Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
uploads
static stretching-induced performance impairments. While acute and chronic static stretching has been reported to reduce
musculotendinous injuries, especially with explosive and change of direction actions, the influence of dynamic stretching
on injury incidence lacks a similar volume of literature for acute and chronic responses. It was the objective of this narrative
review to examine the acute and training effects of dynamic stretching on injury incidence and possible moderating variables
such as dynamic stretching effects on range of motion, strength, balance, proprioception, muscle morphology, and psychophysiological
responses. One study demonstrated no significant difference regarding injury incidence when comparing a
dynamic stretching-only group versus a combined dynamic stretching plus static stretching group. The only other study
examined functional dynamic stretching training with injured dancers and reported improved ankle joint stability. However,
several studies have shown that dynamic activity with some dynamic stretching exercises within a warm-up consistently
demonstrates positive effects on injury incidence. Regarding moderating variables, while there is evidence that an acute bout
of dynamic stretching can enhance range of motion, the acute and training effects of dynamic stretching on strength, balance,
proprioception, and musculotendinous stiffness/compliance are less clear. The acute effects of dynamic stretching on thixotropic
effects and psycho-physiological responses could be beneficial for injury reduction. However, the overall conflicting
studies and a lack of substantial literature compared with SS effects points to a need for more extensive studies in this area.
static stretching-induced performance impairments. While acute and chronic static stretching has been reported to reduce
musculotendinous injuries, especially with explosive and change of direction actions, the influence of dynamic stretching
on injury incidence lacks a similar volume of literature for acute and chronic responses. It was the objective of this narrative
review to examine the acute and training effects of dynamic stretching on injury incidence and possible moderating variables
such as dynamic stretching effects on range of motion, strength, balance, proprioception, muscle morphology, and psychophysiological
responses. One study demonstrated no significant difference regarding injury incidence when comparing a
dynamic stretching-only group versus a combined dynamic stretching plus static stretching group. The only other study
examined functional dynamic stretching training with injured dancers and reported improved ankle joint stability. However,
several studies have shown that dynamic activity with some dynamic stretching exercises within a warm-up consistently
demonstrates positive effects on injury incidence. Regarding moderating variables, while there is evidence that an acute bout
of dynamic stretching can enhance range of motion, the acute and training effects of dynamic stretching on strength, balance,
proprioception, and musculotendinous stiffness/compliance are less clear. The acute effects of dynamic stretching on thixotropic
effects and psycho-physiological responses could be beneficial for injury reduction. However, the overall conflicting
studies and a lack of substantial literature compared with SS effects points to a need for more extensive studies in this area.