Bitch bitch bitch

Pah!

2006-08-03T20:23:18Z

I'm texting Eric for support because I feel sad about Andrew and he's telling me how I shouldn't blame myself for what happend. WHAT THE HELL DID I DO? It's not my fault! I didn't make him take crack and hurt me! So I told him that I don't blame myself for what happend.

Why are women so quick to blame themselves for something an asshole does in a relationship?!

You chose too leave, now stay gone. You gave up your rights

2006-07-19T18:35:42Z

Is it just me or are Dad's (especially Dad's who you don't live with and therefore try and make up for poor parenting) really hard to please? Unless you have a job and are going to school...you're just sitting around wasting space. No room for a young person to find out who they are between the ages of 18-20, we're all slaves to a big machine!

And what right does HE have for giving advice and critizing my mother on how she's rased me when he left us for a new wife and more chances to work at his high paying job?! Ironic my boyfriend is also currently having the same problem with his wannabe Dad.

feeeeeney @ 2006-05-09T19:44:00

2006-05-10T02:45:54Z

Fuck those Tobacco Smokes You commercials with the "Kissing a smoker is just as gross." No. You know. I've kissed a smoker. It tasted like stale cigarettes and the spearment gum he was chewing to cover it up. Not nearly as fucking gross as eating goddamn cat vomit. STOP SHOWING THESE COMMERCIALS.

feeeeeney @ 2006-04-13T03:40:00

2006-04-13T10:42:11Z

Man, we haven't had a good bitchin' in a while, have we? Well, I got one for ya!

First, an explanation: I hate Uwe Boll. This is a strange hatred, especially for a filmmaker, because I've only seen one film of his. Usually, when it comes to disliking a filmmaker, I would've seen at least two or three of his films before making a complete judgement on my part. I did that with Tarantino, and I've done that with Tony Scott. However, Uwe Boll is a special case. He's somehow made a movie so laughable bad, that I cannot fathom myself to ever as much touch the case which carries a DVD of his movie. Hell, I wouldn't even give it the satisfaction of being downloaded! There's also another good reason: he's whiny. In this article, Boll bitches and moans about how horribly "oppressed" is by all those who dislike his work. He's done this several times before, but the more I see it, the more funny it is.

Second, I'm going to take some quotes in the article and reply back to "Dr." Boll, whether he reads this or not.

"The dangerous thing right now is that a lot of people bash me without thinking about the movies. It's fashionable to hit on Uwe Boll, and this is what I don't get. And I don't get why this comes so harshly from the games press," Boll says.

Don't flatter yourself. It's not "fashionable," it's just fun! I mean, when you produce a classic stinker like House of the Dead, what the fuck do you expect?

Boll says the point is that his movies get better as his career progresses - Dungeon Siege is "ten times better" than BloodRayne, which is ten times better than House of the Dead, and so on.

...Which isn't saying much, is it?

"People say BloodRayne has a very bad IMDB rating - yes, but how many votes of zero points were made before the movie was out, by people who hate me but haven't even seen the movie?"

I think that happened when you put two actors like Michael Madson and Michelle Rodriguez in a period piece. That pretty much spells "disaster," don't it?

"Let's be realistic, what is House of the Dead? House of the Dead is a brainless shooter, where you shoot zombies into pieces. So what are you expecting from the movie, Schindler's List?"

No, but we do want a well made and entertaining zombie movie. George Romero's done it, Lucio Fulci's done it, and Zack Snyder (an up-and-comer) was able to do it. So, please, don't use such a shitty argument to cover the fact you just can't direct worth a damn. Be a man and admit it - it was bad.

Us games journalists, Boll argues, should be pleased that videogame-based movies are getting made at all. "It's tough to convince someone from the studio system to believe in a videogame-based movie. It's way easier to have a great book or to have a comic book [as your source material], because these studio guys, they know Spider-Man, Batman, that kind of stuff."

It's difficult to really be thankful when you happen to completely ruin those franchises. But that leads to another question, why did you choose those particular games, of all, to be made into movies? House of the Dead? Alone in the Dark? BloodRayne? One of these games were either completely disposible, never popular in the first place, or only have something of a cult audience. You aren't trying to make a movie from a particularly popular game franchise, just a bunch that no one gives much of a shit about anyway.

But that isn't the point. The point is that it isn't the fact you're getting these movies made as much as the fact as how you made them. No matter what the intent, if the film sucks, it sucks.

According to Boll, he's fallen foul of this on more than one occasion. "Sega did nothing for House of the Dead, and Atari did nothing to support Alone in the Dark. They developed Alone in the Dark part 5, parallel to my movie, and then they closed the LA facility and never finished the game. And I was standing there alone in the rain with my movie..."

Again, how the hell can you blame them when you've done such a poor job making the movie? Maybe they didn't want to try and promote the movie along with the games because it was more of a risk than they were willing to take, especially when those risks involves quite a bit of money. But, again, this goes back to the point of making films based off near-dead game franchises rather than one the creators would actually care about.

"I'm in the movie - Uwe Boll will play a minor part. I get killed by my 'Boll haters'," he explains. So will he be getting real, er, Boll haters to play themselves? "Absolutely! I don't have a problem with that," Boll says. "I think I'd get thousands of extras doing that, coming to the set to track me down and lynch me!"

Wow. You're actually doing something right! Color me surprised.

"So if people are writing on the Internet about how my movies were big failures, it's because these people are amateurs and they have no idea of the reality of film-making and film selling.

So, you're not allowed to be criticized either? Grow up. You're working in an industry where you'll, more than likely, be criticized. Why don't you, an adult, just ignore it if it annoys you so much? That's what grown-ups do.

"I get bashed as the worldwide enemy number one in film-making by people who are working at Starbucks and who also want to make movies. It's ridiculous - it's completely idiotic because they're hitting on a guy who actually made it happen, but I started my career in the same position as anybody else," Boll argues.

That logic is profoundly stupid. So, no one can criticize you because they haven't made a movie themselves? I guess this means all those "fans" you like to mention so much are incorrect as well, because I'm sure they haven't made a movie either. You don't care though. The only reason you make a comment like this is to try and convince yourself any criticism that you get from whatever source must be wrong.

I mean, I know it's really difficult to comprehend, but maybe that criticism is coming from people who know how movies work and have seen your movie. Even if they don't know how to make a film, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that you don't know what you're doing either.

"Now people are getting hired as directors at 20 years old, coming from film school and getting 100 million bucks for their first movie. If people think that this is a good situation, that I'm the worst enemy in film-making and a completely talentless idiot, it's their decision."

I can tell that's a trick question: it's both.

"Maybe this is bad news for the Boll enemies, but while there are a few thousand people trying to crush me on the Internet, there are millions of people who buy the product."

There are also a dozen million more people who can profess to hating your work outside the internet, too, if you already haven't noticed.

Besides, there's always bound to be idiots who like everything...

feeeeeney @ 2006-03-03T12:35:00

2006-03-03T21:53:24Z

I'm new lol omg lollerskates...

*ahem*

Onto my first FEEEEENEY! rant.

Billy Graham writes an Op Ed for Kansas City Star and many other Op Eds in syndication for places all over the world. Mostly U.S. Go figure. Anyways, he wrote yet another poorly done Op Ed, but this one drove me to the edge. He probably gets this question constantly but this is the first time he showed the Jesus Balls to answer it.

DEAR BILLY GRAHAM: How do you know the Bible is true? After all, the people who wrote it could have just been making it up. I know you won't agree with me, but I can't see why we ought to believe the Bible any more than we do any other ancient book. -A.P.

Good question. The writer was obviously trying to get a rise out of Billy, but wouldn't we all like to. But did he going into facts, did he give any solid response? No. Here's what God's Foot Massager replied with.

DEAR A.P.: Have you ever taken the time to read the Bible for yourself - not just a few sentences, but honestly studying it to see what it really says? The reason I ask this is because I find many people reject the Bible without ever actually reading it. Because the Bible claims to answer life's deepest questions, doesn't it make sense to listen to what it has to say? Of course it does.

This is why I challenge you to discover the Bible for yourself. Take one of the Gospels (which tell us about the life of Jesus) and read through it carefully. (I often recommend people start with the Gospel of John.) As you do, ask yourself if it sounds like something people just made up, or if it rings true.

As Peter later wrote, 'We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses to his majesty' [2 Peter 1:16]

What a fucking cooking cutter, cut and paste, half-assed response!

Come on. Give us some hell fire at least. The person writing the letter is obviously not a believer in the Bible. Maybe he's Buddhist or something. Oh Shits!

Plus, why would reading the Bible change your mind about it anyways? It has tales of people getting ate by whales and surviving, which has been proven to be physically impossible because the throat hole is rather small. Where's the ark? Something that can hold billions of different species of animals and have them all seperated so they don't eat eachother? Jesus being the son of God? What about all those other people who say they are? Do you have any idea around Jesus' supposed time said they too were the son of God? Virgin Birth? I learned in sex ed that the woman's heimen (cherry if you will) doesn't always pop on the first time. On a woman's wedding night, if she did not have blood soaked sheets because of a busted cherry, she was stoned, and not in the fun way. So, if their hymen didn't pop, then they were done. Joseph hit it. That's it.

That's why there is faith and you need faith that defies logic, physics, and life spans to believe these tales.

I hate religion. I have found very few religious people who I actually like. The majority are too wrapped in hypocricy and saying "God" every second to actually talk and get real. If I don't see logic in it, then it's bunk. Religion is a fickle thing. I would really have to have some sort of explosive revelation to ever get into religion again. I used to be a Catholic just because that's why my family was. I was agnostic since 12 and was too frightened to tell my family. Then, about a year and a 1/2 ago, I realized I was an Atheist. I'm not one of those Atheists that take it so far as to be their own sort of Anti-Religion, but it's just what I am, and my parents will never see me or love me the same again. If I really didn't feel this way, I would still be in denial, going la la la every time something logical came up against a belief I had, Drinking Jesus Blood and Eating Jesus Skin. But, this is who I really am, and I hope they realize I still love them someday.

So Billy, to you I say, enjoy reading your plot hole filled book several billion more times. At least when I read a poorly written book with no real story and little to no memorable quotes, I admit it and don't base my life on it.

Ok, throw the stones!

More shit that happens to annoy me.

2006-03-03T07:35:54Z

First off, political correctness.

Now, it's kind of tired to rant about how stupid political correctness is, but I'm not the type of moron who rebels against it by calling blacks "niggers" and gays "faggots." That isn't being politically incorrect, that's being a dickead (and I don't fucking care if you have black or gay friends).

No, it's part of the terminology that bothers me. In particular: African-American. It's really just a term in a series of many other terms to describe those with extremely dark skin that may have some form of descent from places such as the African continent, as well as Haiti, Jamaica, and probably even Brazil. Now, calling anyone anything-American means that they had come from one country to the United States and have taken up permanent residence. As far as I know, African-Americans are not all from Africa. They happen to be Americans who are (*GASP*) black. Yes, that's the dreaded word I use: black. That doesn't really mean anything, or at least it should, but it somehow equates to being a racist.

Of course, being called a racist for not following the strict rules of politically correct terminology is simply a knee-jerk reaction. As far as I know, I'm the least racist person I know. Sure, I like to make a jest at how some Asians reverse their L's and R's, but it's all in good spirits - it has nothing to do with hating them. In fact, I probably have more dislike for people of my own racial ethnicity than of any other, especially the fucking British. What a bunch of self-important snobs, really...

Still, there's this crowd who act that they're so racially sensitive that even a race joke should be considered a form of bigotry against a culture. Of course, it's all okay if you happen to be of that race, but if you're white and make a joke about Mexicans and jokes, you're "obviously" as bad as Hitler. It's a bunch of bullshit, though! It's not like my telling of a joke will lead to the lynching of Mexicans. Seriously, if these assholes really care about racial prejudice and discrimination, why not actually observe some actual acts of it and do something about it. Being a self-rightous prick to some people for telling a joke is like being a nagging mother to a child who says he likes to eat his own boogers - you're just being annoying and they're not going to listen.

Second, playing devil's advocate.

There's nothing I hate more than when you're pissed off and someone sincerely comes up and defends the subject of your anger. For example, you could be driving and want to mutilate the guy who cut you off - the last thing you want to hear from someone is "well, maybe they just made a little mistake..." Does that mean your being mad is then invalid? Does that mean whoever pissed you off is suddenly off the hook? The answer to both: no. The problem is that the person next to you feels some weird need to represent the other side, even if they agree with you.

One thing I always despise is when I go to the movies is when someone has to talk during the movie. I don't care what the reason is, you don't talk while I and several other people are trying to watch a movie. Want to make a comment on some action scene? Well, then fucking take it outside after the movie. I don't want to hear you yelling "oh my GAWD! 'Dat was so friggin' cool! Oh my GAAAAAAAAAAWD!" If I didn't have the ability to keep myself from beating the shit out of every single thing that annoyed me, you'd most definitely be next in line for an ass-beating. Still, there are people who feel some need to even defend these assholes "well, maybe this is one of the few times they see a movie..." Let me say this right here and now: Shut. The. Fuck. Up. I don't care why someone needs to talk during the movie, it's the fact they're doing so - trying to convince me that there's an excuse for it is absolutely moronic.

I know a lawyer's job is essentially playing devil's advocate, but that's what they're paid to do. You don't pay someone to burst into your conversation and defend the guy at work who keeps stealing the last doughnut in the lunch room. They do so because there's this odd belief that there are two sides to the story and that neither are wrong or right. Is that so? Oh, well, at least we know now that if a guy broke your car window with a crowbar, it isn't his fault - he was just having a bad day. You can't blame him for that, can you? That'd be mighty unfair, although he had no right to wreck your car and try stealing your car radio.

Third and last...okay, let me explain: ever been around someone who claims to be something like a "freak" (i.e. "Don't mess with me, 'cause I'm one crazy motherfuckin' freak!") or "asshole" (i.e. "don't expect me to be nice, I'm an asshole."), etc.? Yeah, those people.

There's nothing worse than someone who claims to be something and act like it. They think that having some self-proclaim title is like having a medal around your chest that tells everyone else just how much cooler you are than them. In real life, an actual asshole gets shit from others because he's being an asshole. However, if you're a self-proclaimed asshole, it's a different issue - it means it's part of your personality! Nevermind that you say shit most people can't get away with, you're an asshole and people respect it!

What annoys me about them is that they really aren't what they have claimed to be, but only act so because they claimed it and get away with it. What makes it worse is that some people fall for it and vocally excuse their phoney-baloney bullshit. While the guy who proclaims he an asshole may not be a true asshole, acting like one is still inexcusable. I mean, when have self-proclaimed titles become a life style choice? Was there some agreement made by everyone on the planet and I was left out? Really, it makes no sense to me. I mean, if I did the same thing, I'm sure that I (deservedly) would be given shit for doing it. Yet, somehow, I find these people who do it all the time and get away with it. Is there some requirement where you can only self-proclaim a title as long as there's an excuse that goes along with it? I'm sure for most of them it's because they (like any disposible excuse) "had a hard life" or complete bullshit like that. Of course, I'm sure half of what's considered a "hard life" by these same people was only getting $20 a week for an allowance instead of $100 and having their parents not let them hang out with their friends until midnight. Yeah, what a horrible reality to live in. Those kids in South Africa are a bunch of pussies by comparison.

I believe that when you let people like this get away with whatever they want, you're actually contributing to the downfall of society. When we don't hold people accountable for their actions, it leads to excuses based on these non-truths people make up. The kind of non-truths where someone would try to convince another person that date rape is acceptable because the victim was wearing a short skirt. It's a load of shit and it's distracting us from the fact that when you do something, that you're completely responsible for it. Of course, nowadays, you can just about say anything and it'll come out as a solid defense for reckless behavior ("Well, you see, sir: he drank soda as a child and it made him hyperactive. You can't blame him for breaking into a store for crack money, right?"). So, yes, you're fucking dooming us everytime you do it - so think next time before you defend an asshole for being an asshole.

grawr

2006-02-14T19:23:16Z

I've got two rants today, one little, minor and presumably pointless, one big, major and omg fuck off I'm pissed.

I'll start with the small one.

I admit it, I download music. Who the fuck doesn't these days? But to prove the point that the internet is full of idiots, I'm bringing this up.

If you do not know the artist, do not make an assumption. Video Killed the Radio Star is by the BUGGLES, not the BANGLES. Gwen Stefani has nothing to do with Save Ferris, therefor she didn't do the cover of Come On Eileen. The Ramones didn't do My Sharona, the Knack did.

And if you can't tell the difference between Tiffany and Debbie Gibson, stop listening to them!!!! For fuck's sake, google is your friend here, people. If you are unsure.. LOOK IT UP. It'll make P2P much easier.

Ok onto the second rant.

I was exploring my favorite BMW site a week or so ago, and came across a mini rant from the webmistress, about why she's prolife. While I will respect someone's right to believe whatever the fuck they want, I do not respect ignorance, and I certainly don't respect people using the Bible for their arguements.

I'm pro-choice. That doesn't mean I'm a baby killer. That doesn't mean I have ever had, or ever intend to have an abortion myself, nor does it mean I believe it should be used for birth control. But I also don't think I have any right to force another person to give birth, to parent. It isn't fair to either the woman or the fetus.

Fetus. Not baby. Not child. Hell, at a legal standpoint, it isn't even a fetus when Abortions take place, it's a Zygote. That is a collection of cells, people. not a baby. not a child. not a precious little angel. a collection of fucking cells. It does not have a brain, a heart, a central nervous system. It is only barely human. It is not a he or a she, it is an IT.

I don't believe that life begins at conception. Fertilization begins at conceptions. In my opinion, life doesn't begin until it becomes actually alive, more than a plant or a rock is "alive". Once it has enough characteristics that are HUMAN, oncce again, brain, heart, central nervous system, then it's alive.

I hate the arguements that include God. Not everyone has the same god, dammit. Not everyone believes in Jesus and the Almighty and the angels and whatnot. Some people don't believe in any higher power. You don't have the right to force someone into believing what you believe. You don't. Your God doesn't own my body, or anyone elses, unless they say so. See, in MY FAITH, until the baby is half-way out of the mother, it's all fair game. While it's not ok to abuse your body, or to allow someone else to, The mother comes first, and if she doesn't want to have a baby, guess what? Her choice. Her body. The parasite that is a fetus doesn't come first in that case.

Now look, I'm so pissed off I'm going all over the place.

I'll end this here, with the main reason I'm pro-choice:

Before I was born, my mother had an abortion. Knowing the way my father was when faced with parenthood (he took off like a chickenshit) had my mother kept the "baby" I would have never been born. In that case.. I'm very, very thankful for abortion. Very. I'm glad I"m alive.

Ok that's it.

feeeeeney @ 2006-02-13T01:07:00

2006-02-13T10:03:39Z

Most recently, I had been talking to my friends while we were just hanging out, doing what most bored teens do: finding a way to get more inebriated than we already were.

That's not the point, however. I mentioned to both of them that I probably wouldn't be hanging out with them as frequently for the next month and a half, as my spending money is dwindling right now and I need it to last me as long as possible. Their response: "get a job." Obviously, they didn't know jack shit about my situation, but I was dumb enough to mention Social Security and apparently that didn't stop them from claiming that I "need a job." There's several factors as to why getting a job, right now, would not be beneficial to me, especially since I need as much money as I need to get to pay my school expenses. Getting a job wouldn't help even a small bit, as I'd be far less than whatever I'm getting on a monthly basis now. They, however, are both relatively rich and live with their parents - they don't have expenses and study full time like I do.

Okay, that isn't the point to this entry, either. I'm meandering. It does, however, introduce what I'm trying to talk about: we're often so hooked on our own perceptions that we don't give much thought in applying it to someone else.

It all goes back to that spoiled bitch of an Austrian princess turned French royalty, Marie Antoinette. When told the poor were starving, all she said was "let them eat cake." She, being overwhelmingly rich, couldn't even consider the fact that maybe the poor, who were actually starving, had food (that being cake, of all things). In a lot of ways, I often find a lot of people doing this - myself included.

Having a conversation with someone doing this is like being at a party where everyone's gathered around this one girl at the party. She is constantly talking while everyone around her vacantly nod their heads in false agreement. She could make some really stupid remark and you can correct her, but there'll be this moment of silence, and then you're ignored while the popular girl goes on incessantly talking. They can't help but only hear what they think, and anything that may be countered against any of that is like trying to make water go right a 15-inch thick brick wall.

We, as humans, can't help ourselves. All we really have to base on the world around us is our own perception of it, and it's upsetting when it's threatened. It's something of a defense mechanism to either be incredibly stubborn or just to completely ignore another's view. It's hard to convince anyone of anything unless they decided to change it themselves, because at least they're the ones who are doing it and not someone else. It's why nothing changes instantly and happens slowly. You want to wish more people were less racist, homophobic, or ignorant all at once, but all you can hope is that the future generation will be different.

If I were told that life was created from trans-dimensional sperm ejaculated into the primordial oozes by a neon red T-Rex that rides in a giant spaceship shaped like a pineapple, I'm quite sure I could reject that completely - I believe in evolution. I'd also say it's the dumbest possible thing I've heard anywhere about the origin of life. Any! I know, that's extreme, but we've heard enough Intelligent Design, have we? Anyway, such a criticism from me would lead to one of the following responses:

"You should be more tolerant of someone else's views!"

"That isn't very accepting!"

Really, when was the last time anyone was ever fully tolerant or accepting of someone else's idea? Sure, we love to think we can tolerate things we can't stand, but we also want to be given the privilege to bash that thing's brains out at times, too. We don't because it isn't something anyone would do, at least in a social context. As for accepting; we can't stomach 90% of the things most people say - I sure don't. Opinions are fine and dandy and you can have as many of them as you want. However, just because it's your opinion doesn't mean anyone is obligated to be agreeing with it. Regardless of being your view - well, too fucking bad if someone thinks it's bullshit. I don't care if someone likes George W. Bush, I still think the man's a fucking moron and anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves. Why should I sugar-coat it? If you had the chance, you'd call me a dirty Commie, wouldn't you? The fact people sugar-coat just means they're being passive-agressive and being that is far worse than just outright being honest. A lot of us don't do that, though. We're stuck in this mindset where we must somehow be careful of everyone's feelings or else everyone will be offended. Hey, if someone wanted to ask me an urgently serious question, I'd prefer getting it right then and now rather than being bullshitted (at least I do, most of the time).

We hold our views sacred because they are our's. Sometimes we do take them too seriously, sometimes so much that we can't possibly let anyone tell us otherwise. We can turn a simple disagreement of musical taste into an argument of who is lower on the evolutionary ladder and make an agreement on a movie to be words that should be etched into the stone that is eternity. Any other time, we like to believe what we want to believe until we say otherwise - screw everyone else to Hell!

feeeeeney @ 2006-01-24T00:54:00

2006-01-24T08:52:53Z

Recently as I was walking around my college campus, I came across a flyer displaying a particular fact that, I'm quite sure, everyone's probably familiar with: most college professors happen to be Democrat rather than Republican. The flyer mentioned that apparently the Democratic professors outnumbered Republican professors 8 to 1.

Now, I won't argue this is wrong. No, what angered me was the fact the flyer called such a "crime" and that "something had to be done about it." It's almost as though I could hear several blood vessels within my head bursting simultaneously from the pure stupidity of such a claim. Of course there aren't many Republicans as teachers, but is there a need to force a policy to fulfill a fucking quota for them, of all things? Maybe the fact most professors are Democrat isn't because of some "liberal bias," but just the fact that many teachers, especially those in colleges, happen to be politically liberal.

Really, the day when the same people who often argue against affirmitive action happen to use it to their advantage will be one of great irony.

Truthfully, if the "liberal bias" thing happens to be true, I'd prefer it over any sort of "conservative bias." I'd like to think that, when you go to college, your preconceptions will be shattered. I think it's more than natural for youths to be rebellous. Of course, the argument from Rush "Dittohead" Limbaugh would probably be that that's the problem with colleges: they're brainwashing them into being little hellions (which, more or less, means they actually would dare to doubt the Republican party)!

A conservative bias would only turn youths into a bunch of vapid conformists. Instead of people thinking we can make the world a better place by, I don't know, helping the poor, they'll be taught they're meant to be mocked and ridiculed accordingly - it's their fault for not having jobs, not the economy! Oh, and crime: that's just a genetic trait carried on by minorities - whitey don't do such,'yo!

Seriously though, why would replacing one bias be an improvement over another? The whole idea that things are being taught in a bias fashion almost frightens me. Why can't a subject be taught objectively? It can be done so with any subject, but apparently some things are a no-no to one side of the political spectrum or the other. It almost comes to the point on splitting hairs on small details as to how a particular subject is brought up in a class room. Nevermind the teacher isn't using it as a mouthpiece, it's the fact she's teaching the subject in a certain way. "Yes, you can bring up that poverty is bad, but you can't say it has to do with the economy." Well, geez, I'd think to enlighten one of their subject of study, you'd have to give them all the dirty little details. Of course, apparently those dirty little details might lead to baby-killing witches that drink blood, so who knows?!

I know I'm rambling, so I'll conclude all this: if you're going to argue what so fucking wrong with education in this country, especially in colleges, you should argue about the lack of funding and qualified teachers many of them get. Going into whether one subject is more politically correct to one party or the other is just detracted us from the real issues and there's no one to blame but the assholes who bring 'em up. They want to turn education into a clash of ideology when it should be about enlightening youths and helping them find themselves.

feeeeeney @ 2006-01-19T15:29:00

2006-01-19T23:31:08Z

OH MAN
It's been like over 2 weeks since anyone has bitched. And I really don't have much to bitch about that isn't entirely personal.

Maybe people in seminar who refuse to say ANYTHING. Which is 80% of our class. REALLY frustrating. Why are you even here? Go to a lecture-based college. I was quiet my first quarter and now that I have a feel for seminar I'm probably too vocal. Too bad. Speak up or go away. A five person-conversation gets really boring after 2 hours.

feeeeeney @ 2005-12-31T23:13:00

2006-01-01T07:19:14Z

I"m currently on prescription drugs, so forgive if this comes off as rambling and mumbled.

Dear girl in ER a cubicle away from mine:

What the fuck is wrong with you? Your daughter has an extremely rapid heartrate and you're going to sign her out of the HOSPITAL because you're getting tired? Excuse me? I really don't think your comfort really matters there, your DAUGHTER has an elevated heartrate. I heard the nurses telling you that. They said that she could end up having a heart attack! You dumb bitch! I don't give a fuck that it takes you 4 hours to drive back to Gardnerville (which is BULLSHIT, you cunt! I spent half my life in that town and it's at most a 45 minute drive, even with the flooding!!) How about you take your daughter's health in to concideration?

If your child dies because of your selfishness, it will be entirely your fault. And I hope the guilt will eat away at your fucking soul, if you happen to have an ounce of one left.

Love,
the very pained woman sitting in the next cube waiting for some relief from her pain.

(the relief came in the form of 2 shots in my ass, by the way, so while I'm doped up but good now, fucking hell that made my anger worse. Plus, they hurt!)

Warren Ellis imitators...

2005-12-31T11:05:48Z

Warren Ellis himself can be at times, witty, amusing, intellectual, introspective, self aware...

and once in a while a snarkish asshole. It's part of the online persona he's created. He knows his fans expect it so he feeds it to them. Some enjoy it... others find it reptitive.

I find BAD SIGNAL (referred to at the V as DAD SIGNAL) to be insightful, He'll examine trends and industrie statistics.

His fan imitators... not so much.

Being an asshole for the sake of being an asshole isn't what Ellis is about. The worse offense? Pretending to examine the industry as though you're an expert and making that the crux of your LJ, blog or general comic discussions.

I look back at posts I had made before I lucked out and landed my cool little gig and realize that I knew JACK SHIT.

I'm learning day by day from the people I work with... people pretending that they know what comics need and doing the Ellis imitation are just wasting air.

feeeeeney @ 2005-12-23T22:19:00

2005-12-24T06:19:53Z

This is a rant in which I portray the object of my hate in it's perspective. In this case; a rich, white suburbanite teen:

Hi, I'm 17-years-old. A lot of people would say I'm "inexperienced" 'cause I never went out of the state and still live at my parents house, but they don't know shit! Y'see, I'm smart. Not book smart - that's for fucking queers and wimps. Nah, I'm too smart for school. So smart, in fact, I only get C's and D's, but still pass each grade because I'm a jock and the public school system sucks.

My dad tells me a lot of stuff, like how immigrants are taking our jobs. I know he's right, because he makes tens of thousands of dollars a month, but never went to college - he's a professional ass-kisser in his company. Anyway, he tells me this and I know he's right. I mean, I know he's right because I never had a job. I'd get one, but like, the Mexican kid at my school named Pedro got a part-time job at McDonald's. I never actually wanted to get the position. I mean, fuck it, I already get an $150 allowance a week, so it's not like I need the money. Still that beaner took a job from a hard-working kid like me!

He also told me the liberals are trying to take his money away. So, instead of having to buy that new Hummer that gets half a mile to the gallon, he has to buy that big screen TV to replace the one we already have. My friend in college told me my dad's full of it, because he's rich. Yeah, like, rich people are...uh...people, too! They may get tax breaks from the government, but we get money taken away from us just like poor people, except we need it more! Really, I need to get that new stereo system in my car. If I don't, how can I share my love of 50 Cent to my neighborhood?

Seriously, 50 Cent is the next fucking Mozart (whoever he was, my music teacher keeps mentioning him). He knows about what shit is like on the street, yo! What's even more amazing is how he whored himself out to not only make a movie that glorfies his former lifestyle in a positive manner. Yeah, I know he was a drug dealer and shit, but he made inspiring music that speaks the truth. Especially about women, they all ho's.

Like, this one time, I asked this girl out. I never actually talked to her before, but I asked her is she wanted to come to my place and fuck like rabbits. She slapped me - what a bitch! She ended up going out with this other guy, who I know is a complete faggot 'cause he's in all the school plays. Ha ha! She's dating a faggot!

Gay people scare me, too. I don't want no guy coming up from behind me and touching my shit. It's okay when my teammate Ritchie slaps my ass during practice, but those gay pieces of shit need to stay the fuck away. Besides, I hear all those priests that molest children are gay, too. Again, my friend in college had to point out most child molesters are actually straight. Seriously, that fucking egghead needs to shut up every once n' a while.

Really, just 'cause he's going to college he thinks he knows more than me. That asshole hasn't even lost his virginity yet 'cause he's concentrating so much on school (me, I lost mine to some chick who got drunk and passed out on my friend's couch. That was so awesome!). He also says he has severe depression. Wah, wah, wah! Just 'cause his mom died doesn't mean he's depressed, he can fucking snap out of it anytime he wants to. Besides, like Tom Cruise says, psychology is bullshit. I mean, he'd know - he's a fucking successful actor! My friend says that Cruise believe in something called Thetans and belongs to a cult, but like all fucking liberals, he's just basing that on our horribly bias liberal media (speaking of which, I need to read my dad's Ann Coulter books, listen to some Rush Limbaugh, and watch The O'Reily Factor on FOX).

Besides, unlike him, I've been involved in some heavy political shit. Like, a few days ago, I wore this button that says "ABORTION IS MURDER" and walked around school with it on. This one kid came up and asked me why I believed that, and I said it's killing babies, and he asked how I knew it was actually killing a baby as opposed to, I don't know, cells or some shit. I kept telling him that if a chick's pregnant, it's a baby and she has to have it. The kid got pissed and then talked about how is sister died because she decided to have the kid, 'cause her parents would disown her because they were pro-lifers. Seriously, what a whiny little bitch.

So, yeah, you know I'm right. If you disagree, you're an asshole, dig?

If one more fucking person....

2005-12-23T20:36:41Z

...tells me that smoking is bad for my health, I am gonna tell them that second hand smoke is worse, so piss the fuck off!!

...tells me that I get piercings and tattoos because I am "rebelling" and "I'll regret it," I'm gonna tell them that my body is a canvas and what I am doing is creating art. Then I will "rebel" my size thirteen boot up their ass (I wont regret it).

...asks me if my New Beetle is my wife's car, I will politely point out the skull-covered license plate holders and her garter on the rear-view mirror (the black rose in the bud vase could go either way) and then politely run them over.

...ignores the "NO SOLICITORS" sign next to the doorbell and tries to sell me something, I am going to hold up a "Tresspassers Will Be Shot" sign and my paintball gun and riddle them full paint splatters. Try selling a vacuum to my neighbor looking like that, bitch.

...tells me that I'm too old for video games, I'll show them how much money I will earn by making video games in a few years. I will of course being laughing maniacally as they run away crying.

...tries to convert me or otherwise shove their religious views down my throat, I'm gonna give them my spare copy of the Satanic Bible and tell them to come back after they have finished reading it. If they wont take the time to learn about my spirituality, then I wont bother with theirs.

...asks why the Imperial March is coming out of my pocket, I'll tell them that everyone needs a theme song.

A rant

2005-12-23T05:02:51Z

There is more to this universe than can be defined by science. It is an impossible thing to claim that our surroundings, ourselves, can be mapped out with mathematics and science, with numbers. Who are these modern contemporaries, praising the assumptions that the workings of a human soul can be brought down to the mere bubblings of chemicals? Have we accepted that our emotions are no more than the interaction of chemical A with chemical B? Macro evolutionist priests believe that everything was created from chaos. I don't know about you, but from a completely objective point of view, that is as unlikely a story as some atheists would see the bible's account of how our cosmos was created. I find myself disgusted as my existence is made baser and baser by those who would constantly dehumanize my existence. Every day we as a race are deemed more like a common animal than someone who is above them. I vehemently disagree with such ludicrous notions of self-debasement. Does our faculty of reason mean nothing? Is compassion, love, hatred, jealousy, and the multitude of other emotions lost to these "scientists" who would ignore what is already in their mind to pursue some higher "truth" that screams utter contradiction to their inherent nature? I fear the day when science renders us as nothing more than automatons.

The worst kinds of people are

2005-12-17T10:31:06Z

the people who believe the only serious problems are their own.
The people who are constantly in need of assistance, only to turn their backs on you when it's your turn for needing a sympathetic ear.
Are they selfish, stupid, oblivious?
How can one meander through life taking and taking and never giving?

I try to have faith in people. I try to trust, I try to do good to people. And it seems like every day somebody reminds me of why I was so negative and untrustworthy in the first place.

Paris Hilton and Rich People

2005-12-15T06:42:33Z

I want to bring up someone: Paris Hilton.

I think I've come to the conclusion that she stands for everything that I despise about this country. She's a rich, worthless, bimbo who happens to gain overnight popularity and fame for a sex tape. It also happens that she apparently inspires another generation of girls to starve themselves and look as about as anemic as she does.

I brought her up with my dad and he replied "well, she did put a lot of work into how she looks..."

Wha?! Huh?!

When has anyone on this planet been given any sort of fame for existing! She hasn't actually contributed anything to soceity and more than likely never will, but we're suppose to claim there's some validity in her claim to fame?

Okay, how about this: award anorexic women for making a positive imapact on today's youth. Yes, that's right, I said it. If Paris Hilton should be given credit for "looking good," why not take it a step further by claiming anorexia isn't a disease and anorexic women happen to put up a positive image for the women of America. Bravo!

I say this as a guy: I love women. If I was gay, I'm sure I'd still love 'em (not as much as my Nubian Prince, Taye Diggs...oh yeah). My point, though, is that I don't understand other guys' obssession with these skinny-as-a-twig, blonde, overly-boxom body types. Of course, the same guys that usually obssess over this type of body also happen to be 5'8", 280 pounds, and a beer belly to match. God forbid they lose weight and stop drinking swill like Miller for more than a minute. They expect their wives to look like a half-decent substitute for a Hooters girl, but how dare anyone would expect them to ever look good for their wives! Maybe instead of fantasizing over women who may as well likely be illustrations in an issue of Heavy Metal, maybe they can appareciate the fact most women, including their wives, look far more natural and better that way than any trumped-up, life-sized Barbie doll they cream their pants over night after night.

Speaking of Paris Hilton, I just plain don't like rich folk.

It amazes me in the US that we still love to glorify the top 1% of Americans as the "self-made man." It's quite ignorant, really.

Does an inheritance count as one being "self-made"? Did they actually work in order to get the inheritance, or did they just happen to have it fall into their lap via rich parents and/or relatives? If you answered the latter, you're right.

I could actually not give two shits about the rich being rich if it wasn't for:

1) The fact we glorify them on the basis that they're wealthy.

2) Are oftend excused on matters which, for most everyone else, would be unacceptable.

When we glorify the wealthy, it's insinuated they must "deserve" whatever they want. Not that they're children are smarter than any other from the middle or lower class, or that they actually have done something profound - they just apparently do. Criticizing them, you would be out to be a Commie. Never mind you believe in free trade and developing small businesses, you have to suck the perverbial cock of the Bourgeoisie like the rest of the unwashed masses.

Going back to Paris Hilton, I have to point out a hyprocricy within our society: if any woman happened to have done what Hilton had done, she'd be branded as a slut and whore and, if she happens to have children, an unfit mother. Not that some people haven't done that with Hilton, but she seems to have been given more praise for doing what she's done than anyone else on the planet. No one is arguing that she doesn't deserve the Hilton fortune after being banged on camera, they just gave in to The Simple Life and Burger King ads. Again, if someone else had done the same, they'd lose their job and would have a hard time finding another - probably their kids, too.

I'm sure the many things we'd terrorize any normal person for, like a woman getting an abortion or a man having sexual intercourse with another man, are all wiped under the carpet when it comes to some oil baron and his family. Hell, I'd even go as far as to say Dubya took one too many girls in a back alley after too much beer and cocaine at the local barn dance. If anyone happens to suggest any of this about them, it's lies, slander, and libel. Say it about anyone who isn't them, it's a crusade against immorality and godlessness. Not that any wealthy person actually believes in a strict moral code. If this were a different world, I'm sure they'd love hunting down peasents for shits and giggles. Of course, like Divine Right, we treat them like gods despite their constant oblviousness to any true sense of standards and decency (and no, the FCC doesn't count in either category.)

What a wondeful world, eh?

Screw you, I like my Christmas tree!!!!

2005-12-11T01:29:40Z

I wanna preface this rant with a lil info: I am a devout (no jokes) Satanist. I do, however, totally dig Christian mythology.

That being said, this may come as quite a shocker:
PC Police, please leave Christmas the fuck alone!!! I mean it! I dont care if there is a manger in the mall or Christmas songs playing at all the stores. I DONT CARE! The country is like 80% Christians, so of course the corporations are gonna market to the masses, not the minorities. Oh no, someone wished a non-christian a Merry Christmas... whoop-de-fucking-doo! You wont melt, trust me. You wont "catch" a religion by touching greeting cards (you sure as hell cant catch merry-ness). Carry on being all grouchy and crap, protect your kids from the happy people, dont watch TV, complain about the malls and the roads and everything else, I dont care, just let other people have their damn fun. Drink some egg-nog you fuckers.

Oh, and for you killjoys that want everyone to stop spending during the holidays and blah blah blah, remember this: the only reason we have the USA is because we got pissed off at unfair taxes. So thank capitalism every time you rant about your "rights" being infringed on.

Even though I long since converted to paganism and later to Satanism, I still put up a tree and give gifts, because thats how I grew up doing it, and I enjoy it. The Christians ripped off the yule holiday from the pagans, and I am taking it right back.

Werd

feeeeeney @ 2005-12-10T00:56:00

2005-12-10T08:57:22Z

BOYS.
the end.

friendly neighborhood maintaner post

2005-12-08T17:09:47Z

hey.. thanks to the snarkilicious new members for joining. I'd like to give you all a warm welcome and a big ol hug.. but this is not the place for that.

So c'mon and get with the snark! Think of this as your open invitiation to bitch yer arse off, starting now, ok?

as of right now there's unmoderated posting for all current members, though any new members will be on probationary moderation. mostly because we can.

♥Chase

a little PS - you are free to advertize this community, but be aware that if someone joins because of that, you may be held responsible for them. It's like sponsoring a child, only not as expensive and a bit more work.

feeeeeney @ 2005-12-07T19:58:00

2005-12-08T03:59:52Z

I SEE NO BITCHING FROM OUR NEWER MEMBERS.
I took off jourgy and ironmysandwhich for inactivity.

lol I'm just asking to get yelled at, eh?

2005-12-06T18:12:23Z

So this is a rant that has been building up for a while. Please don't excuse the words I use, because if I say it, I mean it.

Childfree.

It brings out the most irrational fears in so many parents. There are people who just can't wrap their minds around the concept of people not wanting to have kids. There are psycho women who get angry and defensive when they find out someone doesn't want to be a parent, and will troll, flame and spam to try to get their point across.

Yeah.. Those parents aren't what I'm upset about.

I have nothing at all against the Childfree lifestyle. If you don't want to have kids, yay. If you do, yay. Hope you're up to the responsibility. If someone doesn't want kids, there's nothing wrong with that.

It's these militant asshats in cf_hardcore that piss me off. These people who claim to be "flameproof", Mature and rational, but really, are none of the above. They're immature, mean and spiteful people. Now, not all memebers arel like that, but the most vocal are.

These specific CFers tend to go out of their way to piss themselves off. They'll troll parenting boards, go on image searches, and generally nitpick on anything parenting/child related that they come across. They'll find a picture (usually a userpic) of someone pregnant and go off in the most immature little tirade you've ever seen. They'll see a picture of a child (a fucking picture!!) and make a post about how gross it is, patting eachother on the backs about how OMGHARDCORE!!!!!111!!!11! they are for making jokes about a child, about harming the child, or their parents.

Let us not forget that they're usually (and once again, I'm not talking about all CF people. I'm talking about those vocal fucktards who like to make public asses of themselves on lj) Entitlement minded assholes.

"OMG this CHYYYULD almost ran into me in a gorcery store!!! I feel so violated! I'm gonna lie to a group of backpatting simps so I can feel all high and mighty!"

Any child that is anywhere is a complete annoyance to these people. "OMG why don't they keep their kids insiiiiide!! They shouldn't be allowed in public until they can act like grownups!"

Ok... so the kids are supposed to be mature and responsible, quiet and sweet, respectful and well behaved? Well.. what about you? You're acting far worse than any child could.

Get the fuck over yourselves, you jackasses.

I'll say this again (because these "hardcore" Cfers seem to be a bit dense sometimes)

This is not against all CF people. SOme of my best friends are Childfree. The thing is, they're not evil. They're not spiteful. Even if they don't like kids (and I don't blame them, really. See one of my previous posts here) They're not evil, "OMG get that baby away from me before I catch compassion" fucks. They know how to act like adults.

Ok, that went all over the place. That's all, for now.

Is the lady of the house available?

2005-12-06T04:54:24Z

grr... I hate telemarketers. I hate everything they do, I hate everything they say, and I hate every last policy that they'll never tell you about that they have to follow. I hate that one the most, because I was one.

Yes. I was a telemarketer. No, I never, ever, ever called your house. I called people who had specific credit cards, usually in the midwest, who for the most part had corporate accounts. Whee.

ahem.

I hate it that they pull the craptastic tactics of the automated person, and "press 1" to speak to representative shit. No, that's ok, I'll just use all my explitaves on the nice robot lady, thanks. I don't want what you're selling. In fact, I'm writing down your company name, since I know damn well you called every day for the last week, even though you were told that we aren't interested, and I asked, and then demanded to be put on the DNC list. I know you're not allowed to call back, It is illegal for a company to call the same individual more than once per 12 months to offer the services that were already refused. I know because that was in the company handbook I was forced to read.

I have sympathy. I do. But I will hang up on you. I will ask to be put on the DNC list. I will yell at you if you become insistant. And you know what else? I will tell you how badly you're doing your job.

I'm not even gonna get started on the people who barely speak english (usually Indian, sometimes god only knows) and insist on giving me their whole intro. All I can say is I go from o_o to o_O to >_< pretty damn fast.

Peace the fudge out

feeeeeney @ 2005-12-05T15:35:00

2005-12-05T23:42:56Z

Smokers. 'Nuff said.

Well, no. In particular--"Smoker's Rights."
What the fuck is that, seriously?
Smoking = killing yourself.

It's like cutting. Do Cutters get Cutter Rights? When you smoke you disturb and harm everyone around you. Do Cutters get to cut everyone around them because it's their right?

I happen to enjoy my lungs, thanks. I don't want your nastyass secondhand smoke wafting into my airway. Personally I'm ESTATIC when they raise the cost of cigarettes, when they ban it in resturants and bars and from certain establishments. I don't think smoking sections are small enough, you shouldn't get smoke breaks, and your health insurance shouldn't cover you if you get sick due to it. It's your own fucking problem you fucking idiots. It's not like it's such a secret what cigarettes do to you anymore, there are thousands of products and programs and counsellors to help you quit, it's no longer socially-off if you don't smoke, and also... you're an idiot. Maybe you deserve to get throat cancer and die.

And stop spitting on the sidewalk you chodes. People walk there. Carry around a hankey if your lungs are crumbling into bits and being coughed up--I don't want to step in it.

EDIT: And when I work 8 hours with a half hour lunch break, and smokers work 8 hours with a half hour lunch break + 5 10-minute smoke breaks while I stay inside and work. FUCK YOU.

feeeeeney @ 2005-12-03T22:27:00

2005-12-04T06:32:48Z

Dearest Entitlement cunts at various shops I visited today,

Move. Now. Apologize if you do something shitty. This is a checkout, not a bypass. Do not give me a dirty look because I noticed that you farted. You FARTED ON ME, you bitch. hey, fat lady with the full cart, you and your husband do not have the right to block every isle you come to. Fuck off.

Dear guy who pushed my cart away from my mother's, fuck off, you piece of shit. WALK AROUND.

Dear lady who smelled like vomit, please stop trying to touch my baby. I bite. So does she. I make no promises that neither one of us has rabies.

Dear fucktard, hey, just because I buy kosher hot dogs and bagles, doesn't mean I'm Jewish. And it's uncalled for to start spewing your hatred verbally in my direction. You know what? I just like those foods. And there's nothign wrong with people being Jewish, you cuntsucking knobgobbler.

*spent*