close
Skip to main content
Log in

An Examination of the Perceived Fairness of Workplace Romance Policies

  • Published:
BERJAYA Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fairness perceptions regarding several workplace romance policies (i.e., no action, counsel, verbal reprimand, written warning, transfer, terminate) applied to different types of couples (e.g., lateral vs. hierarchical) in a variety of situations (e.g., couple's performance improves vs. declines) were examined. We found the counsel policy was perceived more fair than any other policy. Stricter workplace romance policies (verbal reprimand, written warning, transfer) were perceived fair when the couple's performance declined or the romance was highly visible. Taking no action was perceived more fair than any other policy when the couple's performance improved. These results and others are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, C.I. & Hunsaker, P.L. (1985). Why there's romancing at the office and why it's everyone's problem. Personnel, 62, 57-63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Are office romances OK? (FaxForum Results). Training & Development Journal, 48(5), 38.

  • Bordwin, M. (1994). Containing Coupid's Arrow. Small Business Reports, 19(7), 53-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, L. (1991). Regulating love. Personnel, 68(6), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, J.P., Hale, J.L., & Segrin, C. (1994). Close relationships in task environments: Perceptions of relational types, illicitness, and power. Management Communication Quarterly, 7(3), 227-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, D.R. & Baridon, A.P. (1992). Managing sexual attraction in the workplace. Business Quarterly, 56(3), 19-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A.B. (1994). Getting comfortable with couples in the workplace. Fortune, 130(7), 138-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural justice and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C. & McLaughlin, F. S. (1987). Should cupid come to the workplace? Personnel Administrator, 32, 100-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, K. (1983). Managing sexual attraction in the workplace: intra-staff romances can damage productivity and morale. Personnel Administrator, 28, 45-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M.M. (1992). Romance in the office. Across the Board, 29(3), 23-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1982). Design & Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M.A., Schweiger, D.M., & Sapienza, H.J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainiero, L.A. (1993). Dangerous liaisons? A review of current issues concerning male and female romantic relationships in the workplace. In E.A. Fagenson (Ed.), Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainiero, L.A. (1989). Office romance: Love, power, and sex in the workplace. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainiero, L.A. (1986). A review and analysis of power dynamics in organizational romances. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 750-762.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin, D.B. & Sweeney, P.D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 626-637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B.P. & Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Driscoll, P. (1997, May 16). The trials of a pilot, the military. USA Today 3A.

  • Osigweh, C., Yg, A.B., & Hutchison, W.R. (1989). Positive discipline. Human Resource Management, 28(3): 367-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G.N. (1986). What do tomorrow's managers think about sexual intimacy in the workplace? Business Horizons, 29(4), 30-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G.N. & Mainiero, L.A. (1990). What human resources managers need to know about office romances. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 11(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. (1977). Coping with cupid: The formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 30-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, E. (1992). Dangerous liaisons. Working Woman, 17(2), 56-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. (1992). The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 647-676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yandrick, R.M. (1995). Helping supervisors solve people problems. HRMagazine, 40(10), 51-54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karl, K.A., Sutton, C.L. An Examination of the Perceived Fairness of Workplace Romance Policies. Journal of Business and Psychology 14, 429–442 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022928216431

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022928216431

Keywords