close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20160827170922/http://mmr.sagepub.com:80/content/9/2/118.abstract
  • Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.
Impact Factor:1.927 | Ranking:Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary 8 out of 93
Source:2016 Release of Journal Citation Reports, Source: 2015 Web of Science Data

Are Humanism and Mixed Methods Related? Leibniz’s Universal (Chinese) Dream

  1. José Andrés-Gallego1
  1. 1Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (Superior Council of Scientific Research), Madrid, Spain
  1. José Andrés-Gallego, C/Fermin Caballero 56, 28034 Madrid, Spain. Email: 1848jag{at}gmail.com

Abstract

According to Guba and Lincoln, renunciation of mixed methods is characteristic of a moribund culture with the possible exception of human sciences. The question I raise here is whether a person can be considered a humanist only if he or she mixes methods, and I analyze Leibniz’s search for a universal system of justice to test this hypothesis. Considering the difference between a methodology and a mere approach, I also consider the issue of whether acquiring knowledge of any methodology always entails an approach. I stress the relationship between the concepts of “paradigm” and “culture” as a set of habits linked to mixed methods, and I conclude with an explanation of how mixing methods can be first sequential and, then, concurrent.

Article Notes

  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

  • Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Journal of Mixed Methods Research vol. 9 no. 2 118-132
    All Versions of this Article:
    1. current version image indicatorVersion of Record - Apr 9, 2015
    2. OnlineFirst Version of Record - Dec 22, 2013
    What's this?

Share