close
Skip to main content

A Lower Bound for Agnostically Learning Disjunctions

  • Conference paper
BERJAYA Learning Theory (COLT 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4539))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3631 Accesses

  • 9 Citations

Abstract

We prove that the concept class of disjunctions cannot be pointwise approximated by linear combinations of any small set of arbitrary real-valued functions. That is, suppose there exist functions \(\phi_1,\ldots,\phi_r:\{-1,1\}^n\to\Re\) with the property that every disjunction f on n variables has \(\|f-\sum_{i=1}^r\alpha_i\phi_i\|_\infty\leq 1/3\) for some reals α 1,...,α r . We prove that then \(r \geq 2^{\Omega(\sqrt{n})}.\) This lower bound is tight. We prove an incomparable lower bound for the concept class of linear-size DNF formulas. For the concept class of majority functions, we obtain a lower bound of Ω(2n/n), which almost meets the trivial upper bound of 2n for any concept class.

These lower bounds substantially strengthen and generalize the polynomial approximation lower bounds of Paturi and show that the regression-based agnostic learning algorithm of Kalai et al. is optimal. Our techniques involve a careful application of results in communication complexity due to Razborov and Buhrman et al.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alon, N.: Problems and results in extremal combinatorics, Part I. Discrete Mathematics 273(1-3), 31–53 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-David, S., Eiron, N., Simon, H.U.: Limitations of learning via embeddings in Euclidean half spaces. J. Mach. Learn. Res 3, 441–461 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bshouty, N.H., Tamon, C.: On the Fourier spectrum of monotone functions. J. ACM 43(4), 747–770 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Buhrman, H., de Wolf, R.: Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials. In: Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC), pp. 120–130 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buhrman, H., Vereshchagin, N.K., de Wolf, R.: On computation and communication with small bias. In: 22nd IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Decatur, S.E.: Statistical queries and faulty PAC oracles. In: COLT, pp. 262–268 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forster, J.: A linear lower bound on the unbounded error probabilistic communication complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 65(4), 612–625 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Forster, J., Simon, H.U.: On the smallest possible dimension and the largest possible margin of linear arrangements representing given concept classes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 350(1), 40–48 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Golub, G.H., Loan, C.F.V.: Matrix computations, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, J.C.: The harmonic sieve: A novel application of Fourier analysis to machine learning theory and practice. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalai, A., Klivans, A., Mansour, Y., Servedio, R.: Agnostically learning halfspaces. In: FOCS: IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kashin, B., Razborov, A.A.: Improved lower bounds on the rigidity of Hadamard matrices (In Russian). Matematicheskie zamet 63(4), 535–540 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kearns, M.: Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries. In: STOC ’93: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, pp. 392–401. ACM Press, New York (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kearns, M., Li, M.: Learning in the presence of malicious errors. SIAM Journal on Computing 22(4), 807–837 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kearns, M.J., Shapire, R.E., Sellie, L.M.: Toward efficient agnostic learning. Machine Learning 17(2–3), 115–141 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kearns, M.J., Vazirani, U.V.: An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klivans, A.R., O’Donnell, R., Servedio, R.A.: Learning intersections and thresholds of halfspaces. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 68(4), 808–840 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Klivans, A.R., Servedio, R.: Learning DNF in time \(2^{\tilde{O}(n^{1/3})}\). In: STOC ’01: Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 258–265. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kushilevitz, E., Mansour, Y.: Learning decision trees using the Fourier spectrum. SIAM J. Comput. 22(6), 1331–1348 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Linial, N., Mansour, Y., Nisan, N.: Constant depth circuits, Fourier transform, and learnability. J. ACM 40(3), 607–620 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Linial, N., Mendelson, S., Schechtman, G., Shraibman, A.: Complexity measures of sign matrices. Combinatorica, (2006) To appear, Manuscript at http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/ñati/PAPERS/complexity_matrices.ps.gz

  23. Linial, N., Shraibman, A.: Learning complexity vs. communication complexity. (December 2006) Manuscript at http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/ñati/PAPERS/lcc.pdf

  24. Linial, N., Shraibman, A.: Lower bounds in communication complexity based on factorization norms. (December 2006) Manuscript at http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~nati/PAPERS/ccfn.pdf

  25. Lokam, S.V.: Spectral methods for matrix rigidity with applications to size-depth trade-offs and communication complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 63(3), 449–473 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mansour, Y.: An O(n loglogn) learning algorithm for DNF under the uniform distribution. In: COLT ’92: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 53–61. ACM Press, New York, USA (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Mansour, Y., Parnas, M.: On learning conjunctions with malicious noise. In: ISTCS, pp. 170–175 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Donnell, R., Servedio, R.A.: Extremal properties of polynomial threshold functions. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 3–12 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paturi, R.: On the degree of polynomials that approximate symmetric Boolean functions. In: STOC: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Razborov, A.A.: Quantum communication complexity of symmetric predicates. Izvestiya of the Russian Academy of Science, Mathematics 67, 145–159 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudin, W.: Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Sherstov, A.A.: Halfspace matrices. In: Proc. of the 22nd Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sherstov, A.A.: Separating AC0 from depth-2 majority circuits. In: Proc. of the 39th Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Valiant, L.G.: Learning disjunctions of conjunctions. California 1, 560–566 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Nader H. BshoutyClaudio Gentile

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klivans, A.R., Sherstov, A.A. (2007). A Lower Bound for Agnostically Learning Disjunctions. In: Bshouty, N.H., Gentile, C. (eds) Learning Theory. COLT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4539. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72927-3_30

Download citation

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics