close
2013
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-232
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Bad air, amulets and mosquitoes: 2,000 years of changing perspectives on malaria

Abstract: For many centuries, scientists have debated the cause and best treatment of the disease now known as malaria. Two theories regarding malaria transmission – that of “bad air” and that of insect vectors – have been widely accepted at different times throughout history. Treatments and cures have varied accordingly over time. This paper traces the evolution of scientific consensus on malaria aetiology, transmission, and treatment from ancient times to the present day.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
59
9
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
12

Year Published

Range
1996
1996
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
45
11
10
1

Relationship

0
67

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 67 publications

(50 citation statements)
references

References 20 publications

1
37
0
12
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This result confirmed previous anecdotal evidence that historically mangrove forests were considered with ambivalence or as a nuisance [20]. The majority of ecosystem disservices discussed in these reports (59%) referred to the role of mangroves as a reservoir of disease; since these reports were written before the advent of germ theory in medicine, the main vector of disease was thought to be "miasma", poisonous vapors emitted from decaying matter [21]. Of the ecosystem disservices reported, 28% referred to the general view of mangrove forests as gloomy (or other similar words), suggesting a negative cultural and aesthetic response to the mangrove environment [17].…”
Section: Sources Of Historical Information On Mangrove Ecosystem Serv
supporting
confidence: 75%