Inside the world’s newest data centers, energy-guzzling computations proceed round the clock as AI chatbots and other generative AI tools tackle tasks from the frivolous to the weighty: assembling imagery for social media, proffering relationship advice, analyzing medical images to diagnose cancer, creating code for developers or detecting financial scams for banks.

Just as the popularity of AI tools has skyrocketed in recent years, so have the associated environmental costs. Data centers now consume 414 terawatt-hours per year, or about 1.5 percent of global electricity use, according to the International Energy Agency — an amount that grew by 12 percent annually for five years before jumping to 17 percent in 2025. By 2030, the agency projects that demand for electricity by data centers will more than double. Much of the increasing demand for electricity is being met by fossil fuels, while experts also worry about the use of local water resources to cool data centers in drought-struck regions.

Use of AI to generate text or imagery probably accounts for a mere sliver of any given person’s environmental footprint. And experts stress that the onus is on tech companies to reduce AI’s resource consumption, from creating smarter, energy-saving algorithms to building more efficient hardware.

Yet there are simple actions people can take to ensure that their AI usage has as little environmental impact as possible — from carefully considering where AI is needed to tailoring prompts to minimize the amount of computation required.

“Individual choices are not meaningless, and some are more powerful than people realize,” says computer scientist Ivana Drobnjak of University College London.

Energy-hungry bots

It is notoriously tricky to estimate the energy expended on processing an individual chatbot query. Google, for example, estimates that its chatbot Gemini consumes around 0.24 watt-hours to respond to a median-length text query — equivalent to the electricity needed to watch TV for less than nine seconds. It also uses about 0.26 milliliters of water and emits the equivalent of 0.03 grams of carbon dioxide (driving a gas-powered car for a mile would emit about 400 grams). Small individually, these expenditures build up for those individuals and companies that use AI tools a lot.

The reason AI models consume so much energy lies partly in the processors that power them, such as the graphic processing units (GPUs) that consume significantly more energy than the central processing units (CPUs) that fuel simpler tasks like web searches and email. It also has to do with the models that underlie most popular generative AI tools, including the large language models (LLMs) that power AI chatbots and assistants.

These are based on a particular design called transformer architecture. This allows LLMs to train on vast swaths of language patterns in text and, from this, compute hundreds of billions or trillions of parameters. These parameters can then be used to generate new strings of text, by predicting which words are likely to follow one other.

A transformer-based LLM is computationally intensive because for each new word it generates in response to a user’s query, it runs the query and the words that have been written so far through the model, performing billions of calculations each time.

Tech companies note that LLMs have become more energy-efficient over time; according to Google’s 2025 calculations, the 0.24 watt-hours that Gemini consumes on a median-length text prompt represents a 33-fold decrease compared with the model’s energy consumption the previous year.

In any case, even small amounts of energy add up quickly given the scale of AI use. Based on 2025 numbers from tech company OpenAI, Drobnjak estimated in May that, at that point, around 3.2 billion queries are being sent every day to its chatbot ChatGPT. Users are asking AI tools to process and produce vast quantities of text, images and video. Some are having lengthy conversations with chatbots. And, increasingly, people are creating their own “AI agents” that themselves send queries to AI chatbots.

So what can users do to minimize the resources spent on their AI use? Experts have some tips.

Don’t give up on search

As a first, simple measure to save energy, users should carefully consider whether they truly need AI for a given task. “Asking ChatGPT ‘What should I wear today?’ or ‘How is the weather?’ is like taking a Concorde to travel to your supermarket,” says Günter Klambauer, an AI expert at Johannes Kepler University in Austria.

The same goes for web search engines that use AI to automatically generate a response to a query alongside the actual search results, such as Google’s AI overviews or Bing’s Copilot search. “If you’re just looking for a particular article, turning that off could be powerful from a saving-energy perspective,” says Udit Gupta, an expert in electrical and computer engineering at Cornell Tech in New York City. Selecting “Web results only” in one’s browser or including “-ai” in the wording of your web search can do the trick.

Smaller models use less energy

People and businesses that use AI tools a lot for specific tasks like translating or summarizing could consider shifting to smaller language models that are specialized to these tasks. Because these are trained more narrowly and perform fewer computations, they expend less energy than the massive, all-purpose LLMs on the same tasks.

In one 2025 study published by UNESCO, Drobnjak tested the benefits of using small models — such as one called opus-mt-en-es for English-Spanish translations, and other models for summarization and query-answering — in lieu of the model Llama 3.1 developed by Meta. Though these smaller models are often less user-friendly than more popular AI models, they’re freely available from the AI platform Hugging Face. The small models consumed between 15 and 50 times less energy while producing higher-quality outputs on the tasks for which they were designed, the study found.

The shift away from larger models resulted in a 90 percent decrease in energy use overall, making this the most powerful single energy-saving strategy Drobnjak tested in her study. As Gupta puts it, “You don’t need to use a trillion-parameter model for editing an email.”

Less chatty chatbots

Because LLMs perform so many computations for every consecutive word they produce, it helps to choose models that produce less text in general. AI systems expert Mosharaf Chowdhury of the University of Michigan, who has been measuring the electricity usage of LLMs that have been made publicly available, has learned that models that are “chattier” by nature tend to consume more energy.

For instance, one version of the model Qwen developed by Chinese company Alibaba Cloud consumes significantly more energy when it’s in “problem solving with reasoning mode,” where it produced roughly 10 times as many words in response to a prompt compared to its “text conversation” mode. So some experts recommend using reasoning mode only for complex questions and otherwise sticking with a chatbot’s standard mode.

Simply asking AI chatbots to “be brief” or giving them a word limit can also save energy. In the UNESCO paper, Drobnjak and her colleagues found they could reduce the energy consumption of the Llama model by 50 percent when they instructed it to halve its output. By contrast, keeping the prompt itself short had less significant savings — just 5 percent for a prompt that was half the length of the original query.

“The size of the output is what determines and drives the energy expenditure the most,” Drobnjak says. She has collaborated with the city of San Francisco to develop energy-saving tips for AI users, which include being as specific as possible and adding instructions like “five bullets max.”

Go low-res and batch video

Similar recommendations apply for generating images and video, which can consume orders of magnitude more energy than generating text, as they involve iterating millions of pixels many times over, each time processing the entire image anew, says Drobnjak. Such tools are highly popular: Nearly 40 percent of teens ages 13 to 17 surveyed in a recent study by the Pew Research Center use AI to create or edit images or videos.

Drobnjak recommends generating images or videos only when necessary and only at the resolution necessary. “One option is to just start in low resolution,” she says, “and if the algorithm is in the right direction, you then start increasing resolution.” She also notes that editing existing images is always less computationally intensive than generating new ones from scratch.

And when generating multiple images, it helps to do so in a single session or batch, which is more efficient than doing so in multiple separate requests.

These actions may seem like a drop in a bucket, and in many respects they are, experts say. But small things add up. While waiting for tech companies, scientists and policymakers to find ways of reducing AI’s overall environmental impact, “the individual who knows to reach for the right tool can make a real difference,” Drobnjak says. “AI is [consuming] so much energy that we have to look at it from every angle.”

Editor’s note: This story was updated on July 21, 2026, to clarify that the energy use of individuals who use AI tools a lot is cumulative, not necessarily huge, as was originally stated.

This article originally appeared in Knowable Magazine, a nonprofit publication dedicated to making scientific knowledge accessible to all. Sign up for Knowable Magazine's newsletter.

About 2,500 years ago, people in what is now India and Sri Lanka were manufacturing an exceptionally high-quality type of steel. Wootz steel was extraordinarily strong and sharp, and they exported it globally — in the Middle East, it was used to forge the legendary Damascus blades. But around A.D. 1100, it vanished, and the knowledge of how these ancient people forged such high-carbon steel was lost.

In this excerpt from the book "The Age of Alchemy: How Early Innovators Shaped Modern Chemistry" (Profile Books, 2026), author Kit Chapman, a science journalist and honorary researcher at Falmouth University in the U.K., reveals the extraordinary story of Wootz steel and the experiments that finally showed how it was created using furnaces powered by monsoons.

During the Industrial Revolution, it became clear that something far stronger [than iron] — steel — was needed. Victorian engineers had started to build larger projects than anyone had ever seen, and were using cast iron for their structures, such as the first metal bridge, at Ironbridge in Shropshire. But cast iron was too weak. In 1847, a cast-iron railway bridge over the River Dee collapsed less than a year after it was opened.

If the world was going to modernise, it had to come up with a better material. Steel was the obvious answer, but how did you get rid of just the right amount of carbon in pig iron? The answer was found by an inventor called Henry Bessemer, who was hired by the British government to try to make cheap steel for use in guns. Bessemer's great innovation was to suggest that, once you've got your molten-hot pig iron, you blow air — a lot of air, between 85,000 and 550,000 litres per minute — up from beneath it.

This results in the iron undergoing oxidation, both increasing the temperature of your molten steel and reacting with the impurities. The impurities form a scum at the top of the furnace called slag. This is a mix of metal oxides and other unwanted byproducts such as silicon dioxide, which then needs to be removed, decarbonising the pig iron into the exact ratio you need for steel. With the steel already molten, it can then be poured out into whatever shape you need.

Bessemer became one of the leading figures of the "Second Industrial Revolution" at the tail end of the nineteenth century. He was knighted by Queen Victoria; his steelworks in Sheffield led to it becoming synonymous with steel; and in the US, eight towns were named after him. Without Bessemer, the world would never have known steel's true potential, and our skylines wouldn't be dominated by modern structures that rely on them, such as skyscrapers, railroad tracks and suspension bridges.

Except there's a big problem. "The story you've been told about metallurgy is from a western viewpoint," explains Gill Juleff, an archaeologist from the University of Exeter, and the reason I've come out to Sri Lanka. "It comes from colonialism, and the dominance of Europe. In Asia, there were technologies that were making very good-quality steel. The makers of iron understood it. All of the evidence suggests that India was very familiar with it. They were producing hardened chisels that carved granite even in the Iron Age. You can only do that with steel."

As early as 500 BCE, steel began to originate from the Indian subcontinent that was far greater in quality than any other. The blades were forged with intricate, elaborate patterns and banding, like the marbling of the finest cut of steak. These were harder than any other blades, cut sharper and cost more.

Arabian, Greek, Roman and Chinese writers all described this wonder-material, which became so legendary that a Persian euphemism for cutting someone with a sword was an "Indian answer." It was known as Wootz steel. Just like pepper or other commodities from southern India that moved west along the Silk Road, the steel's rarity made it a luxury item.

"It's not a material that your everyday blacksmith would necessarily want," Juleff says. "High-carbon steel is an awful lot harder to work. It's not for arrowheads or kitchen knives. It became used by specialist swordsmiths." Then, around 1100 CE, the mysterious, intricately patterned blades simply vanished. Subsequent versions emerged (the most famous is Damascus steel), but Wootz steel had disappeared completely. It left a gaping hole in the history of chemistry.

No one could figure out how the Sri Lankans produced steel of such fine quality, and with such intricate patterning, well over a thousand years before it should have been possible. That is, until Juleff discovered the answer. She realised that archaeologists had been looking at the question based on how Europeans worked with iron.

"We discovered that the furnaces were all placed at the top of hills," Juleff explains. "Hundreds of them, of a type we'd never seen before; we only knew they were furnaces because there was slag everywhere. For some reason, the early Sri Lankans had their villages at the bottom of a hill, and then dragged all their iron to the top to smelt it." Initially, the strange furnaces were a puzzle. Typically, a furnace is tall and erect, like a chimney; this creates a natural draught that feeds oxygen to the fire, drawing air in and pushing out the exhaust gases. The Sri Lankan furnaces were totally different. They were flat, half a metre high and 2 metres long, with hundreds of holes bored into the front and back. They looked like oversized harmonicas.

"The answer wasn't immediately obvious why," Juleff says. "And then we realised they were all facing into the wind." What if the Sri Lankans weren't using bellows at all? This is why Juleff asked me to come to Colombo in the off-season. Every year, Sri Lanka is buffeted by two wet seasons: the south-west monsoons from May to September, and the north-west monsoons from December to February. It's a kind of weather you have to experience yourself to truly appreciate.

"A monsoon wind blows up to 90km an hour [56 mph]," says Juleff. "When you're at the top of a hill, you get an aerodynamic effect, where all the wind's rushing up and cresting. You're battered by it. Everyone told me you couldn't run a furnace just using the wind, because it's not strong or reliable enough. So, I decided to experiment. I built one." Juleff's furnace was identical to the Sri Lankan ruins she had found. She fed it using charcoal and iron sourced locally from surface deposits — exactly as would have been available to the villagers who built them.

Then, she waited for the monsoon. "So, we ran this furnace," Juleff says. "And, to begin with, I thought it wasn't working. We had this line of fire behind the front wall, and nothing at the back. I thought everything needed to be burning." It looked like the experts had been right: the monsoon winds weren't regular or consistent enough to blow into the furnace's holes to create the temperatures required.

But then Juleff's mood changed. "It was like a Transformers toy, everything rearranged in my mind. I had a eureka moment! It wasn't wrong at all; it was how it was designed to work. The wind was blowing up the hill — it wasn't blowing into the tubes at all, it was blowing over the top of the furnace. It's like an aeroplane wing: by blowing over the furnace, you're creating this incredible pocket of low pressure." The Sri Lankan furnace wasn't a harmonica, with air puffed through it; instead, it was played like a flute.

This is the Bernoulli effect, the same principle that sticks a race car to the road, or keeps water moving through your plumbing. The change in pressure and the smooth, ordered air flow was creating a furnace beyond anything western science had considered possible. The team continued putting in ore and charcoal throughout the day, then allowed things to cool. The next day, they returned to see what they had produced. At the top was a knotted lump of pure iron — a bloom, as expected. "But then below that, stuck to the bottom of our slag, was another layer of metal," Juleff says. "High-carbon steel. The wind did it. We couldn't stop the wind doing it. We had created a furnace that could make the best steel anywhere in the world."

Juleff had solved the mystery of Wootz steel. Not only did we now know how it was made, we understood why the technology hadn't spread around the world: the technology was anchored in the unique geography of Sri Lanka, and the people who visited weren't scholars, but traders who didn't appreciate the small miracle they were witnessing.

"The metal-makers weren't moving," Juleff says. "They were here, sat in the interior of Sri Lanka, season after season, running these incredible furnaces." Why did Wootz steel vanish? In the twelfth century CE, Sri Lanka was invaded by the Pandya dynasty of southern India. It triggered a societal collapse, as Sri Lankans were forced to pay tribute to their conquerors. The most likely explanation is that, during the chaos of the invasion and its messy aftermath, the traders and middlemen who brought the Wootz steel to the coast, and the ships that transported it around the world, had stopped coming.

It wouldn't have occurred, or mattered, to a Sri Lankan metallurgist that their goods were ending up in the hands of kings and emperors in some distant land they'd never heard of; they'd have only seen that they couldn't sell to local traders any more. The villagers stopped making goods that didn't sell, and moved on to other, more profitable, careers.

Excerpted from "The Age of Alchemy: How Early Innovators Shaped Modern Chemistry," Profile Books, 2026.

Millions of people across Europe and North America will witness a solar eclipse on Wednesday, Aug. 12, but the event will vary greatly depending on the location. A narrow corridor stretching from Greenland to northeastern Spain will experience a total solar eclipse, much of Europe will enjoy a deep partial eclipse, and parts of North America will see a smaller partial eclipse.

Want to know what you can expect to see from where you are? Here's an overview of the event from various locations, along with the exact viewing times for the Aug. 12 solar eclipse.

Remember, it's important to wear certified solar eclipse glasses during all partial phases of the eclipse. Totality ‪—‬ when the sun's face is completely blocked by the moon ‪—‬ is the only time it's safe to remove your eclipse glasses. (It’s not too late to order last-minute eclipse glasses if you don’t have a pair on hand.)

If you're in the path of totality

If you're fortunate enough to be inside the 180-mile-wide (290 kilometers) path of totality — the path of the dark shadow of the moon — in eastern Greenland, western Iceland or northeastern Spain, you'll experience the moon completely covering the sun for up to 2 minutes, 18 seconds. The sky will darken to twilight, bright stars and planets may appear in the daytime sky, and the sun's spectacular corona (its wispy outer atmosphere) will become visible. Here’s a handy guide to all the gear you’ll need to get the most out of totality.

The closer you are to the centerline of the path, the longer totality will last. But the most important consideration is to stay within the boundaries of the path, because it has a hard edge. Madrid, for example, is barely outside the path and will see a 99.99% partial eclipse — and no totality whatsoever. The partial phases last an hour on each side of totality.

Here's when totality will occur in various locations for the Aug. 12 total solar eclipse:

• Scoresby Sund, Greenland: 4:35 p.m. WGST (up to 2 minutes, 17 seconds)
• Reykjavik, Iceland: 5:48 p.m. GMT (60 seconds)
• León, Spain: 8:28 p.m. CEST (1 minute, 45 seconds)
• Soria, Spain: 8:29 p.m. CEST (1 minute, 43 seconds)
• S'Arenal, Mallorca, Spain: 8:31 p.m. CEST (1 minute, 36 seconds)

If you're in North America

Viewers in North America will see a modest partial eclipse, with the biggest eclipse seen from northern and eastern Canada, Alaska and the northeastern U.S. The farther northeast you are, the deeper the eclipse will appear. Eclipse glasses are essential at every stage of the two-hour event, because there will be no totality. Here are the times of maximum eclipse in various locations:

• Iqaluit, Nunavut: 1:24 p.m. EDT (61% eclipse)
• St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador: 3:00 p.m. NDT (53%)
• Fairbanks, Alaska: 8:27 a.m. AKDT (37%)
• Anchorage, Alaska: 8:21 a.m. AKDT (28%)
• Bangor, Maine: 1:53 p.m. EDT (23%)
• Quebec City: 1:46 p.m. EDT (24%)
• Montreal: 1:45 p.m. EDT (18%)
• Boston: 1:55 p.m. EDT (16%)
• New York: 1:54 p.m. EDT (9%)

If you want to watch totality from outside the path, there are many live stream options available, including planned streams from NASA and the European Space Agency.

If you're elsewhere in Europe and North Africa

Most of Europe and far northwestern Africa will see a spectacular deep partial eclipse, with more than 90% of the sun covered in many western cities. Although the eclipse will never become total, it will still be an impressive sight, though solar eclipse glasses will be required throughout the event. Here are the times of maximum eclipse in some major cities:

• Madrid: 8:32 p.m. CEST (99.9%)
• Barcelona: 8:29 p.m. CEST (99.8%)
• Algiers, Algeria: 7:33 p.m. CET (96%)
• Nice, France: 8:24 p.m. CEST (95%)
• Lisbon, Portugal: 7:36 p.m. WEST (94%)
• Dublin, Ireland: 7:10 p.m. BST (94%)
• Cardiff, Wales: 7:13 p.m. BST (93%)
• Belfast, Northern Ireland: 7:08 p.m. BST (93%)
• Paris: 8:17 p.m. CEST (92%)
• Tangier, Morocco: 7:40 p.m. WEST (92%)
• London: 7:13 p.m. BST (91%)
• Edinburgh, Scotland: 7:05 p.m. BST (91% eclipse)

To check exactly what you'll see and when, enter your location on an interactive map of the eclipse, which will give you a schedule for when the eclipse begins, peaks and ends where you are.

Yams and sweet potatoes are often confused, and the names are sometimes used interchangeably in the U.S. However, they're two different crops. So what sets them apart?

The differences lie mainly in these vegetables' classifications, plant growth, and nutritional profiles, experts told Live Science.

Despite both growing underground and appearing somewhat similar, "Botanically, sweet potatoes and yams are not closely related, as they belong to different plant families," said Phillip Wadl, a research geneticist at the U.S. Vegetable Laboratory in Charleston, South Carolina. Sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) are in the morning glory family (Convolvulaceae). Yams (Dioscorea), by contrast, belong to the Dioscoreaceae family, and there are 11 yam species cultivated for food and income, Wadl told Live Science in an email.

Yams and sweet potatoes also belong to different plant groups, or "cotyledon types," said Jeffrey Cole Denis Gregorie, a sweet potato specialist at the Sweet Potato Research Station in Chase, Louisiana. Yams are monocots, plants whose embryo has only one cotyledon, or seed leaf, like grasses and lilies. Sweet potatoes are dicots, plants with two embryonic seed leaves, which include many fruits and vegetables, such as grapes, squash, strawberries and tomatoes.

In addition, yams and sweet potatoes store food in different parts of the plant. "Sweet potatoes form storage roots which are enlarged parts of the root system," Wadl explained, "whereas yams form tubers, which are enlarged underground stems for nutrient storage."

A single sweet potato plant typically produces about four to 10 sweet potatoes, while a yam plant yields about one to five yams. Sweet potatoes generally take about three to five months to mature, compared with about six months to a full year for yams, according to Craig Yencho, a professor of horticultural science and a sweet potato and potato researcher with North Carolina State University.

How do you tell sweet potatoes and yams apart?

Visually, sweet potatoes and yams are easy to tell apart when you know what to look for. Sweet potatoes tend to be shorter and blockier, with tapered ends. Yams are usually long and cylindrical, sometimes with "toes," or branching shapes.

Sweet potatoes come in various flesh colors, including orange ‪—‬ the most common color in the U.S. ‪—‬ as well as yellow, purple and white. Their skin is typically thin and smooth, whereas "yams often have a rough, bark-like skin and their flesh can be white, purple or reddish," Wadl said. One well-known purple yam, known as ube (Dioscorea alata), is a popular ingredient in treats such as ice cream, cookies and pound cake.

Sweet potatoes and yams also have noticeable differences in their culinary and nutritional profiles, Wadl said. "Sweet potatoes are generally sweeter and have a moist, creamy texture when cooked, although dry types are available," he explained. "Yams, on the other hand, tend to be starchier, drier, and have a more earthy, sometimes less sweet, flavor compared to sweet potatoes. Their texture can be more like a regular potato."

Nutritionally, the two crops are quite different, too. Sweet potatoes, particularly the orange-fleshed varieties, are an excellent source of beta-carotene (a precursor to vitamin A), vitamin C, dietary fiber, potassium and some B vitamins. "While nutritious, [yams] typically contain less beta-carotene than orange sweet potatoes," Wadl noted. Instead, yams are a good source of potassium, vitamin C, manganese and dietary fiber.

Sweet potatoes are generally considered safe to eat both raw and cooked, Wadl said. By contrast, many wild varieties of true yams, especially those not cultivated for commercial consumption, contain compounds like dioscorine that could make them toxic to humans if eaten raw. "These must be thoroughly cooked to remove the toxins and make them safe for consumption," Wadl said.

Thanksgiving confusion around yams and sweet potatoes

If yams and sweet potatoes are so different, why do so many Americans call sweet potatoes "yams"?

Part of the answer lies in history. The yam was a key provision on voyages of enslaved people from West Africa to the Americas, "used to feed captives a familiar food," said Judith Carney, a professor of geography at UCLA. "In mainland plantation societies of North America where the African yam could not be grown, the sweet potato served as a substitute dietary staple." Because the two crops shared some characteristics, "the word 'yam' came to refer vernacularly to both tubers in mainland America, as we see in the U.S. today," Carney told Live Science in an email.

The U.S. sweet potato industry also leaned into the confusion, adopting the term "yam" for marketing reasons, Gregorie told Live Science in an email. "In the United States, many orange-fleshed, moist varieties of sweet potatoes are often mislabeled as "yams" to distinguish them from the drier, white-fleshed sweet potato varieties," Wadl explained.

As a result, the "yams" at most U.S. supermarkets are probably sweet potatoes. "Garnet yams" and "jewel yams" aren't actually yams, despite those labels; instead, they're softer, sweeter varieties of sweet potatoes, according to the University of California, Davis.

Although genuine yams are sold in many international markets in the U.S, "if you're buying a "yam" in a typical U.S. supermarket, you're almost certainly purchasing a sweet potato," Wadl said.

Do you know where pumpkins and blueberries come from? Find out with our fruits and vegetables quiz!

Bolstering a type of bacteria that lives in the uterus may help counter age-related changes that can make it harder to get pregnant, a new study suggests.

While fertility decline is often linked to changes in egg number or quality, the uterus also becomes less receptive to an implanting embryo with age. The new research suggests that changes in the bacteria living there may be part of the reason.

In experiments, treating aged mice and lab-grown human uterine cells with a specific species of Lactobacillus, a group of bacteria often found in the uterus, reduced signs of aging in the uterine lining and improved embryo implantation. This improvement was also seen with a specific byproduct of Lactobacillus.

The findings, published Thursday (Aug. 6) in the journal Cell Host & Microbe, suggest that the uterine microbiome could be a promising target for treating age-related infertility. However, experts who were not involved in the study cautioned that the research is still preliminary.

"This is an interesting and promising approach, but we still don't know whether these findings will translate into meaningful improvements in human fertility," said Dr. Alex Robles, a fertility specialist at Columbia University Fertility Center who was not involved in the study.

"The microbiome can be influenced by many factors, including genetics, diet, geography, environmental exposures and other lifestyle practices," he told Live Science in an email, "which is why it's important to validate these findings across diverse populations before developing broadly applicable treatments."

To explore whether and how the uterine microbiome changes with age, the study researchers analyzed samples of the endometrium — tissue from the lining of the uterus — from 149 women ages 20 to 45 who were undergoing fertility treatment in China. The older women had lower levels of beneficial Lactobacillus bacteria, particularly L. gasseri and L. crispatus. These bacteria are generally associated with a healthy reproductive tract.

"One finding that surprised us was that overall microbial diversity did not change markedly across the different age groups," study co-author Dr. Rong Li, deputy director of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Peking University Third Hospital in Beijing, said in a statement. "Instead, the major differences involved particular bacterial species."

Later, 93 of the women underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF), and of those, 56 became pregnant. Those who became pregnant had higher levels of Lactobacillus in their uterine lining than those who did not get pregnant. That said, the pregnancy rates were similar across women of different ages who underwent IVF.

To better understand the effect of these bacteria on the uterus, the team isolated five Lactobacillus species and tested how they interacted with uterine cells. L. gasseri stood out because it attached strongly to uterine cells, and this attachment was associated with reduced inflammation and lower damage from oxidative stress. The bacterium also produced large amounts of exopolysaccharides (EPS), a type of sugar molecule.

The researchers then purified these sugars into a postbiotic they call LG-EPS. Unlike probiotics, postbiotics are products of bacterial cells and thus do not contain live bacteria.

Then, the researchers ran tests in older female mice (roughly equivalent to a middle-aged woman) to see whether introducing L. gasseri or LG-EPS to the vaginal canal could affect the aging uterus. After four weeks of daily vaginal treatment with either the bacterium or the postbiotic, the mice had fewer signs of uterine aging, less inflammation and higher embryo implantation rates than the untreated animals did. (That said, the team did not measure how much of each treatment actually reached the uterus.)

When they tried the same test with a modified strain of L. gasseri that could not make EPS, they found that many of these benefits disappeared. That suggested that the exopolysaccharides were responsible for much of the benefit. LG-EPS also reduced signs of aging in artificially aged human uterine cells, improving their ability to support embryo implantation.

Further experiments suggested that the postbiotic works by modifying a signaling pathway that helps control cell growth and tissue repair. This pathway was overactive in aged mice and uterine cells, but treatment helped to normalize its activity. Blocking a key protein in the same pathway eliminated the treatment's effects.

Robles said postbiotic treatments could be especially interesting because they may be easier to manufacture than treatments containing live bacteria. "If confirmed in future studies, these treatments could potentially be used alongside IVF to improve the uterine environment before embryo transfer," he suggested.

But he cautioned that the study should not prompt people to try over-the-counter probiotics or other supplements as ad hoc fertility treatments.

"The reproductive tract is a delicate ecosystem, and introducing or eliminating certain bacteria could have unintended consequences," Robles said. "We do not fully understand what constitutes a 'healthy' uterine microbiome. As such, any intervention should be approached with caution."

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

Even though August 12's solar eclipse won't be much to look at for observers in the U.S., it'll be even less impressive if you can't look at it at all. In order to see the partial phases, you MUST wear a pair of certified solar glasses or solar binoculars to view the sun safely.

The American Astronomical Society states, "ISO 12312-2 specifies the properties that a solar viewer should have in order to protect your eyes from injury and provide a comfortable view."

With the eclipse fast approaching, there is still time to pick up some last-minute solar viewing equipment, but some retailers are already selling out and won't be able to deliver before Wednesday, August 12.

Here are the best options you can still get hold of before the solar eclipse.

Nestled within Brazil's Cerrado tropical savanna — the second-largest biome in South America, after the Amazon rainforest — Uberaba Geopark is a time capsule from the Late Cretaceous period (100.5 million to 66 million years ago).

The geopark boasts abundant, well-preserved fossils from the last chapters of the nonavian-dinosaur era, according to UNESCO, earning it the nickname the "Land of the Giants," or "Terra dos Gigantes" in Portuguese. Paleontologists have discovered more than 10,000 fossils belonging to dinosaurs, prehistoric crocodyliforms (a group encompassing living crocodiles, alligators, caimans and gharials, as well as their extinct relatives), turtles and other ancient creatures within the park's boundaries.

One of the best-known discoveries is the fossil of Uberabatitan ribeiroi, a titanosaur measuring 89 feet (27 meters) long and 33 feet (10 m) tall, according to UNESCO.

The finds were clustered in impressive geological features, including the Serra da Galga formation and Serra Geral mountain range. These structures formed from ancient basalt flows, which came from giant volcanic eruptions that predate the breakup of the Gondwana supercontinent 180 million years ago.

The park has the ideal conditions to preserve fossils because it alternated between shallow lagoons and river systems when the dinosaurs roamed the region, meaning the animals' remains were conserved in mud when they died.

Serra da Galga and Serra Geral also overlie one of the world's largest freshwater reservoirs, the Guarani aquifer, which supplies drinking water for more than 100 cities in Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.

The Cerrado savanna, which houses the entire park, is a critical-yet-underprotected carbon sink that hosts more than 12,000 plant species and diverse animal life.

The "Land of the Giants" was added to UNESCO's list of geoparks in 2024 in recognition of the region's geological and natural heritage.

What is now the Uberaba Geopark was the birthplace of Brazil's modern livestock market, which is one of the biggest in the world. Farmers in the 19th century introduced zebu (Bos indicus) cattle from India because they are better suited to the climate in Brazil and require less food than common domesticated cattle (Bos taurus). Zebu cattle also produce lower greenhouse gas emissions than common domesticated cattle do, according to UNESCO.

Uberaba Geopark is open to visitors. There are several museums and trails to explore, including one that leads to the Vale Encantado, or "Enchanted Valley," which contains forests, waterfalls and prehistoric rock formations, according to the BBC.

Discover more incredible places, where we highlight the fantastic history and science behind some of the most dramatic landscapes on Earth.

Your favorite stretchy workout clothes may be much easier to recycle one day, thanks to a new type of elastic yarn that is as strong and stretchy as today's spandex-containing fabrics.

The yarn, described in a July 25 study in the journal ACS Materials Letters, is built entirely from polyethylene, the plastic used in milk jugs and single-use grocery bags. By contrast, most of today's stretchy fabrics blend spandex, a bouncy-but-weak polyurethane fiber, with a tougher fiber like polyester or nylon.

That combination gives clothes their stretch and durability. But because the fibers are chemically different, it's difficult and costly to separate them for recycling, and chemicals used to break down the fabrics are toxic. The result is that almost none of this material is recycled. An estimated 80% of textiles sold in the U.S. contain spandex, and most end up incinerated or in a landfill, study co-author Svetlana Boriskina, a research scientist in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at MIT, said in a statement.

To solve that problem, the MIT team turned to polyethylene, one of the world's most widely recycled plastics. For the yarn's stretchy core, the researchers created a soft, springy version of polyethylene akin to a rubber band. Around that core, they wound a second, stiffer polyethylene fiber, more like a fishing line, coiling it tightly the way a spring or a twisted phone cord is coiled. Because both materials come from the same plastic family, they don't need to be separated before they're recycled.

In laboratory tests, the researchers melted a spool of the yarn and respun it into new yarn 10 separate times. Each time, they tested its strength, and the recycled yarn performed just as well as the original in every case. In head-to-head tests, the new yarn even outperformed commercial spandex-polyester yarn in maximum load, meaning it could bear more force before breaking, according to the study.

The team has already shown that these lightweight polyethylene fibers can be engineered for other perks, too ‪—‬ like cooling, moisture wicking and stain resistance ‪—‬ building on their earlier work spinning polyethylene into wearable fabric. Even buttons, zippers and buckles could eventually be made from compatible plastics, so a whole garment could be melted down and remade without being taken apart first.

Scientists are preparing for an interstellar rescue of humanity's most distant spacecraft, Voyager 1, after fixing up its twin from billions of miles away.

According to a NASA statement released Aug. 4, a clever power-saving maneuver known as the "Big Bang" helped the agency avoid having to shut off another one of the Voyager 2 probe's three remaining science instruments later this year. The Big Bang procedure involves selectively shutting off some high-power instruments on the Voyager probes while switching on lower-power alternatives, all while keeping the spacecraft warm enough to operate in the frigid environment of interstellar space.

"The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off, and replacing them with lower-power alternatives, to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data," representatives from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which manages the mission, wrote in an April blog post.

NASA carefully ran tests on Voyager 2 before implementing the procedure in May and June. Now, sharing the results of those tests in the Aug. 4 statement, NASA reports a successful power transfer that should keep Voyager 2 running a while longer.

"The savings should provide power to keep its three instruments operating for at least an extra year," NASA wrote of the Big Bang.

But power is dwindling on both nuclear-powered spacecraft, and Voyager 1 is in worse shape than its twin. Mission scientists were forced to turn off one of Voyager 1's last remaining science instruments in April.

Voyager 1's turn for a life-extending Big Bang will happen within a few months, to keep science operating there as long as possible, agency officials added.

Going out with a bang

Scientists decided to do the "Big Bang" on Voyager 2 first because it is in better health, and closer to Earth, than Voyager 1. Voyager 1 is nearly 171 astronomical units (AU, where 1 AU is the average distance between Earth and the sun) from our planet, while Voyager 2 is about 143 AU away. Both spacecraft are crucial for revealing clues about the region outside the heliopause ‪—‬ the sphere of influence the sun exerts upon our solar system ‪—‬ as they are the only working spacecraft at such a distance.

That distance is no small factor. In November, Voyager 1 will reach a milestone "light day" from Earth — when it takes 24 hours for a radio signal to travel one way from our planet to the spacecraft. Both spacecraft will also turn 50 years old in 2027, assuming they keep working.

Both Voyager probes launched in 1977, with Voyager 2 getting an opportunity for a "grand tour" of our solar system. An alignment of the outer planets — Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune — that occurs only once every 176 years allowed both Voyager probes to maneuver from one planet to the next with minimal fuel usage.

Voyager 2 flew by all four planets, finishing its Neptune encounter in 1989, while Voyager 1 was tasked with flying above the plane, or "ecliptic," of our solar system after its closest approach to Saturn in 1981. As each spacecraft finished its close-up imaging of these planets, some instruments were shut off to extend their mission for as long as possible. But as the two spacecraft aged, more instruments needed to go quiet.

Plutonium, which the spacecraft rely on for power, has a natural decay rate, with the spacecraft now losing roughly 4 watts of power a year, according to NASA. In recent years, power supplies have turned critically low on both spacecraft. Voyager 2 would have needed to shut off one of its remaining three science instruments later this year if measures were not taken, and Voyager 1 was in slightly worse shape after an unexpected power drop in February occurred following a planned maneuver in deep space. Only two of Voyager 1's 10 science instruments remain powered after the latest was shut down in April.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has helped uncover new weaknesses in two cryptographic systems, including a simplified version of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) that underpins much of today's internet. While these headline-grabbing findings don't put anyone's passwords or bank accounts at immediate risk, experts say the research could mark the beginning of a new era in which AI becomes a powerful assistant for discovering flaws in the mathematical foundations of digital security.

In a blog post published July 28, representatives from Anthropic's Frontier Red Team said Claude Mythos Preview independently developed new cryptanalytic techniques against two different targets: a version of AES-128, one of the world's most widely used encryption algorithms, and HAWK, an experimental post-quantum digital signature scheme currently being evaluated as part of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) effort to standardize cryptography for the quantum computing age.

It's tempting to interpret this news as AI cracking one of the internet's most important encryption algorithms, but the reality is less dramatic. Nonetheless, experts say the achievement could mark the start of a new age of digital security.

The power of encryption

AES protects huge amounts of everyday digital life, from encrypted websites and messaging apps to Wi-Fi networks and financial transactions. But the version Anthropic attacked wasn't the full AES-128 algorithm used in those systems. Instead, the researchers studied a seven-round version of AES, a deliberately weakened variant long used by cryptographers to test new attack techniques.

The full AES-128 algorithm uses 10 rounds of encryption, while Anthropic's research focused on a seven-round version. In a self-published study that has not been peer-reviewed, scientists Milad Nasr and Nicholas Carlini said Claude found a faster way to recover the encryption key from that simplified version, making the best-known attack between 200 and 800 times faster. However, the study stressed that the technique does not work against the full version of AES used to protect real-world systems.

The more significant result may instead involve HAWK. Unlike AES, which has protected data for more than two decades, HAWK is a relatively new digital signature scheme designed to resist attacks from future quantum computers. It's one of the remaining candidates in NIST's additional post-quantum signature standardization process, meaning it is still being scrutinized by researchers before its widespread deployment.

In a separate study, Anthropic scientists Zygimantas Straznickas and Stephen A. Weis found that Claude spotted a mathematical property that researchers hadn't previously exploited. Combined with existing attack techniques, this property made it much easier to recover HAWK's secret key.

Thomas Espitau ‪—‬ head of research at PQShield, a cybersecurity company that specializes in post-quantum cryptography, and a cryptographer who has published research on HAWK ‪—‬ described the work as "one of the most, if not the most significant, cryptanalytic result of the year."

"To say it plainly, this is great work, and it is exactly what the NIST process is designed to produce," Espitau told Live Science. "Candidate schemes exist to be attacked before they are deployed, not after."

Espitau said the attack combined previously known techniques with one missing mathematical insight that Claude identified, substantially reducing HAWK's estimated security margin. He believes the work demonstrates how AI could increasingly help researchers evaluate the strength of cryptographic systems before they are adopted.

"This development illustrates how AI can act as a powerful accelerator in cryptanalysis," he said. "Claude Mythos Preview identified the exploitation of the sign-flip symmetry, providing the final piece of a puzzle that the research community had been assembling."

Building defensive measures

However, not everyone thinks the announcement means AI suddenly outsmarted human cryptographers.

"There is nothing you need to change," Roberta Faux, head of cryptography at cybersecurity and quantum encryption company Arqit, told Live Science. "Both Anthropic and the outside cryptographers agree that you don't need to change your key sizes or switch your cryptography."

Instead, Faux said the bigger story is AI's ability to apply expert-level cryptanalysis across thousands of algorithms that relatively few researchers have had time to examine.

"The interesting prospect is not a model outdueling the world's best lattice theorist on one problem but a model applying solid, roughly expert-level analysis at scale to the several thousand ciphers nobody ever had the human-hours to examine," she said.

Faux also cautioned against attributing the HAWK breakthrough solely to AI.

"The HAWK attack used no exotic ingredients; it simply competently assembled tools that were already lying around," she said. "A post-quantum candidate is seriously scrutinized by maybe a few dozen people on the planet, so beating two years of review mostly reveals how thin that layer of review is."

For consumers, the immediate implications are reassuring. The encryption protecting online banking, shopping, messaging and cloud storage has not suddenly become obsolete. But for the researchers designing the next generation of cryptography, Anthropic's work hints that AI could soon help cryptographers test tomorrow's encryption schemes more quickly and more thoroughly than has previously been possible.

New images captured by the world's most powerful solar telescope have revealed something that was hiding in plain sight on the sun for 150 years: thousands of tiny whirlpools twisting across our star's surface. The ultra-detailed observations could help to explain some of the sun's most violent behavior as well as hint at the answer to a long-standing solar mystery.

The new time-lapse footage offers the first direct proof of a long-predicted phenomenon called Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The effect itself isn't new to science; it's named for physicists Lord Kelvin and Hermann von Helmholtz, who described it in the 19th century. The physicists found that whenever two fluids slide past each other at different speeds, the friction between them, or shear, rolls into spiraling patterns. However, this is the first time this effect has been seen on the sun, where that shear plays out between neighboring streams of solar plasma.

Researchers captured the swirls using the U.S. National Science Foundation's Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope in Hawaii and then compared the images against computer simulations of the sun's visible surface, called the photosphere. The findings were published Aug. 5 in the journal Nature.

The resulting time-lapse footage from the telescope is unlike anything solar physicists have captured before. It shows dozens of tiny vortices clustering along the edges of magnetic regions, some accompanied by delicate, dark stripes known as striations, according to a statement from the National Science Foundation. The telescope's resolution is sharp enough to pick out structures just tens of miles across — a scale so fine that the vortices had gone completely undetected until now.

When the researchers lined the images up against their simulations, the match was close enough ‪—‬ down to the average spacing between vortices ‪—‬ to confirm that they'd finally caught the instability in action.

Beyond the impressive visuals, researchers think these swirls may serve an important function. By constantly twisting and mixing the sun's magnetic-field lines, these vortices may play a part in building up the energy behind solar flares and coronal mass ejections.

The effect also might help to explain the long-standing mystery of why the sun's outer atmosphere, or corona, reaches temperatures of around 2 million degrees Fahrenheit (around 1 million degrees Celsius) while its surface remains hundreds of thousands of degrees cooler, Thomas Rimmele, chief technologist at the National Solar Observatory, said in the statement.

The team now plans to use computer programs to automatically track these vortices across future observations. This will help them measure exactly how much these swirls contribute to heating the corona and driving the explosive space weather that can disrupt satellites, communications and power grids on Earth.

See how much you know about the sun with our sun quiz!

The Caspian Sea, the world's largest inland body of water, is in major trouble. Since the mid-1990s, this saline lake, located between Europe and Asia, has lost an area nearly the size of Sicily. But until now, it wasn't clear why.

Researchers finally provided answers in a study published June 5 in the journal Earth's Future. Using ground- and satellite-based observations, they connected falling water levels to a drastic drop in river inputs from Iran, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Russia, all of which border the Caspian Sea.

The team particularly highlighted losses from Russia's Volga River, the longest river in Europe, which supplies roughly 80% of the Caspian's inflow.

To find out why the Volga is discharging less water into the Caspian Sea now than it did 30 years ago, we spoke with Amir AghaKouchak, a co-author of the study and professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of California, Irvine.

AghaKouchak, who directs UC Irvine's Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, explained why river inputs have dropped and how decades of water withdrawals have put the Caspian Sea on a path to collapse. He also touched on a solution to this crisis — and revealed why Russia's hunger for ammunition to attack Ukraine is making it harder to save the Caspian Sea.

Sascha Pare: Falling water levels in the Caspian Sea have been attributed to natural variability, and more recently, there's been a focus on climate change and increased evaporation due to rising temperatures. But what did the results of your study show?

Amir AghaKouchak: People quickly jump to conclusions about climate change. Of course, that is important, but it cannot explain the change that we have observed. Over the last 30 years, water levels in the Caspian Sea have shrunk by around 2 meters [6.5 feet] or so. Just to put things in perspective, this translates to about 24,000 square kilometers [9,300 square miles] of sea area loss — about 5%. When we look at drivers, we notice that rainfall hasn't changed significantly over the lake and upstream, so the decline cannot be explained simply by changes in rain.

Evaporation has increased, so it explains maybe about one-third of the change. There is less water in the lake, and that indicates there's probably some water lost along the way. We don't have a lot of human-related data ‪—‬ for example, water withdrawal for irrigation or groundwater wells. That area is very difficult; the countries are not open to sharing data. A lot of our results are based on looking at proxies. Our interpretation is that temperature caused about 30% of the change and the rest is probably because of human activities.

SP: Which human activities does your research suggest are responsible for the Caspian Sea's decline?

AA: Several of the countries on the Caspian Sea have built large dams — Russia, for example. They are all desperate for hydropower. All of the countries around the lake [have also built infrastructure to supply agriculture], and one reason is that they want to create jobs and improve the local economy. Water demand is increasing in all those countries around the Caspian Sea. It's not surprising to see lakes drying or groundwater levels falling.

It's hard to find data about how much water countries are using; they keep data very private, especially places like Russia. We don't have detailed information, but the Volga-Don Canal in Russia is one of the projects that is contributing to this crisis. [Editor's note: The Volga-Don Canal is a ship canal that connects the Volga and Don rivers at their closest points.]

But we cannot blame this whole thing on that. We have to be careful with our language; we can't say one project is responsible. Most likely, this is the collective impact of many different small withdrawals from here and there, overall contributing to a significant decline in the Volga River outflow into the lake. In the paper, we have different rivers, but the Volga dominates because it's the largest river. The Volga has a higher impact than all the other rivers combined. There are lots of demands along that river basin.

SP: Did you expect human activities to play such a big role, or were you surprised?

AA: We did not have any expectations at the beginning. In fact, when we started this project, I reached out to a lot of colleagues from neighboring countries around the Caspian Sea. We didn't want to do it on our own, sitting in California, looking at another area of the world, without having local people involved. If you look at the co-authors, you see people from Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan — so, we have local experts. We thought this was really important to have those perspectives. I didn't want to reflect the opinions of only one research group. What we have here is the collective opinion of people who have not met in person; we only exchanged emails to look at the results, and then we came up with those conclusions.

We do have a Russian involved, but not from an official Russian institution. I thought this was really important, because there's more back-and-forth [with a large group of people]. If two people have to convince themselves of an idea, it's much easier than with 20. Also, we brought in people from other countries who had projects in the area; for example, there is one group from Finland and another group from Germany. We tried to come up with something that this large group of people could agree on. It was not easy, but it worked out.

SP: What is the worst-case future scenario for the Caspian Sea if shoreline countries fail to decrease their water demands?

AA: My concern is that, in the same general area, we have the Aral Sea, which is now about 5% to 10% of what it used to be, and Lake Urmia, in northwest Iran, that has also shrunk really fast and is now very small, with low levels of ecological activity. So we have two smaller lakes in a very similar climate that, from an ecological perspective, are dead. Because we have seen those degrade, we have to consider that this is the worst-case scenario for the Caspian Sea, too.

The Caspian Sea is much, much bigger. I hope it doesn't happen, but it's on the same path. Again, it's much larger, so it would probably take 100 years [to shrink as much as the Aral Sea and Lake Urmia], even with the current trend. But because we have seen those lakes shrink really fast, it deserves attention. Due to the size of this lake, the potential impacts will be huge. Even if 20% of the Caspian Sea dries out, the consequences will be very significant. It would be a disaster.

SP: You mentioned that drying lakes can become ecologically "dead." What other impacts could the Caspian Sea's falling water levels have on the surrounding landscape and people?

AA: The lake's retreat will expose the lake bed, and because it's saline, you have all kinds of minerals that will be exposed. With the next strong wind, they will go into the air. The health impacts include respiratory diseases, and even eye diseases, that are linked to salt minerals in the atmosphere. Those are the immediate consequences. Additionally, those minerals can travel long distances. In general, salt deposition on agricultural land reduces productivity. It takes a while, but if those lands are exposed for a long time, this will have an impact on the agricultural sector in those areas, which means potential food security issues. We don't exactly know what those materials are on the lake bed, so it's hard to know precisely what the consequences will be.

There is also serious shipping happening in this region. Right now, most of the shrinking is happening in the Caspian Sea's northern part, which is shallower [than the rest of the lake]. The drop in water levels is about 2 meters, and you can imagine that if you have a port and water levels drop more, you won't be able to operate. You'll need to extend your shipping routes southward; you'll need to invest and spend a lot of money to use other ports and docking sites. We have evidence of that around the Aral Sea and also Lake Urmia. There used to be these docking sites and ports, but those are now far away from the water.

SP: What must bordering countries do to save the Caspian Sea and prevent these negative effects?

AA: Demand management is absolutely critical. Demand management doesn't get a lot of attention, because unlike big projects that make the news, management means you have to cut things and do things that people don't notice. Some people argue that politicians don't show a lot of interest in demand management, but it's something that we have control over. The technological opportunities are there.

But when you look at that area, there is a big war ‪—‬ so probably it's not the priority to invest in management. There are a lot of things that we don't talk about in the paper that are relevant. I recently learned through discussions with people from the region — this is something that came to us from co-authors and collaborators — that many countries in that area grow cotton, which uses a lot of water. It has a lot of applications, but apparently, one of them is military. Cotton is used to produce ammunition. Russia needs a lot of ammunition, so not only are they growing it themselves, but they also bought neighboring reserves from Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. So now, even those countries have an incentive to grow more cotton. This is driving more irrigation, more groundwater extraction, more surface water depletion, and probably more impacts on the Caspian Sea.

This interview has been condensed and edited lightly for clarity.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a new seasonal flu vaccine that uses mRNA as its base.

Moderna, the vaccine's maker, announced Wednesday (Aug. 5) that a vaccine advisory committee to the FDA unanimously agreed that the shot is safe and effective for preventing illness from seasonal influenza. The shot, called mFlusiva or mRNA-1010, has been approved for people ages 50 and older.

Similar to mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, the vaccine uses the genetic molecule mRNA to encode instructions for cells in the body. In this case, it prompts the cells to build hemagglutinin (HA), a protein found on the surface of influenza viruses. Flu viruses use this protein to infiltrate human cells, and it's the same protein targeted by conventional flu vaccines. Following vaccination with mFlusiva, the immune system learns to recognize the HA protein on targeted flu strains, thereby improving its ability to block the viruses from infecting cells.

The HA protein poses a major challenge for conventional flu vaccines because it mutates very rapidly as the viruses multiply and spread — and these existing vaccines take months to manufacture. That's one reason the resulting shots aren't always a great match for the flu viruses that end up circulating in any given year. A benefit of the mRNA platform is that vaccines can be produced very quickly and thus made to better match the season's dominant strains.

mFlusiva's approval was based in part on a late-stage clinical trial involving over 40,000 people ages 50 and up who were vaccinated for the 2024-2025 Northern Hemisphere flu season. Half received the mRNA-based shot, and half received a standard dose of a conventional flu vaccine (as opposed to the higher-dose option available to older adults in the U.S.).

Of the 40,000 participants, about 970 got sick with flu, including 2% of the mRNA group and 2.8% of the standard group. That means the mRNA vaccine was 26.6% more protective than the conventional vaccine against illness from flu in this trial.

mFlusiva also offered superior protection against each of the three flu subtypes included in the vaccine. And in participants ages 65 and up, the vaccine was 27.4% more protective, overall.

More people in the mRNA group experienced side effects like injection-site pain, headache, fatigue and achiness, compared with the standard group, but these effects were mostly short-lived and mild to moderate in severity. These side effects were consistent with what was seen in earlier trials of the vaccine.

An additional trial involved a group of adults ages 65 and older and directly compared mFlusiva to an existing high-dose flu vaccine, which is approved only for older adults in the U.S. The findings suggested that the mRNA vaccine generated superior immune protection than the conventional option, based on antibody levels.

These results led the FDA advisory committee to decide that the vaccine's benefits outweigh its risks, and the agency ultimately approved it. For adults ages 50 to 64, the vaccine earned standard approval, and for adults 65 and up, it earned "accelerated approval," meaning further trials will be conducted to confirm the benefit of the shot over the high-dose option for this population.

"Flu remains a significant public health challenge, and mFLUSIVA provides an important new option for America's seniors," Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a statement.

The approval appears to mark a shift in the government's stance on mRNA vaccines.

Under the second Trump administration, the federal government has been broadly retracting its support for mRNA vaccines, directly canceling hundreds of millions of dollars in funds for research and development and indirectly sending a chilling effect through the mRNA field, experts previously told Live Science. Even Moderna has been pulling back from investments, citing opposition from the U.S. market. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has repeatedly voiced his opposition to mRNA technology.

When Moderna initially filed for mFlusiva's approval in February, the FDA declined to review the application — but then changed its mind one week later. The exact motivation for this reversal was unclear to experts.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

In the dead of night on Wednesday (Aug. 5), part of a defunct SpaceX rocket slammed into the moon at more than 5,000 mph (8,000 km/h) — and a Korean lunar satellite has just shared the first images of the aftermath.

A series of photos snapped by South Korea's Danuri lunar orbiter on Wednesday reveal a small, blackened crater at the alleged site where a used Falcon 9 upper stage crashed into the lunar surface around 2:35 a.m. ET. The crash occurred near Einstein crater, on the northwestern limb of the moon, close to the terminator zone where lunar day and night meet. The photos were shared by the Korea AeroSpace Administration on social media on Thursday (Aug. 6).

Because this region was on the sunlit side of the moon at the time, the initial flare from the crash was not visible from Earth; however, scientists at the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile reported seeing evidence of a debris plume lifting off of the lunar surface shortly after the collision, according to the CBC. (At this time, no photos of the debris plume have been released).

A preprint study shared earlier this week predicted that the crash would create a new crater on the moon measuring roughly 90 feet (27 meters) wide and up to 16 feet (5 m) deep — a dent too small to be seen from Earth, even with a good telescope. No measurements of the newfound crater have been shared yet, but they are likely to arrive in the coming days as other lunar orbiters, such as NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, and Earth-based observatories get a chance to examine the crash site.

What caused the crash?

The pesky piece of space junk that hit the moon on Wednesday is the second (or upper) stage of one of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets that launched into space on Jan. 15, 2025. It was carrying a pair of lunar landers: the Blue Ghost lander developed by private company Firefly Aerospace, which successfully touched down on the moon in March 2025; and the Hakuto-R lander developed by Japanese company ispace, which lost contact with Earth and crash-landed on the moon in June 2025.

Unlike Falcon 9's first (or lower) stages, which can return to Earth for reuse, the rocket's second stages are discarded in orbit. This rocket piece spent nearly a year drifting in an elliptical orbit around our planet before a combination of solar radiation and the moon's gravitational pull nudged it away from us, according to Live Science's sister site Space.com. In May this year, independent astronomer Bill Gray first predicted the crash and when and where the collision would occur, before other experts confirmed his calculations.

The 4.4-ton (4 metric tons) rocket part is estimated to have struck the moon at roughly 5,400 mph (8,700 km/h). While many times faster than the speed of sound, that’s still much slower than the average meteoroid strike on the moon, making the crash that much harder to see.

More to come

This is not the first time that human-made objects have impacted the moon, nor will it be the last. Studying these crashes can lead to important insights about the moon’s composition.

For example, the 2009 crash of a Centaur rocket's upper stage near the moon's south pole was analyzed by NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite mission, which revealed subsurface ice in the area. As a result, the lunar south pole is now the most coveted location for missions that aim to establish a permanent human presence on the moon.

Studying human-made impacts like these will also be essential for managing the potential risks to future astronauts and missions, like the permanent moon base NASA hopes to build.

"Now that we're in an era where we're going to have more and more astronauts going back to the moon, perhaps permanently, we also want to understand how much of a risk these artificial impacts pose," Benjamin Fernando, a postdoctoral researcher at Los Alamos National Laboratory and co-author of a recent study on the impact, told CBC.

"It presents a different set of hazards than say the Apollo astronauts faced on the lunar surface from the average background meteoroids that are striking the moon every day. And what we want to try and do with this event is understand both the direct [and indirect] hazards."

Physicists have built a crystal out of an "einstein" tile — an elusive shape mathematicians spent years searching for — and found that it bends light in a way no ordinary crystal can.

In the new study, published July 29 in the journal Nature Communications, researchers arranged this never-repeating tile shape into a pattern of nanoscale holes. This structure, known as a photonic crystal, is designed to control the way light moves through it. When the team shined a laser at it, the crystal produced a swirling, pinwheel-shaped scattering pattern that responded differently depending on which direction the incoming light was spinning.

The tile solves what mathematicians call the "einstein problem," a decades-old puzzle asking whether a single shape could cover a flat surface endlessly without ever repeating its pattern. (The name is a pun on "ein stein," German for "one stone," not a reference to Albert Einstein).

In the 1970s, mathematician Roger Penrose showed that two different shapes, used together like floor tiles, could cover a surface without the pattern ever repeating. Then, in 2023, geometry enthusiast David Smith and collaborators finally found one: a 13-sided shape that they nicknamed the "Smith hat"

Yuto Moritake, an experimental physicist at the University of Tokyo, first came across the hat tile in a popular science book in 2024. Moritake specializes in photonic crystals — materials patterned with repeating structures (often much thinner than a human hair) that bend and steer light for uses like lasers and optical sensors. Almost all photonic crystals rely on patterns that repeat in a regular grid. Moritake wondered what would happen if he swapped that repetition for the hat tile's never-repeating arrangement.

"I decided to include it in our photonic crystal structure," Moritake told Live Science, describing it as the starting point for the project.

To build the structure, Moritake and his colleagues used two precision manufacturing techniques, called electron beam lithography and etching, to punch hundreds of thousands of tiny holes — each just 100 nanometers in radius, or roughly 500 times thinner than a human hair — into a thin film of silicon nitride. This ceramic material is commonly used in computer chips. The holes were arranged according to the hat tile's pattern, covering a chip roughly half a millimeter across ‪—‬ about the width of a pencil tip.

When the team shined a laser at the finished chip, the light scattered, or diffracted, into a pinwheel-shaped pattern that appeared on a screen. Moritake first photographed the colorful pattern using his iPhone's long-exposure mode. The setting captured faint light over several seconds. Then, he switched to specialized cameras for more precise measurements.

The pattern was made up of well-defined bright spots, called Bragg peaks, that stayed in the same positions no matter where on the chip the laser hit. That consistency confirmed that the structure had the kind of long-range, predictable order found in a quasicrystal — a class of material whose atoms (or, in this case, holes) follow an orderly pattern that never repeats, unlike the repeating grids found in ordinary crystals such as table salt or diamonds.

Because the hat tile itself has no mirror symmetry — meaning it doesn't look the same as its own reflection, similar to how a left hand differs from a right hand — the scattering pattern it produced was also asymmetrical in this way. Scientists call this property chirality.

That chirality led to the study's biggest surprise. Light can be circularly polarized, meaning it spins either clockwise or counterclockwise as it travels, like a corkscrew. When Moritake tested the structure with both types of spinning light, he found a subtle difference in how each direction scattered off the crystal. Ordinary quasicrystals, which do have mirror symmetry, cannot produce this kind of effect.

"This structure can have some kind of circular polarization dependence," Moritake said, adding that the effect — made only possible by the tile’s asymmetry — was not something he initially expected to find .

Now, Moritake wants to apply this never-repeating pattern to control light traveling inside a photonic chip, rather than light that simply bounces off its surface. This could lead to future uses in optical communications and optical computing ‪—‬ technologies that use light instead of electricity to transmit or process information, Moritake said.

See how much you know about Albert Einstein with our Albert Einstein quiz!

A German startup has debuted the world's first diamond-based quantum computing system to exceed 10 qubits.

The machine, built by engineers at Saxon Q, is a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) quantum computer, meaning it uses defects in synthetic diamonds as quantum bits (qubits) to perform quantum operations. Qubits can be manipulated to represent the 0s and 1s of data, as well as quantum states that are superpositions of both the 0s and the 1s.

The hardware is currently available in rack-mounted systems featuring up to 128 qubits, with 512-qubit configurations available for delivery next year. According to the company's road map, the goal is to scale to 10,000 qubits and beyond after 2030.

Although the technology existed before this debut, scientists have found it difficult to build systems beyond 10 qubits due to the difficulty of creating nitrogen vacancy qubits.

Although Live Science saw a technical white paper outlining how the technology works, there didn't appear to be any published research demonstrating a functional quantum computer based on the NV architecture operating with more than 10 qubits before this launch. It's still unclear exactly how well the firm's quantum computers stack up against other platforms.

Quantum mechanics and flawed diamonds

In the 1970s, scientists discovered that certain diamonds shone with a brilliant red light when illuminated in a specific way. Subsequent research determined that the optical shift was caused by annealing radiation damage that attracted isolated substitutional nitrogen atoms. In other words, nature occasionally produces a diamond that has a nitrogen atom where a carbon atom should be.

The unintegrated nitrogen atoms are drawn to the vacancy in the otherwise perfectly ordered carbon atoms inside the diamond. Although these flawed diamonds occur rarely in nature, scientists can create diamonds with nitrogen vacancies in laboratories.

Functionally, the single nitrogen atoms inside the vacancies act as if they were "trapped," and their electrons can "spin" independently of the electrons inside the surrounding carbon atoms.

Scientists exploit this "spin" feature by using special lasers to put the nitrogen atom's electrons in a specific state they measure as "zero." They can then use microwave pulses to precisely manipulate the electrons into numerous configurations, including quantum states that binary "bits" can't achieve.

Marius Grundmann, a professor of experimental physics at Leipzig University and co-founder of Saxon Q, said the breakthrough that allowed his firm to push past the 10-qubit barrier was a materials discovery.

When the Saxon Q team creates the vacancy inside its lab-grown diamonds, they co-implant sulfur. Per Grundman, “That's the key technology point. Because the sulfur lifts the chemical potential to a point that it's negatively charged. The sulfur supplies the electron; the sulfur also makes the vacancy attached to the nitrogen with a very high yield."

In other words, by co-implanting sulfur atoms, the Saxon Q researchers can express greater control over the individual qubits. Once the qubits are set with lasers and subjected to microwave pulses, they're ready for error correction. In a statement, Saxon Q representatives said the qubits achieved a 99.92% fidelity rate — fewer than one error per 1,000 operations — before error correction.

However, Grundmann told Live Science that the latest numbers as of July 22 showed 99.98% fidelity in single-qubit operations. That's comparable to state-of-the-art error correction results reported by other quantum computing labs, such as those from IBM and MIT, although it wasn't possible to independently verify the results.

Room-temperature quantum computing

It's difficult to compare Saxon Q's diamond-based NV systems with more established quantum computing platforms, such as superconducting qubits. Most recent research on NV systems has focused on quantum sensing applications, though at least one preprint study discusses hybrid NV/superconducting systems.

"We have a fully functioning quantum computer," Grundmann told Live Science. According to Grundmann, the company's quantum computers are on a par with those using other modalities. "We have a quantum computer that can execute quantum code that you can reach via the network, and it is a multiuser, multitasking, multicore system," he said.

If the Saxon Q systems ultimately prove comparable to existing solid-state quantum computing architectures, they'd be among the first generation of room-temperature quantum computers to reach performance similar to systems that require cryogenics and on-site monitoring.

The ease of setup is notable. Saxon Q's devices can be slotted into a standard computer rack and plugged directly into alternating-current power.

This provides a clear near-term advantage for clients who want to run algorithms on a quantum system without operating through the cloud. Grundmann said this could be especially important in edge computing scenarios, such as autonomous driving or robotics, where cloud communication could produce unacceptable latency.

Research comparing solid-state quantum systems indicates that superconducting quantum computers would typically operate faster than diamond-based NV systems. It's unclear, however, what the trade-off between processing speed and cloud latency would be or whether it could be addressed through scaling.

The current challenge to scaling diamond-based NV quantum computers beyond the 512-qubit range is the size of the chips. Saxon Q's current chips are limited to supporting either eight or 16 qubits. For more powerful systems, scientists will need to squeeze hundreds ‪—‬ or even thousands ‪—‬ of qubits onto a single array to support operations requiring hundreds of thousands or millions of qubits.

Can you match these ancient devices to their pictures? Find out with our computing quiz!

A fleet of telescopes around the world just captured the first shocking moments of a supernova explosion in the most detailed-ever observations of their kind.

The explosive event was first spotted by China's Einstein Probe space telescope as a flash of X-rays in March. Ground-based telescopes jumped in within the hour and quickly identified the flash as a supernova, a powerful explosion of a massive dying star. Before long, a big team of observatories was on the job, including the wide-field Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which began its ambitious 10-year survey of the sky in late June.

With this fleet of telescopes, astronomers charted how the light of the supernova, located 500 million light-years away, changed over time. They reported their results in two papers published July 14 in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Each science team verified the "shock breakout" ‪—‬ the point when a supernova emits its first light from the explosion as a huge shock wave. The recently detected supernova is only the second stellar explosion in the past 20 years in which a shock wave was observed, because these events tend to be short — only seconds to hours, the researchers noted.

They classified the stellar explosion as a Type Ic broad-lined (Ic-BL) supernova, meaning that the blast included jets with material moving close to light speed. This type of supernova is often associated with gamma-ray bursts, which are extremely powerful flashes of high-energy radiation from space. However, the recently detected supernova presented some surprises: Its shock breakout was the faintest seen in an Ic-BL supernova, and no gamma-ray bursts were observed.

"Follow-up observations using the most sensitive facilities found no evidence" of the gamma-ray bursts, Brendan O'Connor, an astrophysicist at Carnegie Mellon University and co-author on one of the studies, said in a statement. "One possibility is that the jet was 'choked,' either by the surface of the star or by circumstellar material surrounding the star."

Telescopes of the world unite

The Rubin telescope, located in Chile, happened to spot the explosion because it was viewing that particular patch of the sky at the time, known as the COSMOS Deep Drilling Field.

"Thanks to Rubin's rapid cadence and unprecedented sensitivity, continued observations are expected to provide detailed, long-term records of the supernova as it evolves for years to come," the science teams said in the statement. The Rubin Observatory will spend the next decade mapping the entire southern sky many times over, creating a time-lapse movie of the cosmos expected to reveal millions of supernovas, asteroids, comets, and other transient events.

As Rubin spots events in the sky, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument on the National Science Foundation's Nicholas U. Mayall 4-meter Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona is tasked with springing into action for follow-up observations. The instrument confirmed the recently detected explosion as an Ic-BL supernova.

When the scientists dove into 10 years of data from the 570-megapixel Department of Energy Dark Energy Camera on the National Science Foundation's Víctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope in Chile, they found a "blue source" just where the supernova later occurred, revealing clues about what the star system and its environment looked like before it exploded.

Meanwhile, a team led by Jillian Rastinejad, an astronomer at the University of Maryland, College Park and co-author of the second study, used the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrographs on two telescopes — Gemini North in Hawaii and Gemini South in Chile — to investigate the explosion, among other observatories. Those telescopes also confirmed the explosion as an Ic-BL supernova, without the jets, and the astronomers obtained archival details on the star's structure and environment before their demise.

"Our observations allowed us to study the physics of three pieces of this explosion: the X-ray shock breakout, the accompanying supernova, and the interaction of the supernova with material previously cast out by the dying star," Rastinejad explained in the statement. "With this information we were able to map out the structure of the material surrounding the star and understand the star's violent lifestyle before it collapsed."

The star was about 20 times the mass of the sun and was classified as a Wolf-Rayet — a star that used up most of its hydrogen early in its life. Just before the star exploded, it periodically ejected massive chunks of hydrogen and helium, leaving behind only carbon and oxygen. These chunks of material generated shells that were visible in telescopes as individual events, including the first X-ray shock.

"This is the first time we've mapped out the pre-explosion environment of a star that has been stripped of hydrogen and helium," said Gokul Srinivasaragavan, an astronomer on Rastinejad's team who was a doctoral student at the University of Maryland at the time of the study. "Going forward, I'm excited to observe more shock breakout events in similar detail to test if all stripped stars have a similar ‘lifestyle' prior to collapse and what, if any, differences we see."

Every total solar eclipse travels from west to east, because the moon and Earth move in the same direction — counterclockwise, or from west to east. Earth rotates eastward once every 24 hours, and the moon also travels eastward as it orbits our planet. Because the moon's shadow moves across Earth faster than the planet rotates beneath it, the path of totality (the route of the moon's umbra, the darkest part of its inner shadow) always sweeps from west to east.

But if you've looked at maps of the Aug. 12, 2026, total solar eclipse, you may have noticed something puzzling. At first glance, the eclipse appears to do the exact opposite. The path seems to begin in far northern Siberia, near the North Pole, before heading toward eastern Greenland, making it look as though the moon's shadow were traveling from east to west. It then appears to curve over western Iceland and northern Spain. So what's going on?

The apparent reversal from Siberia to Greenland is an illusion. It's created by geometry, but it's also a result of viewing the eclipse on a flat map instead of on a globe. The moon's shadow follows a smooth arc across Earth's curved surface and never changes direction, as shown by this animation. This eclipse passes so close to the North Pole that the distortion caused by map projections makes the track appear to bend back on itself, when in reality, the shadow is simply sweeping over the top of the world.

"The path of this eclipse also has a strong north-south component, the combined effect of Earth's rotation and the tilt of both Earth's axis and the Moon's orbit," experts at NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio explained. "Combined with Earth's rotation, the umbra's eastern motion during the first half of its travel is effectively canceled out."

This causes the shadow to sweep over the Arctic in a broad curve, instead of following the more familiar west-to-east path. On a flat map, that curved route can make it look as though the eclipse briefly reverses direction, even though it never actually does.

The moon's shadow has two parts — the narrow umbra, where observers experience totality, and the much broader penumbra, where only a partial eclipse is visible. The widths of these shadows depend on the moon's distance from Earth, while their speed is influenced by the moon's orbit, Earth's rotation and the geometry of the eclipse.

If you are among the millions of people who will be in the moon's penumbra on Aug. 12, make sure to always wear a pair of certified solar eclipse glasses (or use a solar filter on your telescope or binoculars) to view the partial eclipse. It is never safe to look directly at the sun, except during the moment of totality, when the sun is 100% covered.

If you aren't in the right spot for the total solar eclipse, fear not. A near-total lunar eclipse will be visible over most of North America just two weeks later, and there are plenty of other summer skywatching highlights to watch for.

An ichthyosaur fossil found in Australia's outback may preserve a rare snapshot of a prehistoric food chain. Around 100 million years ago, the enormous marine reptile swallowed a flying pterosaur before being attacked by a giant ocean predator, new research suggests.

The fossil set, nicknamed "BOB" or "Bag of Bones," belonged to a 20- to 23-foot-long (6 to 7 meters) ichthyosaur, an animal that belonged to a group of dolphin-shaped marine reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs during the Mesozoic era, from about 250 million to 90 million years ago. But in a new study, researchers discovered fragments of a pterosaur's jaw — along with fish and cephalopod remains — preserved inside the animal's body cavity.

The finding is the first confirmed evidence that ichthyosaurs ate pterosaurs, an extinct group of flying reptiles that ruled the ancient skies, according to the new study, published July 28 in the journal Gondwana Research.

The fossils may also hint at the ichthyosaur's violent end. Its skeleton — discovered in 2019 in Queensland's outback — contains shattered bones, missing ribs and large crushing injuries. Researchers think the gruesome wounds may have been inflicted by Kronosaurus queenslandicus, a colossal crocodile-like apex predator that lived 120 million to 100 million years ago in the ancient Eromanga Sea in Australia.

A rare prehistoric meal

Fossilized stomach contents are a rare find because they can be preserved only under very specific conditions.

"Rapid burial after death is essential to prevent decay and scattering of remains," study co-author Matt White, a research associate at the University of New England in Australia, told Live Science in an email. "The animal must have died soon after its last meal so stomach acids don't fully digest the prey."

Researchers used advanced neutron imaging to peer inside BOB's stomach contents without breaking any of the fossilized formations. The scans revealed hidden bones and helped scientists determine that the remains were likely associated with the ichthyosaur's digestive system.

White said that advances in imaging technology are making it possible to uncover evidence that would previously have remained hidden inside fossils.

"Scanning techniques have also improved, which has enabled us to see inside specimens and reveal what they potentially ate," White said. The methods can also reveal "the shape of various organs" and internal bone structures, he added.

The pterosaur remains were found near the front of the ichthyosaur's body cavity rather than in their expected position as digested prey, which White and his colleagues think may be because the ichthyosaur struck the seafloor headfirst shortly after its last meal, shifting some of its stomach contents forward.

"We believe the animal died in the water column — perhaps from a pliosaur (Kronosaurus) attack or natural causes — and then sank," White said. "It impacted the seafloor with its rostrum, and connected soft tissues kept most of the body in sequence."

Reconstructing an ancient ecosystem

The fossil offers a rare glimpse into the food web of the ancient Eromanga Sea, which covered much of central Australia during the early Cretaceous period around 145 million to 100 million years ago.

Although ichthyosaurs are known to have eaten fish and squidlike animals, evidence that they ate pterosaurs, a common predator of the ancient skies, has been elusive. The new fossil suggests that at least some ichthyosaurs may have fed on flying reptiles that landed on the water or died and floated to the surface.

"Such discoveries yield valuable information about trophic interactions and allow us to reconstruct ancient ecosystems in greater detail," White said.

A camera drone operator captured footage of a humpback whale giving birth off the north coast of New South Wales in what is thought to be a world first.

Alexander Forrest, a commercial drone pilot for the Organisation for the Rescue and Research of Cetaceans in Australia (ORRCA), was conducting aerial observations of migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on July 28. ORRCA is a nonprofit organization focused on the rescue, conservation and welfare of marine mammals.

During the survey, Forrest noticed a whale swimming slightly behind her pod and going unusually slowly. Then, he saw her give birth.

"It's incredibly rare to see a moment like this in the ocean. It's a very rarely documented encounter," Forrest told Live Science. "It's the first drone video as far as we know of a full humpback whale live birth. It gives critical inside moments in the first moments of a calf's life, and also discovers the behaviour of a new humpback whale mother and her freshly newborn calf."

An ORRCA spokesperson said that this is only the fourth time the phenomenon of a humpback whale giving birth had been filmed, in general. Scientists also have footage of other whale births, including a gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) birth filmed off the coast of California and a sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) recorded giving birth in the Caribbean.

The drone video shows the newborn whale surface from blood-reddened water for its first breath. The mother then turns back to reunite with it. The scene was filmed around 0.4 miles (700 meters) from the shore at Kingscliff in northeastern New South Wales.

The birth is "a symbol of one of the strongest conservation efforts in history, returning humpback whales from near extinction to nearly 50,000 on the New South Wales coast," Forrest said. Gathering data on this humpback whale population is critical to "discovering more about where they birth, what happens when they birth, and what those early moments look like."

The footage will now be analyzed so that a report on the observation can be peer-reviewed and published in a scientific journal. Notably, the mother whale was trailing behind her pod when she gave birth, a detail biologists will compare with observations of other birthing whales that were accompanied by members of their pod. For instance, the 2023 drone footage of the sperm whale giving birth showed that she had 10 adult females near her that formed a protective circle and took turns lifting the calf up so it could breathe at the water's surface.

Throughout their first weeks, calves stay close to their mothers and learn critical behaviors, such as breathing at the surface.

"Humpback whales seem to have an incredible maternal bond with their offspring," Forrest said. "There is an 11-month period where this calf will be raised and feeding on very nutrient-rich milk until it is a yearling and can fend for itself."

A newborn humpback whale calf weighs 1 to 1.5 tons (900 to 1,360 kilograms) and measures roughly 10 to 16 feet (3 to 5 meters) in length. While feeding on its mother's milk, the calf will gain 100 pounds (45 kg) a day and develop the strength and food storage it needs for its first migration. Humpback whales undertake one of the longest migrations of any mammal, travelling up to 5,000 miles (8,000 kilometers) each way between the cold waters of the poles to warm tropical breeding grounds.

In the past 20 years, an increasing number of bacterial infections caught by children have been resistant to antibiotics, a new study finds.

The research, published in July in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, looked back at the past two decades, as well as looked forward, to predict how resistance rates might change in the decade to come. By 2035, some critical antibiotics will be met with "steep increases" in resistance among common bacteria, such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella, the analysis found.

Antibiotic resistance contributed to 840,000 deaths among children under 5 in 2021, global estimates suggest, so if resistance continues to increase, that number could grow.

"These forecasts are warning scenarios, not inevitable outcomes," said study co-author Dr. Yanhong Jessika Hu, a clinical epidemiologist and public health researcher at Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI) in Australia. "The projections broadly assume that historical patterns continue without a major change in direction," Hu told Live Science in an email.

If significant action is taken, that trajectory could be altered, she said.

"Resistance increased across all regions"

Antibiotic resistance is sometimes called "a silent pandemic," as it poses a formidable threat without stirring as much concern as other health crises, such as viral outbreaks. Resistance has gained attention in recent years, but the data on how it has affected children is patchy, said study co-author Dr. Penelope Bryant, a clinician-researcher at MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, and the University of Melbourne.

"It's perceived as being a lesser problem in children," Bryant told Live Science. "It's not a theoretical problem; it's real, and it's happening. But I think the visibility is just substantially less than in adults."

That's partly because many resistance-tracking efforts combine adult and pediatric data, and the adult data ends up obscuring trends in children, Hu said. "Adult findings cannot simply be applied to children because children have different infection patterns, antibiotic exposure and treatment options," she noted.

Meanwhile, studies aimed only at children tend to vary in the age groups and clinical settings they include, making direct comparisons difficult, Hu said. This lack of granularity hinders efforts to counter resistant infections in children through changes in policy or clinical protocols. Children also have fewer antibiotic options than adults do at baseline, which makes preserving those options even more important, Bryant added.

To help fill the gap, the researchers turned to the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance database, which contains clinical samples from children and teens ages 0 to 18 across 82 countries. These bacterial samples were collected between 2004 and 2022 from a variety of medical settings, including hospital wards, intensive care units and outpatient clinics. The included countries ranged from high-income, such as the U.K. and the U.S., to low-income, such as Malawi and Uganda.

The analysis included over 106,000 bacterial samples and assessed which antibiotics these germs were resistant to. The antibiotics were grouped based on the World Health Organization's Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) system: "Access" antibiotics target few bacteria and are recommended as the first choice for most bacterial infections, "Watch" antibiotics have broader effects and should be used selectively for more-resistant infections, and "Reserve" antibiotics are considered last-resort options to use when all alternatives have failed.

"Resistance increased across all regions, showing that this is not only a problem in lower-income countries," Hu said. "However, the highest resistance levels and some of the steepest increases were seen in lower-resource settings."

A wake-up call

Part of the analysis zoomed in on eight bacteria that are considered "critical" or "high" priority by the WHO, meaning they impose a particularly high healthcare burden due to their resistance. Across these germs, resistance rates were similar across high- and low-income countries in 2004, but those trends diverged by 2022.

Overall, resistance to Access antibiotics declined across the study period, but that improvement wasn't the same across all settings. In high-resource countries, resistance to Access drugs fell from 48% to 29% among the eight bacteria, while it rose slightly — from 44% to 47% — in low-income settings. These percentages correspond to the number of bacterial samples from each year that showed resistance to at least one Access drug.

The decline seen in some countries is "almost certainly because of the large investment that high-income countries have put into controlling MRSA," Bryant said, referencing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MRSA can cause painful skin infections as well as life-threatening complications, like sepsis.

Modeling future trends, the team predicts that resistance to Access antibiotics will stabilize or decline across most regions by 2035. However, resistance against Watch antibiotics rose between 2004 and 2022 and is projected to continue increasing. Among the eight critical and high-priority bacteria, it rose from 14% to 24% in high-income countries and from 16% to 48% in low-income nations.

Resistance to Reserve drugs also increased among these germs, rising from 9% to 25% in high-income countries and from 4% to 37% in low-income ones.

While the model predicted "steep increases" in Watch resistance, it projected slower increases in Reserve resistance over the next decade, by comparison. These trends were driven largely by increases in low-income settings, but high-income settings were not spared.

"With low-income countries, the problem is amplified because of poor sanitation and because of unregulated access to antibiotics," Bryant noted. Easy access to over-the-counter antibiotics makes it more likely for the medicines to be misused, which ultimately pressures more bacteria to evolve resistance.

This analysis gives a snapshot of how antibiotic resistance is affecting kids now and how it might do so in the future. However, the data it's based on has some limitations. For instance, the samples collected from each country aren't necessarily representative of the entire nation; they came from only certain participating medical centers and each country contributed different numbers and types of samples. So "the results should therefore not be interpreted as precise national prevalence estimates," Hu cautioned.

"But it's the first large dataset, really, to look specifically at children," Bryant said. And "it gives us an idea that things are getting worse."

The team has made their analysis freely available to other researchers on the website AMR in Kids, where "AMR" stands for antimicrobial resistance. Future steps include surveying resistant infections in children in a more representative way, as well as modeling how different intervention strategies could help drive down the rates.

"I'm hopeful that this is a little bit of a sort of wake-up call around children, that it really isn't a problem just in adults," Bryant said.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

The patient: A 60-year-old man in Seattle

The symptoms: The man experienced paranoia, as well as auditory and visual hallucinations. He was also very thirsty but was fearful of drinking water that others offered to him.

What happened next: The man went to an emergency department because he was worried that his neighbor poisoned him. Doctors checked his vital signs and conducted a neurological examination, which did not highlight any immediate concerns.

That changed when blood tests revealed that his level of chloride ions — charged particles of the element chlorine — were above the normal range. This result suggested that the patient may have been suffering from hyperchloremia, a condition in which chloride ions build up in the blood. This usually occurs in people who are dehydrated or consume too much salt.

However, when doctors measured the concentration of other ions in the patient's blood, they realized that this initial interpretation was wrong.

In patients with hyperchloremia, the body cancels out the increase in negatively charged chloride ions by depleting negatively charged bicarbonate ions, which the body makes itself. In essence, the body tries to regulate the electrical balance of the blood.

However, in the man's case, tests revealed that his blood was too negatively charged overall. The most likely explanation was that a negatively charged poison had built up too fast for his body to buffer the change by depleting other ions.

The diagnosis: The man's doctors consulted the poison control department and figured out that he was experiencing a case of pseudohyperchloremia, a condition in which the lab test for chloride erroneously detects another negatively charged ion. This makes it seem like a patient's chloride is too high while masking the actual problem.

A common culprit behind this phenomenon is a high dose of salicylate (aspirin), but the patient didn't have high levels of this pain reliever in his blood.

The next suspect, and the more unusual one, was the poison bromide, a charged form of bromine. Bromine sits just below chlorine on the periodic table, meaning their ions share similar chemical properties, such as charge and size, and bromide has triggered the lab test for chloride in previous reports.

When the doctors measured the patient's bromide levels, they found that they were roughly 230 times higher than the normal range. They diagnosed him with bromide poisoning, also called bromism, which can cause neurological symptoms such as hallucinations and paranoia.

The treatment: The patient remained in a hospital bed for three weeks so doctors could monitor and replenish his electrolytes. On account of his paranoia, he tried to escape from the hospital, so the doctors had to hold him there involuntarily. They gave him daily doses of risperidone, an antipsychotic medication.

His symptoms improved, and he was weaned off medication and ultimately discharged. His condition remained stable during a follow-up assessment two weeks later.

What makes the case unique: After his condition improved, the patient informed the doctors that he had searched for a healthier alternative to table salt (sodium chloride) and had consulted ChatGPT for advice. The chatbot suggested he swap sodium chloride with sodium bromide, and he experimented with that suggestion for three months.

Medicines containing bromide salts used to be popular for treating various conditions, such as headache or upset stomach. These medications fell out of common use when doctors realized that bromide accounted for 8% of admissions to psychiatric hospitals in the early 20th century.

Because it is similar in size and charge to chloride, bromide can fill in for chloride's roles in the body — and that's a problem. For example, chloride contributes to the brain's electrical activity by passing through chloride channels in neurons. Bromide can also move through these channels and thus disrupt normal brain activity, bringing about neurological symptoms.

Bromide poisoning is rare nowadays, so doctors don't typically assume that their patients experiencing paranoia or hallucinations could have this form of poisoning. However, bromide supplements can be easily purchased online, opening the door to such cases, the doctors wrote in a report of the case.

The man's doctors wanted to see whether ChatGPT would again point to bromide salts if asked the same question. They prompted the chatbot with queries about ways to remove chloride ions from the diet, and once again, the bot suggested bromide salt as an alternative. This response didn't provide a health warning about the dangers of consuming too much bromide.

Given the willingness of chatbots to recommend bromide salts, the doctors argued in the report that it would be prudent to more seriously consider the possibility of bromism during psychological evaluations. This case highlights the dangers of relying on AI chatbots for medical advice, the doctors concluded.

Live Science contacted OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, about this case and is awaiting comment. According to the service terms at OpenAI, "You should always verify the information provided by ChatGPT for Healthcare and exercise independent professional judgment in decision-making about a patient without relying primarily or solely on the output."

(Live Science first covered this case when it was published in 2025, and at that time, an OpenAI spokesperson said that the company's safety teams were working to reduce the risk of using its services and to train its products to prompt users to seek professional advice.)

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

Can you guess the diagnosis in these strange medical cases? Find out with our diagnostic dilemma quiz!

Each year, tons of soil, silt and rocks flow into reservoirs in the U.S. and get stuck there, creating a "ticking time bomb" that threatens lives and livelihoods. According to a new study, around a fifth of the world's reservoirs are currently at high risk of filling with sediment, and by 2060, half could be inoperable as a result.

The sediment takes up space meant for water, putting additional pressure on structures that were not built to contain large quantities of sand and sludge. As the reservoir fills with the material instead of water, sediment-filled reservoirs pose a serious threat to water security and the safety of people living near or downstream of them — and as the climate changes, scientists expect the problem to worsen.

"We are losing storage space in our reservoirs faster from sediment accumulation than we gain space from new dam construction," Amy East, a geologist at the U.S. Geological Survey, told Live Science.

What is dam sedimentation?

Dam sedimentation is not a uniquely U.S. problem. Rain pulls sediment down slopes into waterways. Normally, this sediment would travel through the river system, shaping the water flow, creating habitats, and fortifying coastal wetlands and estuaries against erosion. In many parts of the world, this sediment is also a vital natural fertilizer for crops. But after a river is dammed, this sediment can collect in the reservoir.

A 2023 study published in the journal Science found that sediment buildup was the greatest threat to global water storage in existing reservoirs — even more than drought.

New research, which includes smaller reservoirs, has offered a more nuanced and concerning picture. In the study, published June 5 in the journal Nature Sustainability, researchers assessed the state of reservoir sedimentation globally. They looked at more than 550,000 reservoirs, most of which spanned less than 0.4 square miles (1 square kilometre). They found that almost 1 in 5 of reservoirs globally are at high risk of filling up with sediment.

The researchers found that sedimentation is eating into global reservoir storage capacity at about 7.3% every decade. There are 16 global hotspots that are at high risk of reservoir sedimentation, threatening water supplies to more than 2 billion people and impacting more than a quarter of global irrigated land. One of these hotspots includes the western U.S.

The authors found that sedimentation risk was especially pronounced in regions with dense small-reservoir networks supporting key crop systems.

"Without intervention, we project that, by 2060, more than half of all reservoirs could become functionally inoperable," the authors wrote. This includes more than half of all small reservoirs and more than a third of large reservoirs globally.

Where is it a problem in the U.S.?

North America has the second largest number of reservoirs, after Asia, according to the global survey. And at 7.8%, its sedimentation rate is higher than the global average, ranking it third after Oceania (9.9%) and South America (8.1%),

The U.S. is home to many small dams, said Matthias Kondolf, a geomorphologist at the University of California, Berkeley who wasn't involved in the study. "All the focus tends to be on the big dams, and these many, many small ones have been neglected," he told Live Science.

From the 1940s to 1970s, there was a big push by the U.S. government to build "farm ponds," he said. In western Oklahoma, for example, "all these dams are now filling up with sediment, and there's nothing in place to assess the safety of these features, which have now become threats."

Some of these dams have already failed, following large storms as the ageing dams were not able to cope with the volume of water. A 2018 study found that since 1980, there have been on average 24 dam failures a year in the U.S.

Reservoirs in some regions are more at risk than others. The western U.S. is a natural hotspot because it has a steeper topography, meaning more sediment naturally ends up in watersheds, East, who wasn't involved in the new research, said.

And in areas where human activities like farming or logging disrupt the landscape, rainfall is likely to drag even more sediment into reservoirs, East said. "Those types of land use can create sediment-producing hotspots almost anywhere."

In California, for example, more than half of small reservoirs in maize-growing areas are filling up with sediment at a rate of more than 10% a year, which threatens local maize production.

The threat to water security will be particularly acute in places struggling with wildfires, such as the western U.S. After fires, rain washes the debris and sediment into watersheds. A 2024 study in California found that most of this post-fire sediment erosion occurred upstream of reservoirs, rather than in places where sediment would move downstream directly to the ocean.

The dam-sedimentation situation is likely to get worse as the climate changes, researchers said. As the climate changes, there will be more extreme weather events, such as droughts and wildfires, adding more sediment to watersheds. Dams are designed to cope with the pressure of water, not sediment which exerts more force on dam walls. Moreover, in seismically active areas, the sediment vibrates at a different frequency than the concrete of the dam, which creates further impact against the structure. Additionally, the dams are just getting older.

"What do we do 50 or 100 years from now when we have all these reservoirs across the landscape filled with sediment, sitting there as ticking time bombs?" Kondolf said.

What can be done about it?

For a reservoir to be sustainable long-term, the amount of sediment entering it and leaving it should be the same.

"A big part of preventing reservoir sedimentation problems is upstream soil conservation in the watershed," East said. Interventions include ensuring that land use, such as agriculture or timber harvesting, follow best practice to reduce the amount of sediment washing off the landscapes.

If sediment is already in the dam, it can be difficult to manage and expensive to remediate, Kondolf said. Some dams, such as Fall Creek Dam in Oregon, have mechanisms that enable engineers to release sediment. But in the past, reservoirs were not designed to manage sediment and little thought was given to how to decommission them.

"This is one of those issues that falls in the cracks between different agencies and responsibilities," Kondolf said. Some larger facilities fall under the remit of the federal government. Other dams fall under state governments. California, for example, recently launched a state-sponsored program to future-proof the state's dams.

But smaller dams often get overlooked, Kondolf said.

One option is to remove the dams entirely. For example, sediment-related concerns contributed to the decision to remove the Elwha and Glines Canyon dams in Washington. The Elwha River later carried most of the sediment to its river mouth.

For smaller dams with a relatively small amount of sediment, "you just blow up the dam and let the sediment work its way downstream", Kondolf said.

There are other technological solutions, but they are expensive, such as retrofitting dams to enable them to pass sediment; creating a bypass to route sediment-heavy water around the dam; and mechanical dredging.

Another option is to empty the reservoir of water and let the river cut a channel through the sediment, Kondolf said.

However, released dam sediment brings its own risks. If not managed carefully, sediment can flood the river system and disrupt downstream ecosystems.

"The economics of managing reservoir sediment long-term were not generally incorporated into dam design and planning in the last century when many western-U.S. water projects began," East said. This has "pushed the cost burden on future generations."

But the reality is that reservoirs around the country are filling with sediment. It is reducing their ability to store water and potentially endangering the communities living downstream of them — and unless addressed, the problem will only get worse.

Researchers have designed a material that can "program" the way it releases heat, paving the way for more efficient energy systems and, potentially, devices that store information using heat instead of electricity.

The design, described in a June 25 study in the journal Laser & Photonics Reviews, sidesteps a nearly 160-year-old rule of physics linking how materials absorb and emit heat. Under ordinary conditions, a material that's good at absorbing heat from one direction is equally good at emitting heat in that direction. This rule of reciprocity, first described by physicist Gustav Kirchhoff in the 19th century, has limited engineers' ability to control incoming heat independently from and outgoing heat.

In the new study, the researchers designed a theoretical device that could direct heat radiation in different directions and remember that setting even after the power was switched off.

The new device pairs two materials that don't normally work together. Using a magnetic field, the team broke the natural symmetry in a layer of indium arsenide ‪—‬ a material that absorbs and emits infrared light ‪—‬ so that radiation traveling in one direction behaves differently than radiation traveling the other way.

On top of that layer sits a grating made of germanium-antimony-tellurium (GST) — a phase-changing substance that can switch between two distinct physical structures and stay in whichever structure it's set to until it's deliberately switched again. Once the GST is set into position, it locks the directional difference of radiation in place and holds it there without needing continuous power, which is what lets the device's heat-directing behavior be "programmed."

"I was impressed by the elegant combination of magneto-optical nonreciprocity with a nonvolatile phase-change material," Juejun Hu, a professor of materials science and engineering at MIT who wasn't involved in the study, told Live Science in an email.

That's significant because earlier attempts at this kind of directional control typically worked only at steep angles, which made them impractical. It's "particularly noteworthy" that this device functions when radiation arrives just 3 degrees off an otherwise-straight line, making it far easier to fit into real-world optical systems, Hu said.

The researchers compared their design to computer memory, since it holds onto its programmed state after the power is cut. However, the device stores a material state rather than heat itself, Hu told Live Science. GST simply keeps its amorphous or crystalline structure without power, which preserves the programmed response.

For now, the device exists only on paper; it hasn't been built or tested. Still, Hu thinks it's realistic, since it relies on well-established materials and manufacturing methods. However, the GST layer is thick enough that switching it back and forth repeatedly would be difficult, though other materials could fix this problem. Once that hurdle is surpassed, Hu expects the first real-world use to be infrared sensing, where compact, direction-selective heat absorption is most directly useful.

The brain preservation paradox — the discovery of well-preserved human brains among otherwise skeletal remains — has puzzled archaeologists and pathologists alike for decades. Now, new research finally provides a scientific explanation for this longstanding mystery.

"We found that brain preservation isn't a rare anomaly, it's a novel chemical pathway," first study author Alexandra Seviour, a doctoral researcher of paleobiology at the University of Oxford, told Live Science in an email about the new work, published June 19 in the Journal of Proteome Research. "Under the right conditions, preservation actually arises from decay itself: the same reactions that degrade tissue can also weld the breakdown products together into something far tougher."

Despite being one of the first tissues to begin decomposing after death, human brains are surprisingly prolific in archaeology: more than 4,400 preserved brains have been discovered among human remains spanning the last 12,000 years, according to earlier work published by Seviour.

Mummification, freezing, and even saponification (where body fat turns into a greasy substance called grave wax) can all preserve soft tissues, sometimes for millennia. Usually, these processes conserve the structures of multiple body parts, including the internal organs and skin. But bizarrely, around one-third of the archaeological brains recovered don't fit this model, and a shrunken mass of protein is the only surviving tissue left among a cluster of bones.

The bulk of these unexplained brains were found in waterlogged, oxygen-poor (hypoxic) ground — anything from riverbeds and lake shores, to flooded caves and sunken shipwrecks. "Water, being nature's solvent, is typically associated with decomposition, not preservation, " Seviour said. "So the surprise is really the selectivity." In other words: Why is it only the brain which survives under these conditions?

Burying mice

Seviour's team hypothesized that this specific burial environment, combined with the brain's unique structure and chemistry, divert the normal decay pathway away from total breakdown — instead stabilizing the brain's proteins via a different chemical sequence. To test this theory, they buried mouse carcasses in four different water and oxygen conditions and evaluated their decay pathways over a period of six months.

"At 24 hours, 72 hours, one week, six weeks, three months, and six months, we dissected the brains and analysed them using high-resolution mass spectrometry to see exactly which proteins were still present and in what state," Seviour explained. "We were looking for which specific peptides survived and which vanished, and what chemical marks were left on the survivors."

Overall, their analysis yielded more than 1.26 million protein decay trajectories, enabling the team to draw patterns about how and when the chemistry diverged under the different conditions. Early analysis showed that the initial steps of decay were fairly similar, but that after a few weeks, oxygen levels became the controlling factor, with more oxygen leading to faster and more widespread decay. Conversely, wet, low-oxygen conditions favored the formation of toughened protein structures, which resisted further decomposition and preserved the remaining brain tissue.

The solution comes down to free radicals — extremely reactive particles with a single, unpaired electron. Abundant oxygen initiates a chain-like free radical chemical sequence in the brain proteins, which quickly degrades the entire protein structure, Seviour said. However, in hypoxic conditions, there is simply not sufficient oxygen for this same cascade to occur; instead, intermediates in the sequence form crosslinks with other neighboring parts of the brain protein, creating tough and insoluble aggregates that resist decay.

Brain tissue is particularly well-adapted to this localized and self-limiting pathway, Seviour added: it's rich in metals that promote free-radical chemistry, packed with membranes where radicals can accumulate, and contains many "redox-active" amino acids that can absorb free radicals to form crosslinks. The physical barrier of the skull also likely plays a part, restricting the exchange of fluid and oxygen compared with the rest of the body, the researchers said.

Richard Evershed, an organic geochemist at the University of Bristol who was not part of the study, was impressed by the team's comprehensive analysis. Evershed believes it would be fascinating to expand this to other proteins found in the archaeological record.

"Comparing more tissues — other organs and muscles — would be really useful to get an idea whether what was happening in the brain was special compared to what was happening elsewhere, and also to resolve questions regarding proteins preserved in other environments in archaeology such as pots or dental calculus," Evershed told Live Science.

But the implications of the work extend beyond archaeology. "For medicine, the more unexpected finding is that the molecular fingerprint of these decay-resistant peptides closely resembles the fingerprint seen in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's," Seviour said. One interesting future direction will therefore be to explore how far this similarity extends and whether preserved brains could ultimately help scientists understand the progression of these devastating diseases.

See how much you know about the most complex organ in the human body with our brain quiz!

Scientists have confirmed that a flowering plant native to the mountains in southwest China is carnivorous, supporting a prediction made by Charles Darwin more than 150 years ago.

The species, Saxifraga candelabrum, grows at elevations above 8,200 feet (2,500 meters) in the Hengduan Mountains, which connect the southeast portions of the Tibetan Plateau to the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau.

The plant has stems and branches covered in sticky hairs that can trap small insects, predominantly nonbiting midges. However, scientists were unsure if these insects were being ingested by the plant. In a new study, researchers showed that S. candelabrum can digest and absorb nutrients from insects after capturing them, proving that the plant is carnivorous. The scientists published their findings Tuesday (Aug. 4) in the journal Nature Communications.

This is the first demonstrated case of carnivory in the saxifrage plant group, said study co-author Douglas Soltis, a distinguished professor of biology at the Florida Museum of Natural History.

Other carnivorous plants typically grow in moist, boggy soils, but S. candelabrum is found in dry alpine areas, Soltis told Live Science in an email. "These are all nitrate poor soils — that's why this carnivorous habit has evolved a number of times" to supplement the plants in vital nutrients, he said.

In 1875, Darwin theorized that two species closely related to S. candelabrum that also have sticky hairs — S. rotundifolia and S. umbrosa — may be carnivorous, based on their ability to catch insects. But the 19th-century naturalist couldn't show that the plants digested their prey or reused the nutrients in insect tissues — two conditions that are key to confirming carnivory in plants. Without these conditions, a species is considered simply "protocarnivorous," meaning it catches and kills insects or other small animals but doesn't digest or absorb them, according to the study.

"Although untested at the time, Darwin’s hypothesis provided an important inspiration for our study," study co-author Hang Sun, a researcher in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Kunming Institute of Botany, told Live Science in an email.

The researchers conducted field observations and herbarium surveys of S. candelabrum, which revealed that mature plants with more numerous and longer branches had an average of 71 trapped insects on them. In the herbarium surveys, the team found that 43 out of 45 specimens had caught insects, suggesting that insect-trapping is a widespread phenomenon in this species.

Next, the study's authors showed that S. candelabrum possesses phosphatase, a digestive enzyme commonly found in carnivorous plants. They did this by labeling the phosphatase enzymes with fluorescent molecules to visualize them under a specialized microscope, a technique known as fluorescence tagging.

To determine if S. candelabrum digests and absorbs nutrients from insects, the researchers labeled fruit flies with a stable form of nitrogen before feeding them to the plants. This led to a marked rise in stable nitrogen in S. candelabrum and in a different, known carnivorous species, which the team used as a control group. By contrast, a non-carnivorous plant that formed a second control group did not show an increase in stable nitrogen, indicating that S. candelabrum is carnivorous.

Finally, the researchers performed a genetic analysis, which revealed that S. candelabrum has genes in common with known carnivorous plants that are linked to prey attraction, digestion and nutrient absorption. Together, the results showed that S. candelabrum evolved carnivorous traits to cope with its nutrient-poor environment, adapting its hairs — which were initially used for herbivore defense — into insect traps, according to the study.

Larger insects, which S. candelabrum requires for pollination, rarely get stuck to the hairs, the researchers noted in the study, suggesting that the species has perfectly balanced its needs through evolution.

Other Saxifraga species and plants belonging to the same lineage could turn out to be carnivorous, too.

"Many members of the Saxifragaceae, which includes genera other than Saxifraga, have sticky glandular hairs and are often covered with insects," Soltis said. "I would not be surprised if other members of the family are also carnivorous — as Darwin predicted."

The study broadens the scope of carnivorous plant research, Sun said. "Carnivory may therefore be far more widespread among flowering plants than previously recognized," he said.

Charles Darwin quiz: Test your knowledge on the 'father of evolution'

An abandoned part of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket is projected to crash into the moon at 2:35 a.m. EDT on Aug. 5 — and two new studies suggest the event may be visible in telescopes from parts of North and South America, providing both amateur and professional astronomers with a rare, real-time viewing opportunity. Both studies are available as preprints on the arXiv server.

The impending Aug. 5 impactor is the truck-sized spent upper stage of a Falcon 9 rocket. In 2005, the rocket boosted two privately owned landers into orbit around the moon, before leaving its upper stage in an elliptical orbit around Earth, according to OrbitalRadar.com.

A report earlier this year estimated that the collision would occur near the moon's Einstein crater, with the rocket grinding into the lunar surface at a speed of 5,436 mph (8,748 km/h). Although that sounds fast, it's about six times slower than a natural impactor, like an asteroid, would hit.

What can you see with a telescope?

The initial impact flash of the collision — which will last less than a second and be hidden on the sunlit side of the moon — will likely be invisible to casual skywatchers, according to one of the new studies. The brightest estimates for the impact put it at 20 times dimmer than Saturn. The resulting crater likely won't be visible from Earth, as the study estimates that the hole is relatively small and shallow ‪—‬ about 90 feet (27 meters) wide and up to 16 feet (5 m) deep.

More promising for Earthbound skywatchers is the plume of regolith (and potentially water vapor) the impact will loft. The plume will likely reach several miles in height, with computer-based simulations from the second study showing it may tower up to 31 miles (50 km) high. This will make it visible over the moon's limb as a cloud, with the debris spreading up to 112 miles (180 km) from the impact site.

The plume will hang above the lunar surface much longer than the flash ‪—‬ for up to 400 seconds, or close to seven minutes; during this time, it will scatter sunlight toward Earth. Even then, the plume will be too faint to be observed with the naked eye, William Jo, a graduate research assistant at the University of Texas at Austin and co-author of the second study, told Live Science in an email. Viewers will need a good backyard telescope to see it.

"Where the science is"

Although the event will be dim and occur on the sunlit portion of the moon, skywatchers are gearing up to watch it. Benjamin Fernando, a postdoctoral researcher at Los Alamos National Laboratory and co-author of the first study, told Live Science in an email that there "will be an observing campaign involving professional and amateur astronomers from around the world."

In particular, he said, folks in South America and continental North America — where it will be night, with the moon high above the horizon — will have the best chance of seeing it, although you will need at least a 4-inch (10 centimeters) telescope.

However, Jo was less optimistic. "I don't think it would be an easy task for an amateur astronomer," he said, but if they know exactly where to point their telescope and tackle atmospheric refraction, they might see the plume. Nonetheless, he urged well-equipped observers to try observing the plume, as that is "where the science is."

This science, Jo said, would help researchers understand how everything delivered to or disposed of on the moon will ultimately affect the lunar surface. "This would be useful for studying disposal methods for upper stages, maybe how far ejecta will travel, and whether or not the ejecta will hit sensitive instruments, or in the far future lunar bases," he added.

Previous collisions of human-made objects on the moon have likewise led to some major scientific insights. For example, the 2009 crash of a Centaur rocket's upper stage was analyzed by NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite mission, which revealed subsurface ice near the lunar south pole. As a result, the lunar south pole is now considered the most coveted location for moon missions that aim to establish a permanent human presence on Earth's satellite.

How much do you know about the moon? Test your lunar smarts with our moon quiz!

Forecasters are warning that the ongoing El Niño is likely to become supercharged in the coming months and inject potentially unprecedented heat into our already warming world.

El Niño is the warm phase of a multiyear natural climate pattern, but models suggest this year's cycle will be exceptionally intense. Super El Niño conditions could contribute to temperature extremes until next year, but scientists are warning that it may also pose longer-term threats.

Jong-Seong Kug, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Seoul National University in South Korea, uses observational data and artificial intelligence to model El Niño events.

Kug has found that super El Niño events can drive sudden, dramatic and even irreversible climate regime shifts. Live Science spoke with Kug to learn more about climate regime shifts and the long-term threats posed by this year's ongoing El Niño.

Patrick Pester: Last year, you published a study that found super El Niño events significantly increase the likelihood of potentially irreversible climate regime shifts. With a super El Niño now looking very likely, how concerned should we be?

Jong-Seong Kug: We should be concerned but not alarmist, because our study does not suggest that every super El Niño inevitably causes a climate regime shift. Rather, a super El Niño can push an already-stressed climate ecosystem across a critical threshold. If a system is near a critical threshold, then strong forcing can induce irreversible change.

Current forecasts indicate a very strong El Niño is increasingly likely later this year. We need to watch vulnerable regions closely, particularly those that are already experiencing severe warming, drying, ecosystem degradation or ocean stress.

PP: What kind of climate regime shift do you fear most?

J-S K: I am particularly concerned about the persistent shift in major ecosystems, such as the Amazon rainforest moving toward a much drier and degraded state. You know, a long time ago the Amazon was a savannah area, so we are now approaching this kind of tipping point. Also, in the Amazon, this drying can weaken [or] even reverse the forest's role as a carbon sink.

The Amazon is a carbon sink, but imagine it becomes drier and drier, and there's some die-back of the forest. Now, [carbon] sink becomes source. This could amplify global warming long after an El Niño event.

PP: Is there anything we can do to mitigate the threat of extreme climate and weather events in the coming months?

J-S K: We cannot stop El Niño. But we can greatly reduce its human impact or ecosystem impact. Governments should use precision forecasts to strengthen our heat health plan, water and food management and flood and wildfire preparedness. In the long term, a rapid reduction in greenhouse gas emissions remains essential because every additional degree of warming increases this possibility that an extreme natural event will trigger lasting damage.

PP: Do you think a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions is likely, given where we are now?

J-S K: I don't think so. It's very difficult.

PP: So, where does that leave us?

J-S K: I don't know. There are some additional techniques we may use at a critical point. Have you heard about climate engineering? Like stratospheric aerosol injection [reflecting solar radiation back into space]. If we cannot do anything, then we have to choose that kind of technology. I don't want this kind of situation, but maybe in the near future we have to decide.

There are two kinds of climate engineering. One is carbon mitigation, just direct air capture [taking carbon out of the atmosphere]. That is a safe way. The other is solar energy management. We can deflect more solar energy from the surface.

So, the easiest way is just to inject an aerosol into the stratosphere; then this aerosol reflects solar radiation, and then global temperatures will decrease. It's like a volcano: After a big eruption of a volcano, the global mean temperature drops by about 0.6 degrees [Celsius, or 1 degree Fahrenheit] because there is volcano aerosol [in the atmosphere]. Instead of volcano aerosol, artificially we can inject aerosol into the stratosphere. Then global temperature can easily decrease.

But there are many side effects. Some we already know, but some we don't know. Like climate inequality. If we artificially decrease temperatures, then some countries will have a drought or a flood. And then how will we compensate?

Obviously, if you want some kind of climate mitigation, we need a kind of consensus across the countries.

PP: Is there anything else you'd like to add that we haven't covered?

J-S K: This year, super El Niño is developing in an already exceptionally warm climate. We are already seeing widespread heat waves this year, so we cannot attribute every individual event to this El Niño. But El Niño will intensify toward the end of this year, so it is likely to further increase the risk of extreme events in many regions, so we need to prepare.

Editor's note: This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

This eye-catching astronaut photo shows the fractured surface of the world's highest frozen lake lurking in the lofty climbs of the Tibetan Plateau. The smooth, white line where the ice meets the water closely follows a disputed border between China and India.

The elevated lake, known as Pangong Lake or Pangong Tso, sits at an altitude of 13,862 feet (4,225 meters), according to NASA's Earth Observatory. It is long and thin, stretching 83 miles (134 kilometers) across Ladakh, part of the Kashmir region administered by India; and Tibet, an autonomous region of China.

This photo shows a roughly 9.5-mile-long (15 km) section of the river, located around a third of the way along its length from west to east. This is also where the most widely accepted border between Ladakh (on the left of the photo) and Tibet (right side of the photo) lies. However, the exact position of the divide, commonly known as the Line of Actual Control, is poorly defined and has shifted in recent decades, according to The New York Times.

Pangong Lake is endorheic, meaning it has no outflow, and the only way water can escape is via evaporation. As a result, the lake's waters have built up an unusually high concentration of salt over thousands of years. This would usually prevent it from freezing. However, the temperature in the region can drop to minus 13 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 25 degrees Celsius), according to a local travel site, which is cold enough for the salty water to freeze over.

It is unclear why the lake's ice is fracturing in the photo. Normally, the entire body of water is completely frozen in January, when this photo was taken in 2024.

Although Pangong Lake has no major outflow, it is connected to several inflowing rivers, including one on the bottom left of this image. The river's delta has largely frozen over (visible as the large, white patch on land), but you can still see a small plume of water entering the river.

On the opposite bank of the delta, there is a beach littered with several striations parallel to the water. These are ancient shorelines left over from when the lake had a higher water level, according to the Earth Observatory.

Pangong Lake was likely once part of the Indus River, which stretches nearly 2,000 miles (3,200 km) across South and Central Asia. However, it was likely cut off from the waterway millions of years ago as the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates collided and the Tibetan Plateau and Himalayas formed.

Disputed border

The Line of Actual Control was first established in 1959 but was largely set in its current position in 1962 after the Sino-Indian War. Although the countries have technically been at peace ever since, frequent and occasionally deadly skirmishes have broken out along the border, including on the shores of Pangong Lake, according to the BBC.

Nonetheless, the lake frequently draws tourists from both China and India, particularly bird-watchers, who travel there to see the large groups of bar-headed geese (Anser indicus) and Brahminy ducks (Tadorna ferruginea, also called ruddy shelducks) that breed there, according to the Earth Observatory.

On the Ladakh side of Pangong Lake, extreme-sports enthusiasts run long distances across the lake's ice. In February 2023, dozens of runners gathered there to participate in the highest-altitude frozen lake half-marathon ever recorded, according to Guinness World Records.

See more Earth from space

One winter night in 2011, pediatrician Dr. Masahiko Sakamoto met two parents and a feverish infant who would shape the course of his career.

Sakamoto was working at a rural hospital in Japan's Fukushima prefecture, roughly 160 miles (260 kilometers) northeast of Tokyo. Around midnight, as a heavy snowfall coated the ground outside, two parents arrived with their young child. The infant had a mild fever but was otherwise in good shape, Sakamoto determined. There were no signs of an emergency that warranted a doctor's attention.

Then, Sakamoto learned that the parents had driven 1.5 hours from a small mountain village to reach the hospital.

"Driving a car, with such snow accumulated on the road ‪—‬ that's a very risky behavior," Sakamoto said. He told me he was shocked by the "imbalance" between the infant's mild case and the parents' decision to make a three-hour round trip on dangerous roads out of concern that their child might need emergency medical care.

The experience alerted Sakamoto to a broader pattern: Parents with a limited understanding of childhood illnesses can become especially anxious when their child gets sick and end up seeking unnecessary medical care. Pediatricians in both Japan and the U.S. have described a similar trend to me in the context of antibiotics; parents sometimes request antibiotics that aren't needed, in part because they believe the drugs will alleviate their child's suffering.

Many doctors make the effort to explain the basics of childhood illnesses and appropriate antibiotic use to children's caregivers. But given that they're pressed for time and those conversations can be tricky to navigate, doctors told me that it would be helpful if parents came to appointments equipped with that information. Since that snowy night, Sakamoto has made it his mission to help educate parents about childhood illnesses before they arrive at a medical facility.

"What I am currently most interested in as a pediatrician," he said, "is how to provide accurate medical information to the parents or guardians of the children."

Building a pocket-size doctor

By the time parents arrive at a doctor's office or hospital, the chance to avert an unnecessary visit has been missed, Sakamoto recognized. So he wanted to help give caregivers the information needed to weigh whether a visit is necessary. He hoped to relay which symptoms of serious disease should prompt medical intervention and teach them appropriate at-home care for mild symptoms.

He started giving public lectures on these topics. Later, he wrote manuals of childhood illness, featuring adorable illustrations and plain-language explanations. In 2016, those manuals went digital. The free "Oshiete! Doctor" app, whose name translates to "Teach me! Doctor," has been downloaded more than 500,000 times in Japan, with approximately 100,000 active users, Sakamoto told me.

"It's quite famous around here," Risa*, a mother of two in Saku, Japan, said of the app. Sakamoto now works at Saku Central Hospital, and the city provides funding for the app's operation and promotes its use at health centers and events aimed at children and their caregivers.

"As a parent, I'm really grateful to have something like that — a resource that makes it easy to access information — right at my fingertips," said Rie Shinohara, another mother of two in Saku.

The app's content gets updated annually and applies to children and teens up to about 15 years old. It provides information on hygiene, immunization schedules and disaster preparedness, such as how to care for kids' health while evacuating for a natural disaster. (The team translated the app's disaster preparedness content for caregivers affected by the war in Ukraine.)

The app also includes guidance on when children should visit a hospital and explanations of common childhood illnesses and injuries, such as what medications might reasonably be prescribed and how to manage mild symptoms at home.

For similar help with differentiating emergencies from minor ailments, parents in Japan can also look to online resources from The Japan Pediatric Society, or call #8000, a hotline that gives caregivers advice about whether to bring their child to a hospital. Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has recognized the "Oshiete! Doctor" app as a helpful complement to its national #8000 hotline and also awarded the app's developers for its design and impact.

Sakamoto and colleagues have studied the app's impact on caregivers. For instance, they've found evidence that app users utilize the emergency department more appropriately than nonusers do. In that study, 87% of users said the app made it easier to decide whether to visit the hospital, and 94% said they'd recommend it to others.

Challenges of educating parents

The team has also studied how the app's users feel about fever — the symptom that compelled the infant's parents to drive on snow-laden roads that night.

"The phenomenon known as 'fever phobia' among parents has long been recognized, and it is not unique to Japan," Sakamoto said. Notably, the American Academy of Pediatrics offers similar guidance to the "Oshiete! Doctor" app regarding fever, emphasizing that the symptom doesn't always require medical care and giving tips for when a doctor should be called.

Parents' worries about pediatric fever can be outsize compared with the threat it poses. Most fevers in kids are caused by viral infections that go away on their own, Sakamoto said, but caregivers can be compelled to seek care because they're concerned about fever triggering seizures or brain damage. This is especially true of first-time parents and parents with other children who'd had febrile seizures in the past, he added.

"With the first child, you just don't know. Why does he have a fever?" Shinohara noted. Of her firstborn, she added, "I probably took him to the doctor more often than necessary." But by her second, she felt she developed a better sense of when to seek medical care. Sakamoto's hope is that his app can help fill that information gap sooner.

In a survey-based study, Sakamoto and colleagues polled hundreds of caregivers in Saku about their understanding of fever, taking stock of which parents had downloaded "Oshiete! Doctor." Between 2017 and 2024, a greater proportion of parents understood that fever alone does not necessarily mean a child needs medical care. Plus, a lower percentage of parents thought that antibiotics are always needed to treat fever. On the latter point, users of the app were most likely to answer correctly, although nonusers also improved between the two survey years.

Sakamoto credits some of that improvement to the incentive offered to pediatricians to avoid unnecessary antibiotics, which requires that doctors explain appropriate antibiotic use to caregivers. He thinks the message is likely more powerful for parents when it comes from their pediatrician, rather than government information campaigns. That said, Sakamoto emphasized that it's important to have strong educational materials available to help support doctors' explanations to parents.

Despite these improvements, Sakamoto also observed that parental anxiety about fever complications increased between the two survey years — although, notably, the COVID-19 pandemic took place in that time frame, which could be a piece of the puzzle.

"Their knowledge about fever, how to manage fever, and also the appropriate use of antibiotics was enhanced, whereas the fear about the children's fevers worsened," Sakamoto said. "Even when knowledge improves, emotional anxiety does not easily disappear; this is one of the challenges of public education."

Other challenges include the rising use of AI chatbots among parents, Sakamoto noted. He's encountered parents whose anxiety was triggered by erroneous information from a chatbot that suggested their child's prognosis was worse than it was, for instance. "It is rather rare to see that the parents have holistically accurate information from AI," he told me.

If he can secure more funding for "Oshiete! Doctor," Sakamoto hopes to someday make the app multilingual. In the long run, he remains committed to providing parents with this vetted information to both alleviate their worries and optimize their use of the healthcare system.

"We have the responsibility to check how the information is delivered to the parents or guardians and how it leads to behavioral changes," Sakamoto said. "So it is not just us disseminating information but whether or not it is truly received."

Editor's note: Risa (marked with an asterisk) asked that only her first name be used for privacy.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

Editor's note: This is a developing story and may be updated.

Michigan has reported two deaths in its ongoing Cyclospora outbreak, a wave of parasitic infections that has affected over 11,000 people in the state.

Since early May, 193 people in Michigan have been hospitalized with cases of Cyclospora cayetanensis infection, called cyclosporiasis. The parasite can enter the body when someone consumes food or water contaminated with the organism, and the cases in Michigan have been linked to iceberg lettuce sourced from central Mexico.

These two deaths are the first reported in the Michigan outbreak, as well as the first deaths documented in any of the ongoing Cyclospora outbreaks in the United States.

Multiple outbreaks have been detected in the country in recent months, but not all have been linked to a specific source of exposure, such as lettuce. Since May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has confirmed over 6,700 cases of cyclosporiasis acquired within the U.S. (In some states, case counts are typical of what's usually seen this time of year, while in others, case counts are higher than normal.)

Regarding the deaths in Michigan, "according to medical records, both individuals had significant underlying health conditions that may have been impacted by cyclosporiasis and dehydration," the state's Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said in a statement. "No additional information will be provided on these two cases."

Cases of cyclosporiasis range from mild to severe, with severe cases being more likely in young children, older adults, and people with weakened immune systems. Symptoms include loss of appetite, fatigue, low-grade fever, vomiting and diarrhea. The infection is treated with antibiotics, which block the parasite's ability to multiply.

In mild cases, the infection can sometimes resolve on its own, but without treatment, the symptoms can linger for over a month. Severe and prolonged infections can raise the risk of dehydration due to vomiting and diarrhea. Severe dehydration can then cause various complications, such as electrolyte imbalances and hypovolemia (severe fluid loss).

While these complications can be dangerous — causing kidney failure or shock, for instance — cyclosporiasis is not usually life-threatening. For instance, over 2,200 cases were reported in the U.S. between 2011 and 2015, but there were no associated deaths.

"Death resulting from cyclosporiasis is uncommon in the United States," Michigan HHS representatives noted in the statement.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

At the end of a glacier deep in East Antarctica's Taylor Valley, there is a haunting waterfall that oozes red brine like a bleeding wound in the ice. Scientists explained the brine's gory hue several years ago, finding that it is exceptionally rich in iron. And now, they may have identified the salty water's origin.

Microbes in the crimson waterfall, called Blood Falls, suggest the brine is composed of ancient seawater that was trapped in a pool beneath the glacier when ocean levels fell and the glacier advanced. However, it's unclear exactly when that happened, researchers noted. Previous studies had already proposed a seawater origin for the brine, based on various chemical signatures and bacteria detected in the liquid, but the new results add molecular and genetic evidence to the mix of clues.

"Findings in this study reveal a dominance of marine eukaryotic lineages in the Blood Falls area" compared with the broader region, known as the McMurdo Dry Valleys, the authors wrote in the study, published Monday (Aug. 3) in the journal Nature Geoscience. "This marine signal is less prominent but still detectable in the prokaryotic structure," the researchers added.

Eukaryotes' cells contain a membrane-bound nucleus and other closed internal compartments. Prokaryotes, by contrast, are single-celled organisms whose DNA floats around freely in the cell, unbounded by a membrane.

To characterize the types of microorganisms present within Blood Falls, the researchers used a suite of genetic techniques to analyze 167 samples of water, sediment and air from around the falls and the broader McMurdo Dry Valleys.

Some researchers argue that Blood Falls' water does not originate from seawater, and suggest the marine bacteria and chemical signatures that point to seawater may have instead reached the falls from the ocean via intense winds, which are common in the McMurdo Dry Valleys. By analyzing samples from various sites in the Dry Valleys, the team behind the new study compared microorganisms from the wider region with those at Blood Falls to determine if Blood Falls has a distinct microbial assemblage potentially left over from ancient conditions.

The researchers found that the crimson brine and associated red-tinted sediments at Blood Falls shared a higher proportion of eukaryotes with nearby oceanic samples than other sites in the Dry Valleys did. Whereas Blood Falls had a little over 9% of its eukaryotes in common with the ocean, the Dry Valleys showed only about 1% similarity, according to the study. The remaining eukaryotes and most of the prokaryotes identified in the paper had freshwater and terrestrial origins.

The results also showed that the air near Blood Falls contained only a tiny proportion of marine microorganisms, suggesting that present-day winds can't fully explain the microbial composition of Blood Falls, the researchers wrote.

Therefore, an ancient seawater origin is the most likely explanation for the microorganisms found at Blood Falls today, the team concluded. Winds may have played a role in shaping the community in the past, but now, their influence is probably insignificant, the team added.

The brine that feeds Blood Falls may have become entrapped more than 1 million years ago, during a warm period with higher sea levels and less ice cover than there is now, previous estimates suggested. However, further work, including more comprehensive genetic profiling and mapping of microorganisms, is needed to pinpoint when Taylor Valley's glacier grew to cover the brine, the researchers wrote.

Antarctica quiz: Test your knowledge on Earth's frozen continent

A poop transplant — otherwise known as a fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) — may help adults with long-term insomnia sleep better, a small study suggests.

After the transplant, study participants' gut bacteria became more diverse than an untreated group of people with insomnia. Their sleep efficiency, meaning the percentage of time they spent asleep while in bed, also increased, researchers reported July 22 in the Journal of Internal Medicine.

If future studies confirm that FMT is safe and effective for the treatment of insomnia, it could become another tool against the sleep disorder, joining sleeping pills and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).

The findings "are aligned with a recent body of work over the last five years indicating that the gut microbiome may play a role in sleep-wake regulation," said Dr. David Gozal, a pediatric sleep specialist at Marshall University in West Virginia who wasn't involved in this study.

However, "these results should be regarded as promising proof-of-concept evidence rather than confirmation that FMT is ready for routine treatment of insomnia," Kenji Hashimoto, a forensic mental health researcher at Chiba University in China who wasn't involved with the study, told Live Science in an email.

Improving sleep with "poop pills"

The study included 80 adult women and men with chronic insomnia from seven hospitals in China; the participants did not have other health problems, such as migraine or obstructive sleep apnea, that could interfere with the results.

Half of the participants took antibiotics for two days to clear out some of their existing gut bacteria. Then, they swallowed 60 FMT capsules chockfull of gut bacteria from healthy donors who had been confirmed to be good sleepers. These bacteria were isolated from fecal samples from the donors. Two weeks later, this group took a booster dose of 20 capsules.

The other half of the participants instead took placebo pills in place of the antibiotics and FMT capsules.

The researchers used an overnight sleep assessment called a polysomnography, which records brain waves, eye movements, heart rate, oxygen levels and breathing patterns, to assess the participants. The results showed that sleep efficiency in the FMT group jumped from 79% before the transplant to 93% one month after treatment, on average. The placebo group's sleep efficiency barely changed, shifting from about 85% to 87%.

Additionally, the treated group woke up less throughout the night. Their time spent awake after initially falling asleep fell from 79 to 17 minutes, while the same metric increased from 37 to 42 minutes in the placebo group.

On questionnaires, the FMT group continued reporting better sleep from two all the way to six months after treatment.

It is "encouraging" that FMT treatment seemed to improve sleep not only on objective tests, but also in how the participants themselves rated their insomnia, added Harriët Schellekens, a neuroscientist and microbiome researcher at University College Cork in Ireland, who wasn't involved in the work.

Gut-sleep connection

The results also suggest that the treatment is safe. In the FMT group, only three out of 40 participants had side effects, and they were mild, such as nausea and transient fever.

However, experts noted several caveats. The trial was small and limited to relatively healthy adults in China, so the results may not apply broadly. Sleep was measured only once after treatment, at the one‑month mark, Hashimoto said. And because the treatment combined antibiotics with FMT, it's unclear how much of the benefit came from the donor microbes alone, Schellekens and Hashimoto noted.

Hashimoto added that the study focused exclusively on the gut microbiota. "Microbial communities in other body sites, particularly the oral and nasal cavities, may also influence sleep regulation through immune, metabolic, and neural pathways and through oral-gut-brain or nasal-gut-brain communication," he said.

The gut and brain communicate in various ways, including via chemicals made by gut microbes that travel to the brain via the bloodstream, Hashimoto explained. These chemicals may steer inflammation, stress responses and the body's sleep-wake control.

Shifts in certain microbes can alter these gut chemicals and gut barrier function in ways that ripple out to the brain and change sleep patterns, Gozal said. Conversely, disrupted sleep can reshape the microbiome. "The question is, what came first?" he said — a disordered microbiome driving insomnia, or insomnia reshaping the microbiome and worsening symptoms.

In the study, the mix of gut microbes in the FMT group shifted between the start and end of the study, but the placebo group's microbiomes stayed the same. Several types of bacteria became more abundant after FMT, while others decreased, suggesting that FMT reshapes the gut microbiome.

Not everyone responded to the treatment, and they mostly differed in what their gut microbiota looked like before FMT, not after. That suggests that a person's initial microbial makeup may help determine how well they respond to the treatment.

Gozal said he would have liked the study to measure the chemicals made by gut microbes before treatment and then show how those same chemicals changed after FMT.

More research is needed to understand the biological mechanisms underlying the improvements, Schellekens said. For now, "FMT remains an experimental approach for insomnia and is not something that should be used outside carefully controlled clinical studies."

The study's researchers did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

How much do you know about sleep and dreams? Find out with our sleep quiz!

Ancient slingstones found in northeastern Spain may be evidence of a local uprising against Roman rule in the first century B.C.

Archaeologists think the lead sling "bullets" were fired by Roman soldiers after an ambush orchestrated by the local Indigenous Ceretani (also spelled Cerretani) people, who by this time had spent almost 200 years resisting Roman expansion in Iberia.

The findings, which were unearthed during an archaeological survey of the area, reinforce that "the Roman conquest of the Iberian Peninsula was neither a brief nor a peaceful process," researchers explained in a statement from the Autonomous University of Barcelona.

The ancient Roman historian Cassius Dio (who lived from around A.D. 150 to 235) wrote that the Ceretani revolt took place in 39 B.C., but it was generally thought to have occurred farther west. The new finds, however, pinpoint an ancient Roman military camp in what's now Cerdanya, a region of the eastern Pyrenees on the Spanish side of the modern border with France. At the time, this location was in Ceretani territory.

Roman expansion

The archaeological team found the sling bullets last year among the remains of the camp at Collet de Jovell, an alpine pass in the region. The bullets were poured from lead (it was easier than collecting stones), and two were emblazoned with the letters CND, which stood for the Roman governor of the province of Hispania at that time, Gnaeus Domitius Calvinus. These letters help date the ambush to exactly 39 B.C., when he was in office.

The archaeologists also unearthed the distinctive iron studs that Roman legionaries wore on their sandals, called clavi caligae; Roman fibulae, or brooches for fastening clothing; and several Roman coins that reinforced the team's dating of the site.

The Romans started expanding in Iberia, known to them as Hispania, after first landing on the Mediterranean coast in 218 B.C., during the Second Punic War with Carthage. But they were opposed by the Ceretani and other Indigenous peoples.

The two sides battled for centuries. But the Ceretani revolt in 39 B.C. failed to oust the invaders and was followed by severe Roman repression of the local people, according to the statement.

The Romans suffered, too ‪—‬ the governor ordered that some of his troops be punished for running away when the Ceretani ambushed the camp.

From Augustus to Nero, see how much you know about ancient Rome's famous leaders with our Roman emperor quiz!

Aspen trees could provide a natural buffer against wildfires, as new research shows that areas of forest where these trees dominate burn less intensely than those made of conifers.

The findings suggest that planting more of the right kinds of trees, such as trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides, also known as quaking aspen), could be an effective strategy for protecting communities as devastating wildfires become more common and intense in a warming world, researchers reported June 15 in the journal Forest Ecology and Management.

Individual aspen trees burn easily because of their thin bark, but large "stands" ‪—‬ contiguous communities of trees that are uniform in species, age and structure ‪—‬ of them are more resistant to fire than stands of conifers and can act like a firebreak.

The reasons for aspen stands' resilience are not certain. However, researchers think it likely stems from a combination of factors, including the high moisture content in the aspens' leaves and the undergrowth, the trees' lack of highly flammable resin, and the leaves' height, which makes it harder for fire to spread to the canopy and leap from tree to tree.

Flavie Pelletier, who conducted the research as part of her doctorate at McGill University in Montreal, wanted to see whether aspen stands have been able to maintain their fire-resistant properties as climate change makes fire seasons more intense and destructive.

She combined new maps of dominant tree species in forests across Canada with satellite maps of wildfires from three recent years, including 2023, which was the country's most destructive wildfire season ever recorded. She noted which tree species tended to be inside the fire zone and which were more common at the edges. She found that aspen trees were more than twice as common at the perimeters of fires than inside them, while conifers like spruce and pine were equally present in both locations.

Having more aspen trees in a particular area also decreased the amount of forest that burned each day during a fire, so it also appears to help slow the spread of the fire. Notably, the trees still resisted fire spread even in the spring, before their leaves had fully sprouted.

"This is proof that aspen has an impact on fire perimeter formation and can slow fire progression," she told Live Science.

Anthony Taylor, a forest management specialist at the University of New Brunswick, said the study, with its use of large datasets on real fires, does a good job of analyzing and quantifying a phenomenon that Indigenous peoples and foresters have understood for a long time.

"The idea that deciduous trees burn less has been known for millennia, but knowing something through experience is different than testing it," he told Live Science.

Changing practices

The research supports the idea that planting aspen or other deciduous trees around vulnerable communities can help protect them from fires. Taylor said this buffer strategy is being considered or implemented in many areas.

A single line of trees will not do the trick. The stands must be deep enough to stop the flames from blowing over the top — probably 300 to 1,000 feet (100 to 300 meters), Taylor said.

Aspens can also play a role in fire control at larger scales. Pelletier first became interested in this topic when she learned that forestry companies often spray the forests they manage with the herbicide glyphosate to kill deciduous trees like aspen so they can grow monocultures of more economically valuable conifers, leaving those forests at much higher risk of fires. She hopes her work will help convince the companies and regulators to change their practices.

"There needs to be less of a war on aspen in commercial forests," she said. In the long term, it would actually benefit the companies, because it would reduce the risk of losing large numbers of trees to fire, even if it slightly reduces the value of the forest in the short term.

Taylor agrees that in places like New Brunswick, a province with a large forestry sector, officials should be promoting more mixed and hardwood forests, and less of the softwood monocultures that the forestry industry relies on.

"That would go a long way to making our landscape more resilient to wildfire," he said. "And that's what would have been here anyway, before we started converting the forests to a more industrial forest."

When the famous Chicxulub asteroid struck what is now Mexico's Yucatán Peninsula 66 million years ago, it ended the reign of the nonavian dinosaurs. As ecosystems recovered, small, adaptable mammals rapidly spread into newly vacant niches, evolving new diets, larger bodies and more diverse ways of life until they dominated the land within a few million years.

Now, new evidence suggests that even before the asteroid hit, Earth was already beginning to rot.

A study published May 12 in the journal PNAS found evidence of environmental fungal blooms before and after the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) mass extinction event. Looking at microscopic fossils from rocks dating to the K-Pg event in North America, a team of researchers led by Dr. Arturo Casadevall, chair of the Molecular Microbiology and Immunology Department at Johns Hopkins University, identified an earlier fungal bloom dating to roughly 30,000 to 100,000 years before the asteroid hit, during a period of cooling linked to intense volcanic activity in the Deccan Traps in what is now India.

The researchers also found a fungal spike immediately after the Chicxulub impact exactly when dead plants and animals would have littered devastated ecosystems. The finding adds to earlier evidence from New Zealand that suggests the fungal bloom wasn't just a local event.

This idea feeds into a controversial idea called the fungal infection-mammalian selection (FIMS) hypothesis. First proposed two decades ago by Casadevall and subsequently updated in 2018 and 2026 papers, the FIMS hypothesis suggests that the abundance of fungus before the asteroid impact may have helped mammals gain an evolutionary advantage over the dinosaurs that remained after that cataclysm.

The hypothesis doesn't argue that fungus wiped out the dinosaurs. Instead, it proposes that mammals' live births and immune systems may have helped them withstand the rise of fungus in ways egg-laying reptiles and nonavian dinosaurs could not, thereby giving them the upper hand in disrupted ecosystems full of rot, cold, starvation and polluted air.

"The fungal infection mammalian selection hypothesis is focused on how the mammals became the dominant land animals," Casadevall told Live Science via email, "not dinosaur extinction."

But not all experts are convinced. Mary O'Connell, the Chair of the Zoology department at the University of Manchester told Live Science via email that the hypothesis doesn't fit all the evidence and that "it emerges from a chain of plausibility arguments rather than direct evidence, and the links in the chain are weaker than the framing may suggest."

A fungal world before the asteroid

To find this pre-asteroid fungal bloom in their new study, Casadevall and Rosanna Baker, who researches fungus at Johns Hopkins, focused on palynomorphs — tiny fossilized organic remains, including fungal spores, fungal hyphae and plant pollen — preserved in ancient sediment layers from the Denver Basin in Colorado dating back to the K-Pg extinction.

Baker counted between 100 and 500 microfossils per sample across sediment layers spanning about 60,000 years before the K-Pg mass extinction event to 30,000 years after it. Most samples were dominated by plant material, but some layers contained 50% or more fungal spores. The researchers interpreted this high proportion of fungal spores as a sign of ecological disturbance ‪—‬ more dead material and more fungi feeding on it, especially after the dinosaur-killing asteroid.

Baker and Casadevall also found an earlier fungal bloom dating to roughly 10,000 to 30,000 years before the asteroid impact.

"What surprised us was the proliferation in association with Deccan volcanism, which implies ecological disruption prior to [the] meteor impact," Casadevall told Live Science via email.

In other words, ecosystems may have already been under stress — and faced with a fungal overgrowth — before the asteroid delivered the final blow.

The case for FIMS

When Casadevall first proposed the FIMS hypothesis, it rested on a simple observation: Mammals are unusually resistant to invasive fungal diseases.

Fungi are major pathogens of plants, insects, amphibians and many reptiles, but life-threatening systemic fungal infections are relatively rare in mammals with healthy immune systems. Casadevall argued that mammals' relative resistance to fungi came from their sophisticated immune systems. In mammals, first-line, relatively nonspecific defenses such as neutrophils recognize fungal cell walls, engulf spores and attack invasive filaments, while the adaptive arm of the immune system excels at building customized antibodies that selectively target specific fungi, and then creating immune memory so the invaders are recognized the next time they're encountered.

Casadevall also initially believed that mammals' high, stable body temperatures — generally around 97 to 104 degrees Fahrenheit (36 to 40 degrees Celsius) — could prevent many environmental fungi from growing well enough to establish an infection.

"The success of mammals made no sense given their high energy needs and this idea provided a plausible mechanism for their success," Casadevall said.

After the asteroid hit, forests burned, plants died, darkness fell and dead matter piled up, providing a feast for fungi. If fungal spores filled the air, surviving animals may have inhaled enormous, possibly dangerous doses.

However, the FIMS hypothesis proposes that mammals had several possible adaptations against these fungal invaders that other animals did not. In addition to having warm body temperatures and complex immune systems, mammals who could maintain stable body temperatures could forage during the cold "impact winter," ‪when ash and dust blocked out the light of the sun. Meanwhile the dinosaurs, who were originally thought to be the "cold-blooded," would have struggled to stay active and find food, leading them to become weaker and more susceptible to disease.

Differences in gestation may have mattered, too. Many mammals protect developing embryos inside the mother's body, where warmth and immunity could shield them from fungi. In contrast, all dinosaurs laid eggs. Those eggs developed in nests, which were often in contact with soil and decaying plant matter ‪—‬ the exact environments where fungi thrive. Modern fungi can invade reptile eggs, and fossilized hyphae, a type of fungus, was described in dinosaur eggshells in a 2008 study.

That does not prove fungi wiped out dinosaur nests. Fossilized hyphae could suggest either that fungi invaded a living egg, or that fungi colonized the egg after death. Still, eggshells provide one clue that fungi were a problem for the survival of dinosaur young..

A sick sauropod

Another potential line of evidence to buttress the FIMS hypothesis came from dinosaur bones that showed evidence of fungal infection.

In 2022, a team led by Cary Woodruff, curator of vertebrate paleontology at the Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science in Miami, described a Late Jurassic sauropod fossil from Montana with unusual lesions in its neck vertebrae. The dinosaur, an immature diplodocine known as MOR 7029, lived roughly 150 million years ago, long before the asteroid impact.

Sauropods had long, air-filled neck bones connected to their respiratory system. In fossils of healthy sauropods, the places where air-sac tissue met bone are smooth, sometimes glass-like, Woodruff told Live Science.

But in this animal, the normally smooth sockets were rough and irregular. "Coming out of the socket — like imagine coming out towards you —it looked like fossilized heads of broccoli florets," Woodruff said. "And I had never seen that."

Unsure what he was looking at, Woodruff posted a photo online and asked whether anyone had seen anything similar. Other anatomists and paleontologists quickly weighed in. Their response, he recalled, was essentially, "That's exactly what we would have predicted a respiratory infection to look like," he said.

By comparing the fossil lesions with respiratory diseases in modern birds, which are living dinosaurs, the team tentatively flagged the condition as airsacculitis with associated osteomyelitis ‪—‬ air-sac inflammation that had spread to nearby bone.

However, the researchers could not identify the exact disease that caused the inflammation. In modern birds, airsacculitis can be caused by fungal infections such as aspergillosis, but also by bacterial infections. Without preserved soft tissue or fungal structures, they stopped short of confirming a fungal infection diagnosis.

Either way, Woodruff thinks the sauropod was probably sick enough that the infection contributed to its death. It may have become too weak to keep up, too ill to eat or drink properly, or too vulnerable to escape predators.

The case against FIMS

Even so, many experts remain skeptical of Casadevall's hypothesis. For one thing, the asteroid and its aftermath already explain a tremendous amount. The impact triggered tsunamis, earthquakes and a global food-web collapse. Those disasters alone would have killed off large dinosaurs at the top of disrupted food chains.

Another problem revolves around body temperature. In 2005, when Casadevall first proposed his hypothesis, dinosaurs were often thought of as "cold-blooded," while mammals were "warm-blooded." But over the years, research has uncovered that many nonavian dinosaurs, such as Velociraptor, T. rex and Brachiosaurus, were likely warm-blooded, too ‪—‬ so body temperature wouldn't explain why fungus would have been a big problem for many dinosaurs.

Complicating the picture, birds — the only surviving dinosaurs — often have higher body temperatures than mammals do. So the FIMS theory rests on an assumption that living examples of dinosaurs don't support, Flynn said.

Around the time of the asteroid impact, cold-blooded creatures like turtles and crocodilians that lived in the water "don't really suffer as severely as other groups, even including mammals," Andrew Flynn, an assistant professor of paleobotany at New Mexico State University, told Live Science. "Clearly this fungal thing is not probably what's causing mammals to rise up and go on to dominate the ecosystem."

The FIMS hypothesis also has a contradiction at its heart, said Jingmai O'Connor, a paleontologist at the Field Museum in Chicago.

"It's just a hypothesis I had vaguely heard about but was not popular, not often mentioned, and I guess I would say 'out of favor,'" O'Connor told Live Science via email. "If everything we know that suggests dinosaurs are more susceptible to fungal infections is based on living dinosaurs (birds) and they survived, doesn't that rather undermine this hypothesis?"

Dr. Isabel Jimenez, an assistant professor at Johns Hopkins University and a proponent of FIMS, agrees that this discrepancy must be explained.

"For the FIMS hypothesis to still hold water, we have to consider alternative mechanisms by which dinosaurs could have been more susceptible to fungal diseases than mammals," Jimenez told Live Science in an email.

Modern-day birds are avian theropods — the surviving branch of the dinosaur family tree — and likely faced the same fungal pressures as their extinct relatives. More recently, in 2026, Jimenez and Casadevall have suggested a tweak to their theory: that some of the small-bodied, beaked, flying or semiflying theropods may have been able to pull through, despite some baseline higher susceptibility to fungal disease. That's because they were small, had feathers to better insulate their bodies, and maintained generalist diets that enabled them to use more food sources than the dinosaur lineages that died out.

Working with Jimenez, Casadevall outlined an updated version of the FIMS hypothesis in a paper published earlier this year. In it, they propose that dinosaurs' respiratory systems may have made them more at risk than their mammalian counterparts.

Whereas mammals breathe by expanding and contracting flexible lungs filled with blood-rich alveoli, modern birds — and probably many dinosaurs — have rigid lungs ventilated by a network of thin-walled air sacs. The air sacs act as bellows, maintaining one-way airflow through the lungs, but they perform little gas exchange and have relatively poor blood supply. This system could have also carried inhaled fungal spores deep into the respiratory tract, where they may have settled in air sacs that are harder for circulating immune cells to reach and clear.

While birds have a similar sophisticated immune system as mammals — including macrophages and antibodies — their air sacs extend throughout the body and sometimes into the bones, making fungal infections easier to spread beyond just the respiratory system.

This possible weakness is what Jimenez and Casadevall suggest is what made air-sac-bearing dinosaurs vulnerable to fungal infections, similar to modern birds.

After the asteroid strike, there would have been soot and sulfur polluting the air and dinosaurs would have been nutritionally stressed. "So secondary fungal infections are certainly possible," Jimenez said, referring to infections that take root after the body's defenses are weakened.

But skeptics argue that even with these updates in the FIMS hypothesis, more evidence is needed to show it's not just possible but likely.

The idea that their air-sac respiratory systems made them more vulnerable to fungus is "a more testable claim," but its likely impact on dinosaurs would also be more limited, because of competing environmental factors, O'Connell said.

And because only a handful of fungal species actually cause disease in animals, to show that fungi worsened dinosaur deaths, researchers would need to find evidence of elevated fungal disease in dinosaur fossils from right after the asteroid struck, O'Connell said.

"We would also need to be able to identify elevation of pathogenic fungal spores in the sedimentary record at that boundary, rather than just more spores," she said.

Overall, "the fungal infection-mammalian selection hypothesis feels like a conjecture in search of any supporting evidence," paleontologist and science writer Riley Black, told Live Science in an email.

How much do you know about the king of the dinosaurs? Test your knowledge with our T. rex quiz!

A century ago, American archaeologists excavating at a cave site in France unearthed a cache of seven rock crystal tools made by Neanderthals. The discovery was one of the first to prove that Neanderthals were not the unintelligent brutes that many scientists of the time believed they were.

This rare quartz scraper was found at the archaeological site of Abri Des Merveilles in the Dordogne region of France in 1924 by a team from the American School of Prehistoric Research (now a department at Harvard University) led by George MacCurdy. The unique tool is now in the collection of France's National Archaeological Museum.

Neanderthals typically crafted their stone tools from flint or chert because these rocks would predictably fracture into sharp edges. But a small handful of Neanderthal sites in Europe have yielded tools made from microcrystalline quartz, also known as rock crystal, resulting in stunningly clear scrapers and points.

According to MacCurdy's April 1931 excavation report, this was the first rock crystal tool the team discovered. It is transparent but yellow-tinged, and it may have been used as a combination scraper and point. In addition to six other rock crystal tools, MacCurdy found tiny rock crystal chips that meant the tools were likely fashioned on-site in the cave. The rocks may have tumbled downstream from the headwaters of the Vézère, a tributary of the Dordogne River that runs near the site. Abri des Merveilles has never been precisely dated. However, based on stratigraphy, tool types and the presence of a Neanderthal molar, the rock crystal tools were likely made between 45,000 and 80,000 years ago.

MacCurdy's discovery proved that Neanderthals, not modern humans (Homo sapiens), were the first to create innovative tools from rock crystal ‪—‬ a conclusion that surprised many scientists of the time.

A century ago, most experts believed that Neanderthals were ape-like and unintelligent, thanks in large part to paleoanthropologist Marcellin Boule's 1909 analysis of a Neanderthal skeleton from the site of La Chapelle-aux-Saints in France. The skeleton of an older male Neanderthal with osteoarthritis influenced Boule's incorrect characterization of Neanderthals as knuckle-dragging cavemen. This perception of Neanderthals lasted well into the 21st century, when paleogeneticists finally proved that Neanderthals and modern humans mated.

MacCurdy, however, saw the rock crystal tools as an indication that Neanderthals had a sense of aesthetics. "We are accustomed to think of Neandertal man as devoid of the artistic sense," he wrote, because, a century ago, archaeologists had not yet found evidence of Neanderthal rock art, carved artifacts, engravings or use of pigments.

The Neanderthal "was not an artist in the strict sense; that he had an eye for beauty of form and color is evident from even the limited use he made of rock crystal," MacCurdy wrote in the journal PNAS in November 1931. "Neandertal man must also be given credit for discernment of beauty and quality of the material employed in his industry."

According to France's National Archaeological Museum, which profiled this tool as their Object of the Month in September 2025, MacCurdy drew highly innovative conclusions about Neanderthals from the rock crystal tools, which helped pave the way for our modern understanding of our enigmatic extinct cousins.

For more stunning archaeological discoveries, check out our Astonishing Artifacts archives.

Can you put together last week's Astonishing Artifact?

Andromeda is the only major galaxy in the universe that is speeding closer to the Milky Way as all the others rush away. Now, a new analysis of Hubble Space Telescope data hints that our galactic next-door neighbor may be winding down from a big burst of activity as it draws toward a possible collision with our galaxy.

The new study found that the Andromeda galaxy (M31) has been steadily slowing its production of new stars over the past 500 million years. The findings suggest that the galaxy is naturally winding down after a more active period, offering astronomers valuable clues about how large spiral galaxies evolve.

Andromeda is a giant spiral galaxy similar to the Milky Way, but with around twice its mass. As the nearest large spiral galaxy to Earth, it provides an ideal laboratory for studying galaxy formation and evolution. An understanding of when and where stars form is essential for explaining how galaxies develop and change over time.

The new research, published July 27 in The Astrophysical Journal, combines two major Hubble surveys that mapped roughly two-thirds of Andromeda's disk, including around 200 million stars. It's already known that Andromeda experienced a dramatic burst of star formation about 2 billion years ago, which is thought to have formed about a fifth of all the stars in the galaxy. That starburst is thought to be the result of a merger with another galaxy, probably the compact elliptical galaxy M32, which now orbits Andromeda.

The new study found that Andromeda formed stars at a rate of around one solar mass per year 500 million years ago. By 40 million years ago, that rate had halved, while today the rate has fallen to just one-fifth of a solar mass each year. Researchers found that most recent star formation in Andromeda has been concentrated within a ring about 32,000 light-years from the galaxy's center and that the decreasing activity within this region is largely responsible for the overall decline. That suggests the galaxy is gradually winding down from its previous burst of star formation rather than suddenly running out of material.

Scientists also investigated whether M32 may have contributed to the slowdown. Regions closest to M32 show a more recent decline in star formation, making the companion galaxy a possible influence, although the evidence remains inconclusive.

"We need to measure the individual stars because they are the fossil record of the galaxy's formation," study co-author Ben Williams, an astronomer at the University of Washington, said in a NASA statement. "Hubble is the only telescope that can give you high enough spatial resolution over a large enough area to be able to do that in Andromeda."Although the team will continue studying Hubble's archive, they will also target observations from NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, which will launch on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket as soon as Aug. 30. With a field of view at least 100 times larger than Hubble's, Roman will survey the entire Andromeda galaxy and its surrounding halo in unprecedented detail.

Andromeda is best observed in November and is visible to the naked eye, even from locations with moderate light pollution. The galaxy may collide with the Milky Way about 5 billion years from now, though its ultimate trajectory is still uncertain.

Climate change's impacts are being felt everywhere, from health and food security to extreme weather, sea level rise and collapsing ecosystems. World leaders have been slow to adapt to the warnings, despite an ever-growing body of evidence showing the compounding risks of greenhouse gas emissions.

But despite fossil fuels remaining the world's primary source of energy and emissions continuing to rise, there are changes afoot.

In his book "Despite it All" (Granta, 2026), author and journalist Fred Pearce looks at the shifts that have taken place over the last 40 years, highlighting how far humanity has come in the green transition. He believes this progress gives us reason to hope that we can eventually overcome the challenges we face today.

Pearce spoke with Live Science about his book, which has been shortlisted for the 2026 Royal Society Trivedi Science Book Prize.

Hannah Osborne: There are a lot of positive environmental stories throughout the book, including those that aren't necessarily being told. Do you think that there is a growing appetite for positive climate news now? And will it help us?

Fred Pearce: I detect a kind of desire to be told something other than it's all hopeless and there's nothing we can do. Some people are therefore saying, "Well, what can I do?" And they're very sort of personal stories about how they can contribute. But also people who think more, if you like, strategically: What can the world do, what can governments do, what, how can we influence that?

I try not to write what I think people want to read. I try to write what I want to say. And it seems to me that we do so many things so badly, whether it's managing our resources or water or handling forests or the climate, or pollution or whatever. We do things so badly that there is a great deal of scope for doing things a lot better. So, we need optimists and we need pessimists. We need pessimists to point out the problems. We need optimists to come up with some solutions or suggest where [there are] half open doors that we can push open.

I wrote this book in that kind of spirit to say "Look, yes, things are bad, yes, I'm not denying that they're bad, but there's an awful lot that we can do about it and in some cases are doing about it." That then divides into whether we're talking about human activity, our technical solutions to climate change. Tech fixes are good, not bad, which is something that can be a hard sell in the environment community sometimes, so I want to stress that.

I went to the Earth Summit 30 years ago where they agreed [upon] the original climate change convention. Back then they said we [need to] prevent dangerous climate change, but they really didn't know much about how to do it. Wind turbines were just, you know, a few masts on a hill in California. Nobody was dealing much in solar power because it was just so expensive. It had been developed for powering satellites and electric cars. Nobody was talking about [it].

We have made quite a lot of progress and it's not fast enough and CO₂ emissions are stable, they're not going down. We need to do a hell of a lot more and we may have passed climate tipping points. I'm not denying any of that, but rather than throwing up our hands or saying it's hopeless, let's get on with the tech, let's also recognize that nature is very good at recovering. You destroy a forest, a rainforest, it doesn't mean that it's destroyed forever. It will, given the chance, come back if we give it room. So let's give forests room to recover.

In large parts of the world it's already happening — in Europe, even in North America. Agricultural land is being abandoned, and when it's abandoned nature comes back and not necessarily in the sort of ways that we might think. But nature does come back, stuff regrows. We can see how evolution is being kickstarted, if you like, by the chaos that we're creating. That's not to say we shouldn't stop creating the chaos, but we can see how nature recovers.

These are things that we can recognize and respond to; giving nature room to recover, rewilding projects, therefore I'm all in favor of [them]. We're not rewilding where we're trying to garden nature to get back to some sort of perfected past, a pristine system where we thought that everything was great — pre-industrial revolution or before Europeans arrived in North America or whatever it might be. But, we can give nature room to evolve and adapt and change. We can see that nature's doing that all the time, with or without climate change and with or without humans. Nature is constantly, if you like, remaking itself.

I'm not saying nature always comes back in ways that we approve of. Let's recognize the distinction between our sort of slightly romanticized idea of what nature should be and what nature actually is.

HO: You talk about rewilding and letting nature take its course, but how do humans fit in with this? Can we adapt our own perceptions of what nature is allowed and what's not?

FP: I think we can probably forget about what's allowed and what's not. Nature will do what it wants to do. We pride ourselves on our ability to garden nature in a way, or manage ecosystems. We're not really very good at it. Nature will very often take over and do what it wants to do.

Some of the world's biggest rewilding projects have gone quite badly wrong because we haven't quite thought it through. The one I'm thinking of really is the large project in the Netherlands where they're trying to sort of recreate ancient European ecosystems and they ended up with mass deaths of animals because their conception of the ecosystem didn't quite figure out. They then largely abandoned the project because they didn't like to see large numbers of animals dying.

A hardline rewilder would say let nature take its course. I see the case for that, and often I would support that, but we have our own sensibilities and our own concerns and we are living in a world where we are very much in charge of what's going on. So while I'm in favor of standing back and letting nature take its course, we have our own sensibilities, and it's not wrong for us to want to intervene sometimes.

HO: There's a chapter on human population and fertility rates, and how this is very much a climate change story as well. We're now seeing a lot of the rhetoric around this, and rights being stripped back and taken away. What's it like for you, having seen the changes from the UN International Conference on Population in Mexico in the 80s, to Cairo in the 90s to now?

FP: It's an extraordinary story. I've been working on these issues for 40 years now so I've seen a number of changes. Some of the changes I've seen are how technical fixes somehow became a reality when they seemed very distant a while ago.

But our perceptions change too on many things. We are, in many ways, more attuned to environmental issues now than we were 30 or 40 years ago. One of the big changes that I've seen is the notion of the population bomb, which for much of the 20th century was seen as the number one issue. People would say, "Well, there's no point in fixing the climate, there's no point in reducing our pollution because there are more and more people on the planet, and we're kind of doomed for that reason."

Well, it hasn't [happened]. When I went to my first international conference, which was the UN Population Conference in Mexico City in 1984, that was all the rage. They gave the UN Population prize to the mastermind of China's one child policy, which — in terms of human rights and what I would regard as acceptable human behavior — was dreadful. But such was the concern about population issues that they wanted to give a prize to the operator of that program.

A lot has changed. A feminist agenda, if I could put it that way, and I would say that approvingly, has taken over in reproductive politics. I saw it at a UN population conference in Cairo in 1994, 10 years after the Mexico event, that we need to assert reproductive rights. Many environmentalists said that's a cop out. It was all "it's feminist perspective, but it's dooming us."

Well, it didn't, because what we found was that by and large, women wanted to have smaller families because their children got to grow up. Medical improvements meant that you didn't have to have four or five children to secure the next generation. Two would usually do, sometimes you just wanted one. Women wanted to have lives outside the home. The population people seemed to be a bit surprised by that.

The environmental agenda was a very male-dominated one for a long time. So that came as a bit of a surprise, but the net result is that we've halved our fertility rates. They're more or less down to replacement levels [of reproduction] now globally.

I'm not just talking about Europe or North America. I'm talking about almost everywhere except Africa, and African levels have come down. Sometimes they're coming down to super low levels, so that people are now talking about not having enough babies and how we can encourage people to have babies. There are parts of the world where we're down to one child per woman and even a bit less.

My argument is that we need to carry on. Not take a sort of Elon Musk approach [or] send the women back to the home and [do] reproduction and that's what their job is. We need to complete the feminist revolution so that women have more rights, can make better choices, and indeed couples can make more and better choices about the family size that they want. We can arrange things so that it is possible to have children and a career, or make it easier to do that, and at that point probably reproduction levels will come back up.

What I'm really saying is that the agenda is now vastly different from what it was as recently as the 1980s and, and into the 1990s. The population bomb is being defused, to put it simply, there's a residual momentum effect which means that our numbers will carry on going up a bit. Sure, that creates strains on the planet, but we're not now talking about double the world population every 30 years, which is what was being talked about back in the mid 20th century. It's tailing off.

We now have, if you like, a consumption bomb more than a population bomb. The global issue is consumption in the rich world, and that's what's stressing the planet now — not too many babies in poor parts of the world.

HO: Inequality between the super rich and people in developing countries is becoming more and more stark. How do we bridge the gap to make sure there's a reasonable living standard for regular people without a huge cost to the environment?

FP: The truth is, and the numbers have been done by a number of different people, a reasonable standard of living for everybody on the planet is perfectly feasible without destroying the planet.

We need to do some things better, we need to have better technology, but for me, right up there with climate change is an issue of global inequality. When I was young, it was taken [that] inequalities were diminishing and it was taken almost as read that they would carry on diminishing, and a lot of aid policies were directed towards that. That's kind of disappeared since the sort of Reaganomics of the 1980s, all the changes in the finance system and perhaps the fall of the Berlin Wall, which meant that the sort of socialist or, or equality-based agendas collapsed politically.

We're now finding increased inequality, and that, it seems to me, is a threat to the lives of millions and billions of humans, but also to global stability and our ability perhaps to manage.

Serious global issues like climate change and many others are all undermined by the political stresses and economic stresses created by rising inequality. I see them going together.

It's also clear that it's important to level up, but also level down from the obscene riches that we see among a small number of individuals, who seem to be accumulating a greater share of the world's wealth, whether we're talking about dollars or natural resources.

HO: You have a whole chapter on renewables and how they're outpacing fossil fuels. They're the cheaper alternative. How do you see the political opposition to clean energy panning out over the next five to 10 years?

FP: It's fizzling out. It's a weird political backlash and yes, any big social trend or economic trend, they all have backlashes and it feels to me like this is it. What we see in the real world is that the U.S. — not just the U.S., but principally the U.S. — are in a state of near denial about climate and they're wanting to go back to fossil fuels.

In the rest of the world, if you look at it in terms of geopolitics of [the] U.S. versus China, then the U.S. is pushing this rather old agenda of fossil fuels, and China is absolutely going to reap the benefits in many, many ways in its drive towards renewables. China has been a really bad story in the past with its coal burning — and it's still building a few coal-fired power stations. But the really big story is how China has been principally responsible for bringing down the costs of renewable energy, particularly solar power.

You can now go to the most remote corners of rural Africa and you find people putting up their solar panels to recharge car batteries so that they can run their lights in the evening or whatever it is. And then you've got megacities operating using increasing amounts of solar power. India is getting on the bandwagon as well. It's got the fastest growing solar energy economy in the world.

In the real world, renewable [energy] is mostly cheaper than fossil fuels. It is also quicker to install, you don't have to build a huge power station, you can do it in bits and pieces, bolt bits on.

Yes, there are grid issues and they need to be addressed, and there are limits on operating. There are challenges, but renewables are just growing so fast, and it is growing so fast because it is so cheap.

And it's become so cheap, to put it very simply, because the Chinese 20 or 30 years ago decided this is what's going to happen. While everybody else was sort of talking about it and fussing about it and doing it in research labs, the Chinese kind of got to grips with it. I remember back in the 1990s talking about people who were going into China and coming back and telling me stories about how the Chinese are really serious about renewable energy. To be honest, I didn't quite believe them, but they were right, and 30 years on, the world is living with the benefits. That's true whether you're talking about Europe or rural Africa or big cities in Asia or wherever. It's coming.

There will be different solutions in different places and there are undoubtedly things that are harder to do than, you know, running our national grids on renewable energy, which is becoming really quite easy and something that everybody wants to do. The cement industries, fertilizers perhaps, some of these industries will take some more technical innovation. But it's happening, these are technical fixes that are working in the real world. Will we do it in time? Well, we're a bit late on the case, but we are on the case.

HO: We're now seeing a massive rise in AI data centers as well. Is this bad tech, shall we say?

FP: It's a serious issue. Partly because they're growing so fast — they can't just plug into the grid because the grid really can't deliver, so these companies are developing their own energy systems. Even in the U.S. they are very often renewable systems because they're cheaper. If you've got a data center out in Texas, then you're going to use wind power or solar power because it's cheaper and you're in control of it.

I suppose we reach a point where [we have to decide], do we want to reduce our use of energy or have almost as much energy as we want, but just green it and green it very fast. It is true that if all the renewable investment is going into electricity for data centers, that leaves less investment for other sectors of the economy, so I'm sure there are trade-offs, and I'm not saying that we should embrace data centers. But they can be a driving force for adoption of different forms of energy, renewable energy, and for perhaps changes in the grid systems as well.

I think we can have both. I think we need to have both because we're probably not going to stop the data engines, so we've got to find ways of greening them. There are issues and there are challenges ahead, and I don't want to diminish any of those, but you know, let's, let's be hopeful.

The title of the book uses the word hopeful rather than optimist because I don't want to sound Panglossian, but I do want to inject some hope.

HO: When you started writing the book, what did you hope people would take from it, and did that change after you'd finished?

FP: Well it kind of evolved. It began as an idea to sort of [be a] retrospective of my reporting, and then the publisher said, "Well, the story changes rather a lot along the way, so rather than just showcasing your reporting over 40 years, why don't you showcase the change, and be hopeful in the context of how things have changed over the last 40 years?"

That was [the] kind of starting point, and we sharpened up on it, as we went along it did become "Despite It All" and you know, the title is important, and not diminishing the "All." There's a lot of bad stuff out there, but despite it all we can have hope and we can find, develop and demand solutions.

HO: Did you find anything during the process of writing the book that surprised you?

FP: As I say, it started as a sort of retrospective project and going through it, [there were places I went years ago] and it did look bad, then I checked up on what had happened over the intervening years and suddenly things looked a lot better.

I went to Alaska and saw how the conflicts over managing caribou herds and the huge migrations that go on and it felt like that was doomed. I was talking to people who were hunting the animals and they were trying to protect them because they wanted to hunt them, therefore they wanted them still to be there, which is kind of counterintuitive for many environmentalists, but you know, they were the best defenders of the caribou because they ate them.

But it felt doomed, and yet 20 years later I checked out the numbers and the population of that herd has doubled and tripled. So stuff does happen and I suppose my surprise was how much good change I found when I looked into it further. Maybe that's me being better at looking for good news stories. I've written quite a lot of "bad news" books over the years and done a lot of "bad news" journalism over the years, so I certainly don't discount that. But if you step back and you think, well did good stuff happen? Well, yeah, sometimes it did.

The bison herds are coming back on the plains of parts of North America, if you go to Montana. The ranches are disappearing and big areas are being set aside for bison, and I've been seeing how farmland in parts of southern and eastern Europe has been abandoned over the years. It's not necessarily good news that we're abandoning farmland, but again, the way that nature comes back and woodlands are growing, there are more forests in Europe than there have been for probably centuries.

There's a lot of bad stuff to say. But it does seem to me that we have to not just cling onto, but embrace good stuff and try [to] take it forward.

Something I really hadn't thought about till I went back was what were the big issues in the 1980s, 1970s when I started out. Well, all our industrial rivers in Britain were filthy. Now our industrial rivers are relatively clean. It's our agricultural rivers that are filthy, so, I mean, there's been a big change there.

Nobody has to talk much about the ozone layer now. That was the number one issue in the mid 1980s, and the absolutely terrifying prospect if we hadn't fixed that. But it's been fixed.

We banned the chemicals that were doing it.

Remember acid rain, lead in petrol. They were hot topics, headline news, part of the rise of the environmental agenda in the 1980s — and they're the ones that we don't have to talk about anymore.

Now we're talking about climate change. I think there are other things coming up. I think the issue of nitrogen pollution is a fast growing one, and we need technical solutions to that.

The green revolution of crops, the high-yielding crops, which got us out of a cycle of ever worsening hunger and famines in the mid 20 century. That was a solution which created new problems. Those crops grew very well, but they required large amounts of inputs, including water, and water is now a growing issue — finding enough irrigation water, but also fertilizer and other agrichemicals. We're now reaping some of the bad effects of that, and we need to solve that. Scientists I know are working on, if you like, high-yielding crops that don't require so much fertilizer and don't require so much water.

It's doable because as I think I said at the start, we do a lot of things really very badly, but that does give us a lot of scope to do things a lot better, so let's get on with it.

This interview has been condensed and edited lightly for clarity.

Biodiversity loss has been recognized as a threat to global stability for decades. The decline in overall diversity of species on our planet, either through extinction or a fall in abundance, can culminate in ecosystem collapse.

But in this excerpt from "Despite it All" (Granta, 2026), author and journalist Fred Pearce looks at the remarkable resilience of nature. If we can put aside our notions of what should and shouldn't be in a given environment and leave nature to adapt and thrive, we may begin to see the gains needed to support a healthy biosphere.

"Despite it All" has been shortlisted for the 2026 Royal Society Trivedi Science Book Prize.

If we are serious about rewilding, then we need to accept that it will take its own course.

Often invasive species are just the first stage of an ecological resurgence. They are the first movers, and their infestations are short-lived. In time, diversity usually returns — even if it's not always the same diversity as was there before. We should recognize that. We need to be as adaptable as nature itself, and jettison our more romantic notions about biodiversity and pristine environments.

So do many oldschool ecologists, says Chris Thomas, an ecologist at the University of York. They too often simply ignore any bits of nature that do not meet their expectations of what "should" be present. "The establishment of successful species in new locations is commonly interpreted as further evidence that the Earth's system is departing from a more desirable state," he told me.

So when biodiversity assessments are conducted, "alien" species lurking in the undergrowth are simply not counted. As outsiders, they are deemed not to belong to the ecosystem they inhabit. Thomas says that, in Britain, official records show biodiversity in decline, even though, if we add all losses and all gains together, "it is unequivocally true that the total number of species in Britain is increasing."

Most of the gains — the weeds, pests and alien species — are kept off the biodiversity books. This amounts to an ecological catch-22. Biodiversity can only ever decrease, as new species are seen as inimical to the local environment, and each year millions of pounds, dollars and euros are being spent to eliminate them.

Of course, it sometimes makes practical sense to eradicate invaders. I don't say we shouldn't try to keep out pests that cause short-term ecological mayhem and economic damage. But if we choose to get rid of new species, we can't then hold up our hands in horror at declining biodiversity. And besides, ecologically as much as socially, migrants can stir things up to good effect. They interact with other species — eating or being eaten, pollinating, and rotting after death to nurture new organisms.

We should embrace novel ecosystems that contain both what we regard as native species and the feral, opportunistic interlopers that find their new environment congenial. In his book about weeds, British naturalist Richard Mabey celebrated what he called these "outlaw plants" and showed how they have had a hand in shaping not only our landscape but our civilization, becoming crops, medicines and sources of beauty and creative inspiration.

It is easy to be nostalgic about past ecosystems as a golden age. But what we imagine to be the perfect ecological state — a supposedly natural order of things that often gets called "the balance of nature" — was mostly itself a passing phase. Nature is always moving on. And more often than we realize, humans have had a hand in what we now like to regard as natural.

Environmental scientist Erle Ellis, who runs the Anthroecology Lab of the University of Maryland, argues persuasively that most of the planet has been heavily influenced by human activity for thousands of years, including places such as the Amazon that we often think of as untouched. We have, in effect, long lived on a "used planet," and humans and nature have not historically been at odds. The most biodiverse places are often those where people have lived the longest. By constantly tending the land, past civilizations created ever-changing mosaics of habitats where more species thrived than in places with less human interference.

So, we should be careful not to let our reverence for the pristine blind us to the environmental potential of today's wastelands, backwoods, abandoned fields, scrublands and no-go areas. In a Good Anthropocene we are likely to need more of them.

There is a final reason for believing that nature is equipped for recovery from almost anything we can throw at it. The apparent chaos of the Anthropocene is turbocharging evolution itself. Every perturbation of our environment creates an opportunity for existing species to adapt or for new ones to evolve, says Chris Thomas.

I first met Thomas in 2004, when he had just published an influential paper warning that climate change could wipe out a quarter of the world's species this century. He called it "terrifying." It was headline news. Two decades later, he has not changed that forecast, but he has added an important rider. Despite the coming extinction holocaust, he told me, "the Anthropocene could raise biological diversity."

His research is showing that evolution in the twenty-first century is speeding up to fill the gaps left by the extinctions — delivering new and better-adapted species. "The seeds of recovery are already visible," he told me. "Genes are jumping around. New species are beginning to emerge." Rob Dunn, an ecologist at North Carolina State University, agrees. In his book "A Natural History of the Future," he says that this evolutionary spurt is happening fastest in urban landscapes, where species are adapting to city life with almost as much alacrity as newly arrived humans.

This urban ecological renaissance resembles the story of the finches on the Galápagos archipelago, which Charles Darwin observed to have evolved different beaks to match the food on the different islands. In modern cities, house mice have evolved to produce saliva with a chemical make-up better able to digest the carbohydrates available in urban food; cockroaches and bedbugs have developed resistance to pesticides and even learned to avoid sugar-impregnated bait; London's pigeons have learned to commute on the Underground. We have clothes moths and carpet beetles.

Such natural innovations may not always be cuddly, but they do show that nature is on the prowl in the Anthropocene. So where is biodiversity headed? It is undeniable that most species of plants and animals are currently in numerical decline in a human-centric world.

This global disturbance is favouring some generalists — so-called superspecies — that can occupy a wide range of habitats, displacing local, rare and specialist species. Locally, however, biodiversity has sometimes increased substantially, especially in the rich kaleidoscopes of gardens, parks, toxic brownfield sites, roadside verges and so on that humanity has helped create.

Such places may become crucibles for a biodiversity rebound. Understanding this reality should change how we do conservation. We should not abandon nature to its fate. Some of our favourite species will pass into history unless we act to save them, and I'd vote for action any day. But it does mean embracing rather than rejecting the processes of change. Change in the Anthropocene is good. We should be grateful that nature is finding a way.

This is an extract from Despite it All by Fred Pearce, published by Granta.

The ancient Celts thrived in Europe, earning a reputation as fierce warriors. They sacked Rome around 390 B.C. and, decades later, were received by Alexander the Great while he was conquering his empire.

It's no surprise, then, that archaeologists find many weapons in Celtic graves. However, over the decades, some of those weapons have been found in burials of women, hinting that they may have used these weapons. What's more, recent genetic studies suggest that elite Celts inherited power through maternal lines.

The Celts lived throughout Europe, from what is now Spain to Turkey. They shared a similar language and culture, and clues of female power have been found throughout their old lands and hinted at in ancient texts. This raises an interesting question: Did the Celts have women who fought in battle?

Opinions vary, but some experts Live Science interviewed thought it was possible that Celtic women could have fought in battle, although perhaps not regularly. One problem is that there is an ongoing debate among scholars as to whether the inhabitants of the British Isles around 2,000 years ago were, in fact, Celtic.

Genetic hints

Although it's not directly related to answering the question about Celtic women warriors, a few recent genetic studies have found that elite Celtic women held powerful roles. A 2024 study in the journal Nature Human Behaviour that looked at ancient DNA in several Celtic burials from Germany found a matrilineal inheritance of power, and a 2025 study of burials from Iron Age England revealed that men married into local, powerful female lineages.

This supports textual evidence that Celtic women had more power than many of their female counterparts across Europe. Women "of the Celts did generally enjoy more freedom and opportunity than their counterparts in the Greek and Roman world," Philip Freeman, a humanities professor at Pepperdine University, wrote in his book "War, Women and Druids: Eyewitness Reports and Early Accounts of the Celts" (University of Texas Press, 2002). "It is hard to imagine a Greek wife joining her husband on the battlefield or even leading an army, as did the British queen Boudicca."

"Flashing-eyed" women

Another piece of possible evidence is a particularly colorful ancient quote about the Gauls, a Celtic group that lived in what is now France.

The Roman soldier and historian Ammianus Marcellinus (who lived circa A.D. 330 to 395) wrote in his book "Res Gestae" ("Achievements") that "a whole group of foreigners cannot stand against one of them in a quarrel if he involves his wife, stronger than him by far and flashing-eyed — least of all when she swells her neck and gnashes her teeth and, swinging her vast, white arms, proceeds to rain down punches mixed with kicks, like shots discharged from the twisted cords of a catapult" (translation by Gavin Kelly).

In other words, don't mess with a Gallic wife.

But we have to be careful with the Ammianus quote as it refers to brawling rather than warfare, said Gavin Kelly, a professor of Latin literature and Roman history at the University of Edinburgh. We shouldn't take the quote to mean that Celtic women fought in battle, Kelly said. He doesn't know if Celtic women fought in battle but, if they did, Kelly suspects it was rare.

Weapons in burials

Rachel Pope, an archaeology professor at the University of Liverpool who has studied the Celts extensively, told Live Science in an email that "we have good evidence now across Europe that a small number of women were buried with weapons." In a 2021 Journal of Archaeological Research study, she mentioned cases in which women were buried with daggers or spears, including a 2,500-year-old cemetery in eastern France where some women were buried with daggers.

Some of the best evidence is from Britain, where "we have osteological evidence from three hillforts now that [some] women took part in combat," Pope said, noting that there "is evidence too for women fighters in northern Britain, where women are buried with chariots."

Simon Mays, a senior human skeletal biologist at Historic England who has studied a woman buried with weapons on the Isles of Scilly, off the southwest coast of Britain, said women in the region were probably involved in battle. There "is little doubt that violence was a routine part of Iron Age life, and [thus] female involvement is likely," Mays told Live Science in an email.

However, just because someone fought in battle doesn't make them a "warrior," Emmet Taylor, a lecturer at the School of Irish Learning at University College Cork, told Live Science in an email. Taylor noted that it "is important for us to think about martial identities complexly," and in ancient and early medieval Ireland, there is little evidence that women were allowed to join social groups that could be considered warriors.

Can ancient Britons be considered Celts?

Most famously, there is Boudica (sometimes spelled Boudicca), a queen of the Iceni (a people in England) who led a revolt against the Roman Empire around A.D. 60. She led her forces to several victories against the Romans before being defeated at the Battle of Watling Street in A.D. 61, after which she died — either by illness or by taking poison to avoid being captured by the Romans.

However, whether the Iceni or other ancient groups in Britain were Celtic is a matter of debate among scholars. The ancient geographer Strabo (who lived circa 64 B.C. to A.D. 24) actually "distinguished Britons from Celts," John Collis, a professor emeritus of archaeology at the University of Sheffield, wrote in his book "The Celts: Origins, Myths and Inventions" (Tempus, 2003).

Terms such as "Celt" and "Gaul" were "never used for the inhabitants of the British Isles except in the most general way for all the inhabitants of western Europe including non Indo-European speakers such as Basques," Collis wrote.

However, although ancient writers didn't refer to people in Britain as Celts, they did note their cultural and linguistic similarities, Freeman wrote. Following this line of thought, it's not too far-fetched to call Boudica a Celt.

Miranda Aldhouse-Green, a professor emeritus of archaeology at Cardiff University in the U.K., told Live Science in an email that she prefers "to refer to Boudica as British rather than Celtic" but noted that Boudica's rebellion is part of substantial evidence for warrior women in Britain.

"There is archaeological evidence for war-women in Britain in the form of Iron Age chariot [burials]," she said. For example, she noted the story of Cartimandua of the Brigantes in Yorkshire, who allied herself with Rome and fought against anti-Roman groups in the region.

"So yes, women did fight particularly in Britain," Aldhouse-Green said. But there is "less evidence" on the European continent for women fighting in battle, she noted.

In Britain the evidence for women in battle is very strong. "In the texts, we have Boudica, raising an army and razing three cities, and [the ancient writer] Tacitus tells us women commanding combat was not unusual," Pope said.

See how much you know about the celts with our Celtic quiz!

LONDON — In the packed halls of the recent Alzheimer's Association International Conference in mid-July, over 10,000 experts in brain research discussed strategies to beat dementia. But in one room, attendees gathered to watch a video from a nonscientist named Isabel Beltre, whose life was transformed by a recent trial.

Beltre was one of 1,200 participants ages 60 to 77 who took part in the Latin American Initiative for Lifestyle Intervention to Prevent Cognitive Decline (LatAm-FINGERS), the first trial to test a culturally adapted lifestyle intervention to prevent cognitive decline in Latin America. Rather than attempting to treat dementia after it has developed, the trial tackled risk factors that raise the likelihood of the condition, like smoking and a sedentary lifestyle.

In her native Spanish, Beltre thanked both God and the project for its impact on her life. There was a celebratory air in the conference room as the trial's results were released. The lifestyle interventions, which included exercise programs and brain training, had statistically improved participants' thinking skills, compared with a control group who received only bare-bones support, like general health advice.

Trials like LatAm-FINGERS — including a related U.S.-based trial called the POINTER study — ultimately aim to cut rates of dementia around the world. The LatAm trial is the most successful of these trials to date, raising hopes that this approach could help to prevent dementia en masse.

Whether that promise pans out remains to be seen, though, experts told Live Science.

The lifestyle factors that increase dementia risk

When it comes to dementia prevention, few guidelines are as influential as those written by the Lancet Commission, an expert-led review of the available evidence on dementia. Three editions of this review have provided comprehensive overviews of risk factors; the most recent, published in 2024, identified 14 factors, including smoking, infrequent social contact, and a lack of physical activity.

The commission estimated that, together, the identified risk factors contribute to 45% of dementia cases at a population level.

Long before the 2024 report, Dr. Miia Kivipelto, a professor of clinical geriatrics at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, wanted to tackle these risk factors at the individual and population level in her work as a medical doctor and epidemiologist.

"I felt that I wanted to move on to interventions to really show that if you do something, you can change the risk," Kivipelto told Live Science.

The many contributing factors that lead to cognitive decline, and ultimately dementia, couldn't be tackled in isolation, Kivipelto realized. She designed a trial in her native Finland, called the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) study, that would aim to tackle many risks simultaneously.

The two-year project recruited 1,260 participants ages 60 to 77 and divided them into two groups. The first group received general health advice, such as tips on healthy eating and exercise, at the start of the study and then again after six and 12 months.

The other group additionally received a multipart intervention consisting of meetings with nutritionists to discuss personalized meal plans, brain training, exercise programs, social activities, and metabolic and vascular tests. These programs lasted throughout the study period, with the brain training alone including 144 sessions over 12 months of the study.

At the end, the two groups' cognitive skills, such as thinking speed and memory, were tested; the trial did not track dementia rates, only overall cognition. In both groups, these skills improved by the end of the study. But the headline finding was that in the group given the comprehensive intervention, overall brain function was judged to be 25% stronger than in the control group.

What did that difference mean in concrete terms? It turns out, the improvement was relatively small.

It was calculated in terms of a statistical measure called a z-score, which represented the extent of the improvement in brain-function test scores in each group. In the end, the difference in z-scores between the two groups was just 0.04 points, which a 2021 review defined as "small."

However, Kivipelto maintained that the improvement is significant. "It's as big as anti-amyloid treatments," she said.

Several drugs approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease target amyloid, a protein that forms unruly tangles in the brain. These drugs have been reported to marginally slow the disease's progression, but statistically, their overall effect is small.

Targeting those most at risk of dementia

Despite criticism of the trial's moderate effects, Kivipelto's FINGER intervention has since been repeated all over the world, including by the U.S.-based POINTER study, and, most recently, LatAm-FINGERS.

Dr. Gill Livingston, a psychiatrist at University College London who led the 2024 Lancet Commission report, told Live Science that the data from these trials shows that dementia interventions need to be tailored to the risks the participants actually face.

In the POINTER study, 70% of the participants had a college degree, compared with roughly 43% of the wider U.S. population. "People who are usually in randomized controlled trials are usually highly educated people who are very interested in health," Livingston noted. "And that means they're at less risk of developing dementia, and therefore, less can be done to help them" through lifestyle interventions.

The difference between the test group and the control group in the POINTER study was even smaller than in the original FINGER trial — just 0.029 points.

LatAm-FINGERS tried to maximize flexibility in its approach by better tailoring its interventions to its study participants, said study first author Dr. Lucía Crivelli, a neuropsychologist at the neurology center FLENI in Argentina. Dietary advice reflected the produce available in each region. Exercise programs considered local environmental factors; for example, sessions were held outside, avoiding hot gyms during the sweltering summers in Ecuador and Mexico.

The trial recruited volunteers across Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic and Uruguay. The participants were less highly educated than the POINTER cohort had been; 37% had no education beyond a high school diploma, compared to just 5% in the POINTER study. That likely made the study participants more representative of people who might benefit from the trial's interventions.

When Crivelli announced the results of the trial at the conference, a large cheer filled the room. The intervention had achieved a difference of 0.11 points between the test and control groups' z-scores — more than twice the difference seen in the FINGER trial.

That difference corresponded to a relative 55% improvement in overall brain function in the test group compared to the control group at the end of the study.

What made the difference?

Crivelli, Kivipelto and Livingston all pointed to one key factor in explaining the project's relative success. "In Latin America, there are more modifiable risk factors," Kivipelto summarized.

The study participants had lower academic attainment and higher cardiometabolic risk factors, such as high BMI, than the participants in previous studies. The trial had reaped the rewards of delivering the intervention to people who needed it most, experts concluded.

But the approach wasn't perfect. said Dr. Claudia Suemoto, a neuroscientist at the University of São Paulo who presented a detailed breakdown of the trial's results. They found that the intervention didn't improve men's overall cognitive ability, compared with the control group. Only women benefited.

The difference may be that men simply didn't engage in the trial as much as women did, Suemoto's data suggested. Livingston pointed to the trials' exercise classes as an example of an activity that men may not be as likely to participate in, although that's an assumption rather than being based on the trial data.

Can we really prevent dementia?

The LatAm-FINGERS results show that addressing the dementia risk factors that people face is the most effective way to prevent dementia, Livingston said.

And Livingston is leaning into the idea. She's planning a dementia prevention trial in the U.K. that will ask participants about their risk factors and then give them tailored interventions based on the risks they can realistically avoid.

"We ask them to choose which ones they want," Livingston said. "If somebody doesn't want to stop drinking or smoking, then they're not going to."

While LatAm-FINGERS has been the most successful of the FINGER trials to date, it's still unclear whether such projects actually reduce dementia rates.

Only two previous prevention trials have attempted to measure dementia incidence, and neither saw a notable change in their test group. That said, neither trial included cognitive training interventions like FINGER did; they instead focused on cardiovascular risk factors, such as low exercise rates and high body weight.

Measuring changes in dementia rates requires trials much longer than two years, and they also need massive recruitment. Implementing an intensive study like LatAM-FINGERS in the wider community "is not practical," Crivelli said. Instead, she said the study's interventions would need to be distilled into their essential parts so that they could be implemented at scale.

Kivipelto is optimistic that advances in Alzheimer's screening, including new blood-based tests, could provide an early biological measure to show that FINGERS-style interventions can help stave off dementia. This would be an indirect measure but wouldn't require as long a trial as tracking dementia rates.

Some of the risk factors the Lancet Commission identified, like air pollution, can't be modified at an individual level, Livingston noted. A combination of personal and governmental change could address this, she said, as it has in the realm of infectious-disease prevention.

While the scientific field still has uncertainty about the scale of change that trials like FINGERS can bring about, Beltre has little doubt about the trial's impact.

While she previously relied on help from family members like her grandson to complete everyday activities, she said, "I do everything myself now."

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

See how much you know about the most complex organ in the human body with our brain quiz!

Skywatchers across North America and Europe should mark Wednesday, Aug. 12 on their calendars. From a daytime solar eclipse to the peak of the Perseid meteor shower beneath a moonless sky, the date offers an exceptionally rare combination of celestial events within a 24-hour period. Add brilliant Venus and the glowing band of the Milky Way after sunset, and the result is a full day of astronomy that could become one of the standout skywatching opportunities of the year.

The first spectacle arrives during daylight as the moon partially covers the sun across Alaska, eastern Canada and parts of the northeastern U.S. A dramatic total solar eclipse will be visible along a narrow path stretching across eastern Greenland, western Iceland and northern Spain — and that's where eclipse chasers will be. However, about 779 million people in North America, Europe and North Africa will see at least a 10% partial eclipse, according to Time and Date.

Northern Canada will experience North America's deepest partial eclipse, with parts of Nunavut in the Canadian Arctic seeing up to 93% of the sun covered, according to Time And Date; large eastern cities like Toronto, Ottawa and Quebec will see between 8% and 24% coverage. The best views in the U.S. will be from Alaska and the Northeast, with Fairbanks, Alaska, seeing 37% of the sun covered, and Boston seeing 16%.

In Europe, London will see a 91% eclipse and Paris will get 92%. No matter your viewing location, it's important to use ISO 12312-2 certified solar eclipse glasses throughout the entire partial eclipse. Also remember to fit binoculars, telescopes and cameras with solar filters before pointing them at the sun. (Here’s a great selection of gear that will help you safely watch the eclipse from anywhere).

After sunset, the day's second major event begins. Brilliant Venus will be easy to spot as it reaches dichotomy, the point at which the planet appears half illuminated. Through a small telescope or large stargazing binoculars, skywatchers should see Venus resembling a tiny half-moon as it moves closer to Earth.

Once darkness falls, the day's third and fourth major events will begin. The annual Perseid meteor shower will peak during the overnight hours of Aug. 12-13, and this year's display benefits from one crucial advantage: a new moon. With no moonlight washing out faint meteors, observers under truly dark skies could see between 50 and 75 meteors per hour, while even suburban locations should enjoy frequent "shooting stars," according to The Planetary Society.

The best time to look is from midnight to 2 a.m. local time, when the sky is darkest and the constellation Perseus is highest in the sky. As a final bonus, those under dark, rural skies will see the Milky Way arch overhead, providing one of the finest views of our home galaxy all year.

A daytime solar eclipse, a moon-free Perseid meteor shower, a dazzling Venus and spectacular views of the Milky Way make Aug. 12 a great opportunity for anyone with an interest in the night sky. If skies are clear, it could be the single greatest day and night for skywatching in years.

See how much you know about the sun with our sun quiz!

Happy Shark Week, science fans! To mark the occasion, we had a flurry of fishy features this week, including a first look at the secret lives of whale sharks, as seen from cameras on the animals' fins, and the discovery of a "demon cavefish" beneath a World War II chemical weapons facility in Alabama.

This week, we also saw the first drone footage of the birth of a humpback whale.

Meanwhile, off the coast of Spain, the orcas are at it again, sinking yet another ship along the Iberian coast. And speaking of boats, as cargo ships continue to stall near the Strait of Hormuz, scientists have warned of an imminent biological "superspreader" event once the key shipping route reopens.

We also have an update of our own: Live Science has launched Live Science Pro, a paid membership that gives you access to our exclusive features, analyses, interviews, book excerpts and opinion pieces, all without ads And to celebrate, we're offering an introductory price of only $3 for the first three months! You can subscribe here.

Earth registers coldest temperature

Antarctica just experienced minus 119 F, Earth's coldest temperature since 2012 — here's why

While the Northern Hemisphere battled heat waves and wildfires, Antarctica just experienced the lowest temperature recorded on Earth in over a decade. High-altitude research station Concordia, located in the icy continent's interior, logged a low of minus 119.4 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 84.1 degrees Celsius) on July 18, just shy of the coldest temperature ever recorded at the station.

"Even here, where extreme cold is expected, temperatures below minus 84 C are remarkable and highlight how variable Antarctic weather can still be," Gabriele Carugati, the station leader at Concordia for Italy's National Antarctic Research Program, told Live Science from the station.

Discover more planet Earth news

—Magnitude 6.8 earthquake traps shoppers as mall collapses in Japan —‬ here's why the seismic event was unusual

—Colossal scars of 60 million-year-long continental collision streak across warped mountains in Pakistan — Earth from space

—Mice on 'godforsaken' frozen volcanoes eat toxic plants to survive conditions 'not remotely compatible with long-term human survival'

Life's Little Mysteries

Why do cats have 'leg whiskers'?

Cats are known for having whiskers on their faces. But if you look closely, you'll see they also have them on their legs. So what are these leg whiskers for? And how do they differ from the ones on their face?

—If you enjoyed this, sign up for our Life's Little Mysteries newsletter

Geoglyphs from lost Amazonian civilization

Lasers reveal hundreds of geoglyphs made by a mysterious civilization in the Amazon rainforest thousands of years ago

A significant portion of the Amazon rainforest remains unexplored, and even from above, it's almost impossible to see through the trees' thick canopies to find out what lies beneath. However, thanks to modern laser scanning technology, scientists have peered through this wall of leaves ‪—‬ and what they've found may offer new insight into lost human civilizations.

A new lidar survey has revealed hundreds of earthworks made by the Aquiry people, who arose 2,500 years ago in Brazil. So what can these structures teach us about this mysterious lost civilization?

Discover more archaeology news

—Relief fragment with vanquished enemies: A 3,400-year-old depiction of an Egyptian pharaoh crushing western Asian soldiers under his royal chariot

—Ancient human relative cannibalized both adults and children in a cave in Spain 850,000 years ago, fossils reveal

—Archaeologists find 2,800-year-old burial of person clutching sea turtle vessel in El Salvador

Also in science news this week

—A unique antibody system may help explain bats' unusual tolerance of viruses

—Scientists may have found a clue to prevent muscles from aging, study hints

—'Feynman and followers, you guys are off': Physicists disprove decades-old Richard Feynman theory on 'silly' sprinklers

—A strange string of a dozen galaxies keeps surprising astronomers with its missing dark matter

—Scientists discover 2 new 'ghost' lineages that contributed DNA to modern humans

Science Spotlight

Inflammation may trigger persistent 'out-of-body' experiences, emerging research hints

We're increasingly learning about the role of chronic inflammation in a range of diseases, from autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis to neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. However, scientists may have now added a new surprising side effect to this immune response: "out-of-body" experiences.

It's been known for a while that trauma can trigger altered states of consciousness, but exactly what was causing this psychiatric response was unclear. Now, scientists have found that stress triggered by trauma may dial up chronic inflammation, which could, in turn, trigger these dissociative disorders.

Something for the weekend

If you're looking for things to keep you busy over the weekend, here's a selection from our best interviews, explainers, skywatching guides and crosswords that we published this week.

—America's gun violence epidemic, through the eyes of a Chicago trauma surgeon [Interview]

—'World models' are the future of AI, but how do they work? [Explainer]

—Which solar eclipse viewing method is right for you? [Skywatching]

—Live Science crossword puzzle #54: Egyptian pharaoh who died at 18 — 6 down [Crossword]

Science in motion

Chinese rocket hit by rare midair lightning strike moments after launch as onlookers gasp in horror

It's like something from a movie: Seconds after China's Long March 3B rocket launched on July 23, the spacecraft was struck by lightning. Hundreds of spectators watched in shock as at least 100 million volts of electricity hit the craft and surged around its fuselage and through its exhaust plume, before shooting down to Earth.

Despite the strike, the uncrewed rocket safely reached space and successfully deployed its payload into orbit.

Follow Live Science on social media

Want more science news? Follow our Live Science WhatsApp Channel for the latest discoveries as they happen. It's the best way to get our expert reporting on the go, but if you don't use WhatsApp we're also on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Flipboard, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky and LinkedIn.

Cats are known for the whiskers on their faces. However, if you look closely, you can see that they also have whiskers on their legs. So why do cats have leg whiskers?

To answer why they're useful, it's important to understand what whiskers are. Technically known as vibrissae, whiskers are specialized hairs that are stiffer and several times thicker than other hairs. Although whiskers themselves do not contain nerves, their bases are rooted in specialized receptacles loaded with nerve endings, making whiskers very sensitive.

"Facial whiskers are as sensitive as human fingertips," Robyn Grant, a sensory biologist at Manchester Metropolitan University in the U.K., told Live Science.

A cat's whiskers around the nose, which are also known as the mystacial vibrissae, are the longest whiskers they have, according to the veterinary reference book "The Feline Patient" (Wiley, 2025). Although there is variation among cats, on average there are 12 mystacial whiskers set in four rows on each side of the muzzle.

Facial whiskers help cats hunt when light is limited or when their vision is poor. Although cats are good at seeing distant objects, "cats can't really focus on anything less than 10 inches (25 centimeters) from their eyes, so they use their whiskers to figure out where things are," Jonathan Losos, an evolutionary biologist at Washington University in St. Louis and author of "The Cat's Meow: How Cats Evolved from the Savanna to Your Sofa" (Viking, 2023), told Live Science.

In addition, cats have a tuft of whiskers known as superciliary vibrissae above each eye. These whiskers help protect the cat's vision by triggering a blink when stimulated by anything that might fly into their eye, according to The Feline Patient.

Cats also have chin whiskers (mandibular vibrissae) and whiskers on each side of the head, between the ear and chin (genal vibrissae). These also help cats stay aware of the space around them.

Leg whiskers

Cats also possess a tuft of four to six whiskers on the back of each front leg, each about 0.8 to 1.2 inches (2 to 3 centimeters) long. These are known as carpal vibrissae.

"Carpal refers to the bones that, in humans, are in our wrists," Losos said. "Carpal whiskers are attached to cat forelegs near the carpal bones." However, in cats, the carpal bones are not located in the same place as the human wrist. Rather, they "are further up the leg, because cats essentially walk on their toes and not their palms," he explained.

Cats are not the only animals with carpal whiskers. "Most carnivores have them, and many rodents do, as do lemurs and armadillos," Losos said. "Dogs don't have them, but other canine species do. Rabbits don't have them either, nor do ungulates — that is, hooved animals, such as horses and cattle."

The species that have carpal whiskers "tend to be the ones that either grasp things with their forelimbs or climb up trees," Losos said. "The idea is that if it's hard for the animals to see what they're grasping, carpal whiskers can help supplement their vision. Perhaps cats have them and dogs don't because cats can move their forearms laterally from side to side and put their palms together to grab things, whereas dogs can't."

It remains uncertain what role carpal whiskers play in cats, but they likely "guide locomotion — that is, safe forepaw placement — especially during complex locomotion, such as climbing," Grant said. "They might guide prey handling too."

How much of a cat fan are you? Find out by taking our cat quiz!

A private mission to rescue an ailing NASA space telescope may now need a rescue of its own. The LINK spacecraft — designed by private company Katalyst Space to boost the orbit of NASA’s ageing Swift Observatory — is reportedly spinning unexpectedly in the weeks after its launch, so much so that stabilizing the spacecraft will likely delay the telescope rescue.

Katalyst’s LINK spacecraft launched July 3 from a mid-air Northrop Grumman Pegasus XL rocket mounted aboard a modified Lockheed Martin L-1011 airliner. The spacecraft lifted off after less than a year of development, on a mission to catch NASA's nearly 22-year-old Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory before the telescope falls back to Earth.

While teams at NASA and Katalyst are working hard to stabilize the new LINK spacecraft, the next few weeks will be a delicate balance of getting LINK ready before Swift falls back to Earth (which is expected to occur this autumn), while not putting Swift at undue risk.

NASA administrator Jared Isaacman said there’s still time. "We are not giving up yet," he wrote late Thursday (July 30) on X. "This remains a very cool, very low-cost, high-potential, high-reward mission, and another step toward a more autonomous future where missions like this routinely upgrade, repair, service, and boost satellites."

LINK was supposed to rendezvous with Swift about a month after its early-July launch, but now it looks like late August is the earliest possible date, according to the latest update. That’s because the $30-million LINK began spinning in recent days after electrical power issues affected two of the devices that control the spacecraft’s orientation, known as reaction control system (RCS) wheels. Only one of the three RCS is working properly.

As of Thursday (July 30), Katalyst’s mission blog said engineers reduced the rotation with engine fires from the spacecraft, and that work is ongoing to stabilize the spacecraft. LINK is now spinning at four degrees a second, instead of the previous nine.

"Over the last 48 hours, the Katalyst team has worked to reduce LINK’s rotation while assessing current spacecraft functionality and its control system," Katalyst representatives wrote.

All the troubleshooting has delayed LINK’s expected arrival near NASA's Swift Observatory — a legacy telescope designed to detect gamma-ray outbursts — into late August. Time is of the essence, as Swift is expected to fall too far for help by autumn. The observatory has already reduced its science work to stay as streamlined as possible, so that drag doesn’t pull it into the atmosphere this summer.

Swift must stay above a minimum rescue altitude of 185 miles (298 kilometers) for the mission to succeed, agency models suggest. For comparison, the International Space Station typically operates at about 250 miles (400 kilometers) in altitude.

NASA has noted that other systems on LINK are working well. "The spacecraft remains power positive and in communication with the Katalyst team," NASA officials wrote in a Tuesday (July 28) update. Assuming LINK’s attitude stabilizes and the spacecraft is healthy enough, teams "will then evaluate revised plans to approach and capture Swift," NASA stated.

Katalyst’s ultimate goal is to refuel and reboost Swift so that the observatory, worth roughly $450 million today when accounting for inflation, will be able to continue its mission. (The mission cost $250 million in 2004, which is much cheaper than the $10 billion James Webb Space Telescope that launched almost five years ago.)

Swift was initially mainly tasked with looking at gamma-ray bursts, which are huge explosions that happen after a dying and massive star collapses into a black hole. Swift has gathered many observations of these bursts, but it also looks at other stellar changes (like supernovas or X-ray flares) as well as moving objects like comets and asteroids.

Its science remains valuable, a recent NASA statement noted. "Swift is NASA's multitool when it comes to studying the cosmos," S. Bradley Cenko, Swift's principal investigator and an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, said in the statement. "It observes the sky using a wide range of light, and rapidly points at short-lived outbursts, alerting other facilities in space and on the ground to help coordinate follow-up observations."

If successful, the rescue mission could give Swift many more years — potentially decades — to continue surveying the cosmos, as long as its science instruments continue to function.

Surfer, spear-fisher and free-diver Riley Elliott and marine biologist, shark diver and underwater photographer Kori Burkhardt put themselves in harm's way in don't-try-this-at-home "Shark Week" 2026 special "Secrets of the Great White Kill", and Live Science is here with all the TV and streaming details.

It doesn't always go to plan, as this seal uprising and vengeful turtle demonstrate, but great white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) are known for attacking prey from below with such frightening speed and power it can propel their enormous bodies clear out of the water and stun or even kill their prey upon impact.

However, closer inspection has revealed that they can be a little more subtle when the need arises

In "Secrets of the Great White Kill," Eliott and Burkhardt aim to capture and unpack the full range of great white hunting techniques, including one or two surprising methods, the nuances of which have never been fully appreciated before.

How to watch "Secrets of the Great White Kill" in the U.S.

"Secrets of the Great White Kill" airs on Discovery at 8 p.m. ET/PT on Friday, July 31.

If you don't have the Discovery channel on cable, it's available on a streaming basis from several cable alternatives. Best of all, many of the services offer a free trial to new customers.

YouTube TV usually costs $82.99 per month but comes with a free trial and $15 off each of your first five months.

The DirecTV MyEntertainment genre pack costs $42.99 per month after a 5-day free trial, and Hulu + Live TV costs $89.99 per month after a 3-day free trial.

Alternatively, the HBO Max streaming service starts at $10.99 per month.

Can you watch "Secrets of the Great White Kill" in the U.K.?

"Shark Week" programming typically airs on Discovery+ in the U.K. at a later date.

At the time of publication, plans for "Secrets of the Great White Kill" and the other 2026 specials are still firmly under wraps.

If you're currently in the U.K. for work or on vacation from the U.S., you can still catch "Secrets of the Great White Kill" by using a VPN, such as Surfshark.

Watch "Secrets of the Great White Kill" from anywhere

If you're travelling abroad you can access your usual streaming services from anywhere with a good VPN.

A VPN, or virtual private network, is a piece of internet security software that can alter your device's digital location, unlocking the geo-restrictions on most streaming platforms.

Our expert colleagues at TechRadar rate Surfshark as one of the best VPNs. Not only is it great for unblocking streaming services, it has top-level security features, a reasonable price tag and, right now, a big discount.

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

Scientists at IBM and partner institutions say they've reached "quantum advantage" in a trio of experiments demonstrating quantum computing capabilities that even the fastest classical supercomputers can't match.

In a purported major milestone for quantum computing, the experiments show how these machines could perform useful computational tasks, such as computing chemical reactions, within minutes. By comparison, a supercomputer would take years.

In a statement, IBM representatives said these experiments show that quantum computers can provide trusted solutions more efficiently, more cheaply or more accurately than any classical computing method.

Trust and verification

At a July 28 news conference, representatives from IBM, Algorithmiq, Qedma, and the University of Chicago described three experiments demonstrating quantum advantage over classical computers in three different challenges.

Each used IBM's Quantum Heron R3 superconducting quantum computer system running novel error mitigation techniques. The experiments focused on both demonstrating and verifying quantum advantage.

The first study, conducted in partnership with Qedma, investigated the Floquet transverse-field Ising model, a system physicists use to study how a material's magnetic properties evolve when rhythmically driven by external pulses. This is an extremely difficult problem for classical computers because the model's math becomes exponentially more difficult to process as the problem scales. Scientists published the study, which has not been peer-reviewed, on the arXiv preprint server July 27.

But quantum computers can perform deeper computations using the Floquet transverse-field Ising model than their classical counterparts due to quirks of quantum mechanics that allow quantum bits (qubits) to represent not just the 1s and 0s of binary data but also a superposition of the two values, so that calculations can run in parallel.

When physicists use a classical supercomputer to run the model ‪—‬ in this case, the Fugaku supercomputer in Kobe, Japan ‪—‬ they have some trust that the results will be computed correctly and without significant error.

Quantum computers, by contrast, are far more prone to error. They're extremely sensitive to any form of noise, including interference from Earth's magnetic field. One of the chief challenges in quantum computing is finding ways to mitigate the errors caused by this noise.

Scientists can compare a classical supercomputer's results with those of a quantum computer using the Floquet transverse-field Ising model, but only to a certain point. When the classical computer reaches the limit of its ability to compute complex problems, the quantum computer still has plenty of runway left.

But, as IBM principal research scientist Abhinav Kandala explained in an interview with Live Science, the problem lies in trusting the results.

"You want to perform computations that outperform classical, right? But you've relied on classical results for the longest time," he said. "So when you now begin to outperform, or you go beyond classical, how do you know you had the right result? This is a question that's independent of application. For any computation that you want to do, you want to [ask], 'OK, is this really something that I can trust?"

The experiment was designed to create a trusted stack that essentially allowed scientists to verify the quantum computer's results. They used Qedma's quantum error suppression and error mitigation (QESEM) software to provide consistent results, and then compared those results against the Fugaku supercomputer's.

Once the results matched, they cranked up the difficulty until the classical computer could not keep up. Then, to replicate the results, they brought in additional quantum computers.

The team ran the same experiment on multiple quantum computers. To ensure they were getting enough errors to test the error mitigation strategy, Kandala said, they purposely injected each system with different levels of artificial noise and corruption.

"We measured the same circuit on five different quantum computers," Kandala told Live Science, including a superconducting quantum computer from IBM Boston and another at IBM Pittsburgh.

They also ran the experiments on two of Quantinuum's quantum computers, using the same error mitigation techniques. In each measurement, the noise and corruption injected into the system was different, but the computational results were consistent.

Quantum building blocks

In the second experiment, conducted by IBM and Algorithmiq, researchers applied the Floquet transverse-field Ising model to a different set of problems and used a different method for error mitigation. As the researchers scaled the problem on both the classical and quantum computers, the classical systems began to produce inconsistent results. The quantum systems, by contrast, maintained consistency at measured intervals, thus demonstrating verifiable outputs, the team reported in a preprint paper posted to arXiv July 28.

The third study, uploaded to arXiv July 28 and conducted in partnership with the University of Chicago, approached quantum advantage from a different angle. Researchers designed a system of "Clifford gates," a type of circuit that is intentionally easy for classical computers to simulate. Then, they made the circuits progressively harder for classical systems to solve by injecting them with more difficult gates called T gates.

The nature of the experiment allowed physicists to guarantee error mitigation at complexities beyond what a classical supercomputer could handle. Any computations run through the circuit ‪—‬ even those that would be impossible for a classical computer ‪—‬ would be trustworthy by design.

Based on these three technical papers and other press information provided by IBM, it appears that each of the experiments demonstrated a clear quantum advantage over classical computers. Whether it will stay that way, however, remains to be seen.

There have been numerous reports of laboratories achieving "quantum supremacy," "quantum utility" and "quantum advantage" over the past few years — each, essentially, claiming to have surpassed the abilities of classical computing. However, most of those achievements ended up being topped. It isn't possible for physicists to imagine every possible mathematical method for conducting classical computations when they test quantum computers against state-of-the-art supercomputers.

IBM and its partners said they expect classical computer scientists to try disproving their claims.

"The classical back-and-forth ‪—‬ that'll keep going on, I think," Kandala said. "And that should; that's how science progresses. And that's precisely [why we have] the Quantum Advantage Tracker, a benchmark for measuring quantum advantage. "A lot of these problems have been on the tracker for a while now," Kandala said, "and I'm sure getting the papers out will get more eyes on it."

LONDON ‪—‬ New blood tests for Alzheimer's disease aim to catch the condition in its earliest stages. Scientists hope that, someday, by spotting very early signs of dementia and enabling earlier treatments, these tests could significantly improve patients' prognoses.

But how well do current blood tests work for that purpose?

At the Alzheimer's Association International Conference in London on July 12-15, Live Science spoke with researchers and clinicians who study and use blood tests for Alzheimer's disease. Here's their take on the current state of these tests and their practicality for real-world use

Scientists' big hopes for the tests

People diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease face an incurable condition, but their outlook is marginally more hopeful than it was 10 years ago. That's because the first "disease-modifying" drugs for Alzheimer's, which target the disease's causes rather than its symptoms, have been approved in recent years.

These drugs, which include the lab-made antibodies lecanemab and donanemab, only slow, rather than stop, the progression of the disease. However, researchers hope these medicines could be the precursors to more effective treatments.

Alzheimer's disease researchers hotly debate the exact causes of the condition, but they are united on the idea that early intervention is likely to produce the best possible outcome for patients. The aim is to remove disease-linked proteins before they can damage the brain.

That's why new blood tests for Alzheimer's disease, some of which have been approved in the past year, are exciting so many scientists. These tests, which measure chemical signals of the disease circulating through the bloodstream, are currently paired with other clinical exams to provide an accurate Alzheimer's diagnosis for patients with early symptoms, such as subtle changes to memory or personality.

The hope is that if these patients could be identified at this stage, they could access clinical trials and treatments when they might be the most helpful.

What do Alzheimer's blood tests measure?

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two blood tests for Alzheimer's disease: Roche's Elecsys pTau181 assay and Fujirebio's Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio test.

An additional test from Roche (the Elecsys pTau217 test) has received a basic safety certification in the European Union and U.K., which allows it to be sold but is not equivalent to FDA approval. This test is not approved in the U.S. yet. A second test from Fujirebio (the Lumipulse G pTau 217 Plasma assay) is in the same boat.

Plus, there are a host of other tests made in specific clinical laboratories; these are not FDA-approved but they are available in certain specialist clinics.

All of these tests in varying stages of approval measure "a core part of the pathology of Alzheimer's disease in the brain," said Dr. Sebastian Palmqvist, a clinical neurologist at Lund University in Sweden. These include two proteins that build up in the brains of Alzheimer's patients: tau and amyloid.

The Elecsys tests and the FDA-approved Lumipulse test measure levels of tau in the blood, while the other Lumipulse test measures the ratio of tau to amyloid. Both measurements can be used to indirectly assess the presence of amyloid plaques, sticky deposits in the brain that are associated with the disease's progression.

It's important to note that the blood tests alone aren't diagnostics for Alzheimer's disease, said Dr. Jemma Hazan, an old-age psychiatrist at University College London. Instead, "the test is telling you whether you have certain abnormal proteins in your brain." This, she said, makes it important to use the test in a setting where patients can be properly directed to the next steps of diagnosis and treatment.

How are Alzheimer's disease blood tests used?

Currently in the U.S., Alzheimer's blood tests are approved for use only for adults ages 55 and older who have signs of cognitive impairment, like memory problems. Palmqvist said these tests are best used by specialists with knowledge of dementia, such as doctors in memory clinics. They aren't approved for use by primary care doctors in the U.S.

"The clinicians working there [at memory clinics] have many, many years of experience of interpreting these types of biomarkers," he explained.

Before the advent of these blood tests, memory clinics had to rely solely on expensive brain scanning technology or invasive lumbar punctures to identify physical signs of Alzheimer's disease. The new tests greatly simplify diagnosis, Palmqvist said, but they still need to be used in combination with other tests.

So currently, if a patient receives a positive blood test, they must undergo further cognitive testing, brain scans or invasive biomarker analyses to confirm the diagnosis.

While for now the blood tests are best used by specialists, data that Palmqvist presented at the conference suggested that access to a blood test result may improve a primary care physician’s diagnostic accuracy to levels closer to a memory clinic specialist's. That hints that the test may eventually be usable in primary care, without more invasive diagnostics.

How well do the approved Alzheimer's tests work?

In clinical trials, the approved Lumipulse test had a sensitivity of 97.6% and a specificity of 90.8%. Sensitivity refers to the percentage of people who do have amyloid in their brains that test positive — so it's the rate of true positives. Specificity refers to the percentage of healthy people who test negative, meaning true negatives.

However, the test was recalled in February because it returned an unusually high percentage of false-positive results when it was used in the real world, compared to clinical trials. Palmqvist said there's now a newer version of the same test that avoids this problem.

Analyses comparing pTau217 and pTau181, the two tau biomarkers that Roche uses in its tests, have concluded that pTau217 is a more accurate indicator of Alzheimer's disease. That means it more closely matches results from gold-standard amyloid brain scans.

Dr. Ashton Harper, global medical affairs lead for neurosciences at Roche Diagnostics, said the Roche pTau217 test correctly spotted Alzheimer's-linked proteins 96.1% of the time and accurately ruled out that pathology 94.7% of the time in trials. By comparison, pTau181 — the Roche test approved in the U.S. — correctly identified Alzheimer's pathology 83.6% of the time and ruled out pathology in healthy brains 72.2% of the time.

Patients who take this more-accurate test are given one of three possible results based on two cutoff points, Harper said. If their tau level comes back above the upper cutoff — giving a positive result — clinicians can be "highly certain" that the patient has disease-linked amyloid in their brain, he said.

Below the lower of the two cutoffs, clinicians can be confident that their patient doesn't have any disease-linked amyloid in their brain. If the reading comes back in between the two cutoffs, though, the result is uncertain.

Current guidelines set by the Alzheimer’s Association require that patients end up in that gray area no more than 20% of the time, and the pTau217 test meets that requirement, Harper said. As with patients who get a positive test result, patients who receive these uncertain results are also advised to undergo further testing, such as scans or cognitive tests.

There are other reasons a person without Alzheimer's disease might get a positive test result; rare cases of severe kidney disease, for example, can artificially inflate the test's readings.

Harper said early data suggests that Roche's pTau217 test is roughly as accurate at detecting Alzheimer's disease proteins in cognitively unimpaired people as it is in those with symptoms. This may someday open the door to prevent Alzheimer's in patients who have not yet developed symptoms, he suggested, clarifying that Roche's test is not intended for that use yet.

How do Alzheimer's tests actually affect patients' care?

In the U.S., these tests can help patients get a diagnosis more quickly, but treatment options for the condition remain limited.

The approved antibody drugs are available through both private and government insurers, but they still cost the patient thousands of dollars each month. And again, these drugs only slow, rather than stop, the progression of the disease.

Researchers hope that early treatment with the drugs will enhance their effectiveness, but as of yet, there's no published data to back this idea up.

In the U.K., disease-modifying drugs like the antibodies have not been approved by the U.K.'s National Health Service (NHS) yet. Because the drugs only modestly slow Alzheimer's progression, ultimately, the NHS determined that they were too costly to cover without clearer signs of efficacy. That means British patients cannot access the drug for free.

Still, Hazan said a positive test could be beneficial for patients.

"Diagnostic accuracy is important in its own right so that people feel more certain about the diagnosis and also there are management implications," Hazan said. While they can't access antibody drugs, patients do have access to drugs that help ease the condition's cognitive and behavioral symptoms, as well as non-pharmacological treatments like behavior management.

Diagnosed patients can also access one of the many clinical trials for the condition. It's estimated that 50,000 patients are needed to populate these ongoing trials worldwide.

Hazan and Palmqvist agreed that, despite the blood tests' accuracy, they should not be used to preventively screen for Alzheimer's in people with no symptoms. That's because testing in a wider population, where fewer people will have Alzheimer's disease, naturally increases the number of false-positive results, even while the assay itself retains the same level of accuracy. This could lead many healthy people to be incorrectly diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, which would cause stress for patients and have significant financial implications for healthcare systems.

Newer tests that are still in development may help reduce the likelihood of false positives by measuring only a subset of tau protein that comes directly from the brain rather than from the rest of the body, Palmqvist said. But for now, mass screening remains a goal, rather than a reality, for these blood-based Alzheimer's diagnostics.

"I think that's the next frontier," Palmqvist said.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

See how much you know about the most complex organ in the human body with our brain quiz!

Science word of the day: Covalent

Pronunciation: Coh-VAY'-lent

What it means: In chemistry, a covalent bond occurs when two atoms share a pair of electrons. Electrons zip around atomic nuclei at different energy levels, or "shells." An atom fills its shells with electrons starting from the lowest-energy shell to the highest-energy one, which is called the valence shell. Valence-shell electrons can interact with the valence shells of other atoms. When two atoms get close enough, their valence electrons can feel the pull from both nuclei at once, binding the two atoms together into a stable molecule.

How to use it in a sentence: When atoms share electrons in a covalent bond, they form some of the most stable bonds in chemistry ‪—‬ which is good news, because these bonds are also the basis of most organic molecules and organisms, including you.

Can you crack our science word of the day puzzle, Chain Word?