close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;37(6):368-73.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.039255. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

A taxonomy of multinational ethical and methodological standards for clinical trials of therapeutic interventions

Affiliations

A taxonomy of multinational ethical and methodological standards for clinical trials of therapeutic interventions

Carol M Ashton et al. J Med Ethics. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background: If trials of therapeutic interventions are to serve society's interests, they must be of high methodological quality and must satisfy moral commitments to human subjects. The authors set out to develop a clinical-trials compendium in which standards for the ethical treatment of human subjects are integrated with standards for research methods.

Methods: The authors rank-ordered the world's nations and chose the 31 with >700 active trials as of 24 July 2008. Governmental and other authoritative entities of the 31 countries were searched, and 1004 English-language documents containing ethical and/or methodological standards for clinical trials were identified. The authors extracted standards from 144 of those: 50 designated as 'core', 39 addressing trials of invasive procedures and a 5% sample (N=55) of the remainder. As the integrating framework for the standards we developed a coherent taxonomy encompassing all elements of a trial's stages.

Findings: Review of the 144 documents yielded nearly 15 000 discrete standards. After duplicates were removed, 5903 substantive standards remained, distributed in the taxonomy as follows: initiation, 1401 standards, 8 divisions; design, 1869 standards, 16 divisions; conduct, 1473 standards, 8 divisions; analysing and reporting results, 997 standards, four divisions; and post-trial standards, 168 standards, 5 divisions.

Conclusions: The overwhelming number of source documents and standards uncovered in this study was not anticipated beforehand and confirms the extraordinary complexity of the clinical trials enterprise. This taxonomy of multinational ethical and methodological standards may help trialists and overseers improve the quality of clinical trials, particularly given the globalisation of clinical research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None declared.

References

    1. Anon. Nuremberg, October 1946–April 1949. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O; 1949. The Nuremberg Code [from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10.
    1. Jonas H. Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. In: Freund PA, editor. Experimentation with Human Subjects. New York: George Braziller Inc; 1969. pp. 1–31.
    1. Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences in collaboration with the World Health Organization. Geneva: 2002. http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf.
    1. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283:2701–11. - PubMed
    1. Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:426–32. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms