User talk:Cabayi

FYI, since you blocked the anon

Is it possible this was just a logged out admin by accident? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Vandal_or_logged_out_admin_and_AFD_oddness — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:11, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

No. Consider tnis contribution and think about what happens when ~~~~ is parsed. Cabayi (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Ohhhh. OK, I get it now. — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:58, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Stop knowingly violating policies.

Do you know better than to reintroduce false info to a page? Apparently not. You just did so. diff. Despite participating in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Advice_to_T-Mobile_IPv6_users#Challenge_reintroduction_of_false_info. Where the false info you would be introducing was itemized. Could you at least acknowledge that one should Preserve appropriate content? It is policy! Can you acknowledge that? {{helpme}} Admin Cabayi appears to be knowingly violating policy, as noted above.

1. Can I get some help getting the behavior issue addressed?
2. Can I get some help reversing the reintroduction of false info?

RememberOrwell (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

I'm an uninvolved editor, but I agree with Amanda that your revisions have made the page much harder to understand, especially due to the incorrect formatting/html syntax of your edits. If the previously mentioned issues are addressed, other editors may be more open to your revisions. I would also advise you to continue this discussion at the original location of Wikipedia talk:Advice to T-Mobile IPv6 users instead. This request for help template is mainly meant for your own talk page. FlammablePizza (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Also here as an uninvolved editor, but summoning people with the help request template and making sweeping claims that someone is violating policy usually better be backed up with good evidence - especially when I can see that this is nothing more than a content dispute, and not even one over an encyclopedia article. I'll also point out (as zzuuzz has already done so on the original talk page discussion) that not all of the "false info" you're complaining about is actually false - there's at least one point you're very wrong on. I'd advise you to take a step back and try to work collaboratively rather than screaming blue murder over a minor disagreement. stwalkerster (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

What?

User:B.J was not doing harassment 🏏Cricket233r (Talk to the sixes). 16:33, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

How would you characterise a user who cautions 50 users who have done nothing wrong? After having been told already that users who have not edited this wiki are not bound by this wiki's username policy? Cabayi (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

he is suppose to warn users. Also those users are doing some thing wrong. Okay, Verity68 was doing the joke mod on talk pages. It was only one edit but a temp account was doing the exact same. 🏏Cricket233r (Talk to the sixes). 16:17, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Categorization of AE protection actions needed (6 August 2026)

Hello Cabayi,

I'm a bot that helps log arbitration enforcement (AE) protection actions on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. As a result of a September 2025 motion by the Arbitration Committee, administrators are no longer required to manually log AE protection actions. Instead, this bot is responsible for logging AE protections to the AE protection log.

While logging AE protections, this bot detected that you recently took the following page protection actions. These action(s) seemed to be AE actions based on the edit summaries, but the bot wasn't able to tell which arbitration case they related to:

• 18:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC) (Avi Arad)

If these were AE actions, please take a moment to log the appropriate topic code at the AE protection log. If they were not, feel free to remove the actions from the AE protection log, and optionally let the bot operator know about the false positives.

Going forward, in order to help this bot categorize AE actions, please include a link to the contentious topic under which the action was taken in the protection edit summary (for example, [[WP:CT/BLP]] or [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Biographies of Living Persons]]).

If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to the bot operator or to the arbitration clerks at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard.

Thank you! ClerkBot (talk) 23:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Unblock

I've unblocked User:Dreamstudio.io (now User:ArtCurator95) following their promise of disclosing their paid editing and explicitly working through AfC/edit requests. Not 100% convinced, but I figure it's best to see if they follow through, as they haven't really edited beyond draftspace so there's no immediate reason to doubt them. Chaotic Enby (in solidarity · talk · contribs) 14:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)