One Roll Review - Lomochrome Color '92

I have to hand it to the minds at Lomography. Whatever sources they have, or partnerships with film manufacturers, they have been able to come up with some films that simply defy convention and encourage experimentation by photographers.  I'm not sure where this latest release stands in the world of C-41 films that Lomography has come up with, but when I saw it available, I purchased three rolls from the Lomography store.  

First of all, I knew that I wanted to test this film in a camera that has shown reliable results with color films, my Yashica Electro 35CC. With its 35mm f/1.8 lens, this camera is considerably more compact than the big Yashica Electro 35s most people are familiar with.  That's one reason that I use it, and the other is that I like the aperture-priority operation of this camera (even if I don't know what the exact shutter speed will be), and the 35mm lens is perfect for much of the photography that I do.

I already had a roll of Kodak Pro Image 100 in this camera, which was fortuitous, since I could compare the color rendition of the Color '92 with the Pro Image 100.  I shot the roll of Color '92 in Murphy and Asheville, NC.  I shot it at the box speed of ISO 400, and it was developed by Ball Photo in Asheville, and I scanned the negatives on my Epson V700 scanner. Minor corrections were applied post-scan in Corel Paintshop Pro.

The Henn theatre, shot on Pro Image 100

Henn Theatre, shot on Color '92

As you can see, the Color'92 has a bit of a slightly different palette, but nothing like the Lomo Metropolis film.  If anything, it reminds me of some older slide film scans, but with better shadow detail.    In the two photos of the Henn theater in Murphy, NC, the red looks slightly muted compared to the Pro Image 100, but blues are more intense.

Some more images:

The rest are from Asheville, NC

Based on this sample, I'd say that the reds have some cyan that mutes them a bit, and that the film really shines in full sun.   Overall, it's certainly a choice on whether to use it or any other 400 ISO color film.  It's not going to be as obvious a result as say, Lomo Metropolis or Lomochrome Purple. However, I do like the look of this film

Is it worth the extra price over some expired 400 ISO film?  It all depends on what you are looking for. I think the more muted appearance in shade is quite nice.  

The Yashica Electro 35 CC

Yashica produced quite an array of 35mm rangefinder cameras. In the early 1950s, they manufactured only twin-Lens reflex cameras, but expanded to 35 mm after they purchased the Nicca Camera Works in 1958. It wasn’t until about 1959 that Yashica produced 35mm rangefinders of their own design, starting with the Yashica YK.

Yashica YK, circa 1959

The early 35mm rangefinders were all fully manual, with the Lynx and Minister lines manufactured to about 1970. The Lynx and Minister cameras featured uncoupled meters and full manual operation, early models had selenium cells, and later models have CdS meter cells.

Yashica Lynx 14E IC - circa 1969

Yashica Minister III, circa 1966. Note the Selenium cells around the lens.

 With the Electro 35 series, starting in 1966, the cameras featured  CdS exposure metering, relatively fast 45 mm lenses, and electronic aperture-priority auto-exposure.  My early experience (between 2000 and 2012) with the Electro 35 series was not favorable.  All too often I encountered a camera that required a battery I could not find.  In some cases, a camera looked really great cosmetically, but was dead as a doornail mechanically.  In addition, I thought the cameras were bulky and finicky.  In the ensuing years, I learned about the PAD of death problem and the Yashica Guy that made battery adapters.  I think my biggest hangup with these cameras is that while they are aperture-priority, I have no indication of what the actual shutter speed is, and unlike a camera such as the Konica Auto S2, there is no manual mode available.  Yes, the Electro 35 series have a following, and many people liked them, but I was never a fan.

Yashica Electro 35 GSN, post-1975.

 There has been a lot written about the Yashica Electro 35 series which I am not going to duplicate here. Over the years, many of the cameras became unusable due to lack of a proper battery and the PAD of death affecting many of them. Mike Elek has an excellent post on the PAD of death.  As for battery replacement, visit the Yashica Guy and order a battery adapter that will make your Electro 35 camera usable.

As I previously stated, I was not a fan of the Electro 35 series.  However, in December, a very minty Electro 35 CC came my way that seemed to work. It doesn't need any battery adapter, allowing me to use a single 6v 4LR44 battery.  Now, the Electro 35 CC is a bit of a different beast compared to the Electro 35 GSN.  Stephen Gandy's Camera Quest site has an excellent review of the Electro 35 CC, and I have always been intrigued about this camera, but never saw one until now. 

It sure is a pretty camera!

What sets the Electro 35 CC apart from the rest of its line is the 35mm f/1.8 lens.  The Electro 35 series typically feature a 45mm f/1.7 lens, though the Electro 35 MC has a 40mm f/2.8 lens.  The 35 CC is also more compact the the rest.  I found an interesting error in McKeown's Cameras (page 1026) that lists the Electro 35 CC as having a 50mm f/1.7 lens.  The Electro 35 CC was sold from 1970-75, and is apparently one of the rarer models.  The original Electro 35 appeared in 1966, and the Electro 35 GSN was possibly the last model, as it appeared in 1975 and was sold into the early 1980s.

Electro 35 CC features:

• Lens: 35mm, f/1.8, 6 elements in 4 groups.
• Shutter: between-the-lens, electronically controlled two-leaved type.
• Shutter Speeds: 8 sec - 1/250 sec.
• Exposure Meter: CdS cell located above front lens element, allowing metering with filters attached.
• Exposure Value Range: EV -1 - EV 16.
• Film Speed Range: ISO 25-500.
• Flash: PC socket, and only a cold shoe (why?).
• Focusing:  rangefinder-type.
• Viewfinder Information: Overexposure and slow speed indicator
• Film Advance: Manual, lever operated, single-stroke.
• Self-Timer: Mechanical, 10-sec. delay.
• Filter Mount: 52 mm.
• Battery:  6V PX28, or 4LR44 . Battery check illuminates frame counter if battery is good.  Lock button around shutter release to avoid accidental exposure.
• Dimensions: 120 x 74 x 59 mm
• Weight: 550 g.
• Finish of body: black only, no chrome models.

My experience  with the Electro 35 CC was satisfactory, overall.  The rangefinder focusing was easy to see, and the relatively compact aspect of the camera made it a joy to use.  I think one has to use one of the Electro series for a while just to get used to the way they work with the over-under exposure arrows.  Since the maximum shutter speed on the Electro 35 CC is only 1/250 sec, I think using it with slower films is a good idea.  Of course, an ND filter could be used for high speed films.  It's certainly a camera deserving of some praise, in part because it does not require a battery adaptor, its compact size,  35mm focal length, and ease of use. I still wish the camera had a fully manual mode, but I will just have to accept it the way it is. It's about the size and weight of my Canon QL-17 GIII - in other words, compact and easy to carry around. It's also very quiet.

Here are some sample images taken over the past few months. Black and white images were shot in Columbia SC on expired Plus-X; color images were taken in Columbia SC and Ashevill NC on Fuji Superia 200.

I'll have to do more shooting with this cute, compact, and "ever-ready" camera.  I believe it has earned a place in my camera bag.