close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 28;9(1):15402.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51975-3.

Left-handedness is associated with greater fighting success in humans

Affiliations

Left-handedness is associated with greater fighting success in humans

Thomas Richardson et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Left-handedness is a costly, sexually dimorphic trait found at low frequencies in all human populations. How the handedness polymorphism is maintained is unclear. The fighting hypothesis argues that left-handed men have a negative frequency-dependent advantage in violent intrasexual competition giving them a selective advantage. In support of this, many studies have found that left-handed men are overrepresented among modern professional fighters, but studies typically find no difference in fighting success between left and right-handed fighters. We studied over 13,800 professional boxers and mixed martial artists of varying abilities in three of the largest samples to test this hypothesis to date, finding robust evidence that left-handed fighters have greater fighting success. This held for both male and female fighters, and for both percentage of fights won and an objective measure of fighting ability. We replicated previous results showing that left-handed fighters are strongly overrepresented in professional combat sports, but left-handed fighters did not show greater variance in fighting ability, a hypothesis suggested in previous studies. Overall we find strong evidence consistent with the fighting hypothesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The probability that a randomly selected left-hander showed a higher (A) win percentage and (B) BoxRec score than a randomly selected right-hander. Boxes indicate 50% and whiskers indicate 90% bootstrapped confidence intervals (5000 samples).

References

    1. Medland SE, et al. Genetic influences on handedness: data from 25,732 Australian and Dutch twin families. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:330–337. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coren S, Halpern DF. Left-handedness: a marker for decreased survival fitness. Psychol. Bull. 1991;109:90. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.1.90. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dragovic M, Hammond G. Handedness in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of evidence. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2005;111:410–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00519.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llaurens V, Raymond M, Faurie C. Why are some people left-handed? An evolutionary perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008;364:881–894. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0235. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zickert N, Geuze RH, van der Feen FE, Groothuis TG. Fitness costs and benefits associated with hand preference in humans: A large internet study in a Dutch sample. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2018;39:235–48. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.01.001. - DOI

Publication types