Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.

Academia.edu uses cookies to personalize content, tailor ads and improve the user experience. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
I was commissioned to translate a then obscure first futurist opera, Victory over the Sun in 1980 by the Los Angeles County Museum of Art which was mainly interested in reconstructing the costumes and sets of Supremacist Kasimir Malevich; they entrusted the libretto by Alexei Kruchenych to me, an undergrad at Barnard. Unlike the 1913 original, there were more than two rehearsals and no tinny out of tune piano as orchestra; like the original, tickets (9 rubles, a fortune in 1913) were at a premium. Like the original, the house was full; in 1913, there was a banner crowd due to expert Futurist marketing of the Luna Park theater event. Since then, Victory has become avant-garde legend. To this day, it is safe to say that there is little to challenge Victory as the height of experimental poetry-its zaum, translated as transsense or transrational writing, breaks every possible rule of syntax and semantics, delights in razlom, or the breaking apart of language to find new conjunctions, and presents poems brimming with neologisms and consonant clusters intended to be, per poet Kruchenych, more authentically Russian than Pushkin. Here is what he calls a military poem, spoken by the character of the Aviator, for example.
Music and Letters, 2014
The Russian Avant-Garde can be expressed in one word: unique. However, this “uniqueness” is what set it, as a whole, apart from all other forms of art because it became its own artistic revolution. It completely stripped away artistic form to create a sense of oneness, of being complete and spiritual in an entirely new way that art had never been viewed or portrayed before. Thanks to the combined efforts of Kruchenykh, Malevich, Matyushin, and even Mayakovsky, they created Victory Over the Sun, which is considered to be the most influential of multiple Russian futurist operas that existed at the beginning of the 20th century. This opera helped fuel artists into thinking outside of the box, being completely different and unique in their approaches, and with going against the grain (or brushstroke) in terms of how the fine arts were viewed and depicted. Through Victory Over the Sun’s unique makeup and composition, it helped to inspire and influence an entirely new way of thinking in terms of fine arts and with opening new doors during an already complicated artistic era; it became essential to reject the old, favor the new, embrace a different sense of spirituality, and start an artistic revolution.
Association of Writers and Writing Programs Conference Presentation, 2021
Larissa Shmailo discusses the work of Russian Futurist Alexei Kruchenych. She shares scenes from her original English translation of Victory over the Sun (Ĉervená Barva Press 2014) and analyzes themes of hypermasculinity, war, and eradication of the feminine through the lens of gender theory. She remarks upon the relevance of Kruchenych’s linguistic manifestos to the avant libretto of Victory. Question: What is the relevance of Kruchenych to experimental poetry today? To women today?
2016
The Caine College of the Arts Visiting Artists and Scholars Series is underwritten by the Marie Eccles Caine Foundation-Russell Family, the Tanner Charitable Trust, and Differential Tuition provided by the students of the college.
Academia Letters, 2021
The first Futurist opera, Victory over the Sun (VOTS) by Alexei Kruchenych,is known as a brilliant linguistic, poetic, and theatrical experiment, an anti-opera which may have been the world's first performance piece. The inspired shenanigans of VOTS even pre-date the antics of Dada.
" Wars have no memory, and nobody has the courage to understand them until there are no voices left to tell what happened, "-Carlos Ruiz Zafón, The Shadow of the Wind. The literature of war is a literature of paradoxes, the greatest of which is the fact that it comments continuously on its own failure. War writers often lament their incapacity to describe the realities of armed combat, the inexpressible nature of the subject matter, the inadequacy of language, and the inability of their audiences to understand. Tim O'Brien writes of the war he experienced in Vietnam: " There is no clarity. Everything swirls. The old rules are no longer binding, the old truths no longer true. Right spills over into wrong. Order blends into chaos, love into hate, ugliness into beauty, law into anarchy, civility into savagery. The vapors suck you in. You can't tell where you are, or why you're there, and the only certainty is overwhelming ambiguity. " From ancient Nordic ballads to Masai folk songs or Red Indian sagas, war has always been a predominate theme in literature. Zafon in The Shadow of the Wind portrays a war ravaged Barcelona and comments, " There's something about that period that's epic and tragic " for like the Old English Elegiac poetries, the Arthurian Romances, Gorky's Mother or Tolstoy's War and Peace, the literature of the Great Wars have altered human perception and the very fabrics of literature. However, we witness a distinct line between the literature of both world wars. The Second Great War threatened the humankind like never before. It was a manmade crisis which threw us to the brink of extinction, and thus displaying the futility of human existence. As humanity experienced the terror of the 'absurdity' of reality, the philosophy if 'nothing to be done' surfaced in their consciousness. This paper aims to evaluate the marked change in the form of poetry written in the two Great Wars and how far the Second World War was responsible for the advent of Modernism.
“Life has got out of its rails, everybody has forgotten his insignificant business, everything became confused and was seized by just one goal, by one idea, the idea of war”, so Ivan Kliun described his first impressions as the 1914 war broke out. Still, Russian avant-garde artists and poets treated the new subject not only according to their personal aesthetical attitude (which would not be surprising), but, what is more significant, saw in the Great War a confirmation of their own creative strategies. On the one hand, Futurists claimed that their assault on philistine decency anticipated the military conflict, undermining the predominant conventions of beauty and measure (“Even before the war Futurists lived out of war and at war” the manifesto of the last Futurist exhibition “0.10” affirmed). On the other hand, pacifist writers such as the Symbolist poet Maximilian Voloshin perceived the outbreak of World War I as a tragic fulfillment of their apocaliptycal fears. Drawing on a number of examples, I will argue that the literary response to the Great War in Russian avant-garde circles was largely affected by the crisis that in 1914 both Futurists and Symbolists were confronted with; consequently, the war period, rather than being an opportunity for further evolution, represented a short phase of self-reassessment before the radical changes brought by the October Revolution.
Experiment =, 2017
While the aspiration to harmony, utopian in its essence, became a distinctive feature in the particular vein of modernist aesthetics, interested in constructive principles, which came to the fore after the October Revolution in the early 1920s, another line, which will interest me the most in this essay, had been predominant during 1912-17, and developed in quite a different direction, striving for dystopia, dissonance, and the absurd. The metaphor of war in the pre-revolutionary avant-garde was paradigmatic to the concept of innovation and directly linked to the rather symbolic "destruction" of previous achievements. A deeper understanding of avant-garde ideology-on social, political, and aesthetic levels-appears when contextualized in relation to World War I. Natalia Goncharova's series of lithographs Misticheskie obrazy voiny [Mystical Images of War] (1914), Pavel Filonov's artist book Propeven o prorosli mirovoi [Canticle of World Flowering] (1915), Olga Rozanova's linocut portfolio Voina [War] (1916), and Aleksei Kruchenykh's album of collages Vselenskaia voina [Universal War] (1916) were among the most profound artistic responses to the war. These unique works represent three different artistic explorations of the theme, as reflected in neoprimitivist, futurist, and suprematist aesthetics.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Cambridge Opera Journal, 2014
ARTES. Journal of Musicology, 2020
Cambridge Opera Journal, 2006
Slavic Review, 2007
Rethinking Prokofiev. Oxford University Press. Eds. McAllister, Rita and Ch. Guillaumier., 2020
Print Quarterly, 2014
Artes. Journal of Musicology, 2020
Heritage on the Margins? Central and Eastern European Perspectives (29.-30.11.2023), 2023
International Yearbook of Futurism Studies, 2012
Revista de Historia Regional, 2023
