close
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Ecology

Save the Baltic Sea

Geoengineering efforts to bring oxygen into the deep Baltic should be abandoned, says Daniel J. Conley.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Gustafsson, B. G. et al. AMBIO http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0318-x (2012).

  2. Meier, H. E. M. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L24608 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stigebrandt, A. & Gustafsson, B. G. AMBIO 36, 280–286 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Conley D. J. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 3407–3411 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumblad, L., Rydin, E., Sjöö Lilliesköld, G. & Mörk, E. Fosforfa¨llning fo¨r en fo¨rba¨ttrad ska¨rgårdsmiljo: ett mesokosmfo¨rso¨k (BalticSea2020/Swedish Ecology Consulting, 2011); available at http://go.nature.com/o4x6om (in Swedish).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Conley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conley, D. Save the Baltic Sea. Nature 486, 463–464 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/486463a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/486463a

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. Phosphorus pollution of the Baltic wastes an increasingly valuable resource. Only five countries control 90% of the world's mined phosphate which makes the supply vulnerable to political or monopolistic manipulation. The price, which had been steady for decades, was subject to a more than tenfold hike in 2008 and is now 50% of the peak. Phosphorus is vital to agriculture; formerly the substitute for mined rock was collecting bones from slaughterhouses. Sci.Am.2008

    Dr. Conley could have included the scarcity and possible price increase of phosphorus in his argument favoring conservation instead of geoengineering. Sewage treatment plants produce a salable fertilizer besides preventing pollution.

  2. Does the author have any competing financial interests, or financial interests that a reasonable person might perceive as competing?

  3. Posted on behalf of Drs. O. Magnus Karlsson, J. Mikael Malmaeus and Christian Baresel

    Efforts to bring oxygen into the deep Baltic to increase precipitation of phosphorus should be abandoned, advocates Daniel Conley. His opinion is based on estimates of costs for establishing oxygenation pumps and speculations about ecological damage this could create. Instead, he suggests that mitigation measures focus entirely on reducing nutrient loads.
    Conley gives examples of grants to projects testing different engineering methods. Those figures are irrelevant to determine cost efficiency of, e.g., oxygenation. What matters is how much phosphorus that is removed per money unit spent. This can be achieved only through a proper cost-benefit analysis, which has not yet been possible to do because the technique for oxygenation is still under development. However, such analyses have been done for nutrient load reductions. What we do know is that actions Conley calls for, e.g., massive nitrogen reduction from farming areas (D.J. Conley et al. Science 323, 1014-1015; 2009, besides from being uncertain regarding its efficiency (D.W. Schindler & R.E. Hecky Science 324, 721-722 2009) are associated with yearly costs within the range of billions of ?, if implemented.
    The ecological risks Conley refers to must be taken seriously before applying geoengineering. Nature itself has provided us with possibilities of testing oxygenation. Several Baltic coastal areas near municipalities have historically been polluted from both toxic and eutrophicating substances. Some of these areas are now recovering (O.M. Karlsson et al. AMBIO 39, 486-495; 2010) but there are not any reports of high levels of harmful substances or adverse effects on biota due to dead bottoms being recolonized.
    Any method to reduce the trophic level of the Baltic Sea has its ups and downs. Effluent treatment requires energy and produces carbon dioxide emissions. Actions on farming areas will lead to large-scale changes of the landscape. Society decides which remedy of land based sources and historical deposits we finally undertake. Whether oxygenation is a cost-effective method against eutrophication must be tested before any scientifically based advice can be given.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing