Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions
Cicada1010 (talk | contribs) →Nancy Harkness Love: Requesting semi-protection of Nancy Harkness Love. |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]]. [[User:Cicada1010|Cicada1010]] ([[User talk:Cicada1010|talk]]) 19:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC) |
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]]. [[User:Cicada1010|Cicada1010]] ([[User talk:Cicada1010|talk]]) 19:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC) |
||
=== [[Arthur Katalayi]] === |
|||
'''Reason:''' High level of IP vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-18416-83|~2026-18416-83]] ([[User talk:~2026-18416-83|talk]]) 19:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Subject: Request for Semi-protection on [[Arthur Katalayi]] |
|||
Type of protection: Semi-protection (Level 1)Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and targeted sabotage by a Single Purpose Account (SPA). |
|||
Rationale: |
|||
The article has recently become the target of a newly created account (User:STACKofBRIEFS, account age: 7 days) engaged in aggressive mass blanking and disruptive editing. |
|||
Mass Content Removal: The user removed over 20,000 characters of reliably sourced content in a single edit, reducing the number of citations from 34 to 8, without any prior engagement on the Talk page.Disruptive Tagging: Despite the article being supported by 34 high-quality international secondary sources (Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Financial Times, etc.), the user implemented excessive "citation needed" tags as a form of visual vandalism to discredit the content.Refusal to engage (WP:BRD): The user was notified of WP:V and WP:DE policies on their talk page but has failed to justify these massive deletions, suggesting a coordinated attempt at de-legitimizing the subject.Context: Given the high-profile nature of the subject in global finance and mining (notably the AstraZeneca/EsoBiotec $1B M&A), the page is currently vulnerable to reputation-based sabotage. |
|||
A temporary semi-protection is requested to deter further disruptive editing by non-confirmed accounts and to maintain the integrity of the WP:CONSENSUS version. |
|||
Revision as of 19:08, 24 March 2026
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the requests for increase in protection level subpage of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
| |
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and try to curb truth regarding the page. Dg bouti (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is a bit of disruptive editing, some of it by the OP. Other remedies may be brought to bear. Favonian (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing from temporary accounts (seemingly the same person operating under multiple temporary accounts). Same temporary accounts are also targeting NFL Slimetime with vandalism/disruptive editing. Magitroopa (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism Calvinsky (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. One reverted good-faith edit in over a month is not "frequent vandalism". - The Bushranger One ping only 18:26, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Your Face Sounds Familiar (Philippine TV series) season 4 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Page vandalism (i.e., inclusion of unverified content) continued following the lifting of prior protection, this time coming from both temporary accounts and new accounts that appear to be created for this purpose. TofuMuncher (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 16:48, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editwarring without talking at the talk page. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 17:23, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 17:38, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Bushranger One ping only 18:30, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sister articles Hindi and Hindustani language both have had semi-indef protection for nearly 5 years, requesting the same level for Urdu. ~ oklopfer (💬) 18:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Due to NASA's new rollout of plans involving the lunar gateway there has been increased editing on this article. BelowFlames (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cicada1010 (talk) 19:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. ~2026-18416-83 (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Subject: Request for Semi-protection on Arthur Katalayi
Type of protection: Semi-protection (Level 1)Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and targeted sabotage by a Single Purpose Account (SPA).
Rationale: The article has recently become the target of a newly created account (User:STACKofBRIEFS, account age: 7 days) engaged in aggressive mass blanking and disruptive editing.
Mass Content Removal: The user removed over 20,000 characters of reliably sourced content in a single edit, reducing the number of citations from 34 to 8, without any prior engagement on the Talk page.Disruptive Tagging: Despite the article being supported by 34 high-quality international secondary sources (Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Financial Times, etc.), the user implemented excessive "citation needed" tags as a form of visual vandalism to discredit the content.Refusal to engage (WP:BRD): The user was notified of WP:V and WP:DE policies on their talk page but has failed to justify these massive deletions, suggesting a coordinated attempt at de-legitimizing the subject.Context: Given the high-profile nature of the subject in global finance and mining (notably the AstraZeneca/EsoBiotec $1B M&A), the page is currently vulnerable to reputation-based sabotage.
A temporary semi-protection is requested to deter further disruptive editing by non-confirmed accounts and to maintain the integrity of the WP:CONSENSUS version.
