Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
2023-2024 has not been exactly the best of times for the LGBTQ community, has it? In the last year or so, some 500 bills targeting gays, lesbians, and in particular the transgender community have been introduced in state legislatures across the USA. Not all of these bills have become law, but enough have to give any queer person pause. Yet the Pride celebrations continue unabated, and not just in such historical LGBTQ meccas as San Francisco and Greenwich Village, but even here in the flyover rust belt metropolis of Cleveland. Nevertheless, the question must be asked, given all the bad news, what exactly is being celebrated?
That's easy. You see......um......well......ah......hmm......er......um......I tell you what, why don't you watch eight minutes of the Pride march that took place this past Saturday morning in Cleveland while I do some head-scratching and try to figure this whole thing out:
This is the second Pride march I've participated in (my little group apparently ended up on the cutting-room floor), and it was much bigger than last year's, the marchers--both members of the LGBTQ community and their allies--totaling around 7000. No official count yet on how many people watched the march or took part in the festivities held afterwards, but it was easily in the thousands as Cleveland's downtown was transformed into a sunlit dance club on steroids. Now, is there anything else I can tell you that the above video doesn't? Just this. I recall that most people waved at us as we marched past. Furthermore, every so often somebody yelled out, "Thank you for doing this!" Whenever they waved or I heard the thank-yous I felt at one with those people, which is exceedingly rare for me as I'm always fighting narcissism. Mostly I just waved back at the crowd, but at one point I remember yelling out, "And thank you!" because, really, the marchers needed the watchers as much as the watchers needed the marchers. Without anyone watching, the whole shebang would have been nothing more than a huge exercise in talking to yourself (and I do that enough on my own anyway.) Thank you for doing this. Such an expression of solidarity is a reminder that as much as it may resemble Mardi Gras, a Pride march or parade is still very much a political statement, a form of social activism. As Marsha P. Johnson once so memorably put it, "We're all in this rat race together."
Is comedy inherently subversive or is it inherently reactionary? Does it make fun of, and thereby attack, the status quo, or does it reenforce existing norms by taking potshots at anyone or anything that poses a challenge to those norms? I guess it all depends on what you're laughing at. If it's the Marx Brothers in the 1930s ruining a wealthy matron's dinner party along with the mansion where it's being held, then you could say what you're laughing at is an attack on the capitalist system, and thus the status quo, making it subversive. However, if you're somebody who laughed hysterically every time the late Medal of Freedom recipient Rush Limbaugh made mention of "feminazis" on the radio, then you're laughing at, and in agreement with, a potshot taken at those who would challenge a woman's freedom to be nothing more than barefoot and pregnant, a challenge to a norm that today apparently still holds some appeal (we'll see just how much at election time), and that makes it reactionary.
Then there's the curious case of Bob Hope. A lifelong Republican, much of his material was written by lifelong Democrats (such as Larry Gelbart, who went on to create the TV version of MASH.) In his monologues, Hope pretty much made fun of anybody in the news, be they on the left or the right, though in a no-blood-drawn sort of way. And he made fun of himself (most famously his failure to win, or even be nominated for, an Oscar), the comic self-effacement a big part of his appeal. The movies he made in the 1940s and '50s, such as the The Princess and the Pirate and Son of Paleface (where his costars were Roy Rogers and Trigger), as well as the Road pictures he made with Bing Crosby, were mildly subversive in the way his cowardly heroes stumbled head first into one movie genre after another, making chaotic mincemeat out of Hollywood depictions of machismo, but as he got older, and older, and older still (he lived to be 100), Hope became much more of an Establishment figure, and the trademark self-effacement lost much of its credibility. Whatever shame he felt in not winning an Oscar was probably more than made up for by getting White House invites throughout ten different administrations. Finally, like many comedians who got their start in vaudeville, he peppered his monologues with jokes aimed at ethnic and racial minorities. He did that less and less as time passed, but there was one minority which he just wouldn't let up on:
“I’ve just flown in from California, where they’ve made homosexuality legal. I thought I’d better get out before they make it compulsory.”
By 1989, the homophobic humor had begun to catch up with Hope. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) wrote him a strongly worded letter of complaint, reminding him that whatever Orwellian fears he had of a future homosexual police state, for the time being it was gays and lesbians themselves who were uncomfortably at the mercy of a heterosexual ruling class. Whether out of sincere regret, or a realization that a public relations fix was in order, or maybe even both, Hope surprised the alliance with a letter of apology. Furthermore, he offered to film a Public Service Announcement condemning violence against gays and lesbians. GLAAD had only been around four years at that point, and couldn't afford such an announcement, so Hope went and paid for it out of his own pocket. Watch:
Bob Hope may have been at his most subversive when playing it straight. Thanks for the memory.
Though he played all sorts of characters throughout his long career, Dabney Coleman's specialty was the comic scoundrel, the man you not so much love to hate, but rather are too busy laughing at to hate. Yet the real-life Coleman comes across as anything but a scoundrel as he receives his Hollywood Walk of Fame star back in 2014:
In addition to Hollywood Chamber of Commerce President Leon Gubler, the other two men speaking were filmmaker Mark Ryder, who directed the movie version of On Golden Pond (which we'll get to in a second), and television director Dennis Klein, who helmed several episodes of Coleman's critically acclaimed but short-lived sitcom Buffalo Bill. Actress Penelope Ann Miller was also on hand. I can find no movie or TV production that Coleman and Miller appeared in together, so maybe she was just there as a friend. There are such things as friendships in Hollywood.
Though he worked steadily throughout the 1960s and into the '70s, Dabney Coleman's career didn't really take off until he joined the cast of the above prime time/late night comedy soap opera in its second season. Coleman played the somewhat devious Merle Jeeter, father of nine-year-old child evangelist Jimmy Joe Jeeter. After that story line came to its (literally) shocking conclusion, Merle ran for mayor of Fernwood, Ohio, Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman's fictional setting:
Merle won, naturally. He fit right in with that fucked-up town.
Taking a break from the comic scoundrel for just a moment, 1982's On Golden Pond, based on a Broadway play of the same name, gives me a chance to show you Coleman's range as an actor, that he could do drama as well as comedy. Despite his character not deemed significant enough for his visage to appear on the above movie poster, in the following scene you'll see that Coleman more than holds his own with the great Henry Fonda (as he also does in scenes with the great Katharine Hepburn and the great Jane Fonda):
Did that old dude just say you could ask him anything you wanted to about sex?
Sorry Dr. Reuben, you've just been replaced by a Fonda.
Back to Dabney Coleman. Hank's daughter Jane must not have minded working with Coleman, because a year before On Golden Pond, they both appeared in this comedy blockbuster:
Unlike Jane, Lily, and Dolly, Coleman doesn't receive above-the-title billing, but at least he's prominently displayed on the poster, as well as the movie itself. We'll show him with each of these ladies, starting with Lily:
Now Dolly:
And finally, Jane:
Where's a golden parachute when a corporate executive needs one?
Michael Cohen faces another grueling day of cross-examination by Donald Trump's lawyers in the former president's hush money and business records falsification trial, but does he deserve such scathing attacks on his character?
Roger made us work hard and long, I remember that! He was always fascinating to me, a fascinating man – and a good businessman! He had such incredible energy, it was tremendous – he was a dynamo to be around. I always knew he was going to be a huge success because there was no stopping him. He just made up his mind that he was going to be a success and that was it.
--Beverly Garland
Roger seemed a driven man. Roger wanted to accomplish a lot, he had to have a lot of drive to do it, and he pushed through. He not only pushed through, he punched through! With a lot of energy, and a lot of disregard at times...What we did for Roger Corman – I mean, things that you could never do in a real studio, but you did for this guy! Everything seemed unreal with him.
--Susan Cabot
I wrote a screenplay titled Gluttony, abouta salad chef in a restaurant who would wind up cooking customers and stuff like that, you know? We couldn't do that though because of the [production] code at the time. So I said, 'How about a man-eating plant?', and Roger said, 'Okay.' By that time, we were both drunk.
--screenwriter Charles B. Griffith
It's not precisely the Edgar Allan Poe short story known to high school English that emerges in House of Usher, but it's a reasonably diverting and handsomely mounted variation ... The film has been mounted with care, skill and flair by producer-director Roger Corman and his staff.
--Variety
[Frank Sinatra] was very worried that his daughter was in a film with the Hell's Angels. And for some reason he didn’t want to bring it up to me, so he arranged to meet with my second assistant director, Paul Rapp, and said, “Is Nancy going to be all right?” And Paul, we had never even thought about it, but Paul made up a whole lot of nonsense, just, “Well, we’ve got people there, we’re going to be protecting her all the time.” It was all just talk, but Frank accepted it, and Nancy was great.
--Roger Corman
1926-2024
(Things happen, so I'll just save the Mother's Day post until next year. You know how it is--Kirk)