close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20050422002404/http://americablog.org:80/

    

BERJAYA
A great nation
 deserves the truth

AMERICAblog.com
http://AMERICAblog.blogspot.com

by John Aravosis & friends

Send me your tips/comments:

(Press Inquiries: Put the word
"media" in the subject line.)

Join my Gay Politics
email list: 
click here



Syndicate my site:
BERJAYA

BERJAYA Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines BERJAYA

AMERICAblog is a proud sponsor of:
BERJAYA

Jeff Gannon Links
- Gannon linked to male prostitution
- Washington Post
- NBC Nightly News, video
- CNN's Reliable Sources, video and transcript
- NY Daily News
- The Daily Show, video
- Bill Maher, video
- Gannon on CNN's 360, video and transcript
- CNN's Aaron Brown, video
- Salon on Gannon escort sites
- Maureen Dowd
- Frank Rich
- Salon: More questions about Gannon's incredible access
- Court TV, video

- Why this story matters
- Joe Conason on Gannon
- Examples of Gannon's softball questions
-
Story ideas for journalists

 

Please consider making a donation to support AMERICAblog and independent media.

Or feel free to use snail mail: John Aravosis, PO Box 21831, Wash, DC 20009

check to have links open new windows

Thursday, April 21, 2005

John Bolton: UN ambassador, gay-basher, stalker?

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 07:44:00 PM

Just when you thought John Bolton, Bush's choice for UN ambassador, couldn't get any creepier. Now there are charges that he tried to destroy the reputation of a whistleblower by spreading rumors to her coworkers that she was lesbian, and that he literally stalked this woman in a hotel, beating on her door and chasing her down hallways. Uh, excuse me, but is that behavior even legal, let alone worthy of a UN ambassador?

Here's an excerpt of the letter the woman wrote to the US Senate:
Dear Sir:

I'm writing to urge you to consider blocking in committee the nomination of John Bolton as ambassador to the UN.

In the late summer of 1994, I worked as the subcontracted leader of a US AID project in Kyrgyzstan....

After months of incompetence, poor contract performance, inadequate in-country funding, and a general lack of interest or support in our work from the prime contractor, I was forced to make US AID officials aware of the prime contractor's poor performance....

Within hours of sending a letter to US AID officials outlining my concerns, I met John Bolton, whom the prime contractor hired as legal counsel to represent them to US AID....

Mr. Bolton proceeded to chase me through the halls of a Russian hotel -- throwing things at me, shoving threatening letters under my door and, generally, behaving like a madman. For nearly two weeks, while I awaited fresh direction from my company and from US AID, John Bolton hounded me in such an appalling way that I eventually retreated to my hotel room and stayed there. Mr. Bolton, of course, then routinely visited me there to pound on the door and shout threats.

When US AID asked me to return to Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan in advance of assuming leadership of a project in Kazakstan, I returned to my project to find that John Bolton had proceeded me by two days. Why? To meet with every other AID team leader as well as US foreign-service officials in Bishkek, claiming that I was under investigation for misuse of funds and likely was facing jail time. As US AID can confirm, nothing was further from the truth.

He indicated to key employees of or contractors to State that, based on his discussions with investigatory officials, I was headed for federal prison and, if they refused to cooperate with either him or the prime contractor's replacement team leader, they, too, would find themselves the subjects of federal investigation. As a further aside, he made unconscionable comments about my weight, my wardrobe and, with a couple of team leaders, my sexuality, hinting that I was a lesbian (for the record, I'm not).

When I resurfaced in Kyrgyzstan, I learned that he had done such a convincing job of smearing me that it took me weeks -- with the direct intervention of US AID officials -- to limit the damage.
Read it all at Daily Kos. It's bad.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Experts solve mystery of unpopped popcorn

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 07:19:00 PM

Consider this is a breather after a bad 24 hours. Kind of like liquor, but newsier.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Open thread

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 06:43:00 PM

Man, this Microsoft story is growing, at least judging by my emails and the press calls. Good. Serves them right.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Big gay rights bill loses in Washington State by one vote - Where was Microsoft?

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 05:07:00 PM

The gay rights bill I reported on last night just lost in the Washington state Senate minutes ago by a 24-25 vote, i.e., by one vote.

All the Republicans voted against the bill, and at least one Democrat. Apparently the forces of good did win a procedural vote to force the bill out of committee and onto the Senate floor, but then it was killed by the 24-25 vote. As an interesting aside, if you can call it that, one of the moderate Republicans voting against the bill was the guy representing Redmond, Microsoft's district.

And speaking of Microsoft, haven't heard a lot from them today, have we.

I'm hearing rumblings that Microsoft is now claiming the story in The Stranger is "wrong." That's the story that exposed last night that Microsoft refused to endorse the bill this time around, even though they had previously endorsed it, and that Microsoft's non-endorsement came on the heels of a boycott threat from a single anti-gay radical right preacher.

So what exactly isn't true about the story? You mean Microsoft DID support this year's gay rights bill? Well, not according to all the top sources I talked to in Washington state over the past 24 hours. According to them, people have known for weeks that Microsoft caved. And if the story were wrong, and Microsoft did support the legislation, then why didn't Microsoft speak out today to correct this "error"? And why didn't Microsoft call The Stranger back before the story went to print, in order to give their side and correct the "error" before it went to press? (They refused to call back.) Why, indeed.

It's hard to reach any other conclusion than that Microsoft just screwed us. The bill lost by one vote, and it's hard to imagine that Microsoft, run by the richest man in the world, couldn't have had some influence on which way that one vote swung, especially when Microsoft's own member of the Senate is a moderate R and voted the wrong way.

Microsoft has been a champion of gay rights for years. But by the admission of their own staff, as quoted in The Stranger, they've decided to reevaluate how much they get involved in these kind of political debates, and clearly their reevaluation has told them to get LESS involved, not MORE.

Microsoft, for whatever reason, has decided it's time to pull back from its previous decade long (if not more) support for civil rights in general, and the civil rights of gays and lesbians in specific. That's not only sad and infuriating, it's also incredibly ominous. It means the culture wars have taken their toll on the richest man in the world, and one of the biggest companies in America. It means that Microsoft may very well go soft on it's pro-gay advocacy in other states and at the national level. And finally, it means that other companies may now follow Microsoft's lead and jilt the gays as well.

Hell, if the richest man in the world thinks helping the homos is bad business, who's to argue?

What we may have just witnessed over the past 24 hours is the beginning of a business backlash against gays and our civil rights as Americans. The attacks started years ago from the religious right, worked its way into the US presidency and the Congress, and then down into the states. And now, America's top corporations - businesses who we counted as our friends - are offering us up for slaughter.

Shame on Microsoft. It had the chance to stand up and show the country that you can do well by doing good. But instead it sat by and shut up while our civil rights went down in flames. And yes, Microsoft was great on gay rights issues in the past. But that's all the more reason to be confused and troubled by their actions today, and all the more reason to be concerned, very concerned, that this is a sign of more betrayals to come from Microsoft, and those businesses who now choose to follow the prejudiced precedent that Microsoft just set.

It's one thing to watch a right-wing company take pot shots at you. It's quite another to watch a longtime friend stab you in the back. That's not something you recover from, ever.

PS I just heard a new joke today:

Q: How do you spell "Microsoft"?
A: C-o-o-r-s

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Open thread

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 03:08:00 PM

Chat away. More Microsoft updates coming shortly.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Is it safe to be gay in America anymore?

by Joe in DC - 4/21/2005 02:13:00 PM

I have a really sick feeling again. It's the same way I felt after the election. It really doesn't feel safe to be gay in America.

The radical right wingers have a bloodlust to enact their agenda. The GOP believes gay-bashing is a winning strategy. The Democrats are cowering over the gay issues. Sam Brownback told D.C. not to give us any rights. Mayor Bloomberg is trying to have it both ways too. He appealed the gay marriage decision.

Microsoft has abandoned gays in Washington State.

Okay, we did win in Connecticut. Kudos to the folks up there. Mike Lawlor and Andrew McDonald did a super job, but even there, they had to insert language precluding gay marriage.

It just doesn't feel safe to be gay. We have a new Pope who spent years refining his gay bashing. He says we have disorders. And the Catholic hierarchy here in America goes right along with it.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Dear Microsoft, you messed with the wrong faggots

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 12:25:00 PM

Dear Microsoft,

You messed with the wrong faggots.

You thought you were avoiding a religious right boycott by suddenly going anti-gay. And you may have thought "hell, the evangelicals boycott us, the gays boycott us - we've got to choose one, and the evangelicals are in power, so let's screw the gays."

But here's something you didn't count on. You messed with the wrong faggots.

We have no intent of launching a boycott. Boycotts are hard to enforce, especially when dealing with a monopoly. And in any case, we're smarter than that. We're the country's top lobbyists, and grassroots activists, and lawyers, and politicos, and bloggers working in both Washingtons (state and DC).

When we fuck back, we don't launch boycotts. When we fuck back, we go for the jugular.

Changing the subject, we understand congratulations is in order. You're planning a 2.2 million square foot expansion of the Microsoft campus in Redmond over the next ten to twenty years. The expansion, we hear, would allow you to hire 10,000 to 20,000 new employees.

Well bully for you. You must be quite excited about that.

We also hear that you're going to need a lot of help - a LOT of help - from the state legislature and the Redmond city council to actually make that expansion work, for highway and road improvements and the like, and that not everybody is real happy about it.

Well, wouldn't it be funny if some really smart faggots decided to use their political expertise to kill any possibility of you getting the legislation and city council approval you need to make that expansion happen? And wouldn't it be even funnier if those same faggots went to your competitors and asked them to finance the entire campaign to kill your expansion?

It'd be pretty hard to hire those extra employees without your expansion, wouldn't it? I'm not saying anyone is going to do that to you. I'm just saying it would be really funny.

Best of luck to you with the legislative session over the next 24 hours.

Yours truly,

One of the faggots you just screwed

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


TAKE ACTION: 24 Hours to STOP Microsoft's anti-gay bigotry

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 11:27:00 AM

UPDATE: The full newspaper story explaining what Microsoft did is now online here.

Folks, as I'd told you last night, Microsoft has withdrawn its support for a sweeping gay rights bill in Washington state after a single religious right anti-gay activist complained. The bill has one day - ONE DAY - left for possible passage, then it's dead. The vote is close, very close - and Microsoft's decision, I'm told by folks in the state, could be the death knell of this bill.

I've explained much more in my post below.

PLEASE contact Microsoft today and let them know you're made as hell. They have 24 hours to save this legislation or they are toast. And remember, this isn't just about this bill. Microsoft has supported gay rights for over ten years now, they've gotten senior management who are openly gay, and now, all of a sudden, they've decided to rethink just how pro-gay they should be (read my post below, it's chilling what Microsoft had to say about all of this). If we lose Microsoft, we could lose lots and lots and lots of other major corporations that follow their lead.

I for one have had it with the backlash. It's not longer PC to be pro-gay in America, and enough is enough. It's time to take back our country. Tell Microsoft it has 24 hours to use its massive influence to save that bill, or Microsoft had better buy a lot of advertising in the Baptist Press, because those are the only customers they're going to have left.

Here's the Take Action info from my other post, but do read the other post if you want all the background:

********** TAKE ACTION **********

1. Call Microsoft's director of Government Relations, Jack Krumholtz, at tel. 202-263-5900 and tell him:

- You know about Microsoft secretly pulling its support for the Washington state gay rights bill, and you're not happy about Microsoft kissing up to anti-gay bigots.

- You demand that Microsoft IMMEDIATELY and PUBLICLY endorse the gay rights bill in Washington state, and demand that Microsoft publicly repudiate its new policy of backing-off of support for the civil rights of gays and lesbians and other Americans.

- Tell him that if the Washington state gay rights bill dies on Friday, Microsoft's reputation goes down with it.

2. Contact these other contacts for Microsoft and its public relations reps and tell them the same thing:

- Jim Desler,
Microsoft US
425-703-6061
jdesler@microsoft.com

- Dirk Delmartino,
Microsoft Europe
+32 (0)2 550 06 21
dirkdelm@microsoft.com

- The firm handling public policy for Microsoft in DC:
The Glover Park Group
Washington, DC
202-337-0808

- The firm handling Microsoft's "rapid response" to questions:
Waggener Edstrom Rapid Response Team
rrt@wagged.com
503-443-7070

- Media Relations for Microsoft
Global Communications & Television
(212) 339-9920
mediarelations@gctv.com

- Microsoft Investor Relations
Curt Anderson
(425) 706-3703

- Walt McGraw, Edelman, (206) 223-1606, walt.mcgraw@edelman.com

- Shon Damron, Edelman, (323) 857-9100, shon.damron@edelman.com

- Carlos de Leon,tel. 425-703-3824, or carlosde@microsoft.com

- Katie Goldberg, tel. 206-268-2244, or katie.goldberg@edelman.com

2. Demand that Microsoft return the award it received from the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center. We don't give corporate bigots awards, and we don't expect them to keep such awards under false pretenses. If Microsoft has now rethunk its position on defending civil rights, then give back the damn award:

Per Microsoft's own Web site:
Microsoft has been honored for its pioneering work on behalf of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community with the annual Corporate Vision Award of the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center.
Yeah, I don't think so.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


FireFox is having issues with blogger, fyi

by John in DC - 4/21/2005 10:51:00 AM

The FireFox browser is having problems with blogger.com blog addresses, fyi. For my blog, for instance, if you use FireFox, make sure you type in Americablog.com or .org, and do NOT use the blogspot address. That should fix it. In the meantime, FireFox has been notified - this has been happening to other blogs too.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Greenspan delivers another shocker

by Chris in Paris - 4/21/2005 10:40:00 AM

The deficits are bad and will cause problems if they're not corrected. Whew! I don't think that just anyone off of the street could deliver such words of wisdom. What are we going to do when he's no longer part of the team?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


This DeLay thing gets more and more interesting...

by Joe in DC - 4/21/2005 10:26:00 AM

Lots of DeLay-related news today. This whole ugly mess is entangling more and more major players.

NY Times has a piece on all the major funders to his private foundation:

A children's charity established by Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, has been underwritten by several of the nation's largest companies and their executives, including companies that routinely lobby lawmakers on issues before Congress, according to a review of charity records released by the companies and other documents.
According to the Times, the list of donors is a who's who of major corporations and billionaires:

AT&T;, the Corrections Corporation of America, Exxon Mobil, Limited Brands and the Southern Company, as well as Bill and Melinda Gates, the Microsoft founder and his wife, and Michael Dell of Dell computers.
The growing DeLay/Abramoff scandal is now further entangling some of the other big GOP players, including Grover Norquist and Ralph Reed, who've been subpeonaed by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, chaired by John McCain. Raw Story has the details. Apparently, Grover's group, Americans for Tax Reform, won't turn over documents to the Hill. Ralph, the little cherub, is running for Lieutenant Governor in Georgia.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave.....

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


It's the Economy Again, Stupid....

by Joe in DC - 4/21/2005 07:35:00 AM

The Washington Post nailed the current economic situation and how it's being dealt with politically....basically, it's not:

Inflation and interest rates are rising, stock values have plunged, a tank of gas induces sticker shock, and for nearly a year, wages have failed to keep up with the cost of living.

Yet in Washington, the political class has been consumed with the death of a brain-damaged woman in Florida, the ethics of the House majority leader, and the fate of the Senate filibuster.
That sums up it pretty well. The Bush economic agenda, if there is one, is to destroy Social Security. That's it.

The Democrats have to drape this economy around the necks of every single Republican. It's the GOP's economy. They have to pay the price for it.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


David Horsey cartoon on Bush nominees

by Chris in Paris - 4/21/2005 04:38:00 AM

Maybe just a slight exaggeration, but not too far off.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Gorby rips on US over nukes

by Chris in Paris - 4/21/2005 04:19:00 AM

Funny how some people just don't like the old "do as I say, not as I do" routine. Nukes are OK for us but not for others? It's OK for us to invade a country but not others?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Vatican II: Prague Spring or False Dawn?

by Michael in New York - 4/21/2005 03:08:00 AM

I'm finally ready to post again after the shock of hearing Cardinal Ratzinger named the new Pope. Now I have to decide if the Catholic Church still embodies the promise of Vatican II. Was the mid Sixties a Prague Spring in the Church -- a period of openness that has inspired a backlash but will ultimately prevail? Or was it a false dawn, portending nothing but a respite on the road to fundamentalism? I know what answer Ratzinger would give -- and was ever anyone in the Church given such a foreboding, Dickensian name as he?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Ratzinger's Spiritual Mentor Dined With, Praised Hitler

by Michael in New York - 4/21/2005 02:54:00 AM

Yes, more information from the well-travelled territory of Pope Benedict XVI/Ratzinger's childhood during the war. This time, the Independent UK goes to his hometown and quotes a number of people quite hard on the teenage Ratzinger.

Yet, in Traunstein, some of the town's older residents feel that questions about the Pope's early years remain unanswered. Herta Kaiser, an 83-year-old pensioner recalled that several people in the town hid Jews from the Nazis and helped them to escape to neutral Switzerland. "Traunstein was not all Nazi, it was also a Catholic stronghold," she said.

There is no evidence that the Ratzinger family felt inclined to help the town's few remaining Jews, or the smattering of anti-Nazi resistance fighters who dared to oppose the regime.

Elizabeth Lohner, 84, whose brother-in-law was sent to Dachau concentration camp for being a conscientious objector, recalled: "It was possible to resist and those people set an example for others." She added: "The Ratzingers were young and made different choices."

In 1937, another Traunstein family hid a local anti-Nazi resistance fighter, named Hans Braxenthaler. He had been tortured in Dachau for his opposition to the regime. Frieda Meyer, 82, one of the Ratzinger family's neighbours at the time, said: "When Braxenthaler was betrayed and the Nazis came for him, he shot himself rather than give himself up."


And here's info I haven't read before about Ratzinger's mentor:

Ratzinger's election will also raise questions about the dubious role played by the Catholic Church during the Nazi era. The extent to which leading Catholics felt obliged to reach compromises with the regime is outlined by the stance taken by Ratzinger's mentor, Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber, one of the Pope's most important early influences.

Documented evidence shows that the cardinal visited Hitler's mountain retreat during the 1930s and was entertained to lunch by the F�hrer in person. During their meeting, Von Faulhaber is on record as telling Hitler that the Church saw him as an "authority chosen by God, to whom we owe respect".


Some mentor. As fallible human beings, I'm sure we can all empathize with the desire to not be harmed. Heck, this is how Naziism and the Holocaust flourished: the price of resisting seemed too high for too many people. But without being flippant or too judgmental, it's hardly crazy to expect a future Pope to do BETTER than most people, to rise above their fears and risk it all for what was so clearly the moral choice. 17 is hardly too young an age for that.

But this doesn't interest me. What DOES interest me is the Pope's attitude towards this painful and indeed shameful past. (It may be understandable, it is certainly defensible, but it is unquestionably a source of pain -- as opposed to the people who bravely resisted and paid the price.) In every quote from his memoir or statements about this time, Pope Benedict XVI explains and defends and rationalizes. I haven't seen any quotes about how this past must pain and sadden him. I'm CERTAIN there must be some at least pro forma statements to that effect. If anyone has an English language version of the memoir or can link to quotes from reputable media where the Pope talks about this defining episode and how it's shaped his worldview, I'd love to see it.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Wednesday, April 20, 2005

Screw Microsoft, Download FireFox Web Browser

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 11:23:00 PM

It really is great, I use it and love it. Friends turned me on to it months ago (I know, I was a late bloomer). It works just like Internet Explorer, but it's LOTS LOTS LOTS better. Meaning, it's not so different that you'll be confused, but it's different enough that it rocks.

Piss of Microsoft. Download FireFox here for free.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Abramoff gave DeLay a free skybox for donors

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 11:11:00 PM

The man is such toast.

And by the way, what Bible and God does the religious right worship, anyway, that Tom DeLay is their number one hero? Do these people worship Satan or something? It boggles the mind how morally and spiritually corrupt the thumper crowd is. Man, you could make a better anti-Christ than these people.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Open thread

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 10:58:00 PM

Chat away.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Connecticut approves civil unions for gays, statewide

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 10:01:00 PM

Take THAT, Microsoft.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Hotline labels Andrew Sullivan a "centrist"

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 09:19:00 PM

Enough already. Pretty soon they'll be hiring Andrew Sullivan to represent liberal bloggers. I like Andrew, he's a friend. Drives me nuts sometimes, as I'm sure I do him. But he helped me come out, and I will always remember that (though sometimes he probably regrets it :-) In any case, this is just bull. Andrew is now a centrist? Then what the hell are the rest of us?

Anyway, here is what the august inside-the-beltway publication Hotline called him today:
Centrist Andrew Sullivan: "I was trying to explain last night to a non-Catholic just how dumb-struck many reformist Catholics are by the elevation of Ratzinger. And then I found a way to explain. This is the religious equivalent of having had four terms of George W. Bush only to find that his successor as president is Karl Rove. Get it now?"

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Microsoft employees, we need your help, please

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 08:27:00 PM

If you're a Microsoft employee and not happy that your company just fed gay and lesbian citizens of Washington state to the religious right lions, then do I have a mission for you.

I want internal phone numbers, email addresses and fax numbers for lots of top Microsoft executives.

During StopDrLaura.com, someone at Paramount Pictures literally FEDEXed me the entire internal Paramount staff directory - it was pretty hysterical. Come on folks, I know you can top that :-) My email is at the top right corner of this page.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Vatican says we simply haven't seen Ratzinger's soft side yet

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 08:16:00 PM

The man is 78. Give me a break. I think we'd have seen it by now.

Bishop Tutu slams Ratz pretty good in the article too.

More on Ratz from Bill Berkowitz.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


TAKE ACTION: Microsoft abandons gays

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 07:04:00 PM

UPDATE: The full newspaper article on this issue is now online here.

NOTE: This post is long because it's important. What I describe in detail below, Microsoft caving to religious right extremists, is not just outrageous and unprecedented, it's downright dangerous for all of our civil rights considering the precedent Microsoft has just set for other businesses that follow its lead. We have a little over 24 hours for Microsoft make things right, otherwise Microsoft may have just killed a major gay rights bill out west.

If anyone out there has inside phone numbers and email addresses for the Microsoft brass, please email them to me. I have some email and phone contacts at the end of this post, PLEASE USE THEM. Thanks.
----------

MICROSOFT SECRETLY PULLS SUPPORT FOR GAY RIGHTS BILL IN WASHINGTON STATE TO CURRY FAVOR WITH RELIGIOUS RIGHT

Microsoft Corporation pulled its support for a gay rights bill in Washington state last month after complaints from a single radical right anti-gay leader, according to an article just published in the Seattle paper, The Stranger (the article is on the news stands already, online Thursday).

My sources in Washington state tell me that the vote on the bill, expected in two days (Friday), is SO CLOSE that Microsoft's actions may be pivotal in KILLING THE PRO-GAY LEGISLATION.

The radical right activist reportedly told Microsoft it had better pull its support for the gays or anti-gay bigots would launch a nationwide boycott of Microsoft, and guess what - Microsoft caved. A single anti-gay jerk, and Microsoft chose to reverse over ten years of policy and bash gays.

This is outrageous. It's also incredibly dangerous. For over a decade Microsoft, along with hundreds of other corporate leaders, has endorsed gay rights legislation in the states and nationally. And now, suddenly, because ONE ANTI-GAY ACTIVIST COMPLAINED, they've suddenly changed their minds ON A CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE. A rather big "oops" after ten years of being in favor of civil rights, don't you think?

WILL MICROSOFT NOW PULL ITS SUPPORT FOR OTHER GAY RIGHTS?

What other "oopsies" does Microsoft now have in store for America's civil rights community?

- Does Microsoft now regret having endorsed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act at the federal level, something it did years ago?

- Does Microsoft regret having received a friggin' gay rights award from the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Community Center back in 2001? I know I regret their receiving it.

- And does Microsoft now regret having bragged ON THEIR OWN WEB SITE that they're such a big supporter of local and national gay rights legislation? I certainly hope THAT Web page is coming down, and soon.

Come on Microsoft, you can't have your fags and bash them too.

Are you pro-gay or not? Do you support civil rights or not? You clearly did support gays, for over 12 years now that I've been involved in gay politics, yet now suddenly we give you the willies? And what's worse, the statements your company has made about this specific issue are terrifying in terms of what they imply for how you're going to treat civil rights issues nationwide in the future.

Let me give you a taste of what Microsoft said, per the article (an astute AMERICAblogger in Seattle got a copy of the paper and faxed me the article, not gonna transcribe the whole thing, you can read it online on Thursday).

EXCERPTS FROM "THE STRANGER" ARTICLE ON MICROSOFT

From The Stranger:
In a move that angered many of the company's gay employees, the Microsoft Corporation, publicly perceived as the vanguard institution of the new economy, has taken a major political stand in favor of age-old discrimination.

The Stranger has learned that last month the $37-billion Redmond-based software behemoth quietly withdrew its support for House bill 1515, the anti-gay-discrimination bill currently under consideration by the Washington State legislature, after being pressured by the Evangelical Christian pastor of a suburban megachurch.

The pastor, Ken Hutcherson of Antioch Bible Church in Redmond, met with a senior Microsoft executive in February and threatened to organize a national boycott of the company's products if it did not change its stance on the legislation, according to gay rights activists and a Microsoft employee who attended a subsequent April 4 meeting where Bradford L. Smith, Microsoft's senior vice president, general counsel, and corporate secretary, told a group of gay staffers about Hutcherson's threat....

At the April 4 meeting, Smith told members of GLEAM, the gay and lesbian employees group at Microsoft, that the company had switched its official stance to "neutral" on the bill, and took personal responsibility for the decision. He characterized the shift as part of a broader general review of company policy designed to more precisely formulate criteria for determining when Microsoft should involve itself in "social issues," but also disclosed the pressure that had been brought to bear on him by Hutcherson....
MICROSOFT SAYS ANTI-GAY POLICY SHIFT IS NOT ISOLATED INCIDENT

What you just read in the quote above is important for two reasons. First, later on you'll see that Microsoft tries to lie about why it dropped its support for gay civil rights in Washington state.

But more importantly, read what Microsoft is really saying. This isn't just an isolated incident. Microsoft having chucked the gays in Washington is part of a "broader general review of company policy" - i.e., they didn't do this in a vacuum, but rather, this is a sign of a bigger shift in Microsoft's policies, policies that have clearly now moved away from their past support of the civil rights of their gay and lesbian employees.

More from The Stranger:
That one of the world's best-known corporations, synonymous with cutting-edge workplace innovation, would reverse its stance on such a basic piece of legislation because of threats from one minister seems to be yet another sign of the ongoing reverberations of last November's presidential election, when "moral values" voters were widely - if probably erroneously - perceived to have played the role of kingmaker in ensuring the reelection of President Bush.

"The pastor of a megachurch gets a meeting in two weeks with one of the top executives at one of the world's most powerful corporations. He makes these idle threats and he gets everything he wants," the GLEAM member who reported Smith's comments says. "Microsoft just got taken to the cleaners on this issue."
WHAT THE BILL DOES & OTHER COMPANIES WHO ENDORSE IT

From the Stranger:
House Bill 1515 would protect gays and lesbians from discrimination in employment, housing, banking, insurance, and other matters by adding sexual orientation to a state law which already bars discrimination on the basis of race, religion, national origin, gender, marital status, and mental or physical handicap. More than a dozen states currently have similar laws on the books....

The list of high-profile companies that endorsed the bill this year reads like a who's who of the Pacific Northwest corporate world. It includes the Boeing Company, Nike, Coors Brewing, Qwest Communications, Washington Mutual, Hewlett-Packard, Corbis, Battelle Memorial Institute, Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen's Vulcan Inc., and others. And as late as February 1, Microsoft, which issued a letter in support of the bill last year, appeared poised to do so again....
MICROSOFT BRAGS "NO ONE WILL KNOW" IF COMPANY'S ACTIONS KILL PRO-GAY BILL

From the Stranger:
DeLee Shoemaker, an aide to former Governor Gary Locke who now handles state-level government relations for Microsoft, had issued a letter in support of the bill. "We are going to be providing copies of that letter to the committee," he said. McCurdy spoke too soon. Murray says that beginning on February 7 he began receiving calls from company employees informing him that Hutcherson was pressuring the company to change its position on the bill. Murray eventually contacted Shoemaker. She admitted to him that Microsoft was planning to change its position on the bill. "I told her, 'This is a crisis. It will kill the bill,'" he says. "She said no one will know."....
SEE MICROSOFT LIE. LIE, MICROSOFT, LIE.

From the Stranger:
[A]ccording to Microsoft corporate communications spokesperson Tami Begasse... "Microsoft's position on the bill this year was not the result of "any external factors... In this case there was some apparent confusion surrounding some employees who testified as individual citizens in Olympia in February, and the company felt it was appropriate for the employees to make their roles clear as they were not representing or speaking for the company."
Excuse me, but the "apparent confusion" wasn't over Microsoft's employees testifying and saying that Microsoft supported the legislation. That's all true and incontrovertible. According to the Stranger article, Microsoft supported the legislation last year:
"Microsoft, which issued a letter in support of the bill last year..."
No confusion there. And Microsoft endorsed the bill this year too, before it changed its mind. Again from the Stranger:
At the April 4 meeting, [Microsoft's general counsel] told members of GLEAM, the gay and lesbian employees group at Microsoft, that the company had switched its official stance to "neutral" on the bill, and took personal responsibility for the decision.
DeLee Shoemaker, an aide to former Governor Gary Locke who now handles state-level government relations for Microsoft, had issued a letter in support of the bill.... She admitted to him that Microsoft was planning to change its position on the bill. "I told her, 'This is a crisis. It will kill the bill,'" he says. "She said no one will know."
The confusion was not surrounding what the employees said. The confusion is because Microsoft was for the bill before it was against it.

Not to mention, you gotta love the last part of that Microsoft quote. Yes, that's right, no one will know - hee hee hee - if Microsoft is secretly responsible for callously killing legislation granting gays and lesbians their share of the American dream. Pretty sneaky of you, Microsoft. Too bad you got caught.

Which begs a much larger question. Why did Microsoft, which has been so good on gay issues for at least 13 years that I know of, suddenly pull the plug and apparently change their entire corporate outlook on civil rights issues simply because one right-wing kook walked into their offices. Makes you wonder if something else isn't going on here, some quid pro quo or something.

Could the Bush Administration have had a hand in this? Remember, Bush worked out a backroom deal with the Salvation Army a few years back to kill local gay rights laws. Did something like that happen here too? Did Microsoft's decision to change its pro civil rights stance have anything to do with the larger issue of the feds dropping their anti-trust investigation of Microsoft? Something doesn't smell right about Microsoft's sudden about face on civil rights. These are questions that need to be answered.

And in the meantime, Microsoft can go to hell. If it wants to throw minorities and our civil rights to the back of the bus in order to pander to bigots, then Microsoft can now pay the full price of its prejudice. And I promise you, it will be costly.

********** TAKE ACTION **********

1. Call Microsoft's director of Government Relations, Jack Krumholtz, at tel. 202-263-5900 and tell him:

- You know about Microsoft secretly pulling its support for the Washington state gay rights bill, and you're not happy about Microsoft kissing up to anti-gay bigots.

- You demand that Microsoft IMMEDIATELY and PUBLICLY endorse the gay rights bill in Washington state, and demand that Microsoft publicly repudiate its new policy of backing-off of support for the civil rights of gays and lesbians and other Americans.

- Tell him that if the Washington state gay rights bill dies on Friday, Microsoft's reputation goes down with it.

2. Contact these other contacts for Microsoft and its public relations reps and tell them the same thing:

- Jim Desler,
Microsoft US
425-703-6061
jdesler@microsoft.com

- Dirk Delmartino,
Microsoft Europe
+32 (0)2 550 06 21
dirkdelm@microsoft.com

- The firm handling public policy for Microsoft in DC:
The Glover Park Group
Washington, DC
202-337-0808

- The firm handling Microsoft's "rapid response" to questions:
Waggener Edstrom Rapid Response Team
rrt@wagged.com
503-443-7070

- Media Relations for Microsoft
Global Communications & Television
(212) 339-9920
mediarelations@gctv.com

- Microsoft Investor Relations
Curt Anderson
(425) 706-3703

- Walt McGraw, Edelman, (206) 223-1606, walt.mcgraw@edelman.com

- Shon Damron, Edelman, (323) 857-9100, shon.damron@edelman.com

Carlos de Leon,tel. 425-703-3824, or carlosde@microsoft.com

Katie Goldberg, tel. 206-268-2244, or katie.goldberg@edelman.com

2. Demand that Microsoft return the award it received from the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center. We don't give corporate bigots awards, and we don't expect them to keep such awards under false pretenses. If Microsoft has now rethunk its position on defending civil rights, then give back the damn award:

Per Microsoft's own Web site:
Microsoft has been honored for its pioneering work on behalf of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community with the annual Corporate Vision Award of the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center.
Yeah, I don't think so.

And finally, maybe it's time I gave some serious thought to buying that Mac Mini, and testing the waters as to whether it's time to go Mac and never go back.

An Apple a day keeps the bigot away?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Open thread

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 06:58:00 PM

Big story coming out in a few minutes, consider this your open thread for a while.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


House GOP tries to trick Dems into "investigating" DeLay

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 05:34:00 PM

Ok, this IS fishy. Kudos to the DCCC for clearing things up.

More from Raw Story and then the AP

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


New episode of DemsTV.com is up

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 04:04:00 PM

BERJAYA

As always, I'm hosting. Please feel free to watch and give us your FRANK and DETAILED feedback. It's new, we need the advice. But I do think it's getting better, and I know the producer has been trying to incorporate your suggestions, really, so keep 'em coming.

Watch it here.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Bolton nomination to UN might actually be in danger

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 03:53:00 PM

Wow. That'll teach me to be more optimistic.

And check this out from Reuters:
Without Voinovich's support, Bolton's nomination faced being bottled up in the committee on a 9-9 tie vote that would not advance it to the full Senate.
How much you want to bet the Republican now try to change the rules to force a tie vote to be reported out of committee?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


For tax purposes, Bush claims Chicago PO Box as his "home address"

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 03:41:00 PM

Well that's interesting.
They've got a house in rural Texas and a nice home-office setup on Pennsylvania Avenue. But for tax purposes, President Bush and his wife, Laura, claim a Chicago post office box as their "home address."

On the 1040 they signed, which the White House released last week, the listed home address is "Northern Trust Co., P.O. Box 803968, Chicago, IL 60680."

White House spokeswoman Erin Healy said Tuesday that's because Northern Trust handles the blind trust the couple uses for their holdings since Bush took office.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Texas Republicans Put Hatred and Profit Ahead of Children

by Rob in Baltimore - 4/20/2005 01:42:00 PM

We all know the failures of our foster care system. Well, it seems, that gays and bisexuals are one of the root causes of that failure, at least according to Texas Republicans. From AP:
The state House tentatively approved legislation that would prohibit homosexuals and bisexuals from becoming foster parents.

Legislators voted 81-58 Tuesday to approve the ban in an amendment tacked on to a bill that would revamp the state's Child Protective Services agency. The full bill was tentatively approved 126-16. Final approval was expected Wednesday.

"It is our responsibility to make sure that we protect our most vulnerable children and I don't think we are doing that if we allow a foster parent that is homosexual or bisexual," said Rep. Robert Talton, a Republican, who introduced the amendment.
Not that gays and lesbians alone are to blame, it's also the government's fault, and if only we let private contractors handle our foster care system like they handle the prison system, everything will be okay:
The bill also would spin off some of Child Protective Services' duties to the private sector, including foster care and case management. Private agencies already manage 75 percent of foster homes in Texas, and the state handles the rest. The bill would turn all of those functions over to private agencies.
I wonder where the data is that says that of the nearly 20% of children in foster care who were abused or neglected, gays and bisexuals were such a huge portion of the problem. But hey, Republicans rarely if ever let the facts get in the way of a good gay bashing.

BERJAYAIt seems that Rep. Talton has been at this for a while. From an Austin Chronicle article from 2003, Talton has said that homosexuality is "just like pedophilia is a learned behavior" and that rather than the horror of children growing up with two loving parents who happen to be gay or bisexual, "quite frankly, if it was me I would rather [leave] kids in orphanages. ... At least they have a chance of learning the proper values, and if that's not important, than I don't know what is."

Proper values taught to kids by a Foster Care Corporation LLC. Yeah, that's got to be a lot better than letting the homos raise kids.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Santorum down 14% in latest poll

by Chris in Paris - 4/20/2005 01:33:00 PM

OK, it's early days but Casey is going to give him one heck of a fight in PA next year. Casey's lead has increased lately so this one is going to be fun. I may not be gung ho about Casey, but I'd vote for anyone who runs against Santorum. I am so glad I'm a PA voter!

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Breaking News: Jeffords to retire

by Joe in DC - 4/20/2005 12:08:00 PM

Various sources are reporting that Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords will announce his retirement today at 1 p.m.

My friend, Spencer, who lives in Vermont just wrote me, "This is a small state, but a big opportunity."

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Nuclear Option Vote Next Week

by Joe in DC - 4/20/2005 12:04:00 PM

NY Times reports today a vote on the nuclear option is "expected as early as next week..."

What a coincidence. It will come right after Bill Frist and his fellow theocrats do their "God Hates Democrats" event on Sunday.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Morning open thread

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 10:53:00 AM

What's up?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Cardinal Ratzinger's secret past revealed

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 09:59:00 AM

I knew the guy looked familiar.

(Kudos to AMERICAblogger "dad" for catching this one - no, not my dad.)

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Gas fumes overwhelm hundreds in Chicago

by Chris in Paris - 4/20/2005 04:34:00 AM

And now they think they're seeing the Virgin Mary on an underpass. I suppose it's a step up from a grilled cheese sandwich but it doesn't look much like anyone to me other than perhaps a mussel or...

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Only lefty groups are a threat to America

by Chris in Paris - 4/20/2005 04:27:00 AM

At least that's according to the non-partisan Homeland Security Department. I guess we should all forget about Timothy McVay and Eric Rudolph and just pretend they never happened. Freedom and democracy.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Arnie wants to shut down US borders now that he's in

by Chris in Paris - 4/20/2005 04:14:00 AM

I just love people like Schwarzenegger who think it's somehow OK for them to enter the US but no, those other people somehow don't belong. Hmm, the US just did not have enough doped up muscle heads in the country when he arrived so thank goodness we opened our arms for him. Like most Americans my family arrived in the US in the last 100 years and like most others immigrants they had little money or special qualifications but they made it and contributed to the growth of the US. To listen to clowns like Arnie mouth off against immigrants who do the miserable work that many others do not want and prop up California and other agricultural states is incredible.

Go ahead and shut down immigration and see how well the farming industry and other industries do. I'm sure the construction sites will be pleased as well. Most Americans don't want the jobs that these immigrants are taking so I'm sure it will be a big hit as employers struggle to find employees and prices rise. Knock yourself out Arnie, sounds like a brillant plan.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


More personal files lost...this time it's only 200,000 people

by Chris in Paris - 4/20/2005 04:05:00 AM

Ameritrade has somehow "lost" a backup tape with personal information of 200,000 files of current and former clients. The tape may have included Social Security details, which pretty much means that it will be shocking as hell if they were not there. Working in the IT industry, I've heard these horror stories for years so I'm glad to hear that they are finally making it to the news.

So individuals will be paying a heavy price if their personal data is manipulated but when are the corporates who are holding this information be held accountable for lost data?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Gnite open thread

by John in DC - 4/20/2005 12:19:00 AM

Gnite

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Ratzinger intervened in US 2004 election against Kerry

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 11:09:00 PM

BERJAYAOh, the fun just keeps on coming.

From AFP:
"German Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Vatican theologian who was elected Pope Benedict XVI, intervened in the 2004 US election campaign ordering bishops to deny communion to abortion rights supporters including presidential candidate John Kerry.... in the November election, a majority of Catholic voters, who traditionally supported Democratic Party candidates, shifted their votes to Republican and eventual winner George W. Bush."
And you gotta love the photo.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Evangelical Christians terrorizing US Air Force Academy with outright anti-Semitism

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 10:51:00 PM

Gee, what a surprise. America's Taliban takes over the US Air Force Academy - which frankly is a scary thought in and of itself (someone is planning for the future) - and what happens as a result? The place turns into one big anti-Semitism factory.

And they'll know we are Christians by our love, by our love, and they'll know we are Christians by our love.

Yeah, that'll be the day.

From the AP:
Less than two years after it was plunged into a rape scandal, the Air Force Academy is scrambling to address complaints that evangelical Christians wield so much influence at the school that anti-Semitism and other forms of religious harassment have become pervasive.

There have been 55 complaints of religious discrimination at the academy in the past four years, including cases in which a Jewish cadet was told the Holocaust was revenge for the death of Jesus and another was called a Christ killer by a fellow cadet.

The 4,300-student school recently started requiring staff members and cadets to take a 50-minute religious-tolerance class....

Other critics point to a series of incidents, including:

_The Air Force is investigating a complaint from an atheist cadet who says the school is "systematically biased against any cadet that does not overtly espouse Christianity."

_The official academy newspaper runs a Christmas ad every year praising Jesus and declaring him the only savior. Some 200 academy staff members, including some department heads, signed it. Whittington noted the ad was not published last December.

_The academy commandant, Brig. Gen. Johnny Weida, a born-again Christian, said in a statement to cadets in June 2003 that their first responsibility is to their God. He also strongly endorsed National Prayer Day that year. School spokesman Johnny Whitaker said Weida now runs his messages by several other commanders.

_Some officer commission ceremonies were held at off-campus churches. In a letter dated April 6, Weida said the ceremonies would be held on campus from now on.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Man arrested in NYC for threatening to kill judge, bomb courthouse

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 09:24:00 PM

Like I've been saying all along, no issue to take advantage of here, nothing to see, keep moving right along.

Oh, and be sure to Save Phil.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


DeLay slams US Supreme Court Justice Kennedy, a Reagan appointee, for - get this - using the Internet

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 08:58:00 PM

Yes, DeLay criticizes Kennedy for doing some of his own research on the Internet.

Now, I know the Republicans have gotten accustomed to having leaders who are dumb as turnips, get us into wars that are lies, kill thousands of troops, tens of thousands of civilians, yada yada yada. But, really now. Since when is doing your own research, or using the Internet to do it, cause for an uproar? What is this, the Cultural Revolution - kill everyone who wears glasses?

DeLay might be a better lawyer, politician, and human being if he checked out the wide range of legal resources available for free on the Internet.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Open thread

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 07:59:00 PM

Man, are there are a lot of nasty facts out there about this Ratzinger. Please do scroll down and check them out, we have several new ones, all terrifying.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Ratzinger accused of cover-up in effort to shelter pedophile priests

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 07:51:00 PM

From ABC News:
"[Father Marcial Macie] pushed my hand onto his penis. And I didn't know anything about masturbation," Juan Vaca, who was first abused when he was 11 years old, told ABCNEWS. "And he says, 'You don't know how to do it. Let me show you.' And he gets my penis himself and starts to masturbate me. I was in shock."
Now read the rest of the story:
Then, four years ago, some of the men tried a last ditch effort, taking the unusual step of filing a lawsuit in the Vatican's secretive court, seeking Macial's excommunication.

Once again they laid out their evidence, but it was another futile effort � an effort the men say was blocked by one of the most powerful cardinals in the Vatican.

The accusers say Vatican-based Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who heads the Vatican office to safeguard the faith and the morals of the church, quietly made the lawsuit go away and shelved it. There was no investigation and the accusers weren't asked a single question or asked for a statement.

He was appointed by the pope to investigate the entire sex abuse scandal in the church in recent days. But when approached by ABCNEWS in Rome last week with questions of allegations against Maciel, Ratzinger became visibly upset and actually slapped this reporter's hand.

"Come to me when the moment is given," Ratzinger told ABCNEWS, "not yet."

"Cardinal Ratzinger is sheltering Maciel, protecting him," said Berry, who expressed concerns that no response was being given to the allegations against the man charged with sex abuse. "These men knelt and kissed the ring of Cardinal Ratzinger when they filed the case in Rome. And a year-and-a-half later, he takes those accusations and aborts them, just stuffs them."
The cardinals knew all of this, yet they still chose Ratzinger. They had a choice. They chose evil. Unfortunately, this is what the leadership of the Catholic Church has come to, and become. In a word, hubris. In two words, Tom DeLay.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Ratzinger as Nazi

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 06:54:00 PM

When is it fair to call a Nazi a Nazi?

That seems to be the debate surrounding Cardinal Ratzinger, the new Pope. He was a member of the Hitler youth, and he belonged to a a Luftwaffe AA battery. And sure, as some on the left note, just because he was a German soldier doesn't make him a Nazi (though I must admit the nuance is lost a bit on me - I mean, yeah, he was just being a good German, but I thought that excuse went out of favor a long time ago).

The thing is, I feel like some are exonerating Ratzinger's past SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE OF his past. It's almost as if the fact that he was in the Hitler Youth and the Nazi army somehow means "of course he wasn't a Nazi." That logic is a bit weird. It's as weird as folks today who say "how dare you compare what is happening in America to what happened in Nazi Germany." Many people like to think, for whatever reason, that the sins of the Nazis could NEVER happen again, so per se it's bad form to even worry that they might or are. That's a rather dangerous and flippant view of history. And I think it's what's motivating some of the "how dare you call Ratzinger a Nazi" rhetoric.

It's almost as if we've gone from "how dare you think the Nazi horror could occur again" to "how dare you think the Nazis were Nazis?" Folks aren't saying - yes, Ratzinger has some explaining to do. Rather they're saying, per se it's unfair to worry about his unfortunate youth working for Hitler's final solution and victory, and to at least suggest that maybe the Catholic Church could have done better for itself and the memories of what it did, or didn't do, during WWII.

I mean, they couldn't have skipped a generation when picking a German pope?

And while we're at, I looked up the word "Nazi" online:
Nazis (naht-seez, nat-seez)

A German political party of the twentieth century, led by Adolf Hitler. The Nazis controlled Germany from the early 1930s until the end of World War II. The party's full name in English is National Socialist German Workers' party; Nazi is short for its German name. Despite the word socialist in its name, it was a fascist party, requiring from its members supreme devotion to the German government - the Third Reich (see fascism and socialism). The Nazis rose to power by promising the people that Germany, which had been humiliated after World War I, would become powerful again.

The Nazis opposed communism and free intellectual inquiry. Desiring to form a master race that would rule the world, they fought the influence in Germany of peoples not of "pure" descent. Their power was particularly directed at controlling Jews in Germany and in the countries that Germany conquered in war. After depriving Jews of their property and confining them in concentration camps, the Nazis employed the Final Solution of killing them in large numbers; an estimated six million Jews lost their lives (see Holocaust). Also marked for extermination were the mentally and physically handicapped and "enemies of the Reich" such as Slavs, communists, Gypsies, homosexuals, Christians who resisted the government, and defenders of intellectual freedom. The Nazis fought World War II to spread their principles worldwide but were defeated.
All I'm saying is that the man is hardly a picture postcard of the anti-thesis of Nazi thought. The comparison is valid for discussion at the very least, lest we ignore history altogether.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Ratzinger defends pedophiles

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 06:36:00 PM

Ratzinger to the Catholic News Service in 2002, commenting on the Catholic church pedophile priest scandal:
"I am personally convinced that the constant presence in the press of the sins of Catholic priests, especially in the United States, is a planned campaign, as the percentage of these offences among priests is not higher than in other categories, and perhaps it is even lower."

"In the United States, there is constant news on this topic, but less than 1% of priests are guilty of acts of this type," he said. "The constant presence of these news items does not correspond to the objectivity of the information nor to the statistical objectivity of the facts.

"Therefore, one comes to the conclusion that it is intentional, manipulated, that there is a desire to discredit the Church. It is a logical and well-founded conclusion."
Like I said. Talk like a Hitler Youth, write like a Hitler Youth...

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Sad story from Baghdad

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 06:06:00 PM

I don't know this woman, but happened to find the story via some links. Sad.

(Kind of weird, I just realized I know Chris Allbritton, the guy whose blog I'm linking to. Well, don't know him as a friend, but had worked with him on a story or something in the late 90s, he's in my email rolodex, small world.)

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Screw helping the old people, what about bashing the fags?

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 05:24:00 PM

America's Taliban is upset that Bush decided to devote his presidence to helping America's seniors rather than bashing America's homos.

More on the Rapture Republicans from Bloomberg:
Phil Burress, who helped President George W. Bush win the battleground state of Ohio last November by leading the charge among religious groups to pass a gay- marriage ban, isn't pleased with the president's focus on Social Security.

``How come he's not stumping across America defending marriage?'' said Burress, 63, an evangelical Christian and president of Citizens for Community Values in Ohio. ``Marriage is a whole lot more important than Social Security.''....

``We're wising up to the fact that we're very important nine months before an election and we're not very important nine days after that election,'' said Don Wildmon, 67, an ordained minister who is chairman of the American Family Association in Tupelo, Mississippi.

There is ``a lot of disappointment'' among those who voted for Bush expecting him to make his primary focus in a second term a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and other social values issues, Wildmon said.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


More bad poll numbers for Bush and the GOP

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 03:04:00 PM

From the National Journal (no link available):
Fewer than a third of CBS respondents said the country was going in the right direction, and 62 percent said it was off on the wrong track -- a much starker contrast than the 42/52 split in February's CBS News/New York Times poll. President Bush's job approval rating inched up one point since March to 44 percent, but his disapproval also climbed to 51 percent from 48 percent.

Seven in 10 said they were uneasy about Bush's approach to Social Security, while a quarter said they were confident. Presidential job approval on individual issues remained relatively consistent with last month's poll, with the exception of his handling of terrorism. That number, which has consistently earned Bush's highest marks, slipped to 53 percent, an 8-point drop since the previous poll.
More numbers from CBS.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Ratzinger defends violence against gays

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 02:06:00 PM

Gee, this sounds like pure Senator Cornyn talking about the judges.

Sure, violence is wrong, but fags shouldn't be surprised when their own existence invites violence. Spoken like a true former member of the Hitler Youth. Links here and here.
�It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of violent malice in speech or in action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from the church�s pastors wherever it occurs. It reveals a kind of disregard for others which endangers the most fundamental principles of a healthy society. The intrinsic dignity of each person must always be respected in word, in action and in law.

But the proper reaction to crimes committed against homosexual persons should not be to claim that the homosexual condition is not disordered. When such a claim is made and when homosexual activity is consequently condoned, or when civil legislation is introduced to protect behavior to which no one has any conceivable right, neither the church nor society at large should be surprised when other distorted notions and practices gain ground, and irrational and violent reactions increase (No. 10).

8. "What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behavior of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. What is essential is that the fundamental liberty which characterizes the human person and gives him his dignity be recognized as belonging to the homosexual person as well� (No. 11).

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Open thread

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 01:52:00 PM

Doesn't have to be about the Pope.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


The new Pope is Ratzinger, the candidate from the Hitler Youth, think "Karl Rove as Pope"

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 12:41:00 PM

Oh, it's over. They elected the former Hitler Youth as the new Pope. He's going to be known as Benedict XVI. Ironic they chose the name of a traitor.

I checked in with Michael in NYC, as he's my resident Catholicism expert. Here's what he just said by phone:
He sends shivers down the spines of liberal Catholics and Catholic thinkers. He's bee been the head of the inquisition in the church, literally. He's called dozens upon hundreds of theologians and priests to the carpet, put a chill through free speech and debate in the church. John Paul's legacy was of spreading democracy in eastern Europe but he quashed it inside the church. Ratzinger was the main instrument for killing free speech in the church. Ratzinger helped quash democracy inside the church, intellectual thought. He believes the church always knows what right, is never wrong.

He's UBER-conservative, he was a bit of a liberal, a moderate, as a young man. But the 1968 student uprisings turned him into an arch uber-conservative, he's like a convert, the worst kind of conservative.

It's as if Karl Rove became president.
My personal take, speaking as John in DC, is I hope Ratzinger leads this church to a quick and painful loss of credibility in America and Europe. Let him be a conservative nutjob. This will only disaffect more Americans and more Europeans and cause even fewer young men in the West to enter the priesthood. And yeah, he'll inspire the conservatives in Africa and Asia, and in Latin America (though I hear they're more liberal with regards to poverty issues). And I hope he does. That will only sharpen the divide between the Western church and the developing country church, making the church get more conservative while Western culture gets more liberal, ultimately weakening the church leadership's influence in America, and therefore lessening it's horrendously bigoted and harmful influence in American politics.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


CNN's Fact Error: "Awaiting Name of 265th Pope" -- Nope, It's The 263rd Pope

by Michael in New York - 4/19/2005 12:29:00 PM

This confusion arises because Benedict IX held the office of bishop of Rome on three separate occasions in the eleventh century. Therefore, there have been 264 pontificates, if you will, but only 262 Popes counting from Peter to John Paul II. So whomever is named today will be the 263rd man to become Pope. Just one quick way to impress your friends courtesy of Americablog. (MSNBC makes the same mistake and Fox News avoids naming a number, at least on its scroll.)

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


They've picked a new Pope

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 12:20:00 PM

Waiting to hear who he is.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Kill Phil

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 11:32:00 AM

UPDATE: It's worse than I thought. The Save Phil! cartoon, after an agonizing number of minutes, takes you to a text-laden Web page where the big action step is to - ta dah! - do nothing (the "take action" link is practically hidden on the page). So again, the point of this campaign would be, what?

BERJAYAThis is the ad campaign from the big establishment liberal non-profits, taking on the GOP's effort to turn our country into a theocracy run by judges and politicians to the right of Mullah Omar. The ads are on several of the top liberal blogs, and point you to this SavePhil.com. Yes, this is their best shot.

It's still unclear whether Save Phil! is intended to bore the Republicans to death or mobilize the critical under-five age demographic.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Open Thread

by Joe in DC - 4/19/2005 09:26:00 AM

It's a beautiful, and pollen-filled day, in D.C. What's going on?

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


GOP corporate welfare express train continues

by Chris in Paris - 4/19/2005 07:02:00 AM

Those poor oil companies are struggling and could really use a tax break. Never mind their profit margins and the struggling economy, it's payback time for those who bankrolled this team. Full speed ahead!

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


In a shocking discovery, another personal data loss larger than first reported

by Chris in Paris - 4/19/2005 04:14:00 AM

It's just so hard to count these days and somehow the initial report of lost credit card, checking and drivers license information was under reported ever-so-slightly last month. It is now being reported that the DSW data which was stolen was 1.4Million credit card numbers which is ten times the previously reported amount. If credit reports are going to be so critical for Americans, it's time that companies accept higher responsibility for holding this information.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Bush During Armstrong Deception Of Public: He Was Either Lying Or Clueless

by Michael in New York - 4/19/2005 01:16:00 AM

USA Today headlines its story on the Education Department's investigation of itself with the innocuous: "Report: No ethics breach in Education Dept."

Here's a better headline: Bush Lied To America Or was Hopelessly Out of the Loop.

Yes, the report makes clear that Bush was wrong when he first commented on the scandal of the Education Dept. paying commentator Armstrong Williams $240,000 to plug its No Child Left Behind. At the time, Bush said, "We didn't know about this in the White House."

But this initial report makes clear that David Dunn, "a special assistant to President Bush" took part in AT LEAST FOUR CONVERSATIONS about the Williams contract with Education Dept. officials. Not only that, during at least two of them the officials expressed concern about the arrangement. Naturally, the White House had refused to let the investigators speak to Dunn directly about what he did at the time as a presidential policy adviser, saying it lacked the authority to interview White House staffers. Two more investigations of this ethical breach are underway.

And don't believe Williams' lie that he was already a big fan of NCLB. He conceded in an interview with USA Today that NOT ONE of 194 newspaper columns he wrote in nearly three years mentioned it, but as soon as the money started flowing he wrote about it in glowing terms five times.

By the way, the report said there was no technical violation but that the contract smacked of "bad management" and "poor judgment."That's one way to phrase manipulating the media to deceive the American people, but I can think of harsher terms to use.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


DeLay In Email: It Ain't Me, Babe (Nope, He Still Doesn't Get It)

by Michael in New York - 4/19/2005 01:05:00 AM

The Washington Post reports that Tom DeLay emailed an extremely lengthy missive defending himself (running SIX pages, single-spaced) to supporters in his suburban Houston district. Is somebody getting desperate? The gist of the email: DeLay good; Democrats bad.

Titled "What The Press Isn't Telling You," it goes on to blame the Democrats for his numerous admonishments last year and his current pile-up of ethical doo-doos and when it isn't blaming the Dems it blames the Dem-loving media. And everyone's lying about why the three Republicans who crossed party lines to uphold basic standards on the ethics committee by admonishing DeLay were kicked off: it had nothing to do with him. DeLay has never done anything wrong in the past; he ain't doing anything wrong in the present and he's not going to do anything wrong in the future.

Guess Newt isn't exactly on speed-dial with this guy. Let's hope this time the stonewalling doesn't pay off.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s


Late night open thread

by John in DC - 4/19/2005 12:41:00 AM

Off to bed.

Comment   |  Permanent Link |  
Espa�ol | Deutsch | Fran�ais | Italiano | Portugu�s

    
BERJAYA



Why AMERICAblog?
Because at some point you tire of the lies.

What issues do you cover?
US politics overall with a particular focus on the Bush Administration, the radical right, and gay civil rights.

Who are you?
John Aravosis is a Washington DC-based writer and political consultant, specializing in using the Internet for political advocacy. He is the creator of StopDrLaura.com, Matthew Shepard Online Resources, and DearMary.com, among other activist Web sites. 

John has a joint law degree and masters in foreign service from Georgetown, where he studied under former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. He is an avid writer, and in addition to writing THE LIST, he has worked as a stringer for the Economist magazine, and for years was the US Politics Guide at About.com. 

John's policy experience includes stints in the US Senate, the World Bank, and the Children's Defense Fund. John is also an occasional TV pundit, having appeared on The O'Reilly Factor, Hardball with Chris Matthews, ABCNews World News Tonight, CNN, Court TV, and more. John speaks five languages and has visited or worked in 28 countries.

This page is powered by Blogger.
Copyright 2005 - John Aravosis