close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;23(7):884-889.
doi: 10.1038/s41563-024-01883-3. Epub 2024 Apr 26.

Plutonium oxide melt structure and covalency

Affiliations

Plutonium oxide melt structure and covalency

Stephen K Wilke et al. Nat Mater. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Advances in nuclear power reactors include the use of mixed oxide fuel, containing uranium and plutonium oxides. The high-temperature behaviour and structure of PuO2-x above 1,800 K remain largely unexplored, and these conditions must be considered for reactor design and planning for the mitigation of severe accidents. Here, we measure the atomic structure of PuO2-x through the melting transition up to 3,000 ± 50 K using X-ray scattering of aerodynamically levitated and laser-beam-heated samples, with O/Pu ranging from 1.57 to 1.76. Liquid structural models consistent with the X-ray data are developed using machine-learned interatomic potentials and density functional theory. Molten PuO1.76 contains some degree of covalent Pu-O bonding, signalled by the degeneracy of Pu 5f and O 2p orbitals. The liquid is isomorphous with molten CeO1.75, demonstrating the latter as a non-radioactive, non-toxic, structural surrogate when differences in the oxidation potentials of Pu and Ce are accounted for. These characterizations provide essential constraints for modelling pertinent to reactor safety design.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (2022).
    1. Abram, T. & Ion, S. Generation-IV nuclear power: a review of the state of the science. Energy Policy 36, 4323–4330 (2008).
    1. Chang, Y. I. et al. Conceptual design of a pilot-scale pyroprocessing facility. Nucl. Technol. 205, 708–726 (2019).
    1. Carbajo, J. J., Yoder, G. L., Popov, S. G. & Ivanov, V. K. A review of the thermophysical properties of MOX and UO2 fuels. J. Nucl. Mater. 299, 181–198 (2001).
    1. IAEA. Status and Advances in MOX Fuel Technology (2003).

LinkOut - more resources