close

Hello...

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
ghosts-of-rishi
BERJAYA
liberalsarecool

image

Fascism sells a synthetic nostalgia.

BERJAYA
theshampyon

As good a time as any to remind folks of the 14 properties of "ur-fascism" (described by Umberto Eco, who grew up in Italy under Mussolini, in his 1995 essay Ur-Fascism). Not all need be present for single regime to be fascist, but a Venn diagram of all fascist regimes will cover them all.

  1. CULT OF TRADITION. The old ways are best. The New is not worthwhile.
  2. REJECT MODERNISM The development of Western philosophy post-Enlightenment is seen as a descent into depravity. See also : Reject post-modernism, which is seen as an even greater descent into irrationality.
  3. ACTION FOR ACTION'S SAKE. Action is to be taken without reflection or introspection - that's for weaklings and degenerates. Often seen in a derision of "intellectual elites".
  4. DISAGREEMENT IS TREASON. Analytical criticism cannot be allowed. A pantomime of discourse may be allowed, but only within the accepted framework and only if reaching the foregone conclusion.
  5. FEAR OF DIFFERENCE. Outsiders are your enemy. Those who are different are evil and want to corrupt you and destroy all you hold dear.
  6. APPEAL TO A FRUSTRATED MIDDLE CLASS Capitalising on genuine frustrations by pointing them toward convenient scapegoats. Real concerns used a recruiting tools.
  7. OBSESSION WITH A PLOT. There is a conspiracy run by THEM. You are besieged by THEM. THEY are behind all your ills. THEY are working in the shadows to enslave and destroy you.
  8. THE ENEMY IS BOTH STRONG AND WEAK. When rhetorically convenient, THEY are all-powerful. When rhetorically convenient, THEY are feeble, stupid, weak. The rhetorical focus shifts regardless of self-contradiction, because all that matters is positioning the enemy where the speaker's goal requires them to be at any given moment.
  9. PACIFISM IS THE ENEMY. LIFE IS ETERNAL WAR. There must always be an enemy to fight. When that enemy is defeated, another must be found. When they cannot be found, they must be created, even from within. There is always the promise of a Final Solution bringing Ultimate Triumph, but it can never be achieved.
  10. CONTEMPT FOR THE WEAK. Elitism disguised as populism. Everyone of US is superior to THEM, cockroaches and drains on society that they are. But people are sheep who require strong leaders, who are by their nature superior to others.
  11. EVERYONE IS TAUGHT TO BE THE HERO. A CULT OF DEATH. Where in myth the hero is exceptional, in fascism everyone must be the hero. They crave heroic death, the reward for heroic life. In seeking it, they send others to die. (See also: Militarism).
  12. MACHISMO. Disdain for women and femininity. Intolerance of non-standard sexuality and gender expression.
  13. SELECTIVE POPULISM. The People are viewed as a monolith with a single will, as interpreted (in reality, determined) by the leaders. Democratic institutions are viewed as illegitimate because they run counter to the narrative of the existence of a single Voice Of The People.
  14. NEWSPEAK. Vocabulary cannot expand. If anything, it must shrink. Variation and nuance in dialogue means variation and nuance in thought. This cannot be allowed. Therefore categories must be binary. Definitions are simple and limited. If it cannot be boiled down into snappy catchphrase it does not exist.
Pinned Post politics
just-another-weird-artist
BERJAYA
just-another-weird-artist

image


image

A spoiled princeling roasting himself in scalding water, judged by his hedge knight.

Quick painting inspired by this amazing fic by @leupagus , that was my regular dose of laughter and angst during exam season.

I can't put to words how much I am enjoying it, honestly it's one of the best I have ever read.

the songs and the stories the lies and the glories T_T that scene i will go down with the “baelor and matarys and shierra have the fire-proof gene” headcanon akotsk ser duncan the tall baelor breakspear spearhedge dunkbaelor dunkaelor akotsk fanart
depyotee
BERJAYA
depyotee

image

"The day before Egg and Maekar's ship was due to port, Baelor rose with the chiming of the Great Sept's bells — the hour of the nightingale, but none sang that morning as he clothed himself, opened the case that held the crown, and closed it up again. Instead he went to the window and looked out across the city. The rain was still falling from the storms last night; he did not envy Maekar's stomach as he braved the tempest in Blackwater Bay. All he could see from here could see were the roofs and walls of King's Landing; somewhere past the grey mists was the countryside, but it was lost to him now."

The Songs and the Stories, the Lies and the Glories - Chp. 4 by @leupagus

T_T one of the most amazing dunkbaelor fic alongside 'a savage gift' baelor targaryen baelor breakspear baelor breakspear targaryen dunkbaelor spearhedge akotsk a knight of the seven kingdoms akotsk fanart
thechamelioncircut
BERJAYA
tris-morreu

nolan's the odyssey has such a fundamentally culturally christian understanding of religion and divinity that it is genuinely jarring to see characters in a supposedly ancient greek historical context describe divinity and its expression in those terms. characters wonder aloud why gods hide themselves (they didn't), question the existence of what nolan interprets the supernatural to be (they wouldn't) and talk of zeus's law (not real, and still somehow bastardized) in the same way we would talk about the ten commandments. it's so out of place. and it taps into that "defy the gods" thing.

like. we can defy the christian god, in a way, because we can choose to not do what he says we ought to. sure. but we cannot defy greek gods in the same way, because the god is not just an entity that commands you but the very thing you are doing. apollo does not just send plagues, he is plague. you know apollo is real because there is plague. plague is not apollo acting in the world, it is an instance of apollo, in the same way that insight is athena, love is aphrodite, harvest is demeter, storms are zeus. gods are not commanding nature and sending signs and acting upon the world, because signs and nature and human nature are themselves the gods. the gods cannot be absent, because we still get ideas, and harvest, and go to war, and feel desire, and hunt. the gods cannot be defied because you cannot defy "getting ideas" or "harvesting" or "having sex" or "dying." to attempt to is entirely futile. like you cannot defy poseidon because you cannot defy the sea. you cannot defy aphrodite because you cannot defy love and reproduction. nature and human nature are unbeatable, and so the gods are unbeatable, because they are nature and human nature.

and it's such a beautiful way of looking at the world, and he just doesn't get that.

There’s nothing like reading the canon lore of a female character and the entry is like this:

“She was the daughter of [Male Character], born in [date uncertain] and married [Male Character]. Later, she had children. Note: no canon reveals the time or nature of her death at this time.

rip many female characters but really that complaint is mostly about asoiaf hod akotsk ect they don't even tell you when they got married some of their dates of birth are given within a ten years window at this point. it's being reduced to even *less* than just daughter-wife-mother *sigh* star wars. you are not exempt of this shaking my finger at you
luimnigh
BERJAYA
spillways-mp3

a meme showing a set of dominos where the smallest and first in the sequence is "a baron marries a trans girl" and the largest and last in the sequence is "an unelected prime minister collapses the union with scotland"ALT

stolen from twitter lmao

BERJAYA
luimnigh

Okay, to explain this one:

Legal discrimination against trans people in the UK dates back to a specific court case in 1970.

In 1963, Arthur Corbett, the 3rd Baron Rowallan, married April Ashley, an English model sixteen years his junior. Ms. Ashley was transgender, and the fact that she was trans was public knowledge at the time due to her being outed by a tabloid newspaper in 1961. Mr Corbett was fully aware of her being trans from the beginning of the relationship.

I want to emphasize here: they were legally married, and they were not the first couple including a trans person to do so. There were legal methods to change your birth certificate, which trans people had availed of.

The marriage fell apart within weeks. Three years later, Ms. Ashley's lawyers requested alimony payments from Corbett.

Corbett responded by suing to have the marriage annulled by making the argument that Ms. Ashley was legally a man and that, as gay marriage wasn't legal at the time, the marriage wasn't legal.

Despite at least one prior court case finding the opposite, court agreed with Corbett, and this finding set legal precedent in the UK until 1999.

Arthur Corbett died of gangrene in 1993, having previously been disinherited by his father for an extra-marital affair. While he inherited the title of "Baron", the house seat and lands had instead passed on directly to his eldest son from a previous marriage. His son went bankrupt in 1989.

April Ashley passed away in her home in 2021, at the age of 86. She had been awarded an MBE in 2012 for her trans rights activism.

BERJAYA
coline7373

@luimnigh Fascinating and instructive about the "Baron marries trans girl" part (karma! Eat it, Corbett!) but what about the "unelected Prime Minister collapse the union with Scotland"?

Do you know? Does anyone reading this?

My Google-fu isn't figuring this one out and I'm dying of curiosity.

BERJAYA
luimnigh

So, to explain: since 1999, Scotland has had a Devolved Parliament. Basically, Scotland votes for it's own politicians to pass it's own laws in many areas, while other areas are reserved for the wider UK Government to legislate on.

However, the UK Government can block whatever Scottish law it wants completely unilaterally, whenever it wants. This powers sat unused for for 23 years, until late 2022/early 2023.

The Scottish Parliament had passed the Gender Recognition Reform Bill, a law easing the process of changing your gender on legal documents.

The previous UK-wide legislation, the Gender Recognition Act of 2004, required a trans person to obtain a medical certificate that involved invasive questioning and two years of living as the "acquired gender", just to get their gender changed on legal documents.

The Reform Bill instead made it just a process of legally declaring your gender. No wait time, no invasive questioning, no medical certificate.


The Conservative UK government in 2023, led by Rishi Sunak, blocked the Gender Recognition Reform Bill. Because they're transphobes and the UK is TERF Island.

(Sunak had become Prime Minister by becoming leader of the Conservative Party after the previous election, he had not won the election as leader, hence the "unelected PM" part.)

The Scottish Government then launched a legal challenge against the veto.

The meme is basically saying that the latest Scottish push for independence from the UK has a basis in trans rights movement, and the changing of transphobic law brought in due to the divorce of April Ashley.


Since the original post was made, the Scottish Government has unfortunately lost their legal challenge. The SNP, the main party of the Scottish Government, has kinda squandered the opportunity to raise outrage about this, due to a leadership change which has favoured some of the more transphobic members of the party.


The Conservatives have lost control over the UK Government to the theoretically left-leaning Labour Party, however their at-the-time leader Keir Starmer confirmed he would not be rescinding the veto. Because Keir Starmer is a Conservative in a red tie.

The Scottish branch of the Labour Party, who supported the Reform Bill in the Scottish Parliament, turned on the Bill once the UK-wide Labour Party voted in favour of the Veto.

Labour has since changed leadership to the more progressive Andy Burnham, who has yet to state a position on the Veto, but has unfortunately walked back his own trans rights statements in recent years.


This has been your explanation of a outdated political meme.

BERJAYA
coline7373

@luimnigh Thank you for this very kind and thorough explanation.

I live in hope that tyranny and bigotery are like cowboy boots. It come back into fashion every 40 years or so, until everyone remembers why it fall out of fashion in the first place. 🤞🏳️‍🌈⚖✊

uk politics transphobia
twinterrors29
BERJAYA
ladysarai

10 Star Wars Fic Recs for Fanworks Day!

So, today is International Fanworks Day! I saw this post for Feedback Fest 2025, asking for comments "recommending 10 fanworks. Tell everyone why you love these works and why they should check them out." And because I am ~EXTRA~, I decided to make a Tumblr post for this.

But then I realized I could not keep it to 10 recs total and decided to do two posts--one for Inception, and one for Star Wars. There is NO rhyme or reason to the fics recommended here, other than "this is a story I linked to @nutterzoi and told her to go read RIGHT NOW and then when I saw the link I thought 'oh I should read that again'."

Here be my Star Wars fic recs! They are all prequel era, because I have a problem and that problem is named Obi-Wan Kenobi. Recs under the cut!

Keep reading

star wars sw fic sw fic rec fic rec
januaryblight
BERJAYA
spillways-mp3

a meme showing a set of dominos where the smallest and first in the sequence is "a baron marries a trans girl" and the largest and last in the sequence is "an unelected prime minister collapses the union with scotland"ALT

stolen from twitter lmao

BERJAYA
luimnigh

Okay, to explain this one:

Legal discrimination against trans people in the UK dates back to a specific court case in 1970.

In 1963, Arthur Corbett, the 3rd Baron Rowallan, married April Ashley, an English model sixteen years his junior. Ms. Ashley was transgender, and the fact that she was trans was public knowledge at the time due to her being outed by a tabloid newspaper in 1961. Mr Corbett was fully aware of her being trans from the beginning of the relationship.

I want to emphasize here: they were legally married, and they were not the first couple including a trans person to do so. There were legal methods to change your birth certificate, which trans people had availed of.

The marriage fell apart within weeks. Three years later, Ms. Ashley's lawyers requested alimony payments from Corbett.

Corbett responded by suing to have the marriage annulled by making the argument that Ms. Ashley was legally a man and that, as gay marriage wasn't legal at the time, the marriage wasn't legal.

Despite at least one prior court case finding the opposite, court agreed with Corbett, and this finding set legal precedent in the UK until 1999.

Arthur Corbett died of gangrene in 1993, having previously been disinherited by his father for an extra-marital affair. While he inherited the title of "Baron", the house seat and lands had instead passed on directly to his eldest son from a previous marriage. His son went bankrupt in 1989.

April Ashley passed away in her home in 2021, at the age of 86. She had been awarded an MBE in 2012 for her trans rights activism.

BERJAYA
coline7373

@luimnigh Fascinating and instructive about the “Baron marries trans girl” part (karma! Eat it, Corbett!) but what about the “unelected Prime Minister collapse the union with Scotland”?

Do you know? Does anyone reading this?

My Google-fu isn’t figuring this one out and I’m dying of curiosity.

hellolovelyscientist
BERJAYA
justalurkr

She kept finding women in laboratory photographs from the 1800s. Then she read the published papers—and every single woman had vanished. Someone had erased them from history. Yale University, 1969. Margaret Rossiter was a graduate student studying the history of science. She was… pic.twitter.com/dYNun2kFMS  — Mr PitBull (@MrPitbull07) March 11, 2026ALT

Truncated text of tweet from MrPitBull, Mar 11, 2026:

She kept finding women in laboratory photographs from the 1800s. Then she read the published papers—and every single woman had vanished. Someone had erased them from history.

Yale University, 1969.

Margaret Rossiter was a graduate student studying the history of science. She was one of very few women in her program.

Every Friday afternoon, students and faculty gathered for beers and informal conversation. One week, Margaret asked a simple question: "Were there ever any women scientists?"

The faculty answered firmly: No.

Someone mentioned Marie Curie. The group dismissed it—her husband Pierre really deserved the credit.

Margaret didn't argue. But she also didn't believe them.

So she started looking.

She found a reference book called "American Men of Science"—essentially a Who's Who of scientific achievement. Despite the title, she was shocked to discover it contained entries about women. Botanists trained at Wellesley. Geologists from Vermont.

There were names. There were credentials. There were careers.

The professors had been wrong.

But Margaret's discovery was just the beginning. Because as she dug deeper into archives across the country, she found something far more disturbing.

Photograph after photograph showed women standing at laboratory benches, working with equipment, listed on research teams.

But when she read the published papers, the award citations, the official histories—those same women had disappeared. Their names were missing. Their contributions erased.

It wasn't random. It was systematic.

Women who designed experiments watched male colleagues publish results without giving them credit. Women whose discoveries were assigned to supervisors. Women listed in acknowledgments instead of as authors. Women passed over for awards that went to male collaborators who contributed far less.

Margaret realized she was witnessing a pattern that stretched across centuries.

Women had always been present in science. The record had simply pushed them aside.

She needed a name for what she was documenting.

In the early 1990s, she found it in the work of Matilda Joslyn Gage—a 19th-century suffragist who had written about this exact phenomenon in 1870.

In 1993, Margaret published a paper formally naming it: The Matilda Effect.

The term captured something that had been hidden in plain sight for generations. Once you knew the term, you saw it everywhere.

Her dissertation became a lifelong mission.

For more than 30 years, Margaret researched and wrote her landmark three-volume series: Women Scientists in America. She examined letters, institutional policies, individual careers. She gathered undeniable evidence that women in science had been consistently under-credited and structurally excluded.

Her work faced resistance. Many dismissed women's history as political rather than academic. Others insisted she was exaggerating.

Margaret didn't argue emotionally. She presented data. Documented cases. Patterns repeated across decades and institutions.

Eventually, the evidence became undeniable.

Her research helped restore recognition to scientists who had been erased:

Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray work revealed DNA's structure—credit went to Watson and Crick.

Lise Meitner, who explained nuclear fission—omitted from the Nobel Prize.

Nettie Stevens, who discovered sex chromosomes—received little credit.

Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin, who discovered stars are made of hydrogen—initially dismissed.

And countless others whose names had nearly vanished.

Margaret changed the narrative. Science was no longer just the story of solitary male geniuses. It became a story of collaboration that included women who had been written out.

The Matilda Effect became standard terminology. Scholars used it to examine how credit is assigned, how authors are listed, who receives awards, who gets left out.

history
hellolovelyscientist
BERJAYA
gaycism

I mean Jesus fucking Christ this is not right

BERJAYA
mrevaunit42

My friend told me the best example to explain the vast difference between a million and a billion

"A million seconds ago was last week. A billion seconds ago we were still dealing with the Soviet union."

BERJAYA
beeperbopper

This is why when we talk about “rich people” who aren’t paying taxes or who are wasting money, we’re not talking about the person who makes 1 or 2 grains of rice worth of money a year. We’re talking about the person who makes the giant fucking Costco sized pile of rice.

politics