
Date: 21 June 2026 14:37 (UTC)The professor, who has a PhD in this shit, was like, "If you seriously look at it for half an hour, it'll start making sense, and you should be able to read it." that was true for ONE person in a class of thirty! I spent DAYS trying to read this.