Summary
Workers of the ant Formica schaufussi forage as individuals and cooperate in groups to retrieve arthropod prey. In 2 sample years, group-transported prey were on average 6.8 and 4.7 times heavier than individually retrieved items, and the average loading ratios of groups were greater than the loading ratios of single foragers. Retrieval group size was adjusted to prey size, and prey transport velocity for individuals and groups tended to decrease with increasing prey weight. The efficiency of individual and group retrieval, estimated from calculations of the prey delivery rate to the nest (PDR) achieved by each foraging mode, varied as a function of prey size. Individual retrieval maximized PDR at a prey weight of 19.5 mg, and group transport maximized PDR at 190 mg. Although the PDR maxima of an individual in a group and a solitary forager were approximately equal, depending on prey size, group transport may maximize foraging efficiency. Group transport also decreased interference competition from sympatric ant species. Group-transported prey having a greater likelihood of successful retrieval were within the size range of prey that maximized foraging efficiency. Transport group size appeared to be more important in prey defense than in increasing prey transport velocity, suggesting an important role of group size in competitive ability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams EA, Traniello JFA (1981) Chemical interference competition by Monomorium minimum. Oecologia 51:271–275
Bartholomew GA, Lighton JRB, Feener DH (1988) Energetics of trail-running, load carriage, and emigration in the column-raiding army ant Eciton hamatum. Physiol Zool 61:57–68
Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Franks N, Pasteels JM (1989) The blind leading the blind: modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. J Insect Behav 2:719–725
Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant. J Insect Behav 3:159–168
Dixon WJ, Massey FJ (1983) Introduction to statistical analysis, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Franks NR (1986) Teams in social insects: group retrieval of prey by army ants (Eciton burchelli, Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:425–429
Franks NR (1987) The organization of working teams in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 2:72–75
Fresneau D (1985) Individual foraging and path fidelity in a ponerine ant. Insects See 32:109–116
Hölldobler B (1982) Interference strategy of Iridomyrmex pruinosum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) during foraging. Oecologia 52:208–213
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hölldobler B, Stanton RC, Markl H (1978) Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor (Formicidae: Hymenoptera). I. Chemical signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:163–181
Markl H, Hölldobler B (1978) Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). II. Vibration signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:183–216
Moffett M (1988) Cooperative food transport by an Asiatic ant. Natl Geogr Res 4:386–394
Nielsen MG, Jensen TF, Holm-Jensen I (1982) Effect of load carriage on the respiratory metabolism of running worker ants of Camponotus herculeanus (Formicidae). Oikos 39:137–142
Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn DJ, Mitchell RD, Stairs GR (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 154–177
Oster G, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Rockwood L, Hubbell SP (1987) Host-plant selection, diet diversity, and optimal foraging in a tropical leafcutting ant. Oecologia 74:55–61
Schmid-Hempel P (1984) Individually different foraging methods in the desert ant Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:263–271
Schmid-Hempel P (1987) Foraging characteristics of the desert ant Cataglyphis. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 43–61
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Sudd JH (1965) Transport of prey by ants. Behaviour 25:234–271
Traniello JFA (1983) Social organization and foraging success in Lasius neoniger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): behavioral and ecological aspects of recruitment communication. Oecologia 59:94–100
Traniello JFA (1987a) Comparative foraging ecology of north temperate ants: the role of worker size and cooperative foraging in prey selection. Insectes Soc 34:118–130
Traniello JFA (1987b) Individual and social modification of behavior in response to environmental factors in ants. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 63–80
Traniello JFA (1988) Variation in foraging behavior among workers of the ant Formica schaufussi: ecological correlates of search behavior and the modification of search pattern. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview, Boulder CO, pp 91–112
Traniello JFA (1989) Foraging strategies of ants. Annu Rev Entomol 34:191–210
Traniello JFA, Levings SC (1986) Intra- and intercolony patterns of nest dispersion in the ant Lasius neoniger: correlations with territoriality and foraging ecology. Oecologia 61:413–419
Traniello JFA, Fujita MS, Bowen RV (1984) Ant foraging behavior: Ambient temperature influences prey selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:65–68
Traniello JFA, Fourcassié V, Graham TP (1991) Search behavior and foraging ecology of the ant Formica schaufussi: colony-level and individual patterns. Ethol Ecol Evol 3:35–47
Wehner R, Schmid-Hempel P, Harkness RD (1983) Foraging strategies in individually searching ants Cataglyphis bicolor. Fischer, Stuttgart
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Offprint requests to: J.F.A. Traniello
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Traniello, J.F.A., Beshers, S.N. Maximization of foraging efficiency and resource defense by group retrieval in the ant Formica schaufussi . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29, 283–289 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163986
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163986
