close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;132(1):169-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.030. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

Quantitative evaluation of ChatGPT versus Bard responses to anaesthesia-related queries

Sourav S Patnaik  1 , Ulrike Hoffmann  2
Affiliations

Quantitative evaluation of ChatGPT versus Bard responses to anaesthesia-related queries

Sourav S Patnaik et al. Br J Anaesth. 2024 Jan.
No abstract available

Keywords: Bard; ChatGPT; analytics; artificial intelligence; communication; perioperative; preoperative evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Comparison of readability, linguistic diversity, and computational sentiment analysis of generated responses from ChatGPT (blue squares) and Bard (voilet triangles). (a) FKG level, (b) FRE score, (c) SMOG, (d) MTLD, (e) polarity, and (f) objectivity parameters are compared across all groups. Statistical significance denoted by ∗P<0.05, ∗∗P<0.005, ∗∗∗P<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P<0.0001. FKG, Flesch–Kincaid grade level scoring; FRE, Flesch reading ease; MTLD, measures of textual lexical diversity; SMOG, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Klafta J.M., Roizen M.F. Current understanding of patients' attitudes toward and preparation for anesthesia: a review. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1314–1321. - PubMed
    1. Momenaei B., Wakabayashi T., Shahlaee A., et al. Appropriateness and readability of ChatGPT-4-generated responses for surgical treatment of retinal diseases. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7:862–868. - PubMed
    1. Johnson S.B., King A.J., Warner E.L., Aneja S., Kann B.H., Bylund C.L. Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023;7:pkad015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McLaughlin G.H. SMOG Grading – a new readability formula. J Read. 1969;12:639–646.
    1. Fergadiotis G., Wright H.H. Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks. Aphasiology. 2011;25:1414–1430. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types