
“When emotions come, you gotta slow down and take note, because in the midst of all that emotion is where the possibilities lie.” Cheryl Oreglia
How well do we really know anyone?
This might surprise you.
If you’ve been reading this blog for any amount of time, you might know more about me than you care to, but do you really?
Are there things about me that make you cringe, want to throw something sharp, argue about in the dead of the night, or call your Mother?
I bet there are a few.
And I am here to say there are things that you do not know because even I haven’t explored all the deep crevices of my being. There are parts of me, all of us really, that will never be fully exposed, like streaking across the field at the World Series. It’s not going to happen.
Now you’re thinking, what the hell is she hiding?
It’s the risk we all take when we choose to start a blog, fall in love, make a new friend, or post shit on social media, especially when we want to remain both authentic and interesting while doing so.
It’s tricky. Impossible, really.
The point is, as an author, I choose what to include in my stories and what to leave out. What I want to understand is what allows you to enter more deeply into a story and/or derive meaning from the particulars, which I’ve only been able to grasp with a good pair of needle nose players.
Susan Bauer suggests that one way to get at the deeper meaning of an essay is to ask yourself, “What is the message the author is trying to convey, and do I agree with it?”
I think it’s fascinating how the authors and readers can be grappling with completely different messages, yet they’re exploring the same narrative. What readers think the author intended could be a total sidekick like Abbot and Costello.
Why would anyone bother reading an entire essay if it doesn’t compel them?
I’ve been thinking about why I keep going back again and again to particular bloggers, podcasts, and favorite authors.
As a reader, I crave a little mystery or intrigue, something that stimulates my curiosity. I like to pretend I’m unraveling the secrets of the universe while I’m reading why someone did what they did, how they did it, or postulating about what’s going to happen next as if setting a train of dominoes into motion.
The assumption here is that if I understand what compels me, then I’ll be able to guess what compels you, and hopefully, that will make me a better writer.
Wouldn’t that be nice?
I want to unveil the meaning of life one story at a time. Okay, that might be above my pay grade. It’s more like a puzzle. Each piece adds to the bigger picture, and maybe someday, we can put it all together.
Or not.
Either way, I’m going to live in the gap and play with the people I love until some entity recalls my prototype, and then I’m off on a new adventure.
Titillating as that might sound, I’m still enjoying my coffee, pasta, and wine. So, I’m not going to be dangling my toe in the grave just yet.
I’m curious about the particulars of life, like why the hell am I here, what am I supposed to be doing (blogging is not the first thing that comes to mind), and why are we the only species who can laugh?
It’s those kinds of questions I try to answer when deciding what stories to tell, but more importantly, what the experience has taught me. This is what I think about while sipping coffee early in the morning, staring into the pale nothingness through my patio door.
I’m sure you’re as mystified as I am about this life, or you’d be getting up to refresh your coffee, maybe vacuum the front room.
And now we can figure it all out with AI. Keep in mind that A stands for artificial. Just sayin…
I feel as if we have it all backward. What’s really important is at the mercy of what definitely is not, like profit margins over altruism. Larry told me while we were having breakfast the other day that I was a communist (not literally, at heart) because I thought everyone should be able to watch their favorite sports on the television without paying $400 a month.
He said, “It’s all about capitalism, profit margins, and answering to the board.”
I say, “Who could care less about the needs of their community.”
“That is what our economy is based on.”
“Greed”
My argument hinges on the development of a future fan base. If no one can afford to watch sports or go to a game with their families because it cost too much money, there won’t be any fans in the future to watch your damn channel. Take that to the board.
And I’m the communist?
Why is this so hard to understand? But that’s a total aside, and I have no idea where I was going with that. A Costello moment.
The point is we tend to value money more than people.
What is true and what we tell ourselves is true so we can keep on going with our self-esteem still attached (maybe only by a string) are sometimes polar opposites.
I’m just trying to figure out what makes me happy, gives me peace, and what’s gets me out of bed every day besides coffee.
That’s what this blog is about. How am I doing?
Just kidding, there’s no need to answer that. That’s a rhetorical question.
I stumbled on this very cool reel from Mel Robbins, and it put my little nugget in overdrive. Imagine I’m revving my engine for emphasis.
She says she’s been using this new thing called The Let Them Theory, Robbins says, “The next time you feel left out, if all your friends go to brunch and don’t invite you. Let them. Or maybe the person you’re dating doesn’t want a commitment. Let them. You spend so much time and energy trying to control other people and getting emotionally worked up about things that are beyond your control. You can tap into peace and true control if you let them be themselves. So here’s the thing, if you let them, people will reveal who they really are. And when they reveal who they really are to you, you can now choose next what’s right for you. So let them.”
Is she brilliant or what?
So here’s my story.
I witnessed some disharmony at a recent event, it had to do with selfish and inconsiderate behavior at the expense of someone I love. Suddenly, I’m annoyed. Okay, irritated might be a better choice of words. It was as if this person were a dog with a bone. They couldn’t let it go.
When the emotions come, you gotta slow down and take note, because in the midst of all that emotion is where the possibilities lie!
My new motto is to observe my passing emotions as if they were a new species found on the Galapagos Islands. What is my annoyance telling me? I asked myself because Larry refuses to indulge me in this sophisticated practice of self-introspection. Which also is annoying.
I finally decided to listen to Mel’s advice because I’m tired of sitting with uncomfortable feelings I did not create. Let them, I’m using it as a mantra, if anything, it drowns out the repetitive irritating verbiage.
There is no viable reason to let someone else’s piss-poor behavior get under your skin. I admit the behavior was unkind, but all it revealed was the true nature of that person, not me. Which I already knew.
And now, I can make better choices about how I spend my precious time. Right?
We have a choice in life. We can keep trying to improve ourselves, or we can allow the unevolved parts of our character (I assumed you’ve all witnessed a two-year-old who doesn’t get what she wants) to drag us around like a dog on a leash.
I keep inserting the dog metaphor for a reason. A few weekends ago, my friend’s dog, who was on a leash, went tearing off after a stray ball. When she got to the end of the chain, it caught her around the neck, and she did a complete backflip. Guess what. She doesn’t go after stray balls anymore.
Putting a leash and a short chain on our wayward emotions might not be a bad idea.
I suppose at the end of the day, what matters most are all the good words, thoughts, and deeds that we put into the world, maybe even the laughter we inspire, not the good we hoped to experience from others or maybe even expected. These are our delusions. We don’t have to be annoyed by our stray emotions. We can sit in the shade and let someone else chase them around.
It’s like going to your own ball game. Let them!
I’m Living in the Gap, sporting communist ideas, care to join me in the comments?
I did a podcast with Stephanie James on Igniting the Spark. Check it out!
I read an article about why people buy books!
- They buy from an author they like.
- They buy from a friend’s recommendation. (This we can all do and help the authors we love ~ hint, hint)
- They buy because the book is in a prominent place in the bookstore.
- They buy them because they have good reviews on Amazon. (Hello, don’t make me beg.)
Quotes I’m thinking about:
Cheryl’s quote: “Greed, envy, sloth, pride and gluttony: these are not vices anymore. No, these are marketing tools. Lust is our way of life. Envy is just a nudge towards another sale. Even in our relationships we consume each other, each of us looking for what we can get out of the other. Our appetites are often satisfied at the expense of those around us. In a dog-eat-dog world we lose part of our humanity.”
― Jon Foreman
Larry’s quote: “Well first of all, tell me: Is there some society you know that doesn’t run on greed? You think Russia doesn’t run on greed? You think China doesn’t run on greed? What is greed? Of course, none of us are greedy, it’s only the other fellow who’s greedy. The world runs on individuals pursuing their separate interests. The great achievements of civilization have not come from government bureaus. Einstein didn’t construct his theory under order from a bureaucrat. Henry Ford didn’t revolutionize the automobile industry that way. In the only cases in which the masses have escaped from the kind of grinding poverty you’re talking about, the only cases in recorded history, are where they have had capitalism and largely free trade. If you want to know where the masses are worse off, worst off, it’s exactly in the kinds of societies that depart from that. So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear, that there is no alternative way so far discovered of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by the free-enterprise system.”
― Milton Friedman




