I have to be honest that I was overwhelmed when I saw the AfC backlog just now! Your work at articles for creation is incredible. Thank you so much for being part of the June Backlog Drive eliminators. I miss reviewing drafts, and I hope I am able to get back more actively again. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC) [1]
The Articles for Creation Barnstar
This is awarded to Kovcszaln6 for accumulating more than 200 points during the June 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and sustained efforts in reducing the backlog and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process are sincerely appreciated. Thank you for your participation! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC) [2]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Many people review drafts. You review the reviewers. You peer-reviewed the peer reviewers and supported your fellow Wikipedians. :) This is awarded to Kovcszaln6 for completing more than 50 re-reviews during the June 2025 AfC backlog drive. Thank you for your efforts and teamwork! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:44, 8 July 2025 (UTC) [3]
Brownie
This is awarded to Kovcszaln6 for accumulating more than 19 points during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:42, 11 January 2026 (UTC) [4]
The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
There is no right to edit, it is a privilege that can be revoked. Verbose filibustering and wikilawyering is an effective way to lose editing privileges; the volunteers who maintain the encyclopedia have better things to do than read walls of text.
Multiple people pointing out that your behavior is a problem does not mean they are colluding against you. It means your behavior is a problem and you're stubbornly refusing to see that.
A useful two-question test, to apply to dodgy accounts that seem to be stirring up trouble: 1) Is this person helping to build the encyclopedia? 2) If not, is this person actively interfering with those of us who are? If the answers are "no" and "yes", respectively, block immediately and move on.
Most ideas should never make it out the idea lab. Writing policies and guidelines is hard, and good ones require significant workshopping with a wide range of input
Actually, I should have asked after your wellbeing before this point, but I have noticed your recent upturn in activity here, so assumed you must be at least upright, and like me warding off the worst aspects of dementia.
News and notes: An exclusive club Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
In the media: Battle for a soul – who won? Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!
On the bright side: Fatherhood, weather, and diplomacy Father's Day, Canada Day, and the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence.
A request for comment has been started that asks whether the criteria for autoconfirmed and extended confirmed should be modified, and includes links to the main discussions over each change being proposed.
A request for comment has closed with consensus to change the criteria for extended confirmed so that an account's age is calculated from its first edit rather than its creation.
A request for comment has closed with consensus to add an addendum to the Real name section of the Username policy to discourage users from using their real name or other personal information as their username.
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 27th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 2025! Boy, does it feel good to kick off the year with an issue. Yep, it's been a year since we cleared out the 2022-2024 backlog with issues 23 and 24! Good times. Though in this case "a year" just means... 6 months? 😯 The salience of whatever joke I was planning to make here has vanished speedily. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
WikiTextExpander by Polygnotus is this edition's featured script. At the click of a configurable hotkey, this script will find and replace or link a configurable list of phrases within the selected text in all source editors (even in the comment/reply field!). Besides allowing the quick insertion of templated messages, this script greatly mitigates the WP:WTF? problem by providing both the legibility of familiar words and the convenience of shortcuts. And to those asking, the capitalization of "Wikitext" as "WikiText" was a necessary sacrifice for far-more-memorable acronymy.
CanonNi: AlertAssistant has been fixed and rewritten using OOUI instead of Twinkle's Morebits. Such modern, very tool. (Do note that the maintainer has since become inactive.)
NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/AjaxLoader has been updated to use modern JS APIs that replace the browser's URL bar with the link you clicked on to load in place. The "back" (and "forward") buttons also work now. Cool, innit?
andrybak: Unsigned helper no longer shows an error when the message to sign was added in the earliest 50 revisions of a page's history. This is especially relevant to pages with short histories.
BilledMammal/Move+ needs updating to order list of pages handle lists of pages to move correctly regardless of the discussion's page, so that we may avoid repeating fiasco history.
In breaking m:Tech/News, Gadgets can now include .vue files. This makes it easier to develop modern user interfaces using Vue.js, in particular using Codex, the official design system of Wikimedia. Codex icons are now also available. The documentation has examples.
Appo/Globstory integrates OpenHistoryMap, updating the map whenever hovering/clicking on a location or year, the latter of which changes the map to be (hopefully) accurate to the year selected. It's pretty interesting.
linkinfo Somewhat similar to WP:NavPops, Awesome Aasim/linkinfo(pictured) provides a collection of links to replace the right-click context menu, presented beautifully.
Chew/HighlightQuotes: Makes all text between double quotes have a yellow background. Shiny.
Daniel Quinlan: RangeHelper streamlines interacting with IP addresses and IP ranges with views of the full block history (including overlapping range blocks), talk pages for IP ranges by aggregating recent discussions, quick links to IP ranges, and tools to calculate the smallest range that covers specific addresses IP.
PreviousDiscussions provides a link to search for your username on subpages of another user's userpage and talkpage conveniently.
Twineeea/noRedLinks brings you to the "read" instead of the "create" tab when you visit a red link. Contemplate life's mysteries as you stare into the blank! Deeply.
No, this is not going to be the enduring tradition of S++ for the future. This was meant to be a joke for the special occasion on the first day of the fourth month but was delayed by four months because I'm lazy.
Hi. Could you list the [[WP:THREE|three best sources]] that demonstrate the subject's [[WP:N|notability]] in the template below in order to assist the review? Thanks.
{{Best sources
|src1= <!-- Your first source -->
|src2= <!-- Your second source -->
|src3= <!-- Your third source -->
}}
== Sources ==
Hi, thank you for your contributions. Regarding {{Diff2||this}} edit of yours, please see [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_AI_Cleanup/Archive_3#Publifye_AS|this discussion]], as "Publifye AS" publishes AI-generated books with no human review, thus their books are unreliable ([[WP:RSML|per]] [[Wikipedia:Large_language_models#Sources_with_LLM-generated_text|these]] [[WP:RSPLLM|guidelines]]). Please be more careful in the future when dealing with book sources; always make sure to verify the credibility of its publisher and the authors (one of the authors is listed as "AI"). Thank you. ~~~~
{{Adddisamb}}
The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will need to be disambiguated for acceptance.
If the title of this draft has been disambiguated, submitters and reviewers are asked to check the disambiguated title to see if it is the most useful disambiguation, and, if necessary, rename this draft. If this draft is accepted, the disambiguation page will need to be edited. Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised.
Please do not edit the disambiguation page or insert a link to this draft unless you are accepting this draft.
The disambiguation page for the primary name is [[{{{1}}}]].
You may ask for advice about disambiguation at the Teahouse.
{{Addhat}}
The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will require disambiguation if accepted.
If this draft has been disambiguated (renamed), submitters and reviewers are asked to consider whether the current title is the best possible disambiguation, and, if necessary, move (rename) this draft.
If this draft is accepted, a hatnote will need to be added to the primary page to refer to this page. If there is already a hatnote on the primary page, please review whether a disambiguation page is in order instead. Please do not edit the hatnote on the primary page or insert a hatnote onto the primary page unless you are accepting this draft.
The primary page that the hatnote should be added to is [[{{{1}}}]].
You may ask for advice about hatnotes at the Teahouse.
{{Addlinks}}
This draft needs more links to other articles, both to provide information and to facilitate review. Please add links to other articles, such as people and places that are mentioned in the draft, and related subjects, when resubmitting this draft. The presence of links makes it easier for a reviewer to assess the context of a draft.
{{Addlist}}
The title of this draft, if accepted, will need to be added to a list.
Submitters and reviewers are asked to check the title to see if it is consistent with the list, and, if necessary, rename the draft.
If this draft is accepted, the list page will need to be edited. Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised. Please do not edit the list page unless you are accepting this draft.
The list page for the name is [[{{{1}}}]].
{{Addredir}}
The subject of this draft may be known by an alternate name. If this draft is accepted, a redirect should be added from the alternate name to the primary name. The redirect may be tagged {{R from alternate name}} (unless otherwise indicated in another comment on this draft).
Do not add a redirect unless you are accepting this draft.
The redirect to be added should be {{{1}}}.
{{AfC assure}} Please make these changes, then click Resubmit for next review. Do not be discouraged, AFC is an iterative process, and Declines are normal. Keep up the improvements!
{{Blankpage}}
This submission for Articles for Creation review is blank. The author may have submitted it accidentally before entering text. Enter text and sources before resubmitting. You may ask about the procedure for entering text and submitting a draft at the Teahouse.
{{Breezy}}
This page has a breezy informal tone which is not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and is written in a formal impersonal tone.
If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.
{{Caterror}}
This draft has one or more category errors. Either this draft is in a category that is for articles, or this draft lists a category that is not defined. The category errors should be corrected before resubmitting this draft. This draft cannot be reviewed in detail until the category errors are corrected.
A draft should not have category errors if it is composed entirely using the AFC Wizard, or if it is composed entirely by entering text and then submitting it. Category errors in drafts may occur if you copied and pasted material from an existing article that included category designations, or as a result of some other error in composing the draft. Please review the procedure that you were using to compose and submit this draft.
If you do not know how to correct the category errors, you may ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help Desk.
{{Checkredir}} There is currently a redirect from the title of this draft to a related topic. If this draft is being accepted, please check this draft and the targeted article to ensure that there are appropriate cross-references.
{{Chgprime}}
There is an existing article with the same title as this draft, which is about a different person or different work with the same name. If this draft is accepted, the existing primary page should be renamed with a disambiguator, and this draft should be made primary. The hatnote at the top of this draft indicates what the new title of the current primary should be.
If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.
{{Compcomb}}
This draft has information that is not in the article and should be added to the article. The article has information that is not in this draft. Please compare and combine the draft and the article.
You may ask for advice about comparing and combining a draft and an article at the Teahouse.
{{Compsays}}
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.
{{Copypasted}}
This draft appears to have been copied into article space without attribution, known as a copy-paste. A history merge has been requested in order to provide attribution to the contributions for this draft.
{{Copyviosection}} The section titled '{{{1}}}', which looks like a list of some sort, is causing a flag for copyright violations of [{{{2}}} this page]. As lists of this kind could be seen as unduly promotional, my advice would be to remove the list from the article body, and maybe add a simple External Link at the bottom of the article linking to the said page.
{{Cutdown}} Note to AFC Reviewers: This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6.
If you find that this draft should be accepted, and do not have the Page Mover privilege, please request assistance in moving the redirect to preserve the history.
Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss.
{{Disambredir}}
If this draft is to be accepted, the redirect from the current title should be converted to a disambiguation page, and this draft should be moved-renamed.
{{Donotbold}}
See WP:Markup for how to mark section headings. Section headings are delimited by equal signs (=), which are used to construct the table of contents of a page. Do not use bold face or any highlighting in headings. You may ask for advice about formatting at the Teahouse.
Please edit this draft as specified before resubmitting.
If this draft is resubmitted, it is recommended that it be nominated for deletion. If this draft is not an autobiography, it may be resubmitted with an explanation on the draft talk page that it is not an autobiography.
{{Draftintoredir}}
This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.
{{Draftsock}} There is a history of sockpuppetry associated with this draft. If this draft is resubmitted, please check the history and determine whether the submitter is quacking. If so, please take appropriate action, which may include filing a follow-up sockpuppet investigation.
This does not mean that the topic is not notable, and it does not mean that the topic is notable. If this draft is resubmitted by a neutral good-faith reviewer, it may be reviewed and accepted based on its content and sources.
{{Dupdraft}}
This draft or substantial portions of this draft are duplicated. They were probably entered more than once when editing the draft. The duplication must be corrected before resubmitting this draft. Duplication of a draft or portions of a draft are often indicative of sloppiness in the development of the draft, so extra attention should be used in editing this draft before it is resubmitted. If this draft is resubmitted without correcting the errors, it may be Rejected, and may be nominated for deletion.
You may ask for advice about editing this draft at the Teahouse.
{{Dupearticle}}
This page was an abandoned draft that has now been declined or rejected as duplicating an existing article. Any details in this draft that are not in the article may be added to the article. Because the author of this draft may be no longer active, any comments should be addressed to one of the recent reviewers. This draft should be allowed to be deleted six months after this date.
{{Dustydraft}}
This page appears to have been abandoned by an inactive editor, and does not appear to be useful. Since the originator of this draft is inactive, any comments may be addressed to the last reviewer.
{{Expandart}}
This draft is more complete than the article. Please expand the article by adding information from the draft.
You may ask for advice about expanding an article at the Teahouse.
This draft appears to be a proposed expansion of an existing article on the same topic. The Articles for Creation process is not used to review proposed expansions or changes to articles. You may edit the existing article boldly to expand it, by adding additional material, and be prepared to discuss your additions or changes on the article talk page.
{{Expnote}} This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.
This does not mean that the subject of the draft has been found not to be notable. It does mean that this draft, as written, does not establish notability. Notability should be established in the text of the draft, as well as by references.
{{Extl}}
This draft has external links in the article body. They are not permitted. External links should be in the external link section at the foot of the article. The use of external links in the article body is frequently associated with advertising and promotionalism. Please either remove the external links or convert them into references before resubmitting.
There is currently a redirect from the title of this draft. If this draft is accepted, the redirect should be deleted by an administrator when the draft is accepted, because the hatnote at the top of this page will take its place. AFC Reviewers: If you are accepting this draft, please tag the redirect as {{db-afc-move}} or with Twinkle as G6. AFC move. Please leave the redirect alone unless you are accepting the draft.
{{Leftover}} This draft has been abandoned by an editor who has been inactive for more than a year, but review of this draft appears to be in order.
This will be subject to deletion six months after it is last edited by a human.
Since the author of this draft is inactive, any comments may be addressed to the last reviewer.
{{Maybeautobio}} This draft appears to be an autobiography or to involve a conflict of interest due to a close relationship between the author and the subject. The submission of autobiographies is strongly discouraged. If this draft does not involve a conflict of interest, please resubmit it with a statement to that effect.
You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.
{{Needdisamb}} This draft has a title that either has been disambiguated, or will need disambiguation to be accepted.
If this draft is accepted, a disambiguation page will need to be created. (Review of the existing article or articles with the principal name indicates that a disambiguation page should be created in place of the use of hatnotes alone.)
The disambiguation page should be [[{{{1}}} (disambiguation)]].
{{Newprimary}} If this draft is accepted, it should become the primary entry in place of the current primary. To do this, the existing primary page should be moved to disambiguate it. There is a hatnote at the top of this draft that can be used if this draft is accepted.
The primary page is [[{{{1}}}]], and it should be moved to [[{{{1}}} ({{{2}}})]].
{{Noimprove}} This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.
You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Articles for Creation help desk or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may also advise you to visit the help desk.)
If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.
{{Nomulti}}
Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion. If you did not intend to create multiple copies of a draft, you may ask for advice at the Teahouse about submitting drafts for review.
Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.
{{Noreplace}}
This draft appears to be a request to replace the existing article [[{{{1}}}]] with the current draft. Articles for Creation is not used to replace the current version of an article by a revised version of the article. Reworking or replacement of an article is done by normal editing, and should be discussed on the article talk page, [[Talk:{{{1}}}]].
You may ask for advice about editing an article at the Teahouse.
Not every organization, and not every organization with 501(c)(3) status (or its equivalent in other countries) is notable, and this draft does not establish organizational notability. You may ask for advice at the Teahouse.
{{Partmiss}}
Portions of this draft are blank sections. This draft has apparently been submitted for review before it is ready for review. Either:
1. Fill in the missing sections.
2. Remove the sections that are empty headings.
3. Wait to resubmit this draft until the portions can be filled in.
{{Please do not remove past decline templates}} Please do not remove past AfC decline templates. These are left for future reviewers so that they can review your draft and check that any prior concerns have been addressed. Removing these templates can make it more difficult for your draft to be accepted. Thank you.
{{Polcand}}
The subject of this draft BLP is a candidate for political office. As a candidate, they do not satisfy political notability, and so must be evaluated based on general notability. This draft does not speak for itself as to the candidate's general notability, and so will be declined. This draft should only be resubmitted if the body of the draft is expanded to show general notability. (Do not simply add references and resubmit.)
You may ask for advice about articles on political candidates at the Teahouse.
{{Praise}} This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.
If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.
Unreliable sources: these are things like blogs, forums, Facebook, IMDb, etc., that are either user-generated or of questionable reliability. If some guy with an opinion writes something on the internet, it's generally not acceptable.
PRIMARY sources: these are sources that are directly connected to the subject. Often this is the subject's own website, but interviews also fall into this category. They are discouraged, mainly because it is the subject talking about themselves and they could be lying (so it's easier to just not use the information).
Independent reliable sources. These are articles from newspapers, magazines, and reputable websites (such as Mixmag). These references are what Wikipedia is built on - good sources of information and a place where someone can potentially learn more about a subject. There are two types of reliable source
Name drops/passing mentions: these are sources that do little more than mention the subject or give their name in a list (such as the Top 100 Widget Makers, or saying "Company X, run by it's CEO Joe Bloggs"). Since they are reliable sources, they can be used to verify the facts on the page, but don't actually demonstrate notability.
In-depth sources: references that talk about the subject from a reliable source show that someone has "taken note" of the subject. If there is no in-depth coverage of a subject, they fail the Golden Rule and generally are not given a Wikipedia entry.
{{Rapidresub}} This draft was resubmitted rapidly, within a few hours, after being declined, with only minor changes. Resubmitting a draft too rapidly after it was declined is not useful and is not likely to result in approval. When a draft that has been declined is resubmitted, the reviewers look at the history, and expect that the submitter will attempt to address the concerns of the reviewers. If the submitter is not sure what the reviewer wants, it would be a good idea to discuss with the reviewer rather than just resubmitting (and annoying the reviewers).
You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)
The author is very strongly advised to discuss with the reviewers, or at least to rework this draft substantially, rather than just resubmitting.
If this draft is resubmitted rapidly again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.
{{Redirnote}}
Note to AFC Reviewers: There is currently a redirect from the title of this draft with only minor history. If this draft passes acceptance, the redirect may be deleted. If you wish to accept this draft, please tag the redirect for speedy deletion with Twinkle as an AFC move, and wait for an admin to delete the redirect.
{{Referror}}
This draft has one or more reference errors, which indicate errors in the formatting or use of the references. The reference errors should be corrected before resubmitting this draft. This draft cannot be reviewed in detail until the reference errors are corrected.
If you do not know how to correct the reference errors, you may ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help Desk.
{{Refmyth}}
References are a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the acceptance of a draft. The body of a draft should speak for itself as to the notability of the subject before the references are checked, and may be declined on the basis of the body of the draft.
There is a myth that the addition of more references is the key to the acceptance of a draft. Sometimes that suffices, but the addition of references is usually not sufficient unless a reviewer noted an issue with the references. The addition of more references to a draft that does not establish notability is usually not useful.
References were added to this draft, but the text of the draft still does not establish notability, and will still be declined.
{{Rejectdraft}}
This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse, but the discussion will probably advise you of the reasons for the rejection. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.
You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.
{{Rejectfornow}} This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.
It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.
If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.
You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.
{{Rejecttoosoon}} This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process, as too soon. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft, and do not resubmit this draft or a similar draft until the events have occurred to make the subject notable. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will probably result in advice as to what conditions need to be met for notability.
It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic will not be notable in the future. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. This draft will not become an article until the specified events occur for notability.
If this draft is resubmitted without discussion, or before notability has been satisfied, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.
You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.
Please revise this draft with properly formatted footnotes before resubmitting. You may ask for advice on references at the Teahouse.
{{Seemark}}
See WP:Markup for how to mark section headings, and see WP:Layout for general information on the layout of articles. Section headings are delimited by equal signs (=), which are used to construct the table of contents of a page.
Please edit this draft as specified before resubmitting. You may ask for advice about formatting at the Teahouse.
Please revise this draft with properly formatted references before resubmitting. If you need advice on how to format references, the Teahouse is a good place to ask for advice.
{{Sentback}} This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, please ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.
You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)
If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement, it will probably be rejected.
{{Staledraft}}
This page has been declined or rejected as an abandoned draft by an inactive editor. If it is not edited further within six months after it has been declined or rejected, it will be deleted as a disused draft. Since the originator of this draft is inactive, any comments may be addressed to the last reviewer.
{{Subtopic}}
This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, [[{{{1}}}]]. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, [[Talk:{{{1}}}]].
Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.
{{Thirdperson}}
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and is written in the formal third person. The use of either the first person plural, the voice of a company or organization, or the second person, addressed to the reader as a prospective customer, is unacceptable and is blatantly promotional. Pages written in the first person plural or the second person may be tagged for speedy deletion, and may even result in promotional accounts being blocked.
{{Threeref}} This draft has been reference-bombed. The reviewer has not checked all of the references and should not be required and is not required to check all of the references. If the author wishes to have some of the references evaluated in review of this draft, please specify, in AFC comments, which of the references are key. Please specify not less than three nor more than five. This draft will not be reviewed further until the author identifies the key references.
{{Toored}}
This page has too many redlinks. Occasional red links may be used as suggestions that the topics enclosed in brackets are notable topics for which articles are in order. However, multiple red links are distracting, and tend to indicate sloppy drafting. If drafts for the red links are in process, please note them in a comment or on the talk page. Otherwise, review the red links, which may be converted to plain text by removing the brackets or resolved by correcting spelling errors or introducing appropriate redirects, before resubmitting.
{{Twocopies}}
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers.
If the article either is ready for the encyclopedia or appears to be ready for the encyclopedia, the draft will be redirected to the article. However, the article could have been moved into article space instead.
If the article does not appear to be ready for the encyclopedia, the article may be nominated for deletion, and the draft will be kept.
{{Unrelfilm}}
This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
This film draft must, at this time, be evaluated based on general notability of production.
The best practice with regard to unreleased films is usually to wait until the film is released, and then update the draft to include review information, and resubmit when the film is released and reviewed.
{{Vendsays}}
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the vendor of the product, focusing on what the company says about the product. Product notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.
{{Webspend}}
This appears to be an effort to use Wikipedia to advertise. Using corporate or organizational resources to advertise via Wikipedia is an ineffective and sub-optimal use of those resources. A better way to advertise a business or non-profit organization is to spend the resources on improving your own web site.
{{Whichbio}} This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.
{{Whichmusic}}
This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.
{{Whichnote}} This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that [[WP:{{{1}}}]] is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.
In particular, see and refer to [[WP:{{{1}}}]] for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.
{{Whichsport}} This draft does not appear to indicate that one of the sports notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a sportsperson or other subject satisfies a notability criterion.
In particular, see and refer to [[WP:{{{1}}}]] for notability.
Committed identity: 0a5efed90ae2a124a065667ce56860662317dddeabb5a209d5aa95ec9741826a223d712ee86605b3046e09c43ca7ccfec7b63335c85143b5c0bf5f3b820cf6f is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
_(2016).svg){kind=small}
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
Updated scripts
Newly maintained scripts
Improve a script
Requested scripts
Miscellaneous
New scripts
