
Devonya N . Havis
University at Buffalo, CDI Distingushed Visting Scholar, 2021-2022, Faculty Member +1University at Buffalo, CDI Distingushed Visting Scholar, 2021-2022, Faculty MemberCanisius College, Philosophy, Faculty Member
Thinking in community.
less
Papers
The Black Scholar, 2013
Black philosophy, which includes a plethora of divergent viewpoints and competing theoretical fra... more Black philosophy, which includes a plethora of divergent viewpoints and competing theoretical frameworks, at its best, is a liber tory practice. In its most progressive expressions, Black philosophy is a multi-vocal tradition that seeks to undo the epistemic erasure of Black experience by creating and cultivating philosophical tools that promote social justice. In the context of this journal, The Black Scholar, these may not be read as very radical claims. Nevertheless, I want to assert a certain radicality by linking Black philosophy to the exercise of parrhesia and note Black philosophy’s role in cultivating a parrhesiastic attitude toward traditional philosophy. Such an attitude marks the way in which Black philosophy transgresses traditional Western philosophy by generating a “taxonomy of the different kinds of silences and invisibility”1 that signal Black folks’ epistemic absence. This essay is not an account of all the instances in which Black philosophy challenges the Western philosophical canon. Such an account exceeds the scope of this essay. My aim, instead, is to explore the ways that Black philosophy promotes the emergence of social justice possibilities that cannot be prefi gured or codifi ed. As such, the essay will propose an index for analyzing practices that engage in transgression and resistance as a means of promoting social justice. In short, the essay will argue that where and when parrhesia is exercised it has the effect of promoting social justice—not because of the concrete consequences but because practicing parrhesia invents new modes of subjectivity. Utilizing parrhesia as an index for resistance becomes especially important when one understands that contemporary power operates through production and not simply prohibition. In this respect, strategic knowledge for effective resistance must account for the productive functions of power and must not see resistance merely as opposition to prohibitions and exclusions. As Foucault has observed, in the contemporary landscape, power’s operation is ensured not by law but by normalization. Hence, one might transgress normalizing processes without resisting power’s oppressive effects, which are not only prohibitive but also productive. As a means of establishing a mechanism for analyzing transgression and resistance, let us now turn to an explication of Foucault’s notion of parrhesia.
Hypatia, 2013
This paper is a tentative attempt to set out some of the basic points for articulating an alterna... more This paper is a tentative attempt to set out some of the basic points for articulating an alternative philosophical praxis derived from some Black women's lives and experiences. It begins with an explanation of delegitimating processes and the importance of not dividing theory from practice. The essay offers six practices that outline the unique critical attitude that constitutes philosophical practices rooted in Black women's lived experience and asks “How we sound” when doing academic philosophy.
The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, 2019
auditory identity Abstract The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited ex-plorat... more auditory identity Abstract The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited ex-ploration of the ways in which sound, and the awareness of sound, offers an alternative framework for social change. It moves from sight to sound and from visual witnessing to sound-based wit(h)ness to illustrate the implications of sound as a form of political resistance. Combining insights from the work of Michel Foucault and Emmanuel Levinas with elements of the Black Vernacular tradition, it articulates the ways in which the blues, jazz and work songs evoke distinctive sound-based wit(h)ness to perform philosophical interventions by destabilizing the status quo, offering a non-phenotypical account of black solidarity, and transforming what counts as work. Key words auditory identity · blackness · Michel Foucault · Emmanuel Levinas · philosophical intervention · ritual The following article, in Zora Neal Hurston’s words, posits the possi-bility of ‘going straight while walking crooked’. Let...
Thinking the US South
by Melissa Mosko and Devonya N . Havis
Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, 2019
Philosophy and Social Criticism , 2009
The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited exploration of the ways in which sou... more The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited exploration of the ways in which sound, and the awareness of sound, offers
an alternative framework for social change. It moves from sight to sound and from visual witnessing to sound-based wit(h)ness to illustrate the implications of sound as a form of political resistance. Combining insights
from the work of Michel Foucault and Emmanuel Levinas with elements of the Black Vernacular tradition, it articulates the ways in which the blues, jazz and work songs evoke distinctive sound-based wit(h)ness to perform
philosophical interventions by destabilizing the status quo, offering a non-
phenotypical account of black solidarity, and transforming what counts as ppowork.
Key words auditory identity · blackness · Michel Foucault · Emmanuel
Levinas · philosophical intervention · ritual
an alternative framework for social change. It moves from sight to sound and from visual witnessing to sound-based wit(h)ness to illustrate the implications of sound as a form of political resistance. Combining insights
from the work of Michel Foucault and Emmanuel Levinas with elements of the Black Vernacular tradition, it articulates the ways in which the blues, jazz and work songs evoke distinctive sound-based wit(h)ness to perform
philosophical interventions by destabilizing the status quo, offering a non-
phenotypical account of black solidarity, and transforming what counts as ppowork.
Key words auditory identity · blackness · Michel Foucault · Emmanuel
Levinas · philosophical intervention · ritual
The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon, 2014
Dialogues on Disability: Shelley Tremain Interviews Devonya Havis
Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2009
Foucault Studies, Oct 17, 2014
Hypatia Special Issue
Philosophy & Social Criticism, Jan 1, 2009
Page 1. Devonya N. Havis Blackness beyond witness Black Vernacular phenomena and auditory identit... more Page 1. Devonya N. Havis Blackness beyond witness Black Vernacular phenomena and auditory identity Abstract The article posits that philosophy's visual bias has limited ex-ploration of the ways in which sound, and the awareness ...
Books
Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, 2019
In this chapter, we argue that psychiatry works as a mechanism for managing bodies and population... more In this chapter, we argue that psychiatry works as a mechanism for managing bodies and populations. We assert that already socially vulnerable individuals and populations are made even more vulnerable when they interact with the practice of psychiatry which operates through the creation and deployment of specialized knowledges employed to reinforce the boundaries of the “normal.” Using Michel Foucault’s accounts of Disciplinary and Biopower, we examine “case studies” involving the state-enforced sterilization of poor women and women of color; state-sanctioned lobotomies of women in the 20th century; and state attempts to neutralize perceived social threats during the 19th and 20th centuries that attempted to preempt danger through the identification of “dangerous” individuals and populations. Finally, the paper looks at current state use of “crime predictive” technologies as a contemporary mechanism designed to manage “dangerous” individuals and populations.
These cases illustrate how psychiatry and the “psychiatrization of criminal danger” are used to increase the docility and utility of gendered, raced, and poor individuals. Individuals in these groups are measured, controlled, corrected, and made docile through processes of classification that render them abnormal. These same psychiatric mechanisms also promote “social hygiene” through the management of populations deemed undesirable because of the threat they pose to the social body. The paper demonstrates the ways that the birth, life, and death of populations classified as undesirable are regulated by the state to create “safe” environments for desirable populations. The construction of hysteria, forced sterilization, development of the concept of the “dangerous individual,” and algorithms that predict crime serve as “technologies” through which power is deployed to neutralize perceived social threats.
These cases illustrate how psychiatry and the “psychiatrization of criminal danger” are used to increase the docility and utility of gendered, raced, and poor individuals. Individuals in these groups are measured, controlled, corrected, and made docile through processes of classification that render them abnormal. These same psychiatric mechanisms also promote “social hygiene” through the management of populations deemed undesirable because of the threat they pose to the social body. The paper demonstrates the ways that the birth, life, and death of populations classified as undesirable are regulated by the state to create “safe” environments for desirable populations. The construction of hysteria, forced sterilization, development of the concept of the “dangerous individual,” and algorithms that predict crime serve as “technologies” through which power is deployed to neutralize perceived social threats.
Interviews
Hello, I'm Shelley Tremain and I'd like to welcome you to the third-anniversary installment of Di... more Hello, I'm Shelley Tremain and I'd like to welcome you to the third-anniversary installment of Dialogues on Disability, the series of interviews that I'm conducting with disabled philosophers and post here on the third Wednesday of each month. The series is designed to provide a public venue for discussion with disabled philosophers about a range of topics, including their philosophical work on disability; the place of philosophy of disability vis-à-vis the discipline and profession; their experiences of institutional discrimination and personal prejudice in philosophy, in particular, and in academia, more generally; resistance to ableism; accessibility; and anti-oppressive pedagogy.
During the past year, for the third year in a row, I conducted landmark interviews with disabled philosophers who are variously situated with respect to disability, race, gender, institutional status, age, culture, nationality, and sexuality and whose philosophical work covers a wide range of specializations and research interests. This third-anniversary installment of the series highlights insights and lessons that these philosophers offered the philosophical community, reflecting upon the implications of the contributions to philosophy that their interviews have made.
I am delighted that Audrey Yap, whom I interviewed in July 2016, and Devonya Havis, whom I interviewed in June 2017, have returned to Dialogues on Disability to assist me with this celebratory anniversary installment of the series, bringing continuity to the series and expanding it in thought-provoking ways.
I acknowledge that the land on which I sit to conduct these interviews is the traditional territory of the Haudensaunee and Anishnaabeg, covered by the Upper Canada Treaties and directly adjacent to Haldiman Treaty territory. Audrey acknowledges that she lives and works on the traditional territory of the WSÁNEĆ, Lkwungen, and Esquimalt peoples. Audrey, Devonya, and I offer this anniversary installment of the Dialogues on Disability series with respect and in the spirit of reconciliation.
Welcome back to Dialogues on Disability, Audrey and Devonya! We are indebted to you for taking the time to produce this anniversary installment of Dialogues on Disability with me.
During the past year, for the third year in a row, I conducted landmark interviews with disabled philosophers who are variously situated with respect to disability, race, gender, institutional status, age, culture, nationality, and sexuality and whose philosophical work covers a wide range of specializations and research interests. This third-anniversary installment of the series highlights insights and lessons that these philosophers offered the philosophical community, reflecting upon the implications of the contributions to philosophy that their interviews have made.
I am delighted that Audrey Yap, whom I interviewed in July 2016, and Devonya Havis, whom I interviewed in June 2017, have returned to Dialogues on Disability to assist me with this celebratory anniversary installment of the series, bringing continuity to the series and expanding it in thought-provoking ways.
I acknowledge that the land on which I sit to conduct these interviews is the traditional territory of the Haudensaunee and Anishnaabeg, covered by the Upper Canada Treaties and directly adjacent to Haldiman Treaty territory. Audrey acknowledges that she lives and works on the traditional territory of the WSÁNEĆ, Lkwungen, and Esquimalt peoples. Audrey, Devonya, and I offer this anniversary installment of the Dialogues on Disability series with respect and in the spirit of reconciliation.
Welcome back to Dialogues on Disability, Audrey and Devonya! We are indebted to you for taking the time to produce this anniversary installment of Dialogues on Disability with me.
Book Reviews
Philosophy of disability is a relatively recent subfield of philosophy that both builds upon the ... more Philosophy of disability is a relatively recent subfield of philosophy that both builds upon the political motivation and insights of disabled people's movements and draws upon work done in a range of other subfields within philosophy and a variety of disciplines across the university. T he most recent writing in philosophy of disability focuses critical attention on the demeaning conception of disability that continues to prevail in the discipline of philosophy and the ways in which this conception-according to which disability is a "natural" disadvantage-has shaped the composition of both the discipline and profession of philosophy (for example, T remain 2017). Put briefly, philosophy of disability remains marginalized in the discipline of philosophy, including in feminist philosophy, while disabled philosophers continue to be excluded from adequate employment in the profession. A growing number of philosophers of disability persistently produce work that challenges this grievous state of affairs. Addressing Ableism: Philosophical Questions via Disability Studies, by Jennifer Scuro in collaboration with Devonya Havis and Lydia X. Brown, is a vital new contribution to the annals of philosophy of disability and to philosophical discourse more generally, a contribution that all philosophers of disability and feminist philosophers-not to mention all feminist philosophers of disability-should take time to read. T he book spans a wide spectrum of issues and concerns that the disability studies community has introduced into academic discourse, considers the political character of the ontological and ethical claims of other philosophers of disability, incorporates Scuro's personal reflections on her own social and institutional position as a white, nondisabled philosopher of disability with a disabled child, and highlights a fascinating and provocative dialogue that Scuro engages in with Havis, a Black disabled woman, and Brown, a disabled queer of color. Indeed, the attention that Scuro gives to the details of oft-overlooked conflicts and controversies that surround critical work on disability, the diversity and volume of research that she uses throughout the book, and the centrality to the aims and design of the book of the dialogue
Conferences Organized
The Black Scholar, 2013
Black philosophy, which includes a plethora of divergent viewpoints and competing theoretical fra... more Black philosophy, which includes a plethora of divergent viewpoints and competing theoretical frameworks, at its best, is a liber tory practice. In its most progressive expressions, Black philosophy is a multi-vocal tradition that seeks to undo the epistemic erasure of Black experience by creating and cultivating philosophical tools that promote social justice. In the context of this journal, The Black Scholar, these may not be read as very radical claims. Nevertheless, I want to assert a certain radicality by linking Black philosophy to the exercise of parrhesia and note Black philosophy’s role in cultivating a parrhesiastic attitude toward traditional philosophy. Such an attitude marks the way in which Black philosophy transgresses traditional Western philosophy by generating a “taxonomy of the different kinds of silences and invisibility”1 that signal Black folks’ epistemic absence. This essay is not an account of all the instances in which Black philosophy challenges the Western philosophical canon. Such an account exceeds the scope of this essay. My aim, instead, is to explore the ways that Black philosophy promotes the emergence of social justice possibilities that cannot be prefi gured or codifi ed. As such, the essay will propose an index for analyzing practices that engage in transgression and resistance as a means of promoting social justice. In short, the essay will argue that where and when parrhesia is exercised it has the effect of promoting social justice—not because of the concrete consequences but because practicing parrhesia invents new modes of subjectivity. Utilizing parrhesia as an index for resistance becomes especially important when one understands that contemporary power operates through production and not simply prohibition. In this respect, strategic knowledge for effective resistance must account for the productive functions of power and must not see resistance merely as opposition to prohibitions and exclusions. As Foucault has observed, in the contemporary landscape, power’s operation is ensured not by law but by normalization. Hence, one might transgress normalizing processes without resisting power’s oppressive effects, which are not only prohibitive but also productive. As a means of establishing a mechanism for analyzing transgression and resistance, let us now turn to an explication of Foucault’s notion of parrhesia.
Hypatia, 2013
This paper is a tentative attempt to set out some of the basic points for articulating an alterna... more This paper is a tentative attempt to set out some of the basic points for articulating an alternative philosophical praxis derived from some Black women's lives and experiences. It begins with an explanation of delegitimating processes and the importance of not dividing theory from practice. The essay offers six practices that outline the unique critical attitude that constitutes philosophical practices rooted in Black women's lived experience and asks “How we sound” when doing academic philosophy.
The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, 2019
auditory identity Abstract The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited ex-plorat... more auditory identity Abstract The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited ex-ploration of the ways in which sound, and the awareness of sound, offers an alternative framework for social change. It moves from sight to sound and from visual witnessing to sound-based wit(h)ness to illustrate the implications of sound as a form of political resistance. Combining insights from the work of Michel Foucault and Emmanuel Levinas with elements of the Black Vernacular tradition, it articulates the ways in which the blues, jazz and work songs evoke distinctive sound-based wit(h)ness to perform philosophical interventions by destabilizing the status quo, offering a non-phenotypical account of black solidarity, and transforming what counts as work. Key words auditory identity · blackness · Michel Foucault · Emmanuel Levinas · philosophical intervention · ritual The following article, in Zora Neal Hurston’s words, posits the possi-bility of ‘going straight while walking crooked’. Let...
Thinking the US South
by Melissa Mosko and Devonya N . Havis
Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, 2019
Philosophy and Social Criticism , 2009
The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited exploration of the ways in which sou... more The article posits that philosophy’s visual bias has limited exploration of the ways in which sound, and the awareness of sound, offers
an alternative framework for social change. It moves from sight to sound and from visual witnessing to sound-based wit(h)ness to illustrate the implications of sound as a form of political resistance. Combining insights
from the work of Michel Foucault and Emmanuel Levinas with elements of the Black Vernacular tradition, it articulates the ways in which the blues, jazz and work songs evoke distinctive sound-based wit(h)ness to perform
philosophical interventions by destabilizing the status quo, offering a non-
phenotypical account of black solidarity, and transforming what counts as ppowork.
Key words auditory identity · blackness · Michel Foucault · Emmanuel
Levinas · philosophical intervention · ritual
an alternative framework for social change. It moves from sight to sound and from visual witnessing to sound-based wit(h)ness to illustrate the implications of sound as a form of political resistance. Combining insights
from the work of Michel Foucault and Emmanuel Levinas with elements of the Black Vernacular tradition, it articulates the ways in which the blues, jazz and work songs evoke distinctive sound-based wit(h)ness to perform
philosophical interventions by destabilizing the status quo, offering a non-
phenotypical account of black solidarity, and transforming what counts as ppowork.
Key words auditory identity · blackness · Michel Foucault · Emmanuel
Levinas · philosophical intervention · ritual
The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon, 2014
Dialogues on Disability: Shelley Tremain Interviews Devonya Havis
Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2009
Foucault Studies, Oct 17, 2014
Hypatia Special Issue
Philosophy & Social Criticism, Jan 1, 2009
Page 1. Devonya N. Havis Blackness beyond witness Black Vernacular phenomena and auditory identit... more Page 1. Devonya N. Havis Blackness beyond witness Black Vernacular phenomena and auditory identity Abstract The article posits that philosophy's visual bias has limited ex-ploration of the ways in which sound, and the awareness ...
Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, 2019
In this chapter, we argue that psychiatry works as a mechanism for managing bodies and population... more In this chapter, we argue that psychiatry works as a mechanism for managing bodies and populations. We assert that already socially vulnerable individuals and populations are made even more vulnerable when they interact with the practice of psychiatry which operates through the creation and deployment of specialized knowledges employed to reinforce the boundaries of the “normal.” Using Michel Foucault’s accounts of Disciplinary and Biopower, we examine “case studies” involving the state-enforced sterilization of poor women and women of color; state-sanctioned lobotomies of women in the 20th century; and state attempts to neutralize perceived social threats during the 19th and 20th centuries that attempted to preempt danger through the identification of “dangerous” individuals and populations. Finally, the paper looks at current state use of “crime predictive” technologies as a contemporary mechanism designed to manage “dangerous” individuals and populations.
These cases illustrate how psychiatry and the “psychiatrization of criminal danger” are used to increase the docility and utility of gendered, raced, and poor individuals. Individuals in these groups are measured, controlled, corrected, and made docile through processes of classification that render them abnormal. These same psychiatric mechanisms also promote “social hygiene” through the management of populations deemed undesirable because of the threat they pose to the social body. The paper demonstrates the ways that the birth, life, and death of populations classified as undesirable are regulated by the state to create “safe” environments for desirable populations. The construction of hysteria, forced sterilization, development of the concept of the “dangerous individual,” and algorithms that predict crime serve as “technologies” through which power is deployed to neutralize perceived social threats.
These cases illustrate how psychiatry and the “psychiatrization of criminal danger” are used to increase the docility and utility of gendered, raced, and poor individuals. Individuals in these groups are measured, controlled, corrected, and made docile through processes of classification that render them abnormal. These same psychiatric mechanisms also promote “social hygiene” through the management of populations deemed undesirable because of the threat they pose to the social body. The paper demonstrates the ways that the birth, life, and death of populations classified as undesirable are regulated by the state to create “safe” environments for desirable populations. The construction of hysteria, forced sterilization, development of the concept of the “dangerous individual,” and algorithms that predict crime serve as “technologies” through which power is deployed to neutralize perceived social threats.
Hello, I'm Shelley Tremain and I'd like to welcome you to the third-anniversary installment of Di... more Hello, I'm Shelley Tremain and I'd like to welcome you to the third-anniversary installment of Dialogues on Disability, the series of interviews that I'm conducting with disabled philosophers and post here on the third Wednesday of each month. The series is designed to provide a public venue for discussion with disabled philosophers about a range of topics, including their philosophical work on disability; the place of philosophy of disability vis-à-vis the discipline and profession; their experiences of institutional discrimination and personal prejudice in philosophy, in particular, and in academia, more generally; resistance to ableism; accessibility; and anti-oppressive pedagogy.
During the past year, for the third year in a row, I conducted landmark interviews with disabled philosophers who are variously situated with respect to disability, race, gender, institutional status, age, culture, nationality, and sexuality and whose philosophical work covers a wide range of specializations and research interests. This third-anniversary installment of the series highlights insights and lessons that these philosophers offered the philosophical community, reflecting upon the implications of the contributions to philosophy that their interviews have made.
I am delighted that Audrey Yap, whom I interviewed in July 2016, and Devonya Havis, whom I interviewed in June 2017, have returned to Dialogues on Disability to assist me with this celebratory anniversary installment of the series, bringing continuity to the series and expanding it in thought-provoking ways.
I acknowledge that the land on which I sit to conduct these interviews is the traditional territory of the Haudensaunee and Anishnaabeg, covered by the Upper Canada Treaties and directly adjacent to Haldiman Treaty territory. Audrey acknowledges that she lives and works on the traditional territory of the WSÁNEĆ, Lkwungen, and Esquimalt peoples. Audrey, Devonya, and I offer this anniversary installment of the Dialogues on Disability series with respect and in the spirit of reconciliation.
Welcome back to Dialogues on Disability, Audrey and Devonya! We are indebted to you for taking the time to produce this anniversary installment of Dialogues on Disability with me.
During the past year, for the third year in a row, I conducted landmark interviews with disabled philosophers who are variously situated with respect to disability, race, gender, institutional status, age, culture, nationality, and sexuality and whose philosophical work covers a wide range of specializations and research interests. This third-anniversary installment of the series highlights insights and lessons that these philosophers offered the philosophical community, reflecting upon the implications of the contributions to philosophy that their interviews have made.
I am delighted that Audrey Yap, whom I interviewed in July 2016, and Devonya Havis, whom I interviewed in June 2017, have returned to Dialogues on Disability to assist me with this celebratory anniversary installment of the series, bringing continuity to the series and expanding it in thought-provoking ways.
I acknowledge that the land on which I sit to conduct these interviews is the traditional territory of the Haudensaunee and Anishnaabeg, covered by the Upper Canada Treaties and directly adjacent to Haldiman Treaty territory. Audrey acknowledges that she lives and works on the traditional territory of the WSÁNEĆ, Lkwungen, and Esquimalt peoples. Audrey, Devonya, and I offer this anniversary installment of the Dialogues on Disability series with respect and in the spirit of reconciliation.
Welcome back to Dialogues on Disability, Audrey and Devonya! We are indebted to you for taking the time to produce this anniversary installment of Dialogues on Disability with me.
Philosophy of disability is a relatively recent subfield of philosophy that both builds upon the ... more Philosophy of disability is a relatively recent subfield of philosophy that both builds upon the political motivation and insights of disabled people's movements and draws upon work done in a range of other subfields within philosophy and a variety of disciplines across the university. T he most recent writing in philosophy of disability focuses critical attention on the demeaning conception of disability that continues to prevail in the discipline of philosophy and the ways in which this conception-according to which disability is a "natural" disadvantage-has shaped the composition of both the discipline and profession of philosophy (for example, T remain 2017). Put briefly, philosophy of disability remains marginalized in the discipline of philosophy, including in feminist philosophy, while disabled philosophers continue to be excluded from adequate employment in the profession. A growing number of philosophers of disability persistently produce work that challenges this grievous state of affairs. Addressing Ableism: Philosophical Questions via Disability Studies, by Jennifer Scuro in collaboration with Devonya Havis and Lydia X. Brown, is a vital new contribution to the annals of philosophy of disability and to philosophical discourse more generally, a contribution that all philosophers of disability and feminist philosophers-not to mention all feminist philosophers of disability-should take time to read. T he book spans a wide spectrum of issues and concerns that the disability studies community has introduced into academic discourse, considers the political character of the ontological and ethical claims of other philosophers of disability, incorporates Scuro's personal reflections on her own social and institutional position as a white, nondisabled philosopher of disability with a disabled child, and highlights a fascinating and provocative dialogue that Scuro engages in with Havis, a Black disabled woman, and Brown, a disabled queer of color. Indeed, the attention that Scuro gives to the details of oft-overlooked conflicts and controversies that surround critical work on disability, the diversity and volume of research that she uses throughout the book, and the centrality to the aims and design of the book of the dialogue
Please see the event flyers for the 11th Annual philoSOPHIA Conference, organized and co-hosted t... more Please see the event flyers for the 11th Annual philoSOPHIA Conference, organized and co-hosted this year by Lauren Guilmette and Robert Leib at Florida Atlantic University (Boca Raton, FL), March 30-April 1st, 2017; Keynote: Sara Ahmed; Plenary Speakers: Jane Caputi, Kyoo Lee, Devonya Havis, Shelley Tremain, and Ladelle McWhorter.
Full Conference Program is forthcoming!
Full Conference Program is forthcoming!
What is the value of service learning in higher education?
What power relations does service l... more What is the value of service learning in higher education?
What power relations does service learning reproduce?
What possibilities exist for service learning?
What might shift if one decolonizes service learning?
In our workshop, we situate the practice of service learning in higher education within what Anibal Quijano calls “the coloniality of power.” The coloniality of power refers to social and economic structures of power and control constitutive of modern, liberal societies. What then shifts in how we might understand and craft experiential learning when actively troubling existing service narratives? How can this positively alter our praxis? Service learning must be investigated through its various power structures: the structure of professor and student, academic institutions and the communities in which they are located, urban and suburban, and the binary of the intellectual and “native”.
Rather than abandon community-based learning and service learning, we envision possibilities for decolonizing service learning and reflect on our own experiences building the Immersion East Side Program at Canisius College over the last 10 years.
What power relations does service learning reproduce?
What possibilities exist for service learning?
What might shift if one decolonizes service learning?
In our workshop, we situate the practice of service learning in higher education within what Anibal Quijano calls “the coloniality of power.” The coloniality of power refers to social and economic structures of power and control constitutive of modern, liberal societies. What then shifts in how we might understand and craft experiential learning when actively troubling existing service narratives? How can this positively alter our praxis? Service learning must be investigated through its various power structures: the structure of professor and student, academic institutions and the communities in which they are located, urban and suburban, and the binary of the intellectual and “native”.
Rather than abandon community-based learning and service learning, we envision possibilities for decolonizing service learning and reflect on our own experiences building the Immersion East Side Program at Canisius College over the last 10 years.
by Melissa Mosko and Devonya N . Havis
Buffalo Commons, 2020
What is the value of service learning in higher education? What power relations does service lear... more What is the value of service learning in higher education? What power relations does service learning reproduce? What possibilities exist for service learning? What might shift if one decolonizes service learning?
In our workshop, we situate the practice of service learning in higher education within what Anibal Quijano calls “the coloniality of power.” The coloniality of power refers to social and economic structures of power and control constitutive of modern, liberal societies. What then shifts in how we might understand and craft experiential learning when actively troubling existing service narratives? How can this positively alter our praxis? Service learning must be investigated through its various power structures: the structure of professor and student, academic institutions and the communities in which they are located, urban and suburban, and the binary of the intellectual and “native”.
Rather than abandon community-based learning and service learning, we envision possibilities for decolonizing service learning and reflect on our own experiences building the Immersion East Side Program at Canisius College over the last 10 years.
In our workshop, we situate the practice of service learning in higher education within what Anibal Quijano calls “the coloniality of power.” The coloniality of power refers to social and economic structures of power and control constitutive of modern, liberal societies. What then shifts in how we might understand and craft experiential learning when actively troubling existing service narratives? How can this positively alter our praxis? Service learning must be investigated through its various power structures: the structure of professor and student, academic institutions and the communities in which they are located, urban and suburban, and the binary of the intellectual and “native”.
Rather than abandon community-based learning and service learning, we envision possibilities for decolonizing service learning and reflect on our own experiences building the Immersion East Side Program at Canisius College over the last 10 years.
Related Authors













