User talk:Redrose64
Add topic
|
| Redrose64 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
Template process question
[edit]Hi there! We've crossed paths a few times over the years, and I was wondering if you could lend your experience on an issue that keeps resurfacing. First, no rush at all if you're busy. This can wait.
It boils down to this comment, although you may need to scroll up for some context. I realize you helped build RFCNOT from this discussion. Just had me wondering if perhaps more clarification is actually needed somewhere to explain to editors how they should go about demoting a template they feel should be substituted instead of transcluded. Maybe there are situations where they don't want to actually delete the template, so it may not be immediately obvious that TfD is the right venue when discussion on the template talk page stalls.
Should something be added to WP:SUBST and subsequently, WP:TFD? Or is there existing guidance somewhere I'm missing? --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:56, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Lowercase sigmabot III
[edit]Hello @Redrose64, I wanted to kindly request your help regarding the sigmabot having updated to the wrong counter (10) which happened because by mistake, I modified the counter value from 1 to 10. I have undone the change since but now I have to link archive 10 to my current talk page to show the archive as it doesn't appear on the talk page banner as archive no. 2. I'll be waiting for your reply. Thanks. Sddarealone (talk) 20:37, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Sddarealone: The easiest way (and probably best) is to revert several edits and delete a page. Give me a few minutes. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:45, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Sddarealone: OK, it should archive normally next run. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- That was fast. Thank you so much, Redrose64. Sddarealone (talk) 20:57, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
BR Class 43
[edit]Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Request to review talk page discussion closure. ~2026-34502-67 (talk) 18:46, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Avalanche close. —Locke Cole • t • c • b 12:14, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Two ANs in less than 24 hours. What fun. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:52, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
a barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Railway Barnstar | ||
| I see that you have contributed on some railway articles; so I thought it would be fitting if I gave this to you. (I usually type in textish; but I didn't want to do it this time…) AHR (g • s • c) 06:14, 25 June 2026 (UTC) |
Thank you --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:08, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
About pipes
[edit]Hi, about the pipes, I'm using Rater, which is an automated system - I can't control how it works out unfortunately. I apologize in advance for any confusion or hassle! RossEvans19 (talk) 21:18, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- @RossEvans19: Widefox (talk · contribs), who uses Rater frequently – like, almost all the time – doesn't cause these issues. It must be a configuration setting at your end. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:58, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Then I will have a look. RossEvans19 (talk) 17:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- I think i've fixed the issue, something in my settings that I turned on not fully understanding what it did. My bad for any issues! RossEvans19 (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Redrose64 - i can't seem to fix the issue with Rater so i've uninstalled it from my account :) RossEvans19 (talk) 23:20, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Felixstowe Branch Line
[edit]Hi Redrose - I see you reverted some changes I made to current preserved locations of industrial shunters. I appreciate they were not referenced but have found myself wondering whether that information is really required. Also when I originally wrote the Felixstowe Dock section I hoped others would fill in the missing blanks. As they have not I am tempted just to terminate the table at the DL11 and add a sentence to the effect of "After that a number of Class 08 shunters have worked in the dock area and these are exchanged from time to time for maintenance purposes". I'd welcome your thoughts. Davidvaughanwells (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- I've made a total of 18 edits to Felixstowe branch line:
- The first nine were on 15 May 2013 which concerned reference formatting (composite diff)
- Two edits on 4 January 2015 to (a) remove editorialising and (b) remove an undesirable comma
- One edit on 20 October 2015 to fix a list format
- One edit on 28 January 2016 to fix up some refs
- One edit on 11 October 2016 to remove some info which I considered superfluous
- One edit on 8 October 2021 to correct a ref format
- One edit on 13 February 2026 which added a wikilink
- Most recently, two edits on 25 June 2026, one of which was a revert, but the second applied the fix that I suspect you were attempting (composite diff)
- None of these concern preserved locos, so I'm puzzled by your opening sentence. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- OK no worries - thanks for the composite diff fix Davidvaughanwells (talk) 22:42, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
My revert and the Template:Redirect for discussion template
[edit]Just wanted to let you know that I opened a discussion regarding the purpose of your edits (which I reverted) at Wikipedia talk:Deletion process#Discussion for change to WP:RFD/AI regarding relisting discussions. The discussion will explain what's going on, as well as me assuming you were citing WP:RFD/AI with the edits you performed. Steel1943 (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Thank you, indeed this is what I was going by (updating links in the nomination template to point to the new page
); and I note that the relevant bullet has been edited since. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:54, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| Saw you on Wikipedia:Database reports/Longest active user editing streaks, so I had to give this to you. Keep it going! AHR (g • s • c) 04:19, 8 July 2026 (UTC) |
Thank you It would have been longer. In early September 2022 I had six days without any edits at all, due to the upheavals of a house move - no broadband in the new property for about two weeks. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:44, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Reverting Paisley Gilmour Street category
[edit]Sorry, but aren't you splitting hairs here? "Paisley Gilmour Street rail accident" redirects to "Paisley Gilmour Street railway station" so the effect is the same, as there is no separate page for the accident. There are numerous other cases in this category where it refers to a location/station rather than an accident, for the same reason. Hyperman 42 (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- And the same applies to Gidea Park. I will however correct the categories as suggested, as I was unaware that the separate titles existed - they did not come up on a Wikipedia search - but it would have been quicker and easier if you had corrected them yourself rather than reverting them. Hyperman 42 (talk) 10:11, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- In fact when I went to the two "accident" pages, it simply brought back the "station" pages and there was no way to put the "accident" links into the category. So I have reverted your undos. If you know of some obscure way to make the links refer to the "accident" page, by all means do so. Hyperman 42 (talk) 10:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Hyperman 42: First, I did put the cat onto the accident page, see my contribs from that timeframe. Second, it's easy to get back to the redirect in order to edit that - just below the "From Wikipedia, the free ..." notice there will be a link back to the redirect. Third, see WP:ACATR, wp:SUBTOPICCAT and wp:REDCAT. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- OK, sorry, I had missed that - it only showed up in my notifications as an undo of my edits. I should have checked more closely. Hyperman 42 (talk) 17:20, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- You can use the "what links here" feature. At Paisley Gilmour Street railway station, locate What links here. In most skins, it's in the left sidebar; in Vector 2022 it may be in either sidebar or in a dropdown menu, depending on your settings. Click that link, then select both "Hide transclusions" and "Hide links", then click Go. This yields this list which has 13 entries as I type this. Five of these include the words "accident" or "crash". You can use the page name link to get to the redirect, which will show its categories (if any) in the usual box at the bottom; there's also an "edit" link by means of which you can see the category markup, and amend if necessary. Only one of the five redirects needs categories; in this case Paisley Gilmour Street rail accident is the one. This is the one from which you merged the accident into the station page. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- OK, sorry, I had missed that - it only showed up in my notifications as an undo of my edits. I should have checked more closely. Hyperman 42 (talk) 17:20, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Hyperman 42: First, I did put the cat onto the accident page, see my contribs from that timeframe. Second, it's easy to get back to the redirect in order to edit that - just below the "From Wikipedia, the free ..." notice there will be a link back to the redirect. Third, see WP:ACATR, wp:SUBTOPICCAT and wp:REDCAT. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- In fact when I went to the two "accident" pages, it simply brought back the "station" pages and there was no way to put the "accident" links into the category. So I have reverted your undos. If you know of some obscure way to make the links refer to the "accident" page, by all means do so. Hyperman 42 (talk) 10:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
July 2026
[edit]
Hello, I'm Mattdaviesfsic. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, East Lancashire Railway, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. Talk to me. 05:49, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Mattdaviesfsic: You're kidding, right?
Many mistakes on Wikipedia have been made by editors not checking what they are changing.
Did you not notice that I was rolling back a vandalism edit that broke a table? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 06:35, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Redrose Following disagreements on approach with another editor I have decided I am no longer going to contribute to wikipedia (bar the odd spelling mistake). May I thank you for the advice and guidance you have given me over the last few years. regards Davidvaughanwells (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Davidvaughanwells: I'm sorry to hear that. I know exactly who you mean; they're clearly on a mission to remove anything that isn't referenced to FA standards, regardless of WP:V. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:08, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- I have reverted the edit on Southend East railway station as it looked like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut; and anyone who thinks the Midland Railway being expanded to the LMS in 1921 needs a cite right here and now could easily find one. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:42, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Listing for discussion of Template:Editnotices/Page/List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–2025)
[edit]
Template:Editnotices/Page/List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–2025) has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
RFC
[edit]Hi, I appreciate your advice on the RFC, as I'm not overly familiar with the process and have only done it once before. I've changed the sentence on the talk page. Does that update when Legobot runs? I've noticed it hasn’t changed yet on the RFC page, so I'm not sure whether I've done it wrong. Thanks. ItsShandog (talk) 07:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- @ItsShandog: You refer, presumably, to this edit. Yes, as noted at WP:RFCBOT, it will update on the next Legobot run - probably at 08:01 (UTC). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- No problem, thank you for your help. ItsShandog (talk) 08:20, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
EPIC fail.
[edit]Sorry about Special:Diff/prev/1366646115. Thanks for tagging me in the diff. No excuse except me being lazy. Appreciate you catching it and fixing it. Sorry about that! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Re: DISPLAYTITLE
[edit]Clearly you are right, so thank you for picking me up on that – but presumably the MOS once upon a time said something different, because I think most articles I encounter put the DISPLAYTITLE at the bottom, and thus I had wrongly assumed I was doing the right thing! Best wishes, Harfarhs (talk) 10:32, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Technical Barnstar | |
| Thanks for these three edits. I'm gonna take the idea and apply it to some other articles, like List of mosques in Singapore. :) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 04:40, 6 August 2026 (UTC) |
- @Whyiseverythingalreadyused:
Thank you The main thing to remember is that any given element may have only one id=which is why I used this:one on the row, and one on the first cell in the row. Also, the id value must be quoted unless it consists entirely of letters, digits, the full stop and the hyphen-minus, in which case the quotes are optional. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 05:53, 6 August 2026 (UTC)|- id=BY-SA ! scope="row" id="CC BY-SA" | Attribution-ShareAlike
