For some time there has been a discussion among those who run camera traps about how wildlife, especially white-tailed deer, react to the flash of trail cameras. In low light conditions – especially at night – a flash is necessary to obtain a photo. Some cameras use a “white flash” with which we are all familiar; others use an infra-red flash created by light emitting diodes that glow red for about a second; others use what is called a “black flash” that is actually infra-red but which cannot be seen by the human eye.
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Deer Reactions to Flash
For some time there has been a discussion among those who run camera traps about how wildlife, especially white-tailed deer, react to the flash of trail cameras. In low light conditions – especially at night – a flash is necessary to obtain a photo. Some cameras use a “white flash” with which we are all familiar; others use an infra-red flash created by light emitting diodes that glow red for about a second; others use what is called a “black flash” that is actually infra-red but which cannot be seen by the human eye.
Some folks think that the glow of an infra-red flash is less
startling to wildlife than a conventional white flash that seems to light up
everything nearby. Others are of the opinion that a white flash resembles
lightning with which most wildlife is familiar – and that wildlife doesn’t
react to the very brief (typically 1/1000 second) white flash.
While a case can be made for each side of this discussion,
any of us who use both white flash and infra-red flash camera traps should be
able to provide some empirical evidence of how wildlife reacts to a flash.
Herewith some examples. These two series of photos were both
completed in less than one minute from the deer’s first appearance to when it
disappeared from the camera’s view. A Sony P32 in a homebrewed camera trap
using a white flash took the first five; the second four were taken by a
Moultrie M80 camera that uses a visible infra-red flash. Although these were two
different deer, neither of which may have reacted in the same way as other deer
would – or as how these deer would each react on a different day or under
different conditions – the difference in their responses is striking.
It’s rather obvious that the white flash resulted in a
reaction that could best be called curiosity. On the other hand, the infra-red
flash clearly startled the deer to the point where it fled. Over the time I’ve
used camera traps to capture photos of wildlife, the cameras have gotten numerous
series like this. Interestingly, while black bear, deer and raccoons often
display curiosity and investigate the cameras; bobcats, coyotes, both species
of fox, fishers, opossums, porcupines and rabbits seem to ignore the flash;
white-tailed deer are the only species that appear to have been startled and
then only by a visible infra-red flash.
So, for me the argument is settled and I now only use
infra-red flash camera traps in areas where a white flash might reveal a
camera’s location to other people.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Bald Eagles Along the River
Last week on a beautiful crystal clear morning I walked
along the river where an adult bald eagle was occasionally to be seen perched
in a riverside tree. That morning the usual tree was empty, but a bit further
on an eagle flew up from below the bank, went a short way along the shore and
landed in a tree, then flew on out of sight.
Curiosity aroused, I looked over the bank and there on the
ice laid an injured or sick double-crested cormorant. The cormorant could raise
its head but otherwise didn’t or couldn’t move. So, it seemed that the eagle
intended to make a meal of the cormorant. Went back the next morning as the
season’s first real snow was beginning to fall; there was no trace of the
cormorant – it had provided a meal for the eagle or some other predator.
This brought to mind the first bald eagle I’d ever seen, 48
years ago on the tidal section of a tributary to Chesapeake Bay. That eagle
took a duck from a flock that was feeding in a shallow backwater.
Proceeding along the river, I saw the eagle again, this time
perched in the same tree as its mate. The male bird (upper right in this photo)
was much more wary than the female and flew not long after it saw me. The
female, on the other hand seemed to be much more tolerant of the human walking
nearby and let me pass on by without flying.
Twenty-five years ago there were but three bald eagle nests
in Pennsylvania, all in the northwestern corner of the state. It was a rare
treat to see one of the birds here – and it was always a migrant or a bird
wintering along one of the larger streams. How things have changed!
Thanks to the ban on DDT and reintroduction efforts by the Pennsylvania Game Commission there were reports of over 250 bald eagle nests in the state this year. It’s still a treat to see a bald eagle, but now it’s one we can enjoy with some regularity.
Thanks to the ban on DDT and reintroduction efforts by the Pennsylvania Game Commission there were reports of over 250 bald eagle nests in the state this year. It’s still a treat to see a bald eagle, but now it’s one we can enjoy with some regularity.
Thursday, December 12, 2013
We Must All Hang together
“We must all hang
together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.” So said Pennsylvania’s
Benjamin Franklin at the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4,
1776. Ben was right, and his sentiment was true not only in 1776 – it’s still
true in so many, many ways.
Hunting seasons are gradually drawing to a close and the
time for Christmas bird counts begins.
I know some hunters who think all birders are naïve, effete
environmentalists – and some birders who think all hunters are evil,
bloodthirsty killers. But I also have friends that are hunters who watch
songbirds while they hunt bigger game. Other friends are birders who hunt and
who realize that hunters are the only realistic means of keeping white-tailed
deer from destroying the forest understory needed by wood thrush, ovenbirds and
a host of other species.
All too often the hook and bullet crowd and the chickadee
chasers are busy criticizing each other and fighting against even the most
reasonable proposal from the other folks. Meanwhile, as these two groups, who
should be natural allies, are arguing the field (and the forest too) is left to
the developers and the exploiters.
If we look back, many of the pillars of conservation in this
country were both birders and hunters wrapped in one:
· George
Grinnell, in the 1870s, was part of many expeditions exploring the American
west; he hunted in the northern Rocky Mountains, was one of the founders of the
Boone and Crockett Club, and organized the first Audubon Society.
![]() |
| From NPS |
· George
Shiras 3d was an avid hunter and fisherman who pioneered the use of camera
traps in the late 1800s and, as a U.S. Congressman, introduced legislation to
protect migratory birds.
![]() |
| From Northern Michigan Uniersity |
· Teddy
Roosevelt, the president who brought us National Forests and National Wildlife
Refuges, made an extensive list of the bird species he’d seen, and hunted in
the American west and Africa.
| From NPS |
· Aldo
Leopold, the acknowledged father of wildlife management and in 1933 authored
the first text on the subject, was also a bird bander who wrote about his
hunting trips and often wrote about songbirds.
![]() |
| From Aldo Leopold Nature Center |
What Happened?? When and why the two groups, that were once
allies, parted ways doesn’t really matter anymore and is best left to
historians. What does matter now is that if they can’t work together more
and more of the habitat that wildlife needs will be developed into residential
subdivisions or big box stores, or will be impacted by mineral extraction. For
assuredly there are those who, for their own purposes, benefit by keeping the
feud going.
If the people, hunters and non-hunters, who care about wildlife don’t hang together
they will “hang” separately as habitat and wildlife disappear.
Friday, December 6, 2013
Deer at the Lake
It was 56° yesterday – too darned warm for early December. Went to
the Preserve, a property consisting of about 4,000 acres containing a lake of
more than 150 acres. Of the acreage, over three-quarters is open to public
hunting – the remainder, mainly around the lake, is open to the public but
closed to hunting. This being the first week of firearms deer season in
Pennsylvania, taking a camera for a walk around the lake seemed a good way to
spend the day.
A bald eagle was in a tree across the lake, but by the time
I got close enough to the tree for a photo the eagle had moved on, not to be
seen again. For part of the way around the lake a trail hugs the shore,
affording views up and down the shore as well as across the lake.
And there, walking along the shore were two white-tail
bucks. The deer seemed to know they were safe, even though there were old tracks
of other humans on the lakeside trail. These two bucks could live their entire
lives within the area closed to hunting and only be subject to predation by automobiles
on the nearby road and an occasional coyote.
Couldn’t help thinking about the frustrated deer hunters
elsewhere on the property and how tempting it would be to sneak into the area
closed to hunting for a chance to bag one of these bucks. But then, that’s what
sportsmanship is about. As Aldo Leopold said, “ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.






.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)



.jpg)