Booting up the laptop this morning, I found the TikToker’s observation that white people have birds right up front and center, front page news feed.
The magazine Newsweek picked up the story, called it a "participatory trend", interviewed the TikToker who said "she noted the pattern seems more common among older people".
"The theory quickly turned into a participatory trend, as others walked through their homes examining, finding nothing, then noticing dozens of birds on wallpaper, figurines, classical ornaments, a table lamp shaped like a peacock, chicken figurines, a bird clock, and a "Black autistic person, whose special interest is birds" leveling the demographic playing field by admitting 500+ bird decorations".
When interviewed by Newsweek, the TikTok Creator indicated "the pattern appeared more common among older people".
What I really found interesting was mention that the decorating observation wasn’t the only bird theory out there, that earlier it was used as a test for relationship compatibility.
"The test involved telling a significant other you saw a bird that day, then watching how they respond. Partners who ask follow-up questions show interest in the relationship, while those who seem disinterested might indicate larger relationship issues".
Well, that sent me down the TikTok rabbit hole as both men and women tested the theory on partners. Some passed, some failed.
One guy dumped his girlfriend because, when he said he'd seen a bird, she completely ignored him, LOL.
I dunno, seems kind of sappy to me, but that may because I’m tainted in matters of relationships; too practical minded, too old, too tired, no time or patience for the care and feeding of another human's feelings.
If a guy were to tell me he saw a bird, I’d be more likely to dash cold water in his face by saying something like, "Was it a bird, a plane or superman".
Meanwhile, Newsweek went on to say "the decorating bird theory continues spreading as 2026's first major viral trend".
Just remember that I, little Miss Smarty Pants, was the one that initially put you readers onto the theory. You read it here first.
In other news, the Baker, a few days ago, asked that if she put together new bingo rules would I print the rules out for her.
Of course, I said sure.
The Baker later texted that the organizers decided not to issue new rules, but rather to "sit and talk to everybody about them".
Interest peaked, of course I had to inquire, and it seems bingo might be in trouble — people won’t shut up while the game is in play, contributions are down making money tight for prizes and snacks.
To help keep bingo going, the Baker’s two daughters have agreed to donate lunches on bingo day to "save us a little money and to remind people that we need some donations to put on our winners table".
All in all, seems there are a lot of takers, not many givers, too many Chatty Cathy’s and I think it just awful that, in order to keep bingo going, because they know their mother loves giving of her time and energy in organizing bingo for the seniors, that the Baker’s two daughters have to step up to save the activity.
Today is Bingo Friday. I’m tempted to participate for the tea.
We’ll see.


Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.








