Nicolas Zeolla
Interests
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
uploads
Entre 2015 y 2019, la economía argentina experimentó grandes transformaciones en su forma de inserción financiera, lo cual desencadenó una de las crisis externas más importantes de la región en los últimos 20 años. A pesar de que existían signos de estar frente a los clásicos problemas estructurales de balance de pagos, la liberalización cambiaria y financiera incrementó la fragilidad financiera externa. Desde una perspectiva minskiana para economías abiertas, el objetivo de este artículo es analizar la gestación y secuencia de la crisis argentina de 2018, enfatizando la dimensión desregulatoria y de inestabilidad financiera creada por la inversión LEBACs (Letras del Banco Central), la persistencia de la salida de dólares y la inefectividad del acuerdo con el FMI para estabilizar la situación.
Abstract:
In the period from 2015 to 2019, Argentina´s economy underwent major transformations in the regulations of its financial market that ended up in generating one of the largest external crises in the region in the last 20 years. Despite the fact that the economy faced problems related to the historical balance-of-payment constraints, both exchange rate and financial liberalization increased external financial fragility. From a Minskian framework for open economies, the aim of this paper is to analyze the gestation of the last Argentinian financial crisis, the sequence of the crisis and, finally, the outflow of capital. We focus on the deregulatory dimension and the dynamics of financial instability produced by LEBACs investment, persistence of dollar outflows and the failure of the IMF agreement to stabilize the economy.
Entre 2015 y 2019, la economía argentina experimentó grandes transformaciones en su forma de inserción financiera, lo cual desencadenó una de las crisis externas más importantes de la región en los últimos 20 años. A pesar de que existían signos de estar frente a los clásicos problemas estructurales de balance de pagos, la liberalización cambiaria y financiera incrementó la fragilidad financiera externa. Desde una perspectiva minskiana para economías abiertas, el objetivo de este artículo es analizar la gestación y secuencia de la crisis argentina de 2018, enfatizando la dimensión desregulatoria y de inestabilidad financiera creada por la inversión LEBACs (Letras del Banco Central), la persistencia de la salida de dólares y la inefectividad del acuerdo con el FMI para estabilizar la situación.
Abstract:
In the period from 2015 to 2019, Argentina´s economy underwent major transformations in the regulations of its financial market that ended up in generating one of the largest external crises in the region in the last 20 years. Despite the fact that the economy faced problems related to the historical balance-of-payment constraints, both exchange rate and financial liberalization increased external financial fragility. From a Minskian framework for open economies, the aim of this paper is to analyze the gestation of the last Argentinian financial crisis, the sequence of the crisis and, finally, the outflow of capital. We focus on the deregulatory dimension and the dynamics of financial instability produced by LEBACs investment, persistence of dollar outflows and the failure of the IMF agreement to stabilize the economy.
Esto se debe a que existió una transformación fundamental en los mercados de futuros de materias primas donde se ha incrementado la presencia de los inversores institucionales quienes, ante una nueva estrategia de diversificación de riesgos, incluyen en sus estas tenencias siguiendo la metodología de los principales índices de materias primas.
Paralelamente, los países exportadores de alimentos nos encontramos en un contexto de fuerte recuperación de los términos de intercambio que genera una renta extraordinaria en el sector primario exportador. Pero, y aunque grandes beneficiarios del nuevo patrón de acumulación, como la mano de obra representa un costo tanto directo como indirecto, sucede que como actor social hegemónico, el sujeto agrario funciona como un limitante para continuar el mismo proceso de acumulación del que aún forman parte.
The chapter revisits Latin American Structuralist vision on international capital flows and how this topic has been addressed by the more recent contributions from the so-called new Latin American Structuralism. By distinguishing between the domestic and international spheres we analyze the continuity and discontinuity between new structuralism, traditional structuralism and mainstream regarding to, on the domestic side, development banks and supervision of domestic interest rates, and on the international side, international loans and capital movements.