June 22, 2026 New Continuing the Fight for Juneteenth
Thank you to my local paper, the Lexington News-Gazette, for inviting me to write a monthly guest column this summer. My first commentary appeared last Wednesday and focused on Juneteenth. My small town hosted another wonderful celebration on Friday. I can’t wait for next year’s — and what I hope is a massively better political landscape. More on that below:
June 19 is Juneteenth National Independence Day, America’s federal holiday commemorating the end of slavery. Though the Emancipation Proclamation declared that end on the first day of 1863, and Civil War combat halted with Lee’s surrender on April 9, 1865, the practice of slavery continued in the furthest corners of the former Confederacy until the Union arrived in Galveston, Texas on June 19, 1865.
Major General Gordon Granger, with the assistance of 2,000 soldiers, delivered the belated news: “The people of Texas are informed that, in accordance with a proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free. This involves an absolute equality of personal rights and rights of property between former masters and slaves, and the connection heretofore existing between them becomes that between employer and hired labor.”
With the South’s remaining 250,000 enslaved people now actually free, June nineteenth – truncated “Juneteenth”—celebrates our country’s second Independence Day. Rockbridge again joined the national event with the 6th annual Lex Rock BV Juneteenth Celebration in Richardson Park from 6:00 to 9:00 Friday evening. Live music, food vendors, car shows, and kids activities were reason enough to attend, but this year there was an even greater reason.
Ending slavery did not end racism, and freedom did not bring equality. After passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868 and the 15th in 1870, our nation’s moral arc toward justice halted for nearly a century. The American apartheid of Jim Crow segregation and white supremacist vigilantism did not weaken until the Civil Right Movement. When the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the fifth of seven civil rights acts passed that decade, was signed into law during the summer of Juneteenth’s 100th anniversary, America had a powerful reason to celebrate.
Now on the 161st anniversary, America has reason to stand up and renew its fight.
The Supreme Court’s conservative majority reversed the Voting Rights Act with their April decision allowing former confederate states to redraw maps designed to weaken the representation of minority voters. That decision was possible only because two of Donald Trump’s three appointed justices were improperly taken from presidents Obama and Biden, creating a Court out-of-sync with our inherently moderate nation.
Trump also reversed the Civil Rights Act of 1957, which protected the voting rights of Black Americans by creating the Civil Rights Division to prosecute voter discrimination. Six decades later, Trump removed a dozen of the Division’s senior attorneys, including those managing offices investigating police abuse, halting all current probes. He also removed managers of the voting rights section and dismissed all active cases. According to its government website, Trump’s Civil Rights Division is focused on anti-abortion centers, military personnel, and people “sterilized by transgender hormone/therapy” – none of which are civil rights categories.
The Trump administration is systematically dismantling the Civil Rights Movement. Beginning the winter of his second term:
- The IRS eliminated its civil rights office.
- The Social Security department eliminated its Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity and laid off all of its Civil Rights employees.
- The Department of Education eliminated nearly half of its civil rights offices.
- Homeland Security conducted wide-scale layoffs at its Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
- The Department of Labor eliminated its Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.
- The Department of Justice halted all new civil rights investigations and froze all agreements with local governments addressing biased police policies.
Instead of honoring Civil Rights leader Jesse Jackson, the White House ordered flags to half-staff for Charlie Kirk, a commentator who said that Martin Luther King, Jr. was “awful” and “not a good person” and that “we made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”
Kirk articulated the Trump administration’s anti-Black prejudice. Addressing a list of prominent Black women, including Supreme Court Justice Jackson, he said, “You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.” Speaking generally of Black people, Kirk said, “If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.” He extended his racist assumptions even to low-paying jobs: “If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?”
Trump’s Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who never earned a rank above Major in the U.S. Army, recently overruled a board of Navy admirals and blocked two Black men and three white women from becoming one-star admirals. In March, Hegseth overruled the Army Secretary and blocked the promotion of two Black men and two white women to one-star generals. He told the Pentagon it had become “less capable” because it had “promoted too many for the wrong reasons” and he would now promote “the right people.”
Trump’s unsupported claim that policies that support diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) do not also support merit is racist, misogynistic, and deeply ironic given the number of underqualified white men in his administration. It’s also un-American. Our parents and grandparents never imagined that the hard-won battles of the Civil Rights Movement would need to be fought a second time.
But that is the state of our nation on the 161st anniversary of Juneteenth.
[A version of this post appeared in my monthly summer column in the Lexington News-Gazette on June 17th .]

Tags: black-history, history, juneteenth, politics, slavery
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
June 15, 2026 Our Creating Comics Syllabus

Leigh Ann Beavers and I taught our hybrid studio-arts/creative-writing course for the fifth time this spring. We were three years out of practice, but we already wrote a book on the course, which our former selves mapped out meticulously. I’m also comics editor of Shenandoah magazine, so our reservoir of online comics keeps getting deeper. I updated all of the reading assignments and my presentations, which mostly just reinforce what’s in the textbook. I literally never lecture in any of my other classes, so it’s a weird change of pace. So are the four-hour blocks four days week, especially the second two weeks of individual studio time. It’s nothing like teaching a discussion-based literature course.
I just got back student evaluations, so here’s a self-congratulatory selection of cherry-picked compliments:
- “I love the tailored feedback and it really shows how much effort and interest the professor has for his students.”
- “Chris was so kind and helpful, always being supportive.”
- “The professor’s enthusiastic attitude (even at 8:30 a.m. in the morning), humorous jokes, and authentic attitude towards helping students improve really created an amazing classroom of trust and warmth.”
- “Chris creates a welcoming environment with his attitude and outward expression. He is very caring and has a positive attitude every day.”
- “Very welcoming of ideas and expected us to grow as story tellers and artists in a very constructive way”
- “Chris was very kind and always trying to make things fun and light hearted. He made the early mornings better!”
- “The daily homework, discussion posts, presentations, as well as the exercises within the comic book helped me build the foundational skills to create an engaging 12 page comic book.”
If anyone is interested in teaching from Creating Comics and/or Shenandoah, here’s how we do it:
ENGL-ARTS 215: Making Comics
Spring 2026
MTWTh: 8:30 – 12:30
Course description:
Making Comics is both a study of the image-based creative writing form of graphic narratives and a studio art course in the making of those images. The course includes overviews of the comics form and art techniques, which students will then apply in the making of their own comics.
Required texts:
- Creating Comics: A Writer’s and Artist’s Guide and Anthology, Chris Gavaler and Leigh Ann Beavers
- Shenandoah Comics
WEEK 1
DAY 1 Monday
IN CLASS:
- Introduce the studio and materials
- Short exercises: line variation, textures, volume, contrast, marks
- Presentation 1: “Intro to Comics” (form, medium, conventions)
- Presentation 2: “Drawing Styles” (cartoon, naturalism, photo-sourcing)
- Pencil on sketch paper: Draw a kangaroo in a rocking chair in some context in a square panel using 6×6 template [30 minutes]
- Pin-up and critique kangaroo drawings
- Research and begin to revise kangaroo drawings on good paper using 9×13 page template
DAY 2 Tuesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Read:
- Creating Comics, Chapter 6: Processes (pp. 163-177)
- Wanting to Erase Her Share of the Darkness , Rainie Oet, Alice Blank
- The Art Table , Angus Woodward
- We Collect Cans for Money , Ebony Flowers
- Prairie Psalm , Despy Boutris
- I , Martha Kuhlman, Vojtěch Mašek, Džian Baban, and Jan Šiller
- (You might notice that the Shenandoah selections relate to Monday’s “Drawing Styles” presentation. They and the textbook reading also preview what we’re doing in class tomorrow.)
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
Draw:
- Complete revision of kangaroo drawing
IN CLASS:
- Pin-up revised kangaroos and discuss
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- Presentation 3: “Processes” (script, story, layout, image, canvas, end with linear image)
- See value exercise (pp. 126-7) and line variation illustration (p. 23)
- Copy kangaroo drawings, apply 6 different value approaches
- Pin-up and critique
- Assign: “1.2 Copying Others” (pp. 29-30). Use windows or come back to studio and use light tables.
DAY 3 Wednesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Read:
- Creating Comics, Chapter 1: Images (pp. 24-40)
- Equilibrium , Karin Lin-Greenberg
- The Birthmark , Angie Kang
- From the Garden , Fabio Lastrucci
- Excerpt from The Silk Road , Marguerite Dabaie
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
Draw:
- “1.2 Copying Others” (pp. 29-30).
IN CLASS:
- Pin-up “Copying Others” homework and discuss
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- Presentation 4: “Framing and Perspective”
- Photoshoot:
- Work in pairs.
- Create a 1-page comic divided into multiple images/panels.
- Process: Story-first? Layout-first? Image-first? Canvas-first?
- Photograph yourselves and objects for drawing references.
DAY 4 Thursday
HOMEWORK DUE
Read:
- Creating Comics, Introduction (pp. 1-10)
- The Cloud , Kathleen Radigan
- The Story Begins With Hana , Parisa Karami
- Anger Management , Jenny Lesser
- Robert Morris Story , Joel Holub
- Survilo , Olga Lavrenteva
- Hands , Nick Mullins
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
Draw:
- Complete photoshoot comic
IN CLASS:
- Pin-up six kangaroo value panels and discuss
- Pin-up 1-page comics and discuss
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- Directed doodling: (see p.44)
- Anything, zoom in, movement, unique to you, rotate, vivid memory, look inside, strong emotion, zoom out, a concern, abrupt change, a secret,
- Discuss
- Extract, p.43
- List things to research
- Revise doodle
- Redraw in a different position and/or from a different perspective
- (show example again from Processes)
WEEK 2
DAY 5 Monday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Your character fifty times: learn something new about the character and how to draw it each time.
Answer:
- questions about character (pp. 44-46)
Read:
- Creating Comics, Chapter 2: Hinges
- Unfished Unfinished , Grey Wolfe LaJoie
- A Cheeseburger Sushi’s Experience , Taku Ward
- excerpt 1 from “AM/FM/PM” , Mark Laliberte
- excerpt 2 from “AM/FM/PM” , Mark Laliberte
- A Hundred Stories , Sijia M
- Tunnel , Apol Sta. Maria, Marlon Hacla, Kristine Ong Muslim
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
IN CLASS:
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- Pin-up 50 drawings and discuss
- Exchange with partner, select favorites, explain why
- What did you learn from drawing them?
- Further challenges: what makes and could further make your character yours?
- Pick 5 favorite things about your character to tell class
- What is unique about it?
- Presentation 5: “Hinges”
- Exercise 2.1: “Hinging Panels” [11 steps] (see pp. 70-71)
- Exercise 2.3: “Revising Hinges” (p. 72)
DAY 6 Tuesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Read:
- Creating Comics, Chapter 3: Sequences
- How to Do the Scorpion , Aidan Daniel
- Lullaby , Mita Mahato
- An Excerpt from Universe A , Andrei Molotiu
- Coping , Dev Murphy
- Invitation , Breena Nuñez
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
Draw:
- Exercise 2.3: Revise a Hinge (p. 72)
IN CLASS:
- Pin-up revised hinge and discuss
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- Presentation 6: “Narrative Sequences”
- Exercises 3.2 – 3.10 “Sequencing Cards” (see pp. 89-91)
- Presentation 7: “Abstract Narratives”
- Exercises 3.11 – 3.12 “Telling Abstract Stories” (see p .95)
DAY 7 Wednesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Read:
- Creating Comics, Chapter 5: Words
- Parent 34 & Three Other Poetry Comics , Katrina Roberts
- The Control Group , David Sheskin
- The Old Story , A Committee of Gentlemen , Injuries , Amicable Associations , Sarah J. Sloat
- Chaos, Quantum, String , Holly Burdorff
- A-Frame , Jerrod Schwarz
- This World is Not My Home , Richard Bohannon
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
Draw:
- Finish 1-page narrative sequence
- Finish 1-page abstract comic
IN CLASS:
- Pin-up abstract comic and discuss
- Pin-up narrative sequences and discuss
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- Presentation 8: “Words”
- Presentation 9: “Word & Picture Relationships”
- Develop a page that incorporates multiple kinds of words and word-picture relationships.
DAY 8 Thursday
HOMEWORK DUE
Read:
- Creating Comics, Chapter 4: Pages
- Sketchbook Drawings , Tillie Walden
- So Much Good , Trinidad Escobar, Meredith Hobbs Coons
- Again Boy , Helena Pantsis
- Land of Opportunity , Ben Passmore
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
Draw:
- Complete a page that incorporates multiple kinds of words and word-picture relationships.
IN CLASS:
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- Presentations: Layouts & Paths, Frames & Accents, Phrases & Accents, Multiple Pages
- Review word pages (individually)
- Ink your penciled page from last night’s homework
- Discuss page balance
- Plan your book:
- 12 units: front, 10 interior pages (5 two-page spreads), back
- 2 continuous centerfolds: pages 5-6, back-front covers
WEEK 3
DAY 9 Monday
HOMEWORK DUE
Read:
- Creating Comics, Chapter 1: Images (pp. 11-24), “Page Schemes” (pp. 177-182)
- Mothra x Godzilla , Kristin Emanuel
- A Ghost Story (Women) , Maggie Queeney
- The Children’s Crusade , Gregg Williard
- Alligator Gut: A Representation of Survival with Papers, Polyethylene, and Residual Ink , Mita Mahato
- Birds You’re Watching and the Complex Histories You’ve Made up About Their Personal Lives Due to Boredom , Amy Collier
Respond:
- Select a moment from the chapter and three favorite moments from the comics. Copy and paste each and explain why it interests you. Upload to Assignments.
Draw:
- Sketch your 12-page comic
- complete inking page
IN CLASS:
- Upload favorite image from homework on Canvas Discussion and discuss
- sit with partners from the photoshoot comic, present 12-page sketches to each other.
- Presentation: title pages
- Note homework: apply concepts to past classes, to yourself; week 3 pencils, week 4 inks
- Individual inking and book sketches critiques
DAY 10 Tuesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Pencil pages (running total 4)
- [3 in-class, 1 for homework]
Read:
Respond:
- Select two pages from past classes and analyze three aspects of each.
- Consider: drawing styles (simplified, exaggerated, cartoon, naturalistic), framing (matched, mismatched), point-of-view (angle and proximity), hinges (recurrent, spatial, temporal, causal, embedded, non-sensory, associative, continuous, semi-continuous, linguistic, match-cut), narrative sequences (balance, disruption, imbalance, climax, balance), word arrangements (letter rendering, word containers), word-picture relationships (duplicate, complement, contrast, diverge), layout types (regular grids, irregular, rows, columns), paths (Z-path, N-path, mixed path, ambiguous, unordered), phrases, panel accents (size, frame, shape, tilt, spacing, content/value, overlap, inset, breaking frames), phrases, end-stops, enjambments.
- Begin by listing the 3 aspects you’ll discuss.
IN CLASS:
- Discuss pages from previous classes
- Studio time and individual conferencing
DAY 11 Wednesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Pencil pages (running total 8)
- [3 in-class, 1 for homework]
Read:
Respond:
- Select two pages from past classes and analyze three different aspects of each.
- Consider: drawing styles (simplified, exaggerated, cartoon, naturalistic), framing (matched, mismatched), point-of-view (angle and proximity), hinges (recurrent, spatial, temporal, causal, embedded, non-sensory, associative, continuous, semi-continuous, linguistic, match-cut), narrative sequences (balance, disruption, imbalance, climax, balance), word arrangements (letter rendering, word containers), word-picture relationships (duplicate, complement, contrast, diverge), layout types (regular grids, irregular, rows, columns), paths (Z-path, N-path, mixed path, ambiguous, unordered), phrases, panel accents (size, frame, shape, tilt, spacing, content/value, overlap, inset, breaking frames), phrases, end-stops, enjambments.
- Begin by listing the 3 aspects you’ll discuss.
IN CLASS:
- Discuss pages from previous classes
- Studio time and individual conferencing
DAY 12 Thursday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Pencil all pages, including front and back covers
- [3 in-class, 1 for homework]
- Thursday in-class: revise all pages, ink 1 page
Read:
Respond:
- Select two pages from past classes and analyze new three aspects of each.
- Consider: drawing styles (simplified, exaggerated, cartoon, naturalistic), framing (matched, mismatched), point-of-view (angle and proximity), hinges (recurrent, spatial, temporal, causal, embedded, non-sensory, associative, continuous, semi-continuous, linguistic, match-cut), narrative sequences (balance, disruption, imbalance, climax, balance), word arrangements (letter rendering, word containers), word-picture relationships (duplicate, complement, contrast, diverge), layout types (regular grids, irregular, rows, columns), paths (Z-path, N-path, mixed path, ambiguous, unordered), phrases, panel accents (size, frame, shape, tilt, spacing, content/value, overlap, inset, breaking frames), phrases, end-stops, enjambments.
- Begin by listing the 3 aspects you’ll discuss.
IN CLASS:
- Discuss pages from previous classes
- Studio time and individual conferencing
WEEK 4
DAY 13 Monday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Ink pages (running total 2-3)
Read & Respond:
- Select a Creating Comics chapter and related presentations (they’re in Files), select two pages from your comic, and explain how your work applies the ideas.
- Consider: drawing styles (simplified, exaggerated, cartoon, naturalistic), framing (matched, mismatched), point-of-view (angle and proximity), hinges (recurrent, spatial, temporal, causal, embedded, non-sensory, associative, continuous, semi-continuous, linguistic, match-cut), narrative sequences (balance, disruption, imbalance, climax, balance), word arrangements (letter rendering, word containers), word-picture relationships (duplicate, complement, contrast, diverge), layout types (regular grids, irregular, rows, columns), paths (Z-path, N-path, mixed path, ambiguous, unordered), phrases, panel accents (size, frame, shape, tilt, spacing, content/value, overlap, inset, breaking frames), phrases, end-stops, enjambments, and multi-page schemes.
- Begin by listing the 3 aspects you’ll discuss.
IN CLASS:
- Studio time and individual conferencing
- Scan one inked page and insert into digital template (see “Final Instructions” and “NEW 12-page Template” in Files and in Box: “Creating Comics 2026”)
DAY 14 Tuesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Ink pages (running total 5-6)
- [2 in-class, 1 for homework]
Read & Respond:
- Select a Creating Comics chapter and related presentations (they’re in Files), select two pages from your comic, and explain how your work applies the ideas.
- Consider: drawing styles (simplified, exaggerated, cartoon, naturalistic), framing (matched, mismatched), point-of-view (angle and proximity), hinges (recurrent, spatial, temporal, causal, embedded, non-sensory, associative, continuous, semi-continuous, linguistic, match-cut), narrative sequences (balance, disruption, imbalance, climax, balance), word arrangements (letter rendering, word containers), word-picture relationships (duplicate, complement, contrast, diverge), layout types (regular grids, irregular, rows, columns), paths (Z-path, N-path, mixed path, ambiguous, unordered), phrases, panel accents (size, frame, shape, tilt, spacing, content/value, overlap, inset, breaking frames), phrases, end-stops, enjambments, and multi-page schemes.
- Begin by listing the 3 aspects you’ll discuss.
IN CLASS:
- Studio time and individual conferencing
- Scan completed pages and insert into templates
DAY 15 Wednesday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Ink pages (running total 8-9)
- [2 in-class, 1 for homework]
Read:
- Select a Creating Comics chapter and related presentations (they’re in Files), select two pages from your comic, and explain how your work applies the ideas.
- Consider: drawing styles (simplified, exaggerated, cartoon, naturalistic), framing (matched, mismatched), point-of-view (angle and proximity), hinges (recurrent, spatial, temporal, causal, embedded, non-sensory, associative, continuous, semi-continuous, linguistic, match-cut), narrative sequences (balance, disruption, imbalance, climax, balance), word arrangements (letter rendering, word containers), word-picture relationships (duplicate, complement, contrast, diverge), layout types (regular grids, irregular, rows, columns), paths (Z-path, N-path, mixed path, ambiguous, unordered), phrases, panel accents (size, frame, shape, tilt, spacing, content/value, overlap, inset, breaking frames), phrases, end-stops, enjambments, and multi-page schemes.
- Begin by listing the 3 aspects you’ll discuss.
IN CLASS:
- Studio time and individual conferencing
- Scan completed pages and insert into templates
DAY 16 Thursday
HOMEWORK DUE
Draw:
- Ink all 12 pages
- [2 in-class, 1 for homework]
Read & Respond:
- Select a Creating Comics chapter and related presentations (they’re in Files), select two pages from your comic, and explain how your work applies the ideas.
- Consider: drawing styles (simplified, exaggerated, cartoon, naturalistic), framing (matched, mismatched), point-of-view (angle and proximity), hinges (recurrent, spatial, temporal, causal, embedded, non-sensory, associative, continuous, semi-continuous, linguistic, match-cut), narrative sequences (balance, disruption, imbalance, climax, balance), word arrangements (letter rendering, word containers), word-picture relationships (duplicate, complement, contrast, diverge), layout types (regular grids, irregular, rows, columns), paths (Z-path, N-path, mixed path, ambiguous, unordered), phrases, panel accents (size, frame, shape, tilt, spacing, content/value, overlap, inset, breaking frames), phrases, end-stops, enjambments, and multi-page schemes.
- Begin by listing the 3 aspects you’ll discuss.
IN CLASS:
- Finish scanning and inserting pages, then physically print and assemble 12-page comics.
- Select your favorite page for class blog, upload to Discussion.
- Write student evaluations (20 minutes)
Tags: art, books, comic books, comics, making comics, teaching-comics, writing
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
June 8, 2026 Our Gerrymandered Court
Supreme Court Opinions are routinely violating popular opinion and undermining two centuries of American trust. In 2020, Pew polling showed 70% of Americans viewed the Court positively. By 2025, approval dropped to a 48% historic low, where it remains. That shift in approval parallels the Court’s shift in ideology. National Academy of Sciences studies show that the 2010 Court accurately reflected the middle-ground positions of the average American. Today the Court is more conservative than most Americans, revealing that judicial decisions are more about ideological preference than constitutional logic.
Traditionally, the Court progressed in step with popular opinion because voters select presidents, and presidents select justices, making Court membership an indirect product of the popular vote. Then the Republican Senate dismantled that norm and the illusion of an impartial Court.
After Justice Scalia died in February 2016, more than eight months before Election Day, Majority Leader McConnell prevented a hearing for any replacement nominated by Obama, violating the Constitution’s Appointments Clause and two centuries of precedents. As a result, Trump’s first appointee, Justice Gorsuch, was sworn in fourteen months after Scalia’s death.
Justice Kennedy, the Court’s lone moderate, retired in 2018 and was replaced by Trump’s second appointee, Justice Kavanaugh. He should have been Trump’s only justice.
After Justice Ginsberg died in September 2020, seven weeks before Election Day, McConnell held a hearing for Trump’s third appointee, hypocritically reversing his own precedent. Justice Barrett was sworn in four weeks after Ginsberg’s death and one week before the election.
There’s no predicting when a justice may die or retire, but there is an overwhelming norm over the last half-century: once or sometimes twice per presidential term. Obama, Bush, and Clinton appointed two justices, one for each of their two terms. Biden and Ford served one term and appointed one justice each. Reagan and Bush senior averaged higher: Bush served one term but appointed two, and Reagan served two terms but appointed four.
There are only two outliers. Carter appointed none. And Trump appointed three. He replaced the Court’s only moderate and its most liberal member with two conservatives. By denying Obama’s and Biden’s appointees, McConnell threw the Court out-of-sync with the public and ended centuries of institutional trust.
A supermajority of Americans now wants Court reform: 69% support term limits, and 72% support a set retirement age. Justice Thomas is 77 and has sat on the Court for over 34 years, the second longest term in U.S. history. Justice Alito is a year younger and has served for over twenty years, four beyond the average. Trump is likely to replace them both, bringing his total to five.
Only FDR appointed more in the last century, with eight over four terms. FDR also won his elections by wide margins: 57%, 61%, 55%, and 53%. Trump famously won only 46% of the popular vote in 2016, 2% less than his opponent. In 2024, he still won only 49.8%, what he continues to call a “landslide.” His current approval rating averages around 39%.
Trump’s next appointees will likely reflect his demand for personal loyalty rather than ideology. One of his personal lawyers, Emil Bove, was confirmed as an appeals court judge in 2025. Justin Smith, a personal lawyer who attempted to overturn Trump’s sexual abuse and defamation decisions, is waiting Senate confirmation.
Even if Trump appoints no more justices, the Court continues to violate the will of the American public. AP-NORCE polls from the past four years show a consistent majority (between 63% and 70%) of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases. The Court is the opposite: 6 of the 9 justices voted to overthrow Roe v. Wade in 2022. That is the partisan outcome that Trump promised as a candidate: “if we put another two or perhaps three justices on … that’ll happen automatically, in my opinion, because I am putting pro-life justices on the court.”
Trump has installed a pro-executive-branch Court accepting previously unimaginable expansions of presidential power. Of Trump’s 25 emergency requests to block lower judges’ decisions in 2025, the Court approved all but five. While a 60% majority of Americans applauded the Court’s rejection of Trump’s unconstitutional tariffs, voters know the Court can’t be trusted. At this moment when the U.S. most needs a moderate judiciary to check an extremist and unpopular president flouting the Constitution and established law, we instead have a gerrymandered Court abetting the steady erosion of our democracy.
[A version of this commentary appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch online June 1 and in print June 5, 2026.]
I have also received emails from readers. Here are some of my responses:
Dear —,
Thank you again for taking the time to read my commentary.
However, since my commentary did not include any “hysterical proposals,” I would prefer you not lodge that complaint at me. Also, as you know from what I did write, a supermajority of Americans support SCOTUS term limits and retirement age. You belong to a 30% minority. As far as people attempting to “discredit the Court,” the president is the loudest voice: he has called Justices who voted against him “fools,” “lap dogs,” and “unpatriotic.” I agree such behavior is “hysterical.”
You are correct that the Court does swing variously left and right as a result of presidential elections. I said as much myself. The current Court imbalance, however, is not the result of some natural pendulum swing. As you presumably know from reading my commentary, it is the result of McConnell preventing two Democratic presidents from appointing two justices, and instead arranging for Donald Trump to appoint them. The result is historically unique.
Finally, I did not say “the opinions of Justices Thomas and Alito are off base” or “flawed.” All I said about either was their age and length of term.
Sincerely,
Chris
*
Dear —–,
Thank you for taking the time to read my commentary.
You are right: I included an error. FDR did not place six new justices on the Court; he placed eight. You said nine, but that count includes the promotion of a justice to chief justice. Three were during the last two of his four terms. Regardless, I made a factual error in my commentary, which I regret.
Regarding FDR’s failed court-packing attempt, I addressed that in a previous commentary. I wrote in March 2025: “In addition to passing legislation, holding hearings, and, in extreme cases, impeaching and convicting, Congress can reject anti-democratic bills that a president demands, as President Roosevelt’s party did when he tried to undermine the Supreme Court by adding six new appointees. The Democrat-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee responded: ‘The bill is an invasion of judicial power such as has never before been attempted in this country.’”
I wish our Republican-controlled Senate were as forceful in opposing Donald Trump’s anti-democratic behaviors.
Sincerely,
Chris
*
Dear ——,
I try to respond seriously to everyone who writes to me. Occasionally, I receive an email that makes that goal difficult. Yours is one. Since lobbing gratuitous insults appears to be your primary goal, a serious response isn’t required. Still, I’m inclined to try.
Yes, “the Supreme Court’s function is to rule on matters of constitutionality, not to reflect the prevailing public opinion.” That is self-evident. But, as I explained in some detail, the Court has also traditionally reflected public opinion — until now. The change is due to McConnel’s preventing two Democratic presidents from appointing justices. Had he not done that, the Court would continue to reflect public opinion. That it doesn’t reveals what is to me a disturbing fact: the Court’s rulings on matters of constitutionality have less to do with objective truths about the Constitution and more to do with individual justice’s preferences. The revelation applies to all justices across ideological and historical ranges.
So while the function of the Court still is to rule on matters of constitutionality, it is now clear that those rulings are the indirect product of presidential elections and so partisan politics.
I hope that clarifies my argument. If you decide to respond again, I ask that you do so respectfully and avoid additional insults.
Sincerely,
Chris
*
Dear ——,
Thank you for taking the time to read my commentary.
However, you appear to have misread some aspects. I did not write about “the misbehaver of our current supreme court.” The misbehavior I address is Mitch McConnell’s.
I also did not suggest that the Supreme Court should reinterpret the constitution “based on their perception of public opinion at that moment.” I did state that, because the current Court is so out-of-sync with public opinion due to McConnell’s actions, the mismatch reveals that “judicial decisions are more about ideological preference than constitutional logic.” That is not my preference, and I certainly doubt it is what the founders intended. It is, however, the nature of the Court.
You believe that the “so-called conservative justices” interpret the Constitution “properly,” implying that the so-called liberal justice do not. I disagree. I believe that no justices interpret the constitutional either properly or improperly because there is no single “proper” interpretation available for most cases that reach the Court. I presume all justices sincerely attempt to interpret the Constitution properly, but ultimately their rulings reflect their own ideological preferences and not objective facts extractable from the Constitution and other laws.
You believe that rulings that you agree with are proper interpretations and rulings that you disagree with are “justices imposing their will.” That’s a convenient belief. I believe all rulings, whether I agree with them or not, are “justices imposing their will.” Rulings are the inevitable partisan product of justices being appointed by ideologically different presidents elected by (mostly) popular vote every four years.
Sincerely,
Chris
Tags: history, news, politics, Supreme Court, trump
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
June 1, 2026 Teaching White Supremacy in Marvel Comics
I’m looking forward to presenting at the Comics Studies Society conference next week in Columbus, Ohio. Unlike previous years, I’m a member of the CSS executive board, including the subcommittee that read all of the panel abstract submissions and juggled them into mostly coherent subtopics. I didn’t vote on my own anonymous submission, but I did suggest slotting it last in a late 20th history themed panel. The schedule now includes the names of all the presenters, which was a fun reveal:
Before going into detail about my paper, here’s the pedagogy-focused CFP that CSS released last winter:
CSS 2026 | “Everything I Know, I Learned From Comics”
In her talk at 2023’s Cartoon Crossroads Columbus festival, Susan Kirtley breaks comics studies pedagogy into three interrelated practices: teaching about comics, teaching with comics, and teaching through comics. In partnership with the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library and Museum, the 2026 Annual Conference of the Comics Studies Society will focus on pedagogical practices and related topics that broadly explore comics, teaching, and learning. In recent years educators have begun developing more robust comics pedagogies that expand beyond content–teaching about comics–or teaching complex ideas with comics, to consider what it means to engage with the forms and processes of comics and comics composition (teaching through comics). For instance, in interdisciplinary fields like Disability Studies, Indigenous Studies, and Latinx Studies (among others), comics are tied to transmission, preservation, and revival of central ideas and histories both in and beyond the classroom. From practitioners to scholars, researchers to students, archivists to editors, many in the field have made concerted efforts to consider how and why we engage with comics in the classroom. From special issues of journals focused on comics pedagogy to a growing number of books and collections, the scholarly interest in comics and classroom practices continues to grow.
Central to CSS 2026 are the ideas that comics are for everyone, anyone can make comics, and comics can help anyone engage with the world and education through unique pedagogical interventions. Comics Studies stands in a particular place within scholarship largely because of its uneasy situation in the history of the academy and its inherent interdisciplinarity (or “Indiscipline” in the words of Charles Hatfield). This conference seeks to center that liminal space of comics as it relates to questions about pedagogy–bringing together educators, scholars, librarians, and practitioners from various fields of study, levels of education, languages and locations of study, and other educational contexts.
The partnership between CSS and the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library and Museum for CSS 2026 offers a unique opportunity for exploring comics through pedagogy. Alongside the important role the BICLM plays in the connection between education and archives, they also provide an important public museum space which will feature an exhibit on the work of Chris Ware titled “Life is Complicated.” Following this exhibit, the archives, and the importance of institutions like the BICLM, we welcome papers specifically on these ideas and pedagogies. Institutions like the BICLM and practitioner-educators like Ware have been invaluable in considering how we think about and engage with comics, both in and beyond the classroom setting. We look forward to submissions and programming about practitioners as teachers (like Ware himself), the larger comics community in and around Columbus, representations of education and school, and the use of archival materials in teaching.
The Comics Studies Society invites proposals for 15-minute individual papers, pre-formed panels, roundtables, and pedagogy or other workshops that engage with how we learn and teach about, with, and through comics.
I responded with an abstract for “Teaching White Supremacy in Marvel Comics”:
“In 1966, Marvel Comics introduced Sons of the Serpent, its version of the KKK. The white supremacist group has appeared in over a dozen titles since. Though no collection exits, the availability of comics online allowed me to curate a syllabus for the Fall 2025 iteration of my first-year writing course “Superhero Comics.” While the course is about genre and medium, for one of the three reading units I selected stories that highlight their historical contexts and implicit political messages, including the Rodney King beating, George Zimmerman’s trial for killing Trayvon Martin, and Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me. The conglomerate portrayal offers a range of pedagogical takeaways. Rather than producing a continuous and coherent story of the kind Douglas Wolk interprets in All of the Marvels, the sequence reveals the discontinuity and incoherence produced by disparate creative teams working at disparate periods, each motivated by their own real-world political contexts. Despite those differences, the sequence still emphasizes similar political attitudes across decades: moderation is better than extremism, and anger—especially when felt and expressed by Black people—is dangerous, as is protesting generally, because the danger of division is greater than the harms of white supremacy. Also, by embodying white supremacy in the tropes of supervillainy, the comics genre conveys that white supremacy is illegal, isolated, and stoppable. These takeaways especially reverberated as I taught the course at a conservative college named after the leading general of the Confederacy and during the first year of Donald Trump’s second term in office.”
Since writing that abstract I’ve decided that the next iteration of the course, which I’m teaching in the fall, will focus almost entirely on KKK-related white supremacy, by adding the 1963 supervillain Hate-Monger.
Because of the narrower focus, I’m also changing the course title from “Superhero Comics” to “Marvel Comics and Civil Rights.” The title of my paper didn’t change — except for dithering over prepositions.
I’m still ironing out the details, but I’m happy to share my slides and in-progress notes for an eight-decade tour highlighting fourteen iterations of Marvel’s two KKK-inspired supervillains and their political contexts.
1963

Fantastic Four #21, Jack Kirby and Stan Lee
Lee concludes with Nick Fury declaring: “Until men truly love each other regardless of race, creed, or color, the Hate-Monger will still be undefeated.” Lee’s language anticipates The Civil Rights Act of 1964: “without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.”
The Act was passed six months after Fantastic Four #21’s cover date. Given the length of production time, it is likely that Lee and Kirby initiated the story shortly after President Kennedy’s June 11, 1963 televised address in response to Alabama Governor George Wallace physically blocking the entrance of two Black students at the University of Alabama earlier and Kennedy’s executive order authorizing the use of the National Guard to enforce a court order requiring the students be admitted — all taking place the same day. “We face,” said Kennedy, “a moral crisis as a country and as a people,” and “I shall ask the Congress of the United States to act, to make a commitment it has not fully made in this century to the proposition that race has no place in American life or law.”
1966
Avengers #32-33, Don Heck and Stan Lee
Lee champions ex-KKK Senator Robert Byrd as a political role model, while portraying racial discord as a foreign plot designed to weaken the fight against Communism.
Johnson’s FBI director J. Edgar Hoover warned that “the communists” were urging “the abolition of ‘Jim Crow Laws,’ ‘full representation,’ and ‘the fight for Negro rights’” in order to achieve the ultimate goal of “a Soviet America.”
1969
Nick Fury, Agent of SHIELD #11, Gary Friedrich scripting for penciller Harry Springer
The third issues ends with the Hate-Monger accidentally stepping outside his spacecraft where he “drifts aimlessly into the endless void of space … never again to threaten mankind … or the right of man to be free regardless of his color … !”
The epitaph is the issue’s only mention of race — and appears to be inspired by Johnson signing the Civil Rights Act of 1968 a few months earlier. I suspect the event also inspired Marvel to reprise Hate-Monger.
1970
Avengers #73-74, Roy Thomas scripting for pencillers Frank Giacoia and John Buscema
The Sons of the Serpent reprise involves the character of Black Panther — and so the implicit presence of the Black Panther Party, which was reaching its heigh of national attention
The issues also encodes a PBS debate between William F. Buckley, Jr. and Blank Panther leader Eldrige Cleaver, condemning both as extremists working together to divide the country.
1975
Defenders #22-25, Steve Gerber scripting for penciller Sal Buscema
The third Sons of the Serpent story challenges the superhero formula’s inability to address systemic racism by depicting the South Bronx fires as a plot to trigger a race war.
The fires were actually caused by New York City closing fire stations in red zoned areas with abandoned buildings.
1991
Avengers #341-2, Fabian Nicieza scripting for penciller Steve Epting
Marvel fictionalizes the Rodney King beating in an allegory urging Black men to reject “rage” in order to defeat “hate.”
2000
Captain America #25-27, Dan Jurgens scripting for penciller Andy Kubert
Jurgens’ General McAllister Groves, C.O. of the Joint Chiefs, is likely based on General Colin Powell, the first Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who retired in 1993 but remained prominent in national politics in the late 1990s (and then served as Secretary of Defense in the Bush administration the following year).
2007
Punisher War Journal #6-10, Matt Fraction scripting for Ariel Olivetti
Six years after 9/1, five years after the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, and one year after the 2006 Secure Fence Act, the story opens with a fake 911 claiming: “I just smuggled four Arab men across the border. They were talking about an imminent attack on San Diego,” sending all law enforcement in search of “Al-Qaed operatives” along the border wall.
This allows a new Hate Monger and National Force to bomb a Mexican town of “potential immigrants” — a supervillain variation of “vigilante militia,” such as Minutemen and who, Punisher’s sidekick explains, patrol “the borders to stop people fleeing a system designed to crush them with abject poverty.” President Bush said in a 2005 press conference with Mexico’s President Quesada: “I’m against vigilantes in the United States of America. I’m for enforcing the law in a rational way.”
2011
Black Panther: The Man Without Fear #521-523, David Liss scripting for Francesco Francavilla
According to Southern Poverty Law Center, the number of nativist extremist groups such as the Minuteman reached a high of in 2010. In 2010, Arizona passed “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act,” the most extensive anti-illegal immigration bill, which Georgia copied with the “Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011.”
Obama-era deportations further complicate the context. The U.S. deported more individuals during each year of Obama’s first term than during any year of Bush’s two terms. In May 2011, Obama said: “we are focusing our limited resources on violent offenders and people convicted of crimes; not families, not folks who are just looking to scrape together an income.” The ACLU responded: “More than half – 450,000 people – had no criminal record.” And of the criminal deportations, “23 percent have been misdemeanor offenders.”
Liss includes Black Panther as one of those targeted non-criminals.
2013
Daredevil #28-36, Mark Waid scripting for Javier Rodriguez and Chris Samnee
The story encodes the trial of George Zimmerman for killing Trayvon Martin, with Matt Murdock helping to defend a former member of the Sons of the Serpent, portrayed as bumbling rather than evil. “I joined to light farts, y’know? Not crosses.” Though the comic presents white supremacy as an endemic evil, it also presents progressive protests, contextually Black Lives Matters, as well-intentioned but misguided and inherently counter-productive.
2015
Nick Fury, David Walker scripting for Lee Ferguson
The time-travel plot juxtaposes the 1965 Watts uprising with a 2015 fictional event inspired by Ferguson, Michigan after the killing of 18-year-old Michael Brown by police officer Darren Wilson in 2014. DOJ investigations cleared Wilson but also revealed a “pattern of unconstitutional policing” that inflicted “unnecessary harm” on the Black community as evidenced by “clear racial disparities” produced with “discriminatory intent.”
The time-travel also presents the 1965 Fury and the newly formed SHIELD agency as protecting Watts citizens and condemning police violence — before shifting to Hawaii and the most recent Hate-Monger’s attempt to assassinate four-year-old Barack Obama.
2017
Black Panther & the Crew, Ta-Nehisi Coates and Yona Harvey scripting for Butch Guice
After Ta-Nehisi Coates won the 2015 National Book Award, Marvel Comics approached him to write a new Black Panther series. The brief spin-off series Black Panther & the Crew extends elements of Between the World and Me, while repeating tropes about the dangers of protests and anger, as well as the culpability of Black people for directly aiding white supremacy.
2021
United States of Captain America #1-5 (August-December 2021), Christopher Cantwell scripting for Dale Eaglesham.
Cantwell’s shapeshifting Hate-Monger takes the form of a news pundit condemning Captain America as un-American — a probable reference to the role rightwing media played in election misinformation. While two-thirds of Republicans thought Biden rigged the election, the number rose to 82% for those who watched Fox News, and 97% for One America News Network and Newsmax. Fox News later paid Dominion Voting Systems $787 million rather than contest a defamation lawsuit accusing it of repeatedly and deliberately spreading lies about Dominion’s machines switching votes from Trump to Biden.
“Once they’ve built the audience,” explains Cantwell’s U.S. Agent, “Krieger plans to hypnotize viewers” by using Captain America’s stolen shield as a focus point, and “in the process they’re going to give it a new meaning.” Captain America understands: “Change what it means … and that symbol becomes a powerful weapon.”
2025
Marvel United: A Pride Special #1, “Who We Are,” Al Ewing (“he/him”) scripting for Kei Zama (“they/them”)
A team of gay and trans Marvel superheroes definitively destroy Hate Monger.
Based on the June release date, the issue was begun after the anti-trans and anti-gay executive order Trump signed on his first day in office in January 2025.
2026
Mortal Thor, Al Ewing scripting for Pasqual Ferry
Ewing reprises the Sons of the Serpent, evoking the current use of Norse mythology by white supremacists.
And a final sidenote: this white supremacist history started as a chapter for my newly published The Color of Paper, but then it got way way too long and I had to cut it. So now, who knows, maybe I can grow it into its own book? We’ll see.
Tags: civil rights, Hate-Monger, politics, Sons of the Serpent
- 2 comments
- Posted under Uncategorized
May 25, 2026 Comics 215 (Spring 2026)
Leigh Ann Beavers and I taught our hybrid studio-arts/creative-writing course this spring again. We met with twelve students for four hours four days a week for four weeks. The first two weeks were an intensive overview of comics concepts and art-making techniques. The last two were focused on producing twelve highly individualized 12-page comics:
Some students walked into the class with lots of drawing experience, some with little or none. They all produced personally stylized and engaging comics. As I’ve done for the past three iterations of the course (Spring 2023, Spring 2021, Spring 2018), I’m using my blog to show off their favorite pages (or two-page spreads).
Elizabeth Zimmerman:
Alisa Zhao:
Millie Rush:
Efren Reyes:
Hakeem Odusanya:
Thomas Moxley:
Tommy Monaghan:
Ant Miller:
Aidan Lewis:
Annabelle Grogan:
Senay Gebremeskel:
Danny De La Rosa:
We adjusted the course several ways this year, including emphasizing the cover(s) earlier in the process and highlighting centerfold options.
Which gives me an excuse to show off more of their work.
Danny De La Rosa, “R.Y.E.”:
Senay Gebremeskel, “The Losing Hand”:
Annabelle Grogan, “Piggy’s World”:
Aidan Lewis, “I See You”:
Ant Miller, “Lucid”:
Tommy Monaghan, “DAD”:
Thomas Moxley, “Tight Lines”:

Hakeem Odusanya, “Hand of the Guilty”:
Efren Reyes,
Millie Rush, “A Book of Wings and Little Things”:
Alisa Zhao, “Alisa in College Wonder Land”:
Elizabeth Zimmerman, “The Lonely Raindrop”:
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
May 18, 2026 Hate-Mongering in the Bush Years
My MAGA-inspired history of white supremacist supervillainy continues …
Last we heard from Marvel’s Adolf Hitler, AKA Hate-Monger, his new “living energy” incarnation was destroyed by the combined psychic link of thousands of racially diverse Americans rejecting his message of hate in Captain America #48 (December 2001). (See The Re-re-re-return of Adolf Hitler.)
Five years later, Matt Fraction and Ariel Olivetti created another new Nazi-themed Hate-Monger for Punisher War Journal #6-10 (June-October 2007).
His first statement, “America is for Americans,” updates Hitler’s 1923 slogan “Germany is for Germans.”
This “All-New, All-Racist Hate-Monger” also says, “Heil Hitler. Heil me.”
And though Fraction’s use of the term “miscegenation” sounds intentionally anachronistic too, a reference to his “grandfather’s Luger P-08. A classic. A holy relic that survived the fall of Berlin” means he is descended from a Nazi soldier and so is not Hitler even in some new science-fictional sense.
Olivetti’s drawings of the character, even given the detailed but exaggerated drawing style, also appear significantly larger than Hitler’s 5’ 9.” And when finally unmasked, he looks even less like Hitler.
While his belief that the “future is white and Christian and right” is generically white supremacist and Christian nationalist, his rants against “affirmative action and having to be the whole world’s damn welfare program” ground the setting in the U.S. during the late 20th or early 21st century. Fraction may be evoking the Supreme Court’s 2003 split decision Grutter v. Bollinger, which removed a university’s affirmative-action points system for race, but also maintained race as a “compelling interest” for admissions.
Fraction also anticipates Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign slogan when his Hate-Monger refers to what “makes America – that makes the white race – great.”
In a nod to Lee and Kirby’s 1963 original, Fraction’s Hate -Monger employs “H-rays.” Rather than a gun though, he uses “H-stations,” what Fraction’s Punisher, Frank Castle, calls “magic voodoo mindwarp machines.” The first is in his headquarters near the U.S.-Mexican border, with “San Deigo, and Los Angeles, and Chicago” to follow.
But unlike the original Hate-Monger, both Hate-Monger and his followers are fully exposed too: “You’re bathing in pure H-rays now. Drink them in. Frank – they can free us all.”
Whatever this Hate-Monger’s relationship to Hitler, multiple characters (a waitress, a reporter, Punisher twice) instead remark on his resemblance to Captain America, because (we’re told) he and his “National Force” followers are “wearing his uniform.” The narrative fact is odd since actual resemblance is minimal. Instead of primarily blue, the uniforms are almost entirely white – a potential gesture to KKK robes, though the effect is closer to Star Wars storm troopers. The nearest point of comparison is the chest emblem: instead of a white star, a black star with an embedded white swastika centers the Hate-Monger uniform — which Punisher removes with a knife in the final issue: “He wore the uniform, Clarke. Messed up as it was, it was still his uniform.”
Olivetti’s visual inspiration is clear. For Captain America #231-236 (March-August 1979), Roger McKenzie and Sal Buscema created “a radical hate group known as National Force,” what McKenzie’s Captain America declares “a Neo-Nazi cult.” Fraction does not allude to the earlier iteration, but Olivetti’s all-white uniform design updates Buscema’s original. Both also include red swastika armbands.
Fraction’s Hate-Monger’s intended resemblance to Captain America likely originates from the McKenzie’s “Grand Director,” and not just ideologically: “The only way to ensure America’s strength to make her pure! Because a white America is a strong America!” The leader of the 1979 organization was the 1950s Captain America – or rather, the version of the character that Marvel Comics inserted into the 1954 Atlas Comics revival of the Timely Comics original (a Steve Englehart retcon from Captain America #156 [December 1972]).
Fraction’s Hate-Monger understands his own uniform to be Captain America’s too: “S’why I took that pig’s costume away from him. It’s more than just taking a symbol back – we’re taking America back, Frank, for regular, hardworking, law-abiding Euro-Anglo-Aryan Christian white folk like you and me.” Oddly, Olivetti draws him pointing at the eagle emblem on his forehead, where Captain America instead wears an “A” emblem. The only suggestion of an eagle on Captain America’s costume are the wings protruding above his ear.
The plot point is motivated by Marvel’s 2006-2007 Civil War crossover event ending with Captain America’s assassination in Captain America #25 (April 2007) – well before Captain America: Reborn #1 (September 2009) retcon reveals that he was never actually dead.
The real-world context is even more revealing.
Writing six years after 9/11, Fraction opens his story arc with a fake 911 call from a supposed “coyote” claiming: “I just smuggled four Arab men across the border. They were talking about an imminent attack on San Diego,” sending all law enforcement in search of “Al-Qaed operatives” along what, based on Olivetti’s panel backgrounds, appears to be new portions of a border wall – presumably a reference to the 2006 Secure Fence Act authorizing construction.
After seeing a Spanish newspaper reporting National Force’s massacre of a Mexican town in order to kill “potential immigrants,” Frank begins driving to California to avenge, not the victims, but Captain America: “They’re the ones crossing the border and killing people. I can feel it. And they’re doing it while wearing his uniform.”
Fraction uses the drive and Punisher’s sidekick Stuart Clarke to provide further context. His “35.7 million immigrants in 2004, 10.3 of those illegal,” matches the census figure “35.7 Million Foreign-Born” and a Pew Research report: “There are about 10.3 million unauthorized migrants estimated to be living in the United States as of March 2004.”
Clarke’s claim, “All that’s exploded since the mid-nineties. That’s, what NAFTA or CAFTA or whatever,” also matches common analysis. The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement resulted in Mexico corn ending subsidies for small farmers, forcing an estimated two million out of work. Clarke describes “Maquiladoras,” “special zones” with “no tariffs or taxes,” calling them “NAFTA-sanctioned sweatshops” – though the program and factories originated in the 60s.
He also notes that the “2,000 miles of border between us and Mexico” has “been militarized, and they’re building a freakin’ fence,” while “vigilante militias” are “patrolling the borders to stop people fleeing a system designed to crush them with abject poverty.” The militarization includes the Department of Homeland Security created five years earlier, and the right-wing militias Rescue Ranch and the Minuteman Project — though the first was likely David Duke’s “Klan Border Watch” in 1979.
President Bush said in a 2005 press conference with Mexico’s President Quesada: “I’m against vigilantes in the United States of America. I’m for enforcing the law in a rational way.”
Fraction’s Clarke concludes: “There’s no single solution to this,” in part because “nobody in El Nort gives a crap about what happens along the border these days as long as our lawns get mowed.”
Like Jurgens in 2001, Fraction and Olivetti focus on symbols.
When Frank infiltrates National Force, Olivetti draws him wearing a Confederate flag t-shirt and a (fake) Iron Cross tattoo.
The National Force second-in-command wears an SS t-shirt and a (real) swastika tattoo.
Olivetti expressionistically places an Iron Cross in the panel background of their handshake. In response to Hate-Monger’s nominal theft of Captain America’s costume, Punisher designs (and somehow instantly manufactures) his own version.
“This isn’t just a war against an army – Hate-Monger is waging a war of ideas. And on that kind of battlefield, Captain America can be an H-bomb.” I assume Fraction means hydrogen bomb, though the phrase also evokes Hate-Monger’s 1963 “H-ray” and 1969 “germ bomb,” as well as the “madbombs” Kirby’s Captain America thwarted in 1976. But Fraction’s Punisher is speaking symbolically: “Best of all, the symbol. His and mine.”
The incongruity is presumably intentional. Where Jurgens’ Captain America resisted and defeated Hate-Monger’s hate through love of country, Fraction’s Punisher does not resist the H-ray effects and then brutally murders a Latina photojournalist as his final rite of passage while infiltrating National Force.
Even after Punisher has destroyed his H-station and thwarted his plans, Hate-Monger tells him, “We’re exactly alike.” As he shoots him in the forehead, Punisher says, “This hate that’s killing you is mine and mine alone.”
Since the Punisher’s strategy was ineffective (the only people who saw his Captain America costume were National Force, who quickly overpowered him, and if the SHIELD agent hunting him hadn’t intervened, he would have been left dead in the desert), Fraction could arguably be undermining the notion that hate is an effective tool for battling white supremacy.
Or is the takeaway that a war of symbols is ultimately irrelevant? The only real way to defeat a contemporary fascist is a bullet to the brain?
Though Fraction and Olivetti give no indication that their Hate-Monger bears anything but a superficial relationship to previous Hate-Mongers, Frank Tieri and Paul Azaceta’s “The Exhibit” in Captain America #616 (May 2011) retcons an overt connection.
The 12-page episode features Captain America and SHIELD agent Sharon Carter investigating gallery owner Edmund Heidler, who appeared in New York three years prior — so shortly after the Punisher Hate-Monger story arc ended. He is a “clone of Adolf Hitler,” explains Tieri’s Captain America, “One of the Hate-Monger’s spare bodies. Over the years, we’ve been able to track down most of them. But this one apparently slipped through the grid after the base he was grown at was destroyed.”
This clone also “has no idea who or what he really is” because “his programming was never completed.”
The references appear to be to the “clones” Peter Gills established in Super-Villian Team-Up #16-17 (May-June 1980). Azaceta’s panel includes Adolf Hitler, a hooded Hate-Monger with an exposed mouth (so presumably Harry Springer’s 1969 costume), a hooded Hate-Monger with dotted eyes (likely Dan Jurgens’s 2000 costume), and Olivetti’s Hate-Monger (identifiable by the eagle emblem on his forehead).
The retcon is problematic since the 2007 Hate-Monger understood himself to be the grandson of a Nazi soldier and also did not physically resemble Hitler – straining any sense of the word “clone.” The addition of “programming” also contradicts Gills’ description of Hitler’s “mind-essence” traveling from body to body. The “base he was grown at” could be understood as Arnim Zola’s, which Jack Kirby “destroyed” in Captain America #212 (August 1977), but then the 1980, 2000, and 2007 stories may require an additional location to account for those Hate-Monger’s appearances. And did Tieri now reveal that the 1980 clone, who Red Skull trapped in a Cosmic Cube prison, falsely believed himself to be Hitler due to his “programming”?
Though Edmund Heidler apparently retains something of Hitler (he’s taken his first name from Hitler’s brother and last name from Hitler’s grandfather), Captain America prevents Agent Carter from killing him because Heidler has committed no wrong – even mentally, since he lacks Hitler’s defining prejudices. When he refers negatively to a Black waitress’ “kind,” he only means “teenagers.” When he compliments Captain America’s “blue eyes and blonde hair,” it’s because he thinks they will help sell art to his gay male clients. The narrative irony repeats Ira Levin’s 1976 novel and Franklin J. Schaffner’s 1978 film adaptation The Boys from Brazil in which the Nazi-hunting protagonist protects Hitler’s child clones for the same reason – they’re not Hitler.
Tieri and Azaceta’s Heidler and retroactively Fraction and Olivetti’s Hate-Monger are the last of the Hitler “doubles” that Lee and Kirby introduced in 1963. Or, I should add, “currently,” since potential future retcons could reveal otherwise.
Either way, Marvel’s Hate-Monger history isn’t over.
Next up: David Liss and Francesco Francavilla revive a non-clone version in Black Panther #521-523 (September-November 2011).
Tags: ariel-olivetti, Donald Trump, Germany, hate monger, history, Matt Fraction, politics, punisher, trump, white-christian-nationalism
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
May 11, 2026 Decline, Delusion, and Deception in the White House
Trump turns 80 in June. He will be two years older than Biden when Biden took office. Republicans, claiming the president’s decline “was a persistent and obvious truth that was evident for years to anyone who was willing to see it,” began investigative hearings last summer. The goal was clear: “We need to know who was in charge.”
Assessing a president through public statements and appearances is at best difficult and likely produces inconclusive results. Still, since Republicans convincingly argued that such a significant national concern should be not left to hindsight, Congress should begin its assessment of Trump’s potential deterioration now. While an investigation will have the resources to uncover more, a list of concerning events is already established.
Trump confused Obama and Biden repeatedly during his reelection campaign, including during a March 2024 event in Richmond: “Putin has so little respect for Obama that he’s starting to throw around the nuclear word.”
In July 2025, Trump confused himself with Biden when blaming his predecessor for appointing Jerome Powell to Chair of the Federal Reserve: “He’s a terrible Fed chair. I was surprised he was appointed. I was surprised, frankly, that Biden put him in and extended him.” Trump appointed Powell during his first term.
In January, Trump confused Greenland and Iceland. While complaining about NATO, Trump said: “They’re not there for us on Iceland, that I can tell you. Our stock market took the first dip yesterday because of Iceland. So Iceland’s already cost us a lot of money.” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt denied the confusion: “No he didn’t …. You’re the only one mixing anything up here.”
Leavitt did not attempt to cover-up a Trump mix-up in March, when he confused her with Kellyanne Conway, one of his first-term advisors: “Kellyanne Conway, has anyone ever heard of her? She’s fantastic. She’s in there fighting. A friend of mine said, ‘You know that Kellyanne, I admire the way she goes in there and she screams at those people’ – meaning the media …. thank you, Kellyanne.”
Leavitt tried but failed to cover-up remarks that Trump made in February: “We should take over the voting, the voting in at least many — 15 places. The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.” Leavitt insisted: “What the president was referring to is the SAVE Act, which is a huge, common-sense piece of legislation.” But hours later, Trump repeated his remarks, adding further unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud: “Look at some of the places — that horrible corruption on elections — and the federal government should not allow that. The federal government should get involved.” Senate majority leader Thune clarified that he was “not in favor of federalizing elections,” because the power of states to run elections is “constitutional.”
In April, after Trump said, “We’re fighting wars… It’s not possible for us to take care of day care, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things,” White House spokesperson Olivia Wales attempted to cover-up the remark: “President Trump was referring to rooting out the billions of dollars of fraud in these vital programs — and his record proves he will always protect and strengthen Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.” The White House also removed the video of Trump’s speech from its website.
Last year in March, after Secretary of Defense Hegseth accidentally included a reporter in a classified group chat discussing the timing and logistics for a bombing mission, Trump was asked if he took responsibility. He answered: “I don’t know anything about it.” The evidence supports him. Hegseth’s group chat included Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Gabbard, CIA Director Ratcliffe – but not the President.
Similarly, the Wall Street Journal reported last month that Trump “screamed at aides for hours” after learning that two airmen were downed in Iran, and then the unnamed “aides kept the president out of the [war] room … because they believed his impatience wouldn’t be helpful” during the “stressful time” of planning the rescue.
Last October, a House oversight committee issued its report on the Biden administration, claiming that it had revealed not “just a cover-up,” but “the biggest political scandal in American presidential history.” Investigators alleged that while Americans saw the president’s “decline with their own eyes,” his “inner circle sought to deceive the public, cover-up his decline, and took unauthorized executive actions.” The report was subtitled: “Decline, Delusion, and Deception in the White House.”
Voters deserve to read its sequel before midterms.
A version of this commentary appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch on May 5 and 8, 2026.
A Richmond Times-Dispatch reader emailed me yesterday. I responded:
Dear —–,
Thank you for taking the time to read and respond to another of my commentaries. I am, however, confused by some of your statements.
You wrote: “For you to say that some of Trump’s comments have had a negative effect on the stock market is misguided. Under Trump, the stock market has performed better than ever, reaching all-time highs.”
I did not mention the stock market. Perhaps you were responding to more than one commentary yesterday and got confused which one I wrote?
You also go into some length about what “a colossal waste of time” it would be for the Democrats to impeach Trump.
I did not mention impeachment. The process of removal for a president unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office is section 4 of the 5th Amendment. That process can only be initiated by the vice-president and must be approved by a majority of the cabinet. No Democrat would be involved.
The topic of my commentary was cognitive decline. You responded in part by describing Biden “physically” as a “mess” because he walked with a “shuffle” and sometimes “tripped” or “fell.” These are not symptoms of cognitive decline. In contrast, you say Trump has “the stamina of the Energizer Bunny.” Setting aside the fact that in recent months Trump has been photographed and videotaped nodding off at four events, physical stamina is not evidence of cognitive stability.
You are probably aware that Trump’s father was diagnosed with dementia in his 80s. His physical stamina did not decline at the same rate, so in order to maintain their business, family members created a pretend office where he spent his time believing he was still in charge and issuing orders. Trump seems to be following in his father’s “Energize Bunny” footsteps rather than Biden’s “shuffle.”
When you do address the topic of cognitive decline, you apply different criteria for each president. You select statements that “stretch common sense and credibility” from Biden but not from Trump. Are you not equally concerned that Trump recently claimed to have ended a war between Cambodia and Armenia? Or that he keeps telling a fabricated story about his uncle having taught the Unabomber? Or his digressions about pens and drapes?
Examples aside, your implicit claim is: Biden’s cognitive decline was worse, therefore Trump is not suffering from relevant cognitive decline.
That’s not an argument.
Sincerely,
Chris
PS. Rereading, I see that Trump mentioned the stock market while confusing Greenland and Iceland. You somehow mistook his statement for my statement, and then you posed a counter argument to his statement, while also somehow missing the point of the quotation. Please don’t email me again.
Tags: 25th-amendment, cognitive-decline, dementia, Donald Trump, iran, news, politics, trump
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
May 4, 2026 The Re-Re-Re-Return of Adolf Hitler
Last November I started obsessively researching Marvel’s Hate-Monger – a literal clone of Adolf Hitler reshaping the country through racial hatred. The supervillain seemed to meet his final death in 1980 – before he was resurrected yet again in 2000. The new 21st-century American fascist promotes a war against Black people and the mass murder of “illegal aliens” costing “you your homes, your children’s education and hope for the future.”
Any of this look familiar?
Before a further deep dive, here’s a quiz: How many times did Marvel kill Hitler?
During the first sporadic reign (1963-1980) of the Hate-Monger Hitlers, the answer is six: he was burnt alive in a Berlin bunker, shot by his own hate-crazed soldiers, blown-up by his own Nazi scientist, suffocated in outer space, burnt alive as he fell from a launching rocket, and burnt semi-alive when his salvaged brain was destroyed in a laboratory fire. And finally his fate-worse-than-death: imprisonment inside the Red Skull’s new but nonfunctional Cosmic Cube.
With Hitler trapped and narratively forgotten, writer-artist John Byrne appropriated the name “the Hate Monger” (minus the hyphen) for an unrelated villain in Fantastic Four #278-284 (May-November 1985) — whom Jim Shooter immediatley killed in Secret Wars II #2 (August 1985), revealing that he “was merely a human construct” created by Psycho-Man (whose machinery inflicts “fear” and “doubt” along with “hate”). Byrne uses his Hate Monger to briefly transform Invisible Girl into the supervillain “Malice, the Mistress of Hate” — which then motivates her to become “Invisible Woman” permanently. Byrne makes the implicit argument that her experience as Malice, while invasive and destructive, also allows her to grow by accessing her unprocessed anger from years of sexist mistreatment (see Fantastic Four #1-277).
Despite the continuity error it embeds, Roy Thomas, Dann Thomas, and Rich Buckler re-reconfirmed Hitler’s 1945 bunker death in The Saga of the Sub-Mariner #5 (March 1989), repeating dialogue from both Hank Chapman’s Young Men #24 (December 1953) and Roy Thomas’s What If? #4 (August 1977).
With Adolf Hitler now having always been dead and his Hate-Monger guise left unused for a decade, Fabian Nicieza again appropriated the name (again dropping the hyphen) for his and Steve Epting’s Avengers #341-2 (November-December 1991), Marvel’s response to the Los Angeles police beating of Rodney King. Unlike the original Hitler incarnations, Nicieza and Epting’s Hate Monger is a supernatural entity who literally feeds off hate. Nicieza also reprises the KKK-based supervillain group the Sons of the Serpent (which I discuss here, here, and here). Unlike Byrne’s implicit argument about the curative nature of anger for a long-mistreated female character, Nicieza argues that anger for a Black man is wholly destructive, requiring the adolescent superhero Rage to cease being Rage in order to defeat Hate. Overtness is the allegory’s most impressive quality.
Finally, after a two-decade hiatus (three years longer than his previous seventeen-year span), Dan Jurgens and Andy Kubert resurrected the Hate-Mongering Adolf Hitler in Captain America #25-27 (January-March 2000).
Apparently influenced by Byrne’s and Nicieza’s indifference to Lee’s hyphen and “the,” Jurgens’ iteration is simply “Hate Monger.” Unlike Carmine Infantino and Arvell Jones in 1980 and George Perez in 1977, Kubert significantly alters Jack Kirby’s 1963 costume design.
While the now defining pointed hood and holster remain, the chest emblem has migrated to the belt buckle, his hands are gloved, his arms and knees are armored, and he wears a cape with a raised collar and goggles with red, round lenses. Kubert also includes what appear to be business slacks and shoes – perhaps evoking the look of Klan members who wore their robes over street clothes, or perhaps hinting at Hitler’s non-supervillain wardrobe underneath.
The closing image in #25, the character’s first appearance in the story arc, echoes the next issue’s opening panels: five white pointed hoods with yellow cross emblems on the foreheads displayed in front of six Nazi flags. “Symbols of hate,” writes Jurgens’ narrator, “verification of man’s potential for evil.” Though the German Nazi Party and the U.S. KKK have no direct historical connection, Jurgens and Kurbert juxtapose them as equivalents.
The opening of #26 also demonstrates Jurgens and Kurbert’s interest in the role of iconography, which they expand at the level of plot. Shortly after Jurgens’ narrator identifies images of Hitler as “icons for a warped tomorrow,” Hate Monger spraypaints Captain America’s shield with a swastika.
The cover of #26 instead features the word “HATE” in dripping green letters, perhaps to avoid placing a swastika so prominently. Captain America also appears to prioritize removing the swastika (“My flag against yours”) rather than stopping a biological attack — before Jurgens’ plotting reveals the two actions are unified (the burning heat of the missile forces Hate Monger to relinquish the shield, while only coincidentally removing the paint, allowing Captain America to use the shield to free Falcon who then diverts the missiles).
The plot element may have been inspired by Roger McKenzie and Sal Buscema’s Captain America #231-236 (March-August 1979), where Captain America is brainwashed into supporting the white supremacist neo-Nazi group National Force who also paint a swastika on his shield:
When the paint dissolves and he recognizes his original shield, Captain America returns to his normal self.
Whether Hate Monger is “truly a reincarnation of Adolf Hitler,” Jurgens’ Fury replies: “One o’ several that’s been churned out.” The term “reincarnation” differs at least conatively from both Stan Lee’s 1963 “doubles” and Peter Gill’s 1980 “clones.” The nature of Marvel time has evolved ambiguously too. When Jurgens’ Fury recounts Fantastic Four #21 (1963), the phrase ”years ago when I was C.I.A.” seems to ground the events in the early 1960s while also implying a length of time shorter than 37 years. Jurgens also reprises Jack Kirby’s Nazi scientist and Gills’ only partially coherent retcon: “Wasn’t really the man hisself, but a replacement body grown by Arnim Zola.”
Depending on the meaning of “the man hisself,” Jurgen contradicts Gills whose Hate-Monger understood himself to be Adolf Hitler. Jurgens’ Fury doesn’t believe it, which Jurgens makes implicit through the divided references in “He might just succeed where ol’ Adolf failed!” and “Biggest shoveler of hate and racist garbage this side of Hitler himself.” Jurgen’s Hate Monger doesn’t seem to beleive it either, since he intends to “make the whole world the way it should be” because “Such was the vision of Der Fuehrer – and such is the vision of Hate Monger.”
Kubert visually reinforces the division by placing a photograph of Hitler in the background as the Hate Monger speaks: “The world grows sicker by the day, infected by the mongrel species whose mere existence – drags down the superior race!” This Hate Monger presumably shares Adolf Hitler’s face, but Jurgens and Kubert leave him masked.
Though his Hate Monger reiterates eugenics rhetoric (“the one, supreme race finally takes its righteous place in the world!”), Jurgens emphasizes a specifically anti-Black prejudice by kidnapping the “most accomplished African-American military man this country ever produced” to frame him: “How tragic, that a Black military man will lose control and launch an attack against other nations, igniting a race war – and discrediting his people for all time. Or so it would appear when our well-placed evidence is discovered.”
Jurgens’ General McAllister Groves, C.O. of the Joint Chiefs, is likely based on General Colin Powell, the first Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who retired in 1993 but remained prominent in national politics in the late 1990s (and then served as Secretary of Defense in the Bush administration the following year).
Kubert also adds U.S. slavery imagery to the Nazi mix by drawing the General in iron chains. John Buscema drew similar chains thirty years earlier when the KKK-inspired Sons of the Serpent captured Black Panther in Avengers #74 (March 1970).
Hate Monger’s pair of anthrax-loaded missiles (a variation on Gary Friedrich’s “germ bomb” from Nick Fury, Agent of SHIELD #9 in 1969) likely reflects recent biochemical terrorist scares, including the arrest of former neo-Nazi Larry Wayne Harris for possession of biochemical weapons materials in 1995. Jurgens does not reprise the Hate-ray. While previous writers have ignored the question, Jurgens characterizes Hate Monger’s followers as “outcasts,” whose “most common trait” is “a relentless hate they foster to cover their own deficiencies.” Placing the Hate Monger’s complex in Idaho, a state that voted for every Republican presidential candidate since 1968 and was 91% White and .4% Black in 2000, also suggests mid-western prejudice.
When a SHIELD leader explains that “America ain’t perfect” and acknowledges that “she’s still got loads of troubles and the biggest of ‘em is racism,” he lists “the usual rhetoric and church bombings” as the primary challenges. The reference is significant. While the history of attacks on churches largely begins in the 1950s and expands into the 1960s in reaction to the civil rights movement, it peaks in the 1990s, with thirty-five burnings from January 1995 to June 1996, the month the Church Arson Prevention Act passed unanimously in both houses of Congress. Jurgens also uses the character of Falcon to highlight the role of race: “A skeptic might suggest you want a Black man there to help smoke the bad guys out,” which the SHIELD leader agrees is “pretty much true.” Despite these racial acknowledgements, Jurgens’ narrator presents Captain America in exclusively non-racialized terms: “He’s dedicated his life to freedom, individual liberty and the order of a democratic society.”
Unlike (almost all) previous incarnations, Jurgens’ unmasked Hitler also escapes alive. When Captain America finds his costume floating in the river, he calls them “Empty robes,” reiterating the KKK influence, and shouts, “We’ll get you, Hate Monger! I swear it!”
That vow proves surprisingly false, because the next iteration of the supervillain produces a new narrative thread, and (to my best understanding of this already contradictory narrative progression) leaves this 2000 thread dangling.
Dan Jurgens, now scripter and penciller, reprised “Hate-Monger” (the hyphen returns but not “the”) a little more than a year later in Captain America #45-48 (September-December 2001). The September cover date is dramatic, but #45 was likely released in July, #46 in August, and #47 and #48 were in production before September 11, 2001 — and so their depicted content has no relationship to the World Trade Center attack.
Jurgens largely repeats Kubert’s previous redesign, though the cape is now red, the belt gray, the legs enclosed in metal, and the eyes glowing. The last two details prove significant.
When Jurgens’ Fury once again recounts his first encounter with “H-M” “years ago” in Fantastic Four #21 (1963), he reports that “Adolf Hitler was underneath” the mask, which Jurgens’ Sub-Mariner doubts: “Surely not the true Hitler! Just as this one cannot be!” Captain America confirms that his strength is now “more than human.” Though Jurgens gives Falcon a retconning aside, “When we all tangled with Hate-Monger a few months back I kind of figured he was different,” this Hate-Monger differs from Jurgens’ previous iteration. According to Jurgens’ Red Skull, this is “a new and improved version,” who “works for” him.
Apparently, when the Red Skull last used the Cosmic Cube, it merged with his “deepest thoughts,” his “memories and experiences,” including his “time spent with Hitler – and his fiery speeches of conquest and domination,” which the Cube coalesced “into a form of living energy and emotion,” “the personification of my dream — of Hitler’s dream!!”
These events seem to have no relationship with the Cosmic Cube that Peter Gills’ Red Skull constructed to imprison Hitler in Super-Villian Team-Up #16-17 (May-June 1980). Rather than being Hitler or a clone or double or reincarnation or mind-essence of Hitler, this twenty-first-century Hate-Monger is the embodiment of another person’s memory of him. Still, when unmasked, Jurgens draws him literally shining through.
Jurgens may also reference Bill Mantlo’s Peter Parker, The Spectacular Spider-Man #13–15 (December 1977 – February 1978) when Captain America calls his yet-unseen enemy “Evil Incarnate” — the phrase Mantlo’s Man-Beast Hate-Monger uses to describe himself. Or that might just be generic superhero rhetoric. A more significant reference may be to SS General and later Nazi apologist and historical revisionist Paul Hausser, unless Jurgens’s use of the last name “Hauser” for his Hate-Monger’s human disguise is merely as a generically German name.
The more significant shift is toward anti-immigrant rhetoric.
Hauser presents himself as a union representative warning a group of strikers that the corporation they work for “has shipped in a truckload of workers from Mexico,” “Illegal aliens,” “not one of them a tax-paying, voting citizen of this great country,” who will “work for pennies and stab us in the back while they’re doing it,” costing “you your homes, your children’s education and hope for the future.” A network news show soon announces: “one of the worst hate crimes ever reported,” “dozens of white men brutally attacked and killed numerous […] Mexican school-teachers here to visit, study and learn from their American counterparts.” The murders, “pharmacists, architects, retail employees and other common people,” “inexplicably believe themselves to be union employees of the Trident Corporation.”
The goal is to trigger “war along the border” with Mexico and the “complete and total destabilization of America.” Jurgens’ Fury likens the destruction to World War II: “Ain’t much that reminds me o’ London during the Blitz – but this comes close. At least five of these backwater Louisiana towns have gone up in flames. Burned by their own people.”
While the White characters are under the control of Hate-Monger, the Black characters appear to be responding only defensively: “Your kind started this! You burned our business – our churches – our homes!” They accuse Fury of being White, “Just like the ones who started this! Ever since that stranger showed up last night, they’ve been after us!” Since they don’t know anything further about the “stranger,” their impulse to “Kill him!” and “Tear him apart!” are not caused by Hate-Monger but are their actual personal reactions.
Despite the racial implications, Jurgens soon expands and alters the nature of the influence. When Hate-Monger disguised as Hauser next addresses a crowd, he announces: “At last, each and every one of you has come to recognize your true enemies! They’re those who keep you down, preventing you and your people from achieving their ultimate goals – and rightful place as the supreme race!” But Jurgens reveals on the following page that the crowd is diverse and subdivided into identity groups, each hearing a different message spoken by a seemingly different Hauser.
To a new group of approving Black men who call him “brother,” he appears to be a Black man: “they need servants to do the crap jobs so they placate you with a little bit of food, a TV and a low-paying job – just enough to keep you from seeing the truth.” To a group of Asian men, he appears to be an Asian man: “each and every one of you – is being ripped off while inferior races steal what is rightfully yours!” To a group of White women, he appears to be a red-haired White woman: “The time for talk and compromise is over! The time for revolution is at hand! Join me in taking America for us!”
Jurgens implies that all identity groups are inherently susceptible to out-group hatred. He uses his supervillains to reflect U.S. tension over multiculturalism, a term coined in 1965 and which grew into common use in the 1980s and 1990s. Jurgens’ Red Skull voices the conservative argument that multiculturalism weakens society: “I have no reason to destroy America. Not when your pathetically diverse, patchwork country is capable of doing so – all by itself, from within. Your nation is a cauldron of hate waiting to erupt. A cesspool of violent thoughts looking for release. It’s a fuse extending from one coast to the other, waiting for someone to ignite the flame.” Jurgens also selects rural Louisiana for a hate-crimes setting. The state was considered the second most diverse in 2000, with a Black population of 32.5%, more than double the 12.5% national average.
Despite overtly opposing the Red Skull’s rhetoric, Jurgen’s Captain America voices a contradictory combination of political speech: “I look around this room and see people of every race from every background imaginable! If this country stands for anything, it’s that anyone can succeed. Not only do we allow for diversity — but we embrace it because the whole is greater than the sum of the parts!” After the observation that diversity exists, “anyone can succeed” evokes a common conservative talking point used to counter accusations that prejudice remains an obstacle for minority groups. Then “the whole is greater,” a paraphrase of Aristotle that President Obama would later evoke in a 2008 speech (“this nation is more than the sum of its parts”), instead places individuality second to group identity at a national level. Ultimately, it is his “love of America and “his respect for those who defended America in years past,” rather than hatred for its enemies, that enables Jurgens’ Captain America to succeed. When Hate-Monger links himself to “thousands of minds, pooled as one unstoppable force,” he is destroyed by their conversion to Captain America’s utopic vision.
This may or may not count as Adolf Hitler’s seventh death.
Either way, it’s not his last.
Next stop: The Punisher.
Tags: Andy Kubert, Captain America, Dan Jurgens, Hate-Monger, marvel comics
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
April 27, 2026 When did Marvel stop coloring Black people gray?
If you’re looking for the short answer, it’s 1965 and/or 1967.
The answer I offer in The Color of Paper is less precise:
“Until the late 1960s, the skin of Black characters was typically rendered with equal parts yellow, magenta, and cyan, which on off-white paper produces gray-brown or taupe, including, for example, Gabe Jones in Marvel’s Sgt. Fury and his Howling Commandos #1 (May 1963).”
Since CMYK, the standard coloring system for comic book until roughly the mid-1990s, used codes to designate precise percentage-sized dot combinations, I added that “before 1970 Marvel colorists assigned Black characters a gray-brown or taupe skin color coded Y2R2B2 (25% yellow, 25% magenta, and 25% cyan on off-white paper),” and after 1970 they used “Marvel’s new standard for Black skin: YR3B2 (100% yellow, 50% magenta, and 25% cyan).”
That new combination, though more difficult to produce consistently, created a more naturalistic skin color. I assume that was the reason for the change. It was not due to a change in technology. CMYK coloring had maintained essentially the same four-plate process since its invention in 1879. Some comics companies did use (or tried to, since results varied) a wider range of percentages (adding 70% to the standard 25%, 50%, and 100%) for a total of 124 instead of 64 possible combinations (including the unmarked paper). But that later change occurred primarily in the 1980s, and Marvel’s late 1960s YR3B2 brown skin didn’t use any 70% colors. The change also wasn’t an innovation. Jackie Ormes had been using various CMYK browns to represent Black skin since the 1950s.
Knowing exactly when Marvel made that change could also clarify why. Since “the late 1960s” and “before 1970” are vague, here’s a fuller answer.
For Black Panther’s first appearance in Fantastic Four #52 (July 1966), the colorist (a role that was never credited while Stan Lee was editor but was probably most often Stan Goldberg in the 60s), his skin is taupe – or what Zoe D. Smith calls “straight up gray” in her groundbreaking 2020 essay “4 Colorism.”
But in an unpublished version of the cover (which included Kirby’s earlier less skin-covering costume), his face appears brown.
The published cover of Avengers #52 (November 1968) also includes a partially face-exposing mask, and his skin again appears brown.
So why brown skin on covers but taupe skin inside?
Goldberg explained in a 2002 Alter Ego interview:
“We had a little more leeway with covers, because the printing was better on them than on interior pages.” But because interior art was “printed on cheap paper,” the “colors would come through from the other side of the page, and the paper wasn’t white, either. We couldn’t get a white background on the page. The colors would sometimes be way off from what we wanted.”
That means the question, “When did Marvel stop coloring Black people gray?”, needs to be divided too.
Gabe Jones is a good test case.
When the character premiered in Sgt. Fury and His Howling Commandos #1 (May 1963), he appeared taupe in the interior art (shown above), but because his figure is so small on the cover, I’m hesitant to draw a conclusion about the coloring.
But he is more clearly a taupe shade on the cover of Sgt. Fury #2 (July 1963).
And on the cover of Sgt. Fury #12 (November 1964).
Because his face is typically small, it’s difficult to pinpoint the exact moment of change, but certainly by Sgt. Fury #18 (May 1965) his skin is rendered a fuller brown.
He continues to be colored brown on his cover appearances for the rest of the run, including for Sgt. Fury #23 (October 1965).
Which was published the same month as Strange Tales #137 (October 1965), where he debuted as a contemporary character in the new series Nick Fury, Agent of S.H.E.I.L.D. His skin more clearly appears brown on that cover.
Despite a possible taupe aberration on Strange Tales #140 (January 1966), I think it’s safe to say that Marvel stopped coloring Black people gray on its covers in 1965.
But what about interior coloring?
The transition must be after Black Panther’s taupe-colored debut in Fantastic Four #52 (July 1966). It’s also after Avengers #32 (September 1966), which introduced a taupe Bill Foster.
But when Robbie Robertson first appeared in Amazing Spider-Man #51 (August 1967), he skin was colored brown. Same for his second appearances in #52 the following month.
That suggests that the transition was either that month or earlier – except that Gabe Jones is still taupe in Strange Tales #159 (August 1967).
As he was taupe in #157 (June 1967) too.
Though now brown on the cover, he also appeared taupe inside Sgt. Fury and his Howling Commandos #45 (August 1967).
But then in #46 (September 1967), he’s brown for the first time.
And again in #47:
But as Zoe Smith discusses, coloring errors increased, since in the same issue the character also appears green:
Despite those errors, I think it’s safe to conclude that Marvel fully stopped coloring Black characters gray in 1967, completing the transition it began in 1965.
President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in July of that year. Marvel’s first brown-skinned Black character appeared less than a year later. The motivation wasn’t technological.
After posting the above, I received an email from Ray Cornwall.
Ray wrote:
“Subject: Your blog post on Marvel coloring black characters
“I think it’s a really interesting question as to when Marvel changed the coloring of black characters.
“I immediately thought of Robbie Robertson, as you did. But you used the digital coloring (I’m assuming either in a recent printing or from Marvel Unlimited). At some point in the early 2000s, Marvel put out DVDs of scans of main Marvel series up until about 2000 or so. I think the scans were of comics owned by editor Ralph Macchio, but I don’t know.
“Here’s the pages from those scans: clearly, Robbie is brown. Hope this helps. I wonder if the difference in coloring black characters was due to the actual colorist of the comic rather than a company policy. Stan Goldberg supposedly did most of the coloring of comics until 1967, according to Mark Evanier. So it’s possible that the taupe coloring was done by Stan Goldberg, and another colorist- possible Sol Brodsky or Marie Everett- changed the coloring scheme. But I have no proof.”
I responded:
“Thank so much for this, Ray. Except for a handful of cases, I only had access to the digital versions — which I’ve found are surprisingly trustworthy for repeating original color code choices, including even overt mistakes. But of course the digital effect is always very different.
“As far as who was making the skin color choices: I’m guessing Stan Lee. As editor, he of course reviewed and approved all pages, and according to Stan Goldberg interviews, he was pretty hands-on. The taupe and the later switch to brown were also company-wide, so Lee would have been in a position to orchestrate that.
“Would it be okay if I quoted your email and posted your scans as an addendum to my blog post?”
Ray responded:
“You have full permission to use my post. It’s an interesting argument! Best wishes.”
Here are scans of the three panels juxtaposed with their digital recreations:
Note how Robinson’s skin color is different in each panel, further evidence of the inconsistency of CMYK printing. The color is the same in the three digital versions.
And here are the full-page scans for context:
Spider-Man #51
Spider-Man #52
Thank you, Ray.
Tags: art, Black Panther, cmyk, coloring, comics, gabe-jones, Gabriel Jones, Marvel, race
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
April 20, 2026 Trump is always right
Trump hates the media, and he has instilled reflexive contempt for news agencies into his followers. His concern isn’t for accurate reporting. His motives are personal, which his lawsuits make explicit.
After losing reelection in 2020, Trump sued CNN for $475 million, claiming that references to his court-rejected allegations of mass voter fraud as “the Big Lie” defamed him. He lost the suit, and late last month, a second appeals court refused to rehear the case, leaving in place Judge Singhal’s 2023 decision to dismiss because “Trump alleges no false statements of fact.” If a statement isn’t false, it can’t be defamatory.
While running for reelection again in 2024, Trump sued ABC for stating he had been “found liable for rape,” after he had been found liable for “sexual abuse” of Jean Carroll. Trump had already lost a nearly identical lawsuit against Carroll in 2023 when Judge Kaplan clarified that “the New York Penal Law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration,” but “Mr. Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms. Carrol as that term commonly is used and understood.”
Rather than face a sitting president in court, ABC settled after Trump won reelection. Trump then attacked more news agencies during his first year back in office.
In June, he sued Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal for $10 billion after it reported that Trump’s signature and a sexual doodle appeared in a 2003 birthday card for Jeffrey Epstein. The organization responded: “In an affront to the First Amendment, the President of the United States brought this lawsuit to silence a newspaper for publishing speech that was subsequently proven true by documents released by Congress to the American public.” The case was dismissed last week.
In September, Trump sued the New York Times for $15 billion for multiple statements, including quotations from Trump’s former chief of staff John Kelly warning that “in his opinion, Mr. Trump met the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator if allowed, and had no understanding of the Constitution or the concept of rule of law.” Judge Merryday dismissed the complaint because of its “tedious and burdensome aggregation of prospective evidence,” its “rehearsal of tendentious arguments,” and its “protracted recitation and explanation of legal authority putatively supporting the pleader’s claim.” Trump refiled, and the case is ongoing.
Trump also used his presidential powers to expand his media attacks. Last May, he issued an executive order “to cease Federal funding for NPR and PBS,” because he claimed the two news agencies were “Biased Media,” violating the “principles of impartiality” to not “contribute to or otherwise support any political party.” The order included no evidence.
Late last month, Judge Moss declared the order unconstitutional because it “singles out two speakers and, on the basis of their speech, bars them from all federally funded programs,” and “the First Amendment does not tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type.”
Trump has used his administration to expand his attacks too. Last October, Secretary of Defense Hegseth issued new rules limiting press access to the Pentagon by requiring the Secretary’s prior approval for news reports. Roughly fifty journalists from nearly all news agencies, including Fox News and Newsmax, walked out rather than sign the new document. Only One America News Network remained.
Late last month, Judge Friedman ruled that “the undisputed evidence reflects the Policy’s true purpose and practical effect: to weed out disfavored journalists … and replace them” with “individuals and outlets who had expressed ideological agreement with and support for the Trump administration …. This is viewpoint discrimination, full stop. The Policy thus violated the First Amendment.”
In 2016, before Trump started calling unfavorable news reports “fake news,” Pew Research reported that 76% of Americans trusted national news organizations. That trust dropped to 56% by last October. According to Gallup, 30% of Republicans had “no trust at all” in the media when Trump began campaigning in 2015. Republican distrust has since doubled to 62%.
Trump doesn’t care about freedom of speech or freedom of the press. He doesn’t want unbiased media. He wants media biased overwhelmingly in his favor. His doctrine is the same as Italy’s in 1929 when state-controlled newspapers printed a Ten Commandments for the prime minister’s followers.
The list included: “Mussolini is always right.”
[A version of this commentary first appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch on April 7 and 15, 2026.]
Tags: cnn, Donald Trump, history, new-york-times, news, politics, rapist, the-big-lie, trump, trump-lawsuits, trump-media-attacks, wall-street-journal
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized



















































































































































