The long road to protect infants against severe RSV lower respiratory tract illness
- PMID: 31105933
- PMCID: PMC6498742
- DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.18749.1
The long road to protect infants against severe RSV lower respiratory tract illness
Abstract
Severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) in infants has proven challenging to prevent. In the last 50 years, conceptually different approaches failed to evolve into viable preventive alternatives for routine use. Inactivated RSV vaccine (that is, formalin-inactivated RSV) elicited severe LRTI in RSV-infected toddlers pre-immunized as infants; early purified F protein approaches in pregnant women failed to elicit sufficient immunity more than a decade ago; a second-generation monoclonal antibody (mAb) of high potency against the virus (that is, motavizumab) caused severe adverse reactions in the skin, and owing to lack of efficacy against RSV subgroup B, an extended half-life mAb targeting site V in the RSV fusion protein (that is, REG2222) did not meet its primary endpoint. In the meantime, two protein F vaccines failed to prevent medically attended LRTI in the elderly. However, palivizumab and the recent results of the Novavax maternal immunization trial with ResVax demonstrate that severe RSV LRTI can be prevented by mAb and by maternal immunization (at least to a certain extent). In fact, disease prevention may also decrease the rates of recurrent wheezing and all-cause pneumonia for at least 180 days. In this review, we discuss the history of RSV vaccine development, previous and current vaccine strategies undergoing evaluation, and recent information about disease burden and its implications for the effects of successful preventive strategies.
Keywords: asthma; infants; monoclonal antibodies; pneumonia; respiratory syncytial virus; vaccines.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: FPP reports grants and personal fees from Novavax, personal fees from Medimmune, grants and personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Bavarian Nordic, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from ArkBio, personal fees from VirBio, personal fees from Regeneron and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo. SJB reports no conflicts of interest.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.
References
-
- Kapikian AZ, Mitchell RH, Chanock RM, et al. : An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine. Am J Epidemiol. 1969;89(4):405–21. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120954 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fulginiti VA, Eller JJ, Sieber OF, et al. : Respiratory virus immunization. I. A field trial of two inactivated respiratory virus vaccines; an aqueous trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine and an alum-precipitated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. Am J Epidemiol. 1969;89(4):435–48. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120956 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical

