Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-m58mf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-02T22:43:50.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of National Societies: A Critical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Dean C. Tipps
Dean C. Tipps
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access BERJAYARights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Use of the term ‘modernization’ in its present connotations is of relatively recent origin, becoming an accepted part of the vocabulary of American, if not international, social science only in the decade of the 1960s. Despite its relatively rapid rise to currency, the popularity of the term does not appear to be matched by any widespread consensus concerning its precise meaning. The proliferation of alternative definitions has been such, in fact, that the ratio of those using the term to alternative definitions would appear to approach unity. The popularity of the notion of modernization must be sought not in its clarity and precision as a vehicle of scholarly communication, but rather in its ability to evoke vague and generalized images which serve to summarize all the various transformations of social life attendant upon the rise of industrialization and the nation-state in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. These images have proven so powerful, indeed, that the existence of some phenomenon usefully termed ‘modernization’ has gone virtually unchallenged. While individuals may differ on how precisely this phenomenon should be conceptualized and a number of critics have addressed themselves to the relative merits of alternative conceptualizations, both critics and advocates alike tend to assume the basic utility of the idea of modernization itself, treating only the manner of its conceptualization as problematic.

Information

Type
Modernization
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , March 1973 , pp. 199 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Apter, David E. (1965) The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1963) ‘Concepts and Generalizations in Comparative Sociological Studies’. American Sociological Review, 28 (4): 532–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1967) ‘Tradition and Modernity Reconsidered’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9 (3), 292–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, C. E. (1966) The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study in Comparative History. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Bock, Kenneth E. (1964) ‘Theories of Progress and Evolution’. Pp. 21–41 in Cahnman, Werner J. and Boskoff, Alan (eds.), Sociology and History. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. (1966) Evolution and Society: A Study in Victorian Social Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall (1968) ‘A Comparative Approach to Political Sociology’. Pp. 42–67 in Bendix, Reinhard, et al. (eds.), State and Society: A Reader in Comparative Political Sociology. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1938) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1966) Modernization: Protest and Change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1968) ‘Reflections on a Theory of Modernization’. Pp. 35–61 in Rivkin, Arnold (ed.), Nations by Design: Institution Building in Africa. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1963) ‘The Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States’. Pp. 105–57 in Geertz, Clifford (ed.), Old Societies and New States. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1966) Agricultural Involution: The Process of Ecological Change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. (1967) ‘Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change’. American Journal of Sociology, 72 (4), 351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, John Whitney (1965) ‘Changing Conceptions of the Modernization of Japan’. Pp. 7–41 in Jansen, Marius B. (ed.), Changing Japanese Attitudes Toward Modernization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, Manfred (1966) ‘The Revolution of Modernization in National and International Society’. Pp. 178–214 in Friedrich, Carl J. (ed.), Revolution. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Selig S. (1960) India: The Most Dangerous Decades. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heesterman, J. C. (1963) ‘Tradition in Modern India’. Bijdragen: Tot de Taal-, Land-, en Volkenkunde, 119, (3), 237–53.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard (1955) Social Darwinism in American Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. Stuart (1958) Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1965) ‘Political Development and Political Decay’. World Politics, 17 (3), 386–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1968a) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1968b) ‘The Bases of Accommodation’. Foreign Affairs, 46 (4) 642–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1970) Letter to the Editor, with a Reply by Noam Chomsky. The New York Review of Books, 14 (4, 02 26), 45–6.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1971) ‘The Change to Change: Modernization, Development, and Polities’. Comparative Politics, 3 (3): 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkeles, Alex (1969) ‘Making Men Modern: On the Causes and Consequences of Individual Change in Six Developing Countries’. American Journal of Sociology, 75 (2), 208–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, Arthur L. (1966) ‘The Logic of Comparison: A Methodological Note on the Study of Political Systems’. World Politics, 19 (1) 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Abraham (1964) The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Khare, R. S. (1971) ‘Home and Office: Some Trends of Modernization among the Kanya-Kubja Brahmans’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 13 (2), 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leo, Kuper, and Smith, M. G., eds. (1969) Pluralism in Africa. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lauer, Robert H. (1971) ‘The Scientific Legitimation of Fallacy: Neutralizing Social Change Theory’. American Sociological Review, 36. (5), 881–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel (1958) The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald N. (1968) ‘The Flexibility of Traditional Culture’. Journal of Social Issues, 24 (4) 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Marion J. Jr., (1953) ‘Contrasting Factors in the Modernization of China and Japan’. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2 (3), 161–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Marion J. Jr., (1966) Modernization and the Structure of Societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Marion J. Jr., (1967) ‘Social Patterns (Structures) and Problems of Modernization’. Pp. 189–208 in Moore, Wilbert E. and Cook, Robert M. (eds.), Readings on Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley (1971) ‘An Empirical Study of Military-Industrial Linkages’. American Journal of Sociology, 76 (4), 562–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazrui, Ali A. (1968) ‘From Social Darwinism to Current Theories of Modernization’. World Politics, 21 (1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Wilbert (1963) Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert (1966) The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert (1969) Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, Stanley (1961) ‘Modernity and Tradition in Britain’. Social Research, 28 (3), 297–320.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Lloyd I., AND Susanne, Hoeber Rudolph (1967) The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. (1967) A World of Nations; Problems of Political Modernization. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin I. (1972) ‘The Limits of “Tradition Versus Modernity” as Categories of Explanation: The Case of the Chinese Intellectuals’. Daedalus, 101 (2), 71–88.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward (1963) ‘On the Comparative Study of the New States’. Pp. 1–26 in Geertz, Clifford (ed.), Old Societies and New States. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward (1965) Political Development in the New States. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Singer, Milton (1971) ‘Beyond Tradition and Modernity in Madras’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 13 (2), 160–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. (1967) ‘Processes of Social Change’. Pp. 674–728 in Smelser, N. J. (ed.), Sociology, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Ian (1969) ‘The Problem of the Convergence of Industrial Societies: A Critical Look at the State of a Theory’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 11 (1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitacker, C. S. (1967) ‘A Dysrhythmic Process of Political Change’. World Politics, 19 (2), 190–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zevin, Robert (1972) ‘An Interpretation of American Imperialism’. Journal of Economic History, 32 (1), 316–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar